Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. G. S. Brindley and E. N. Willmer, J. Physiol. 116, 350 (1952).
  2. M. Alpern and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 164, 478 (1962).
  3. W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
    [Crossref]

1962 (1)

M. Alpern and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 164, 478 (1962).

1955 (1)

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

1952 (1)

G. S. Brindley and E. N. Willmer, J. Physiol. 116, 350 (1952).

Alpern, M.

M. Alpern and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 164, 478 (1962).

Brindley, G. S.

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

G. S. Brindley and E. N. Willmer, J. Physiol. 116, 350 (1952).

Campbell, F. W.

M. Alpern and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 164, 478 (1962).

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

Hagins, W. A.

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

Rushton, W. A. H.

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

Willmer, E. N.

G. S. Brindley and E. N. Willmer, J. Physiol. 116, 350 (1952).

J. Physiol. (2)

G. S. Brindley and E. N. Willmer, J. Physiol. 116, 350 (1952).

M. Alpern and F. W. Campbell, J. Physiol. 164, 478 (1962).

Opt. Acta (1)

W. A. H. Rushton, F. W. Campbell, W. A. Hagins, and G. S. Brindley, Opt. Acta 1, 183 (1955).
[Crossref]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Equivalent reflectance as a function of wavelength according to Brindley and Willmer,1 Alpern and Campbell.2 (a) Brindley and Willmer: macular region; field size 1°. (b) same as (a) at 10° eccentricity; field size 1°. (c) Alpern and Campbell: 27° eccentricity; field size unknown, but larger than 1°.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Experimental arrangement.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Equivalent reflectance as a function of wavelength for various sizes of the field of view ϕ with central fixation. △ — — — △ first series; ○— —○ second series; bottom curve: mean of all measurements (subject J.B.).

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Equivalent reflectance as a function of wavelength for another subject (J. J. V.), again with central fixation. Average curve for various field sizes ϕ.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Equivalent reflectance for ϕ = 6.5° at the macular region (central) ●——●, at the blind spot (18° nasal) × –·–·– ×, and at the contralateral region of the retina (18° temporal) △ — — — △ (subject J. J. V.).