Abstract

Pulsed, time-domain electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) requires fast data collection. The ideal is for the data acquisition rate to be limited by the spin relaxation times, and not by the data collection hardware and software. Four devices with fast time response were compared in the collection of pulsed EPR data. The fastest data collection was achieved with a Bruker E587 SpecJet transient signal averager.

Nonlinear response function for time-domain and frequency-domain four-wave mixing

Shaul Mukamel and Roger F. Loring
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 3(4) 595-606 (1986)

Extra resonances in time-domain four-wave mixing

John T. Fourkas, Rick Trebino, Mark A. Dugan, and M. D. Fayer
Opt. Lett. 18(10) 781-783 (1993)

Comparison of frequency-domain and time-domain fluorescence lifetime tomography

Anand T. N. Kumar, Scott B. Raymond, Brian J. Bacskai, and David A. Boas
Opt. Lett. 33(5) 470-472 (2008)

Invasive optical pumping for room-temperature masers, time-resolved EPR, triplet-DNP, and quantum engines exploiting strong coupling

Hao Wu, Shamil Mirkhanov, Wern Ng, Kuan-Cheng Chen, Yuling Xiong, and Mark Oxborrow
Opt. Express 28(20) 29691-29702 (2020)

Single-measurement digital optical frequency comb based phase-detection Brillouin optical time domain analyzer

Chao Jin, Liang Wang, Yuli Chen, Nan Guo, Wenghong Chung, Hoyin Au, Zhaohui Li, Hwa-Yaw Tam, and Chao Lu
Opt. Express 25(8) 9213-9224 (2017)