We analyze the sensor out-of-band (OOB) effects for satellite ocean color sensors of the sea-viewing wild field-of-view sensor (SeaWiFS), the moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS), and the visible infrared imaging radiometer suite (VIIRS) for phytoplankton-dominated open oceans and turbid coastal and inland waters, following the approach of Wang et al. [Appl. Opt. 40, 343 (2001) [CrossRef] ]. The applicability of the open ocean water reflectance model of Morel and Maritorena [J. Geophys. Res. 106, 7163 (2001) [CrossRef] ] (MM01) for the sensor OOB effects is analyzed for oligotrophic waters in Hawaii. The MM01 model predicted OOB contributions for oligotrophic waters are consistent with the result from in situ measurements. The OOB effects cause an apparent shift in sensor band center wavelengths in radiometric response, which depends on the sensor spectral response function and the target radiance being measured. Effective band center wavelength is introduced and calculated for three satellite sensors and for various water types. Using the effective band center wavelengths, satellite and in situ measured water optical property data can be more meaningfully and accurately compared. It is found that, for oligotrophic waters, the OOB effect is significant for the SeaWiFS 555 nm band (and somewhat 510 nm band), MODIS 412 nm band, and VIIRS 551 nm band. VIIRS and SeaWiFS have similar sensor OOB performance. For coastal and inland waters, however, the OOB effect is generally not significant for all three sensors, even though some small OOB effects do exist. This study highlights the importance of understanding the sensor OOB effect and the necessity of a complete prelaunch sensor characterization on the quality of ocean color products. Furthermore, it shows that hyperspectral in situ optics measurements are preferred for the purpose of accurately validating satellite-measured normalized water-leaving radiance spectra data.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths () difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] for Chl-a values of 0.03, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and using the MM01 model for (a) SeaWiFS, (b) MODIS, and (c) VIIRS using the MM01 model.
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths (), difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] using MOBY in situ data for SeaWiFS, MODIS, and VIIRS.
Table 4.
OOB Results from In Situ Coastal and Inland Watersa
Turbid Region
(nm)
(nm)
(nm)
Corr
(a) SeaWiFS
CB
413
414.0
−1.0
0.146
0.568
0.993
444
444.9
−0.9
0.019
0.683
0.992
491
490.7
0.3
−0.012
−0.196
1.002
510
510.0
0.0
−0.079
−0.193
1.002
555
555.5
−0.5
−0.990
−0.910
1.008
668
667.0
1.0
0.557
2.060
0.971
ECS
413
413.8
−0.8
0.248
2.708
0.967
444
444.4
−0.4
0.006
0.106
1.000
491
490.2
0.8
0.054
−0.525
1.008
510
510.2
−0.2
−0.079
0.039
0.999
555
555.0
0.0
−0.830
−0.637
1.007
668
667.1
0.9
0.128
0.758
0.967
Lake Taihu
413
414.2
−1.2
0.271
1.015
0.990
444
444.8
−0.8
0.021
0.608
0.991
491
492.1
−1.1
0.205
0.476
0.995
510
510.0
0.0
−0.061
0.104
0.998
555
552.5
2.5
−0.663
−1.182
1.012
668
667.0
1.0
−0.019
1.036
0.987
(b) MODIS
CB
412
417.0
−5.0
1.504
2.135
0.975
442
442.7
−0.7
0.160
0.489
0.994
488
487.1
0.9
−0.087
−0.529
1.006
530
529.7
0.3
−0.027
−0.136
1.001
547
547.2
−0.2
−0.045
−0.154
1.002
666
665.7
0.3
−0.176
0.457
1.027
ECS
412
414.1
−2.1
2.411
4.306
0.959
442
442.2
−0.2
0.191
0.077
1.002
488
487.2
0.8
−0.064
−0.786
1.008
530
530.4
−0.4
0.002
0.180
0.999
547
547.1
−0.1
−0.027
−0.009
1.001
666
666.2
−0.2
−0.233
0.244
0.988
Lake Taihu
412
417.0
−5.0
2.858
4.005
0.960
442
442.8
−0.8
0.286
0.619
0.993
488
487.6
0.4
0.048
−0.240
1.002
530
530.1
−0.1
0.005
0.085
0.999
547
546.9
0.1
−0.060
−0.098
1.001
666
666.4
−0.4
−0.158
0.150
0.998
(c) VIIRS
CB
410
410.0
0.0
−0.921
−0.770
1.008
443
443.9
−0.9
−0.145
0.620
0.993
486
484.7
1.3
−0.439
−0.651
1.007
551
548.4
2.6
−1.166
−0.938
1.009
671
667.6
3.4
1.300
2.159
0.970
ECS
410
409.9
0.1
−0.452
−0.484
1.013
443
443.3
−0.3
−0.031
0.743
0.994
486
484.6
1.4
−0.332
−0.303
1.006
551
549.0
2.0
−1.023
−0.768
1.005
671
670.6
0.4
0.279
0.588
0.964
Lake Taihu
410
411.3
−1.3
0.719
1.426
0.986
443
444.4
−1.4
0.267
1.193
0.986
486
486.6
−0.6
0.044
0.248
0.997
551
547.5
3.5
−0.965
−1.560
1.016
671
669.3
1.7
0.029
1.400
0.981
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths (), difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] from in situ coastal and inland waters in the CB, ECS, and Lake Taihu for (a) SeaWiFS, (b) MODIS, and (c) VIIRS.
