Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. Herbert E. Ives, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27, 177 (1937); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27, 263 (1937); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27, 305 (1937); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27, 310 (1937); J. Opt. Soc. Am. 27, 389 (1937).
    [CrossRef]
  2. H. F. Batho and A. J. Dempster, Astrophys. J. 75, 34 (1932).
    [CrossRef]
  3. With this arrangement the real image which the mirror forms of the discharge is not coincident with the discharge but falls on the other side of the spectrograph slit. It was not believed that this lack of optical symmetry was important when weighed against the accuracy of alignment rendered possible. However, to test this point a tube was constructed furnished with a concave mirror which, by the aid of cross hairs in the discharge path, could be adjusted to image the discharge upon itself. This tube while more difficult to align accurately, gave identical results, as did also a tube with a plane mirror, so that any suspicion that the phenomena observed could be ascribed to optical dissymmetry is untenable.
  4. G. C. Dunlap and J. G. Trump, Rev. Sci. Inst. 8, 37 (1937).
    [CrossRef]
  5. A test for the normality of the spectrum produced by the grating-lens combination was made on three lines of the molecular spectrum of hydrogen covering a range of 250A approximately centered about the Hβ line, namely 4719.01A, 4849.32A and 4973.26A. The following figures were obtained for the quantity A/mm:A/mmInterval 4719.01–4849.32A PlateA,measuredupwardonscrew10.870 “““downward““10.875 PlateB,“upward““10.876 “““downward““10.877Mean10.874Interval 4849.32–4973.26A PlateA,measuredupwardonscrew10.877 “““downward““10.874 PlateB,“upward““10.872 “““downward““10.870Mean10.873A hyperbolic deviation from linearity, such as would produce an apparent shift of the center of gravity of the magnitude in question in this investigation would mean a difference of 0.5 A/mm in the quantity for the two wave-length ranges measured.

1937 (2)

1932 (1)

H. F. Batho and A. J. Dempster, Astrophys. J. 75, 34 (1932).
[CrossRef]

Batho, H. F.

H. F. Batho and A. J. Dempster, Astrophys. J. 75, 34 (1932).
[CrossRef]

Dempster, A. J.

H. F. Batho and A. J. Dempster, Astrophys. J. 75, 34 (1932).
[CrossRef]

Dunlap, G. C.

G. C. Dunlap and J. G. Trump, Rev. Sci. Inst. 8, 37 (1937).
[CrossRef]

Ives, Herbert E.

Trump, J. G.

G. C. Dunlap and J. G. Trump, Rev. Sci. Inst. 8, 37 (1937).
[CrossRef]

Astrophys. J. (1)

H. F. Batho and A. J. Dempster, Astrophys. J. 75, 34 (1932).
[CrossRef]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1)

Rev. Sci. Inst. (1)

G. C. Dunlap and J. G. Trump, Rev. Sci. Inst. 8, 37 (1937).
[CrossRef]

Other (2)

A test for the normality of the spectrum produced by the grating-lens combination was made on three lines of the molecular spectrum of hydrogen covering a range of 250A approximately centered about the Hβ line, namely 4719.01A, 4849.32A and 4973.26A. The following figures were obtained for the quantity A/mm:A/mmInterval 4719.01–4849.32A PlateA,measuredupwardonscrew10.870 “““downward““10.875 PlateB,“upward““10.876 “““downward““10.877Mean10.874Interval 4849.32–4973.26A PlateA,measuredupwardonscrew10.877 “““downward““10.874 PlateB,“upward““10.872 “““downward““10.870Mean10.873A hyperbolic deviation from linearity, such as would produce an apparent shift of the center of gravity of the magnitude in question in this investigation would mean a difference of 0.5 A/mm in the quantity for the two wave-length ranges measured.

With this arrangement the real image which the mirror forms of the discharge is not coincident with the discharge but falls on the other side of the spectrograph slit. It was not believed that this lack of optical symmetry was important when weighed against the accuracy of alignment rendered possible. However, to test this point a tube was constructed furnished with a concave mirror which, by the aid of cross hairs in the discharge path, could be adjusted to image the discharge upon itself. This tube while more difficult to align accurately, gave identical results, as did also a tube with a plane mirror, so that any suspicion that the phenomena observed could be ascribed to optical dissymmetry is untenable.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (14)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Canal-ray spectra. (a) Undisplaced and displaced lines in tube of original type. (b) Undisplaced and displaced lines in tube of Dempster design.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Diagrammatic representation of canal-ray tube.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Side view of canal-ray tube.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

End-on view of canal-ray tube.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Electrical circuits used with canal-ray tube.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Plan of apparatus.

Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Photograph of apparatus.

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Tube in place.

Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Spectrograms obtained for several applied voltages.

Fig. 10
Fig. 10

Computed and observed Doppler displacements.

Fig. 11
Fig. 11

(a) Molecular spectrum of hydrogen in the neighborhood of Hβ. (b) Canal-ray spectrum for voltage selected to make H2 lines clear molecular lines.

Fig. 12
Fig. 12

Chief molecular spectrum lines of hydrogen in the neighborhood of Hβ. Lines to blue side shown full, to red side, dashed.

Fig. 13
Fig. 13

Computed and observed second-order shifts, plotted against voltage.

Fig. 14
Fig. 14

Computed and observed second-order shifts, plotted against first-order (Doppler) shifts.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

e E = 1 2 M ( V 2 / c 2 )
ν = ν 0 ( 1 - V 2 / c 2 ) 1 2 ,