Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. M. J. E. Golay, Proc. I.R.E. 49, 959 (1961).
    [Crossref]
  2. R. N. Bracewell, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 214 (1962).
  3. H. E. J. Neugebauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 470 (1962).
    [Crossref]
  4. J. F. Ready, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 1695 (1962).
  5. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York1959) p. 490.
  6. E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 257 (1958).
    [Crossref]
  7. L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 74, 233 (1959).
    [Crossref]
  8. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80, 254 (1962).
    [Crossref]
  9. When a monitor station is used to link two radio transmitters they are no longer independent and the radiation field close to the transmitters becomes spatially coherent [See L. Mandel and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am 51, 815 (1961), and G. B. Parrent, Optica Acta (Paris) 6, 285 (1959).] in the sense that, for some value η, the degree of coherence |γ12(η)|≈1 [see Born and Wolf5 for the definition of γ12(τ)]. However, this has no relevance to the question of temporal coherence; that is. how long phase correlation of the radiation extends in time, which is always determined by the finite coherence time Δτ.
    [Crossref]
  10. E. Wolf, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A230, 246 (1955).
  11. A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
    [Crossref]
  12. If the cross section of the beams is much greater than the coherence area, then the beams may be expected to give rise to a number of statistically independent fringe patterns, each of which extends approximately over a coherence area.
  13. D. Gabor, Progr. Opt. 1, 111 (1961).
  14. L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 797 (1961).
    [Crossref]
  15. L. Mandel, “Proceedings of the Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (to be published, 1962).
  16. L. Mandel, Progr. Opt.2, (to be published, 1962).
  17. E. M. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956).
    [Crossref]
  18. L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 72, 1037 (1958).
    [Crossref]
  19. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A242, 300 (1957).
  20. R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A243, 291 (1957).
  21. W. P. Alford and A. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 26, 481 (1958).
    [Crossref]
  22. M. P. Givens, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 1030 (1961).
    [Crossref]
  23. L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1335 (1962).
    [Crossref]
  24. F. J. Zucker, “Preprints of Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (1962), p. 410.
  25. L. Mandel, “Conference Report on Coherence Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation,” Rochester, New York (1960), p. 58, and J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 113 (1960).
  26. A. W. Smith and G. W. Williams, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 337 (1962).
    [Crossref]

1962 (6)

L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80, 254 (1962).
[Crossref]

J. F. Ready, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 1695 (1962).

R. N. Bracewell, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 214 (1962).

L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1335 (1962).
[Crossref]

H. E. J. Neugebauer, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 470 (1962).
[Crossref]

A. W. Smith and G. W. Williams, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 337 (1962).
[Crossref]

1961 (5)

M. J. E. Golay, Proc. I.R.E. 49, 959 (1961).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 797 (1961).
[Crossref]

M. P. Givens, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 1030 (1961).
[Crossref]

D. Gabor, Progr. Opt. 1, 111 (1961).

When a monitor station is used to link two radio transmitters they are no longer independent and the radiation field close to the transmitters becomes spatially coherent [See L. Mandel and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am 51, 815 (1961), and G. B. Parrent, Optica Acta (Paris) 6, 285 (1959).] in the sense that, for some value η, the degree of coherence |γ12(η)|≈1 [see Born and Wolf5 for the definition of γ12(τ)]. However, this has no relevance to the question of temporal coherence; that is. how long phase correlation of the radiation extends in time, which is always determined by the finite coherence time Δτ.
[Crossref]

1959 (1)

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 74, 233 (1959).
[Crossref]

1958 (3)

W. P. Alford and A. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 26, 481 (1958).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 72, 1037 (1958).
[Crossref]

E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 257 (1958).
[Crossref]

1957 (2)

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A242, 300 (1957).

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A243, 291 (1957).

1956 (1)

E. M. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956).
[Crossref]

1955 (2)

E. Wolf, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A230, 246 (1955).

A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
[Crossref]

Alford, W. P.

W. P. Alford and A. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 26, 481 (1958).
[Crossref]

Born, M.

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York1959) p. 490.

Bracewell, R. N.

R. N. Bracewell, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 214 (1962).

Forrester, A. T.

A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
[Crossref]

Gabor, D.

D. Gabor, Progr. Opt. 1, 111 (1961).

Givens, M. P.

Golay, M. J. E.

M. J. E. Golay, Proc. I.R.E. 49, 959 (1961).
[Crossref]

Gold, A.

W. P. Alford and A. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 26, 481 (1958).
[Crossref]

Gudmunsen, R. A.

A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
[Crossref]

Hanbury Brown, R.

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A243, 291 (1957).

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A242, 300 (1957).

Johnson, P. O.

A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
[Crossref]

Mandel, L.