Tables (4)
Table 1.
Specifications of Ocean Color Spectral Bands for SeaWiFS, MODIS, and VIIRS
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths () difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] for Chl-a values of 0.03, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and using the MM01 model for (a) SeaWiFS, (b) MODIS, and (c) VIIRS using the MM01 model.
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths (), difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] using MOBY in situ data for SeaWiFS, MODIS, and VIIRS.
Table 4.
OOB Results from In Situ Coastal and Inland Watersa
Turbid Region
(nm)
(nm)
(nm)
Corr
(a) SeaWiFS
CB
413
414.0
−1.0
0.146
0.568
0.993
444
444.9
−0.9
0.019
0.683
0.992
491
490.7
0.3
−0.012
−0.196
1.002
510
510.0
0.0
−0.079
−0.193
1.002
555
555.5
−0.5
−0.990
−0.910
1.008
668
667.0
1.0
0.557
2.060
0.971
ECS
413
413.8
−0.8
0.248
2.708
0.967
444
444.4
−0.4
0.006
0.106
1.000
491
490.2
0.8
0.054
−0.525
1.008
510
510.2
−0.2
−0.079
0.039
0.999
555
555.0
0.0
−0.830
−0.637
1.007
668
667.1
0.9
0.128
0.758
0.967
Lake Taihu
413
414.2
−1.2
0.271
1.015
0.990
444
444.8
−0.8
0.021
0.608
0.991
491
492.1
−1.1
0.205
0.476
0.995
510
510.0
0.0
−0.061
0.104
0.998
555
552.5
2.5
−0.663
−1.182
1.012
668
667.0
1.0
−0.019
1.036
0.987
(b) MODIS
CB
412
417.0
−5.0
1.504
2.135
0.975
442
442.7
−0.7
0.160
0.489
0.994
488
487.1
0.9
−0.087
−0.529
1.006
530
529.7
0.3
−0.027
−0.136
1.001
547
547.2
−0.2
−0.045
−0.154
1.002
666
665.7
0.3
−0.176
0.457
1.027
ECS
412
414.1
−2.1
2.411
4.306
0.959
442
442.2
−0.2
0.191
0.077
1.002
488
487.2
0.8
−0.064
−0.786
1.008
530
530.4
−0.4
0.002
0.180
0.999
547
547.1
−0.1
−0.027
−0.009
1.001
666
666.2
−0.2
−0.233
0.244
0.988
Lake Taihu
412
417.0
−5.0
2.858
4.005
0.960
442
442.8
−0.8
0.286
0.619
0.993
488
487.6
0.4
0.048
−0.240
1.002
530
530.1
−0.1
0.005
0.085
0.999
547
546.9
0.1
−0.060
−0.098
1.001
666
666.4
−0.4
−0.158
0.150
0.998
(c) VIIRS
CB
410
410.0
0.0
−0.921
−0.770
1.008
443
443.9
−0.9
−0.145
0.620
0.993
486
484.7
1.3
−0.439
−0.651
1.007
551
548.4
2.6
−1.166
−0.938
1.009
671
667.6
3.4
1.300
2.159
0.970
ECS
410
409.9
0.1
−0.452
−0.484
1.013
443
443.3
−0.3
−0.031
0.743
0.994
486
484.6
1.4
−0.332
−0.303
1.006
551
549.0
2.0
−1.023
−0.768
1.005
671
670.6
0.4
0.279
0.588
0.964
Lake Taihu
410
411.3
−1.3
0.719
1.426
0.986
443
444.4
−1.4
0.267
1.193
0.986
486
486.6
−0.6
0.044
0.248
0.997
551
547.5
3.5
−0.965
−1.560
1.016
671
669.3
1.7
0.029
1.400
0.981
Nominal center wavelength (), effective band center wavelengths (), difference between the nominal center wavelength and effective band center wavelength , OOB contribution () [Eq. (5)] and its relative OOB contribution () [Eq. (6)], OOB contribution in reference to the nominal center wavelength [Eq. (7)] and the corresponding relative OOB contribution [Eq. (8)], and the OOB correction factor Corr [Eq. (9)] from in situ coastal and inland waters in the CB, ECS, and Lake Taihu for (a) SeaWiFS, (b) MODIS, and (c) VIIRS.