We compare the accuracy of TIM-OS and MMCM in response to the recent analysis made by Fang [Biomed. Opt.
Express 2, 1258 (2011)]. Our results show that the tetrahedron-based energy deposition
algorithm used in TIM-OS is more accurate than the node-based energy deposition algorithm used in
©2011 Optical Society of America
OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.
Alert me when this article is cited.
Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.