Abstract

The distances at which a series of rectangular test objects are visible were determined experimentally. These test objects were black opaque rectangles having variable length-width ratios and were viewed against a transluminated background. Using these data, and an assumed nystagmic motion of the eyeball, the <i>summated temporal illuminance gradients</i> on the retina were computed. These values were found to be essentially constant, even though the length-width ratios of the test objects varied from 1 to 4050. Assuming a motionless eyeball, that is, perfect fixation, the summated values of Δ<i>I</i> were computed for the same observational conditions, Δ<i>I</i> being defined as the difference between the average illuminance incident on adjacent cones in the retinal mosaic. The values of summated Δ<i>I</i> are not constant. Since all of these test objects were <i>just visible</i> at the distance measured, they may be considered as being equal to each other with respect to their ability to excite a threshold neural response. It seems reasonable to conclude, therefore, that since the values of the summated temporal gradients are constant they are the most significant indices of the relative magnitudes of the neural responses. In our opinion these results lend considerable support to the assumption that the perception of inhomogeneities of luminance in the visual field is dependent directly upon the temporal illuminance gradients to which the retinal receptors are subjected by virtue of the movement of the image with respect to the retinal mosaic.

PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. L. A. Jones and G. C. Higgins, "Photographic granularity and graininess. III. Some characteristics of the visual system of importance in the evaluation of graininess and granularity," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 37, 217 (1947).
  2. F. H. Adler and F. Fliegelman, "Influence of fixation on the visual acuity," Arch. f. Ophthalm. 12, 475 (1934).
  3. P. Reeves, "The response of the average pupil to various intensities of light," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4, 35 (1920).
  4. H. K. Hartline, "The nerve messages in the fibers of the visual pathway," J Opt. Soc. Am. 30, 239 (1940).
  5. G. A. Fry, "Relation of the configuration of a brightness contrast border to its visibility," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 37, 166 (1947).
  6. E. S. Lamar, S. Hecht, S. Schlaer, and C. D. Hendley, "Size, shape, and contrast in detection of targets by daylight vision. I. Data and analytical description," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 37, 531 (1947).

1947

1940

H. K. Hartline, "The nerve messages in the fibers of the visual pathway," J Opt. Soc. Am. 30, 239 (1940).

1934

F. H. Adler and F. Fliegelman, "Influence of fixation on the visual acuity," Arch. f. Ophthalm. 12, 475 (1934).

1920

Adler, F. H.

F. H. Adler and F. Fliegelman, "Influence of fixation on the visual acuity," Arch. f. Ophthalm. 12, 475 (1934).

Fliegelman, F.

F. H. Adler and F. Fliegelman, "Influence of fixation on the visual acuity," Arch. f. Ophthalm. 12, 475 (1934).

Fry, G. A.

Hartline, H. K.

H. K. Hartline, "The nerve messages in the fibers of the visual pathway," J Opt. Soc. Am. 30, 239 (1940).

Hecht, S.

Hendley, C. D.

Higgins, G. C.

Jones, L. A.

Lamar, E. S.

Reeves, P.

Schlaer, S.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.