Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. F. J. Low, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 51, 1300 (1961).
    [CrossRef]
  2. P. C. Caringella, W. L. Eisenman, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33, 653 (1962).
    [CrossRef]
  3. W. L. Eisenman, Appl. Opt. 4, 512 (1965).
    [CrossRef]
  4. R. Clark Jones, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43, 1 (1953).
    [CrossRef]

1965

1962

P. C. Caringella, W. L. Eisenman, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33, 653 (1962).
[CrossRef]

1961

1953

Caringella, P. C.

P. C. Caringella, W. L. Eisenman, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33, 653 (1962).
[CrossRef]

Clark Jones, R.

Eisenman, W. L.

W. L. Eisenman, Appl. Opt. 4, 512 (1965).
[CrossRef]

P. C. Caringella, W. L. Eisenman, Rev. Sci. Instr. 33, 653 (1962).
[CrossRef]

Low, F. J.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Solid lines are the noise for the three fields of view plotted as a function of modulation frequency. Broken lines are the theoretical limiting noise for the three fields of view as a function of modulation frequency. The insert gives the operating conditions of the detector for the three fields of view.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Responsivity for the three fields of view plotted as a function of modulation frequency.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Solid lines are the NEP for the three fields of view plotted as a function of the modulation frequency. Broken lines are the NEP for the three fields of view which would be achieved if the detector realized the limiting noise conditions.

Metrics