Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. R. W. Hellwarth, in Advances in Quantum Electronics, J. R. Singer, Ed. (Columbia University Press, New York, 1961).
  2. A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
    [CrossRef]
  3. G. E. Danielson, A. J. DeMaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 123 (1964).
    [CrossRef]
  4. A. J. DeMaria, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Optical Masers, J. Fox, Ed. (Polytechnic Press, Brooklyn, 1963).

1964 (1)

G. E. Danielson, A. J. DeMaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 123 (1964).
[CrossRef]

1963 (1)

A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
[CrossRef]

Barnard, G.

A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
[CrossRef]

Danielson, G. E.

G. E. Danielson, A. J. DeMaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 123 (1964).
[CrossRef]

DeMaria, A. J.

G. E. Danielson, A. J. DeMaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 123 (1964).
[CrossRef]

A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
[CrossRef]

A. J. DeMaria, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Optical Masers, J. Fox, Ed. (Polytechnic Press, Brooklyn, 1963).

Gagosz, R.

A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
[CrossRef]

Hellwarth, R. W.

R. W. Hellwarth, in Advances in Quantum Electronics, J. R. Singer, Ed. (Columbia University Press, New York, 1961).

Appl. Phys. Lett. (1)

G. E. Danielson, A. J. DeMaria, Appl. Phys. Lett. 5, 123 (1964).
[CrossRef]

J. Appl. Phys. (1)

A. J. DeMaria, R. Gagosz, G. Barnard, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 453 (1963).
[CrossRef]

Other (2)

R. W. Hellwarth, in Advances in Quantum Electronics, J. R. Singer, Ed. (Columbia University Press, New York, 1961).

A. J. DeMaria, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Optical Masers, J. Fox, Ed. (Polytechnic Press, Brooklyn, 1963).

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (2)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Laser output time variation with two intracavity acoustic modulators operating with a difference frequency of 3 kHz as a function of mirror tilt. Time scale: 200 μsec/major division.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Lower traces: laser output with single intracavity acoustic cell, (a) modulation with aligned mirrors at twice the ultrasonic drive frequency, (b) modulation with tilted mirrors at the ultrasonic drive frequency. Upper traces: ultrasonic drive signal. Time scale: 10 μsec/major division.

Metrics