Manuscripts returned to the author for revision should be returned to OSA as quickly as possible. The decision email will include the due date for submission of the revised manuscript. Any revisions received after that date may be assigned a new received date. After revising the paper and writing a detailed reply to the reviewers with a list of changes made to the paper, the corresponding author will log onto the Prism Author queue to submit a revised manuscript and response. Many editors find a red-lined version of the manuscript to be useful when evaluating the revised paper. Authors can upload a red-lined manuscript in Prism. The editor will then make a final decision or, less often, may choose to send the manuscript back to reviewers. Editors are encouraged to accept or reject revised manuscripts without requesting further mandatory revisions.
Accepted manuscripts are transmitted to OSA's production vendors for tagging and composition. Authors publishing in AOP, Applied Optics, JOCN, JOSA, Optica, Optics Letters, and Photonics Research will receive page proofs of their papers; typically, authors are prompted by e-mail to log in and access PDF proofs from a vendor website. Page proof corrections should be returned as soon as possible to avoid publication delays. Authors publishing in the Express Journals are instructed to review the final PDF of the article in Prism prior to making payment, because corrections will not be made once the article is published.
Submissions to OSA Journals that are based on work presented at conferences should adhere to the following guidelines:
Comments on articles previously published will be considered in OSA Journals. A Comment should occupy no more than three journal pages (no more than one page for Optics Letters and no more than two for Express Journals) including title, author list, tables, figures, and references. All Comment papers submitted to Optics Letters should be received no more than 6 months after the publishing of the original article.
The abstract should be brief. The Comment should be substantive and collegial in tone. Polemical Comments will be rejected. The main purpose of a Comment should be to point out and to correct significant errors or deficiencies in papers, to clarify the implications of a paper, or to take issue with the conclusions reached. Comments whose primary purpose is to discuss issues of priority or to call attention to oversights in a reference list will generally not be considered for publication.
Before a Comment is reviewed by qualified referees, it may be forwarded to the authors of the article being commented on to allow them an opportunity to provide additional feedback. After receiving this response, the editor can decide whether it is appropriate to send the Comment to review. If, after peer review, the editor decides to accept the Comment for publication, the original authors will be asked to submit a formal Reply. Replies are subject to the same length restrictions as Comments. If the Reply is accepted, both Comment and Reply will be published together in the next available issue of the journal.
OSA journals are editorially independent. However, if an editor receives a manuscript that is out of his/her journal's scope but may be suitable for another OSA journal, he will consult with that editor and, if they are in agreement, will contact the author to offer to transfer the manuscript. If the author agrees to the transfer, the original receipt date is retained.
In the case of submissions to Optica that do not meet the journal's criteria for broad interest, the editor may recommend the author consider transferring the manuscript to another OSA journal for consideration. The author can choose whether or not to transfer the manuscript and to which journal. Further details of the Optica process can be found here.
In neither case does the transfer of manuscript files guarantee acceptance. Any reviewer comments and identities will be available to the editors of the receiving journal since they could facilitate a rapid decision. The editors at the receiving journal may decline the transfer, request further revision, or seek further review as needed.
OSA Journals maintain high standards for acceptance. In many cases, papers are deemed unsuitable for publication either before or after peer review. If as an author you receive such a decision and you believe an appeal is warranted, please contact the Journal editorial staff with the request for an appeal. The staff will then open an Appeal process for your paper in Prism. You will be directed to complete the brief online questionnaire for appeals to provide your arguments to the editor along with a thorough response to all of the referee comments. A final ruling will be made by the editor as soon as possible. The editor's ruling on the appeal, in almost all cases, will be final. Under exceptional circumstances, an appeal may also be made to the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.