Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. Herbert E. Ives and H. B. Briggs, J. O. S. A. 26, 238 (1936),and also J. O. S. A. 27, 181 (1937).
    [Crossref]
  2. R. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. 44, 353 (1933).
    [Crossref]
  3. Herbert E. Ives, Phys. Rev. 38, 1209 (1931).
    [Crossref]
  4. J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 11, 227 (1918).
    [Crossref]
  5. Thornton C. Fry, J. O. S. A. 16, 1 (1928).
    [Crossref]
  6. In our previous reports on the optical constants of potassium and of sodium, comparisons were made between the constants as derived from our experimental work, and those calculated from the theory of metallic dispersion as developed by Kronig (R. deL. Kronig, Proc. Roy. Soc. A133, 255 (1931)). Agreement between experimental and theoretical values, which was good for sodium and fair for potassium, was poor for rubidium and worse for cesium.
    [Crossref]
  7. E. O. Hulburt, Science 54, 147 (1922).
    [Crossref]
  8. J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 25, 75 (1925).
    [Crossref]

1936 (1)

Herbert E. Ives and H. B. Briggs, J. O. S. A. 26, 238 (1936),and also J. O. S. A. 27, 181 (1937).
[Crossref]

1933 (1)

R. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. 44, 353 (1933).
[Crossref]

1931 (2)

Herbert E. Ives, Phys. Rev. 38, 1209 (1931).
[Crossref]

In our previous reports on the optical constants of potassium and of sodium, comparisons were made between the constants as derived from our experimental work, and those calculated from the theory of metallic dispersion as developed by Kronig (R. deL. Kronig, Proc. Roy. Soc. A133, 255 (1931)). Agreement between experimental and theoretical values, which was good for sodium and fair for potassium, was poor for rubidium and worse for cesium.
[Crossref]

1928 (1)

Thornton C. Fry, J. O. S. A. 16, 1 (1928).
[Crossref]

1925 (1)

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 25, 75 (1925).
[Crossref]

1922 (1)

E. O. Hulburt, Science 54, 147 (1922).
[Crossref]

1918 (1)

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 11, 227 (1918).
[Crossref]

Briggs, H. B.

Herbert E. Ives and H. B. Briggs, J. O. S. A. 26, 238 (1936),and also J. O. S. A. 27, 181 (1937).
[Crossref]

Fry, Thornton C.

Thornton C. Fry, J. O. S. A. 16, 1 (1928).
[Crossref]

Hulburt, E. O.

E. O. Hulburt, Science 54, 147 (1922).
[Crossref]

Ives, Herbert E.

Herbert E. Ives and H. B. Briggs, J. O. S. A. 26, 238 (1936),and also J. O. S. A. 27, 181 (1937).
[Crossref]

Herbert E. Ives, Phys. Rev. 38, 1209 (1931).
[Crossref]

Kronig, R. deL.

In our previous reports on the optical constants of potassium and of sodium, comparisons were made between the constants as derived from our experimental work, and those calculated from the theory of metallic dispersion as developed by Kronig (R. deL. Kronig, Proc. Roy. Soc. A133, 255 (1931)). Agreement between experimental and theoretical values, which was good for sodium and fair for potassium, was poor for rubidium and worse for cesium.
[Crossref]

Nathanson, J. B.

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 25, 75 (1925).
[Crossref]

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 11, 227 (1918).
[Crossref]

Wood, R. W.

R. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. 44, 353 (1933).
[Crossref]

J. O. S. A. (2)

Herbert E. Ives and H. B. Briggs, J. O. S. A. 26, 238 (1936),and also J. O. S. A. 27, 181 (1937).
[Crossref]

Thornton C. Fry, J. O. S. A. 16, 1 (1928).
[Crossref]

Phys. Rev. (4)

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 25, 75 (1925).
[Crossref]

R. W. Wood, Phys. Rev. 44, 353 (1933).
[Crossref]

Herbert E. Ives, Phys. Rev. 38, 1209 (1931).
[Crossref]

J. B. Nathanson, Phys. Rev. 11, 227 (1918).
[Crossref]

Proc. Roy. Soc. (1)

In our previous reports on the optical constants of potassium and of sodium, comparisons were made between the constants as derived from our experimental work, and those calculated from the theory of metallic dispersion as developed by Kronig (R. deL. Kronig, Proc. Roy. Soc. A133, 255 (1931)). Agreement between experimental and theoretical values, which was good for sodium and fair for potassium, was poor for rubidium and worse for cesium.
[Crossref]

Science (1)

E. O. Hulburt, Science 54, 147 (1922).
[Crossref]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (8)

F. 1
F. 1

Dispersion curves of N and K0 for rubidium.

F. 2
F. 2

Reflecting power of rubidium.

F. 3
F. 3

Principal incidence angle and principal azimuth for rubidium.

F. 4
F. 4

Calculated transmissions for several thicknesses of rubidium.

F. 5
F. 5

Dispersion curves of N and K0 for cesium.

F. 6
F. 6

Reflecting power of cesium.

F. 7
F. 7

Principal incidence angle and principal azimuth for cesium.

F. 8
F. 8

Calculated transmissions for several thicknesses of cesium.

Tables (6)

Tables Icon

Table I Experimental data for rubidium.

Tables Icon

Table II Values calculated from experimental data for rubidium.

Tables Icon

Table III Transmission of rubidium.

Tables Icon

Table IV Experimental data for cesium.

Tables Icon

Table V Values calculated from experimental data for cesium.

Tables Icon

Table VI Transmission of cesium.

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

R = ( N 1 ) 2 + K 0 2 ( N + 1 ) 2 + K 0 2 .
θ ¯
θ ¯