## Abstract

The growth behavior of ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ interlayers deposited at the interfaces of $\mathrm{Mo}/\mathrm{Si}$ multilayers was investigated using x-ray photoemission spectroscopy, x-ray reflectivity, and x-ray diffraction measurements. We report an asymmetry in the formation of ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ at the ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Mo interface compared to the ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Si interface. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth profiling shows that for ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Mo the formed stoichiometry is close to expectation ($4:1$ ratio), while for ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Si it is observed that carbon diffuses from the ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ interfaces into the multilayer, resulting in nonstochiometric growth ($>4:1$). As a result, there is a discrepancy in the optical response near $13.5\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\mathrm{nm}$ wavelength, where ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Mo behaves according to model simulations, while ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Si does not. The as-deposited off-stoichiometric ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$-on-Si interface also explains why these interfaces show poor barrier properties against temperature induced interdiffusion. We show that the stoichiometry of ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ at the Mo-Si interfaces is connected to the structure of the layers onto which ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ is grown. Because of enhanced diffusion into the amorphous Si surface, we suggest that deposited boron and carbon atoms form ${\mathrm{Si}}_{X}{\mathrm{B}}_{Y}$ and ${\mathrm{Si}}_{X}{\mathrm{C}}_{Y}$ compounds. The low formation enthalpy of ${\mathrm{Si}}_{X}{\mathrm{C}}_{Y}$ ensures C depletion of any ${\mathrm{B}}_{X}{\mathrm{C}}_{Y}$ interlayer. Only after a saturated interfacial layer is formed, does further deposition of boron and carbon atoms result in actual ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ formation. In contrast to the off-stoichiometric ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ growth on top of Si, ${\mathrm{B}}_{4}\mathrm{C}$ grown on top of Mo retains the correct stoichiometry because of the higher formation enthalpies for ${\mathrm{Mo}}_{X}{\mathrm{B}}_{Y}$ and ${\mathrm{Mo}}_{X}{\mathrm{C}}_{Y}$ formation and the limited diffusion depth into the (poly)-crystalline Mo surface.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

Full Article | PDF Article**OSA Recommended Articles**

_{4}C, Mo or Zr diffusion barrier layers

Jingtao Zhu, Sika Zhou, Haochuan Li, Zhanshan Wang, Philippe Jonnard, Karine Le Guen, Min-Hui Hu, Jean-Michel André, Hongjun Zhou, and Tonglin Huo

Opt. Express **19**(22) 21849-21854 (2011)

Robert S. Rosen, Daniel G. Stearns, Michael A. Viliardos, Michael E. Kassner, Stephen P. Vernon, and Yuanda Cheng

Appl. Opt. **32**(34) 6975-6980 (1993)

Jeroen Bosgra, Erwin Zoethout, Ad M. J. van der Eerden, Jan Verhoeven, Robbert W. E. van de Kruijs, Andrey E. Yakshin, and Fred Bijkerk

Appl. Opt. **51**(36) 8541-8548 (2012)