V. I. Tatarski, Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium, transl. R. A. Silverman (McGraw—Hill Book Co., New York, 1961).
L. A. Chernov, Wave Propagation in a Random Medium, transl. R. A. Silverman (McGraw—Hill Book Co., New York, 1960).
Reference 1, Chap. 9.
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 175 (1967).
Y. Kinoshita, T. Asakura, and M. Suzuki, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 798 (1968).
R. A. Schmeltzer, Quart. Appl. Math. 24, 339 (1966).
D. L. Fried and J. B. Seidman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 181 (1967).
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 980 (1967).
A. Kolmogorov, in Turbulence, Classic Papers on Statistical Theory, S. K. Friedlander and L. Topper, Eds. (Wiley—Interscience, Inc., New York, 1961), p. 151.
As implied by our sign convention for R in Eq. (2.1), we are assuming eiwt time dependence. It should be noted that this sign convention for R differs from that used by Schmeltzer [Ref. 6, Eq. (2.1)]. Also, it should be noted that the time convention in Ref. 6, p. 340 is stated to be eiwt but the mathematical formulation actually follows e-iwt time dependence, as can be readily determined from Eqs. (2.6) and (2.12) of the same reference.
Equation (2.2) is obtained from Sckmeltzer's Eq. (7.6) by taking the real part of the right-hand side and setting s=z0 and q=s in the second term.
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1380 (1966), Eqs. (2.16)-(2.22).
The difference in sign of Im(l/α2) between our Eq. (2.6) and Sckineltzer's Eq. (2.9) [also Eq. (2.6) in Ref. 7] is a result of the sign convention we are using for R.
I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryshik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press Inc., New York, 1965), Eqs. 3.381 (4), (5), p. 317.
Reference 14, Eqs. 3.191(3), 3.194(1), p. 284.
A. Erdelyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, and F. G. Tricomi Higher Transcendental Functions (McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1953), Vol. I, Chapter 2.
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (U. S. Gov't. Printing Office, Washington, D. C, 1964; Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1965), Ch. 15.
Reference 17, Eq. 15.1.1, p. 556.
Equation (4.11) is obtained from Eq. (4.11) in Ref. 7 by using the relationships Γ(l/6) and Re(i5/6) = cos(5π/12). Equation (4.11) is obtained from Eq. (4.11) in Ref. 7 by using the relationships Ggr;(-5/6) = -(6/5) Γ(l/6) and Re(i5/6) = cos(5π/12).
D. L. Fried and J. D. Cloud, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1667 (1966), Eq. (2.7), and Ref. 4, Eq. (1.13), or Ref. 7, Eq. (4.14).
Reference 1, p. 208.
D. L. Fried, G. E. Mevers, and M. P. Keister, Jr., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 787 (1967); 58, 1164E (1968).
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 169 (1967), Eq. (1.5).
Reference 17, Eq. 15.3.7, p. 559.
The failure of this assumption to hold [see Ref. 6, Eq. (5.10)] in the spherical-wave limit was first pointed out to the authors by D. L. Fried, private communication (1967).
M. E. Gracheva and A. S. Gurvich, Izv. Vysshikh Uchebn. Zavedenii-Radiofiz. 8, 717 (1965).
M. E. Gracheva, Izv. Vysshikh Uchebn. Zavedenii-Radiofiz. 10, 775 (1967).
D. A. deWolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 58, 461 (1968).
A gaussian mean beam shape is assumed here for the atmospherically perturbed laser beam because of the lack of available data for the log-amplitude statistics at off-axis points in the beam. For a randomly wandering gaussian-irradiance distribution, the average beam pattern can be shown to be gaussian when the orthogonal displacements Δx, Δy of the beam center are independent normal-random variables, with zero means and equal variances. Under more general conditions, however, (e.g., when the perturbed gaussian-beam pattern is also distorted) the average beam shape may not be gaussian.
Reference 1, p. 140.