Abstract

The most significant advance in atomic absorption spectroscopy in recent years has been the development of flameless devices for the generation of atomic vapor. These devices have been widely discussed. The sample is completely evaporated in less than 1 sec, which requires the use of a fast response recorder. The parameter most widely used for measuring signals in flameless atomic absorption spectroscopy is peak height, where peak height is proportional to concentration of atomic vapor produced by the tube or filament atomizer. An alternative method for measuring the absorbance signal is to measure the integrated absorbance, i.e., the area under the peak. One way to measure the area under the peak is to cut and weigh the recorder chart tracings. Improved precision and increases in linear ranges have been reported using peak area. Recently, Sturgeon <i>et al.</i> examined the results of preliminary investigation of the potential of an electronic integration method vs the peak height method of measuring signals generated by Varian's carbon rod atomizer (CRA 63) and Perkin-Elmer's hollow graphite atomizer (HGA-2100). Using a programmable calculator, Bancroft <i>et al.</i> showed that the peak area method gives better results than the peak height method.

Science vs Fiction in Atomic Absorption

C. Th.J. Alkemade
Appl. Opt. 7(7) 1261-1269 (1968)

Urban boundary-layer height determination from lidar measurements over the Paris area

Laurent Menut, Cyrille Flamant, Jacques Pelon, and Pierre H. Flamant
Appl. Opt. 38(6) 945-954 (1999)

Calorimetric measurement of absorption vs temperature in a gold film

M. L. Scott and G. T. Johnston
Appl. Opt. 18(17) 2905-2906 (1979)

An Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer

Herbert L. Kahn and Walter Slavin
Appl. Opt. 2(9) 931-936 (1963)

Predicting the redshift on the ultraviolet spectrum using the peak area method

Angxin Tong, Xiaojun Tang, Feng Zhang, and Bin Wang
Appl. Opt. 59(7) 1823-1833 (2020)