Abstract

We investigate the performance of sinc-shaped QPSK signal pulses generated in the digital, electrical, and optical domains. To this end an advanced transmitter with a digital pulse-shaper is compared to analog transmitters relying on pulse-shaping with electrical and optical filters, respectively. The signal quality is assessed within a single carrier setup as well as within an ultra-densely spaced WDM arrangement comprising three channels. An advanced receiver providing additional digital filtering with an adaptive equalization algorithm to approximate an ideal brick-wall Nyquist filter has been used for all schemes. It is found that at lower symbol rates, where digital processing is still feasible, digital filters with a large number of filter coefficients provide the best performance. However, transmitters equipped with only electrical or optical pulse-shapers already outperform transmitters sending plain unshaped NRZ signals, so that for higher symbol rates analog electrical and optical techniques not only save costs, but are the only adequate solution.

© 2013 IEEE

PDF Article

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription