Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to test and evaluate the initial atmospheric carbon dioxide (${\mathrm{CO}}_2$) measurement capability of airborne, high-energy, double-pulsed, 2-μm integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) lidar. This IPDA was designed, integrated, and operated at the NASA Langley Research Center on-board the NASA B-200 aircraft. The IPDA was tuned to the ${\mathrm{CO}}_2$ strong absorption line at 2050.9670 nm, which is the optimum for lower tropospheric weighted column measurements. Flights were conducted over land and ocean under different conditions. The first validation experiments of the IPDA for atmospheric ${\mathrm{CO}}_2$ remote sensing, focusing on low surface reflectivity oceanic surface returns during full day background conditions, are presented. In these experiments, the IPDA measurements were validated by comparison to airborne flask air-sampling measurements conducted by the NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory. IPDA performance modeling was conducted to evaluate measurement sensitivity and bias errors. The IPDA signals and their variation with altitude compare well with predicted model results. In addition, off-off-line testing was conducted, with fixed instrument settings, to evaluate the IPDA systematic and random errors. Analysis shows an altitude-independent differential optical depth offset of 0.0769. Optical depth measurement uncertainty of 0.0918 compares well with the predicted value of 0.0761. IPDA ${\mathrm{CO}}_2$ column measurement compares well with model-driven, near-simultaneous air-sampling measurements from the NOAA aircraft at different altitudes. With a 10-s shot average, ${\mathrm{CO}}_2$ differential optical depth measurement of $1.0054\pm 0.0103$ was retrieved from a 6-km altitude and a 4-GHz on-line operation. As compared to ${\mathrm{CO}}_2$ weighted-average column dry-air volume mixing ratio of 404.08 ppm, derived from air sampling, IPDA measurement resulted in a value of $405.22\pm 4.15\mathrm{ppm}$ with 1.02% uncertainty and 0.28% additional bias. Sensitivity analysis of environmental systematic errors correlates the additional bias to water vapor. IPDA ranging resulted in a measurement uncertainty of $<3\mathrm{m}$.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

Double-pulse 1.57  μm integrated path differential absorption lidar ground validation for atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement

Juan Du, Yadan Zhu, Shiguang Li, Junxuan Zhang, Yanguang Sun, Huaguo Zang, Dan Liu, Xiuhua Ma, Decang Bi, Jiqiao Liu, Xiaolei Zhu, and Weibiao Chen
Appl. Opt. 56(25) 7053-7058 (2017)

Evaluation of an airborne triple-pulsed 2  μm IPDA lidar for simultaneous and independent atmospheric water vapor and carbon dioxide measurements

Tamer F. Refaat, Upendra N. Singh, Jirong Yu, Mulugeta Petros, Syed Ismail, Michael J. Kavaya, and Kenneth J. Davis
Appl. Opt. 54(6) 1387-1398 (2015)

Self-calibration and laser energy monitor validations for a double-pulsed 2-μm CO₂ integrated path differential absorption lidar application

Tamer F. Refaat, Upendra N. Singh, Mulugeta Petros, Ruben Remus, and Jirong Yu
Appl. Opt. 54(24) 7240-7251 (2015)

Feasibility study of a space-based high pulse energy 2 μm CO₂ IPDA lidar

Upendra N. Singh, Tamer F. Refaat, Syed Ismail, Kenneth J. Davis, Stephan R. Kawa, Robert T. Menzies, and Mulugeta Petros
Appl. Opt. 56(23) 6531-6547 (2017)

Ground-based, integrated path differential absorption LIDAR measurement of CO₂, CH₄, and H₂O near 1.6 μm

Gerd A. Wagner and David F. Plusquellic
Appl. Opt. 55(23) 6292-6310 (2016)