Abstract
Various points raised in a comment [ Testorf, Appl. Opt. 44, 55– 57 ( 2005)] in response to the original publication [ Dragoman, Appl. Opt. 42, 1932 ( 2003)] have been reviewed. The following is the reply.
© 2005 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Markus Testorf
Appl. Opt. 44(1) 55-57 (2005)
James E. Harvey and Andrey Krywonos
Appl. Opt. 42(19) 3792-3794 (2003)
Daniela Dragoman
Appl. Opt. 42(11) 1932-1937 (2003)