L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80, 254 (1962).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 1335 (1962).
[Crossref]

When a monitor station is used to link two radio transmitters they are no longer independent and the radiation field close to the transmitters becomes spatially coherent [See L. Mandel and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am 51, 815 (1961), and G. B. Parrent, Optica Acta (Paris) 6, 285 (1959).] in the sense that, for some value η, the degree of coherence |γ12(η)|≈1 [see Born and Wolf5 for the definition of γ12(τ)]. However, this has no relevance to the question of temporal coherence; that is. how long phase correlation of the radiation extends in time, which is always determined by the finite coherence time Δτ.
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 797 (1961).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 74, 233 (1959).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 72, 1037 (1958).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, “Conference Report on Coherence Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation,” Rochester, New York (1960), p. 58, and J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 113 (1960).

L. Mandel, “Proceedings of the Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (to be published, 1962).

L. Mandel, Progr. Opt.2, (to be published, 1962).

Neugebauer, H. E. J.

Purcell, E. M.

E. M. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956).
[Crossref]

Ready, J. F.

J. F. Ready, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 1695 (1962).

Smith, A. W.

Twiss, R. Q.

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A242, 300 (1957).

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A243, 291 (1957).

Williams, G. W.

Wolf, E.

L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80, 254 (1962).
[Crossref]

When a monitor station is used to link two radio transmitters they are no longer independent and the radiation field close to the transmitters becomes spatially coherent [See L. Mandel and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am 51, 815 (1961), and G. B. Parrent, Optica Acta (Paris) 6, 285 (1959).] in the sense that, for some value η, the degree of coherence |γ12(η)|≈1 [see Born and Wolf5 for the definition of γ12(τ)]. However, this has no relevance to the question of temporal coherence; that is. how long phase correlation of the radiation extends in time, which is always determined by the finite coherence time Δτ.
[Crossref]

E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 257 (1958).
[Crossref]

E. Wolf, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A230, 246 (1955).

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York1959) p. 490.

Zucker, F. J.

F. J. Zucker, “Preprints of Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (1962), p. 410.

Am. J. Phys. (1)

W. P. Alford and A. Gold, Am. J. Phys. 26, 481 (1958).
[Crossref]

J. Opt. Soc. Am (1)

When a monitor station is used to link two radio transmitters they are no longer independent and the radiation field close to the transmitters becomes spatially coherent [See L. Mandel and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am 51, 815 (1961), and G. B. Parrent, Optica Acta (Paris) 6, 285 (1959).] in the sense that, for some value η, the degree of coherence |γ12(η)|≈1 [see Born and Wolf5 for the definition of γ12(τ)]. However, this has no relevance to the question of temporal coherence; that is. how long phase correlation of the radiation extends in time, which is always determined by the finite coherence time Δτ.
[Crossref]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. (5)

Nature (1)

E. M. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. (1)

A. T. Forrester, R. A. Gudmunsen, and P. O. Johnson, Phys. Rev. 99, 1961 (1955).
[Crossref]

Proc. I.R.E. (3)

J. F. Ready, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 1695 (1962).

M. J. E. Golay, Proc. I.R.E. 49, 959 (1961).
[Crossref]

R. N. Bracewell, Proc. I.R.E. 50, 214 (1962).

Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) (4)

E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 71, 257 (1958).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 74, 233 (1959).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 80, 254 (1962).
[Crossref]

L. Mandel, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 72, 1037 (1958).
[Crossref]

Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) (3)

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A242, 300 (1957).

R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A243, 291 (1957).

E. Wolf, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A230, 246 (1955).

Progr. Opt. (1)

D. Gabor, Progr. Opt. 1, 111 (1961).

Other (6)

F. J. Zucker, “Preprints of Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (1962), p. 410.

L. Mandel, “Conference Report on Coherence Properties of Electromagnetic Radiation,” Rochester, New York (1960), p. 58, and J. Opt. Soc. Am. 50, 113 (1960).

M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Pergamon Press, New York1959) p. 490.

If the cross section of the beams is much greater than the coherence area, then the beams may be expected to give rise to a number of statistically independent fringe patterns, each of which extends approximately over a coherence area.

L. Mandel, “Proceedings of the Symposium on Electromagnetic Theory and Antennas,” Copenhagen (to be published, 1962).

L. Mandel, Progr. Opt.2, (to be published, 1962).

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Equations (6)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ρ = γ 12 ( 0 ) 2 δ / ( 1 + δ ) .
C ( t , T , τ ) = 1 T - T / 2 t + T / 2 V 1 ( t + τ ) V 2 * ( t ) d t
C ¯ = ( Ī 1 Ī 2 ) 1 2 γ 12 ( τ ) ,
C C * ¯ = Ī 1 Ī 2 [ γ 12 ( 0 ) 2 + ξ ( T ) / T ] ,
ξ ( T ) = 1 T 0 T 0 T γ 11 ( t - t ) 2 d t d t .
[ ( I max - I min ) 2 ( I max + I min ) 2 ] 1 2 = ξ ( T ) . T