R. E. Hufnagel and N. R. Stanley, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 52 (1964).
G. O. Reynolds and T. J. Skinner, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 54, 1302 (1964).
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1372 (1966).
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1381 (1966).
J. W. Goodman, W. H. Huntley, Jr., D. W. Jackson, and M. Lehmann, Appl. Phys. Letters 8, 311 (1966).
M. J. Beran and G. B. Parrent, Jr., Theory of Partial Coherence, (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1964), p. 175.
Here we are not concerned with the practical aspects of how the object illumination and reference are provided. However, we do assume that both are linearly polarized in the same direction and that the state of polarization is not changed by the perturbing medium. 600
See Ref. 3, p. 1374.
A. Kozma, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 428 (1966).
Here we neglect a constant as well as a quadratic phase factor that would vanish later.
D. L. Fried, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 175 (1967).
The analysis of this section becomes invalid if the irradiance fluctuations across the reference beam are sufficiently large to drive the hologram exposure out of the linear region of the transmittance-exposure curve. However, this problem can be eliminated by pre-exposing the photographic plate.
Ref. 3, p. 1375.
Ref. 11, Eq. (3.3). This equation cannot be strictly correct because of its behavior for large r2, but its use is justified for the purpose of computing image resolution.
A Papoulis, Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1965), p. 226, Eq. (7-14).