Limitation of the achievable signal-to-noise ratio in optical coherence tomography due to mismatch of the balanced receiver

Carla Carmelo Rosa; Adrian Gh. Podoleanu

doi:10.1364/AO.43.004802

Limitation of the achievable signal-to-noise ratio in optical coherence tomography due to mismatch of the balanced receiver

Carla Carmelo Rosa and Adrian Gh. Podoleanu

Applied Optics
Vol. 43,
Issue 25,
pp. 4802-4815
(2004)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.43.004802

Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Carla Carmelo Rosa and Adrian Gh. Podoleanu, "Limitation of the achievable signal-to-noise ratio in optical coherence tomography due to mismatch of the balanced receiver," Appl. Opt. 43, 4802-4815 (2004)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Get PDF (218 KB)
Set citation alerts
Save article

Related Topics
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the OSA Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.
Previously assigned OCIS codes
- Coherence imaging (110.1650)
- Fiber optics imaging (110.2350)
- Noise in imaging systems (110.4280)
- Optical coherence tomography (110.4500)
- Medical optics instrumentation (120.3890)
- Multiharmonic generation (190.4160)

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: October 7, 2003
- Revised Manuscript: May 17, 2004
- Manuscript Accepted: May 17, 2004
- Published: September 1, 2004

Not Accessible

Your account may give you access

Abstract

Owing to the limited spectral response of the fiber directional coupler used in a balanced optical coherence tomography configuration, the spectra are different in the two outputs. This affects unfavorably operation of the balanced photodetector unit. Excess photon noise makes a larger contribution than a directional coupler with a flat spectral response. A theoretical model is developed that shows that an optimum set of parameters may be defined to maximize the achievable signal-to-noise ratio. The model leads to a redefinition of the effective noise bandwidth, which takes into account the nonflat response of the directional coupler used. The model also predicts a limitation on the signal-to-noise ratio even when the stray reflectances in the interferometer are brought to zero.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Evaluation of effective noise bandwidth for broadband optical coherence tomography operation

Ramona Cernat, George M. Dobre, Adrian Bradu, and Adrian Gh. Podoleanu
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 26(4) 723-731 (2009)

Balanced detection spectral domain optical coherence tomography with a multiline single camera for signal-to-noise ratio enhancement

Wen-Chuan Kuo, Yune-Shee Lai, Chih-Ming Lai, and Yi-Shiang Huang
Appl. Opt. 51(24) 5936-5940 (2012)

Optimal interferometer designs for optical coherence tomography

Andrew M. Rollins and Joseph A. Izatt
Opt. Lett. 24(21) 1484-1486 (1999)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Figures (12)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (75)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Parameter	Description
P, P ₀	Optical power of the source and optical power transmitted to the tissue
ν	Optical frequency
E, E(t)	Electric field in complex notation and its real part, respectively
I, I _i	Irradiance and irradiance at the directional coupler input port i, respectively
G(ν)	Power spectral density of the source
G _i(ν)	Power spectral density at the coupler i input port
O	Reflectivity of the object under test
R	Total reflection due to fiber-end reflections
σ	Attenuation due to launching reference light into the second coupler
γ₁	Power cross-coupling efficiency for first coupler
γ(ν)	Power cross-coupling efficiency for the second coupler
α	Photodetector conversion factor of 〈EE*〉 into photocurrent
κ_B	Boltzmann constant
T	Temperature (K)
R _L	Load resistor of the balanced receiver
B	Electrical bandwidth of the balanced receiver including rectifier
e	Electron charge

Coupler	Cross-Coupling Function (wavelength λ, nm)
N1	γ(λ) = -2.378+ 0.00344λ
	Linear fit with r ² = 0.99405
N2	γ(λ) = 4.3- 0.0135λ+ 1.08× 10^-5 λ²
	Polynomial fit with r ² = 0.99556
B1	$γ (λ) = 0.354 + 0.062 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 775.7)}^{2}}{488.1}] + 0.146 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 827.4)}^{2}}{1579.6}]$
	Multipeak fit with χ² = 0.00002
B2	$γ (λ) = 0.21 + 0.15 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 773)}^{2}}{1352}] + 0.245 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 837)}^{2}}{4463}]$
	Multipeak fit with χ² = 0.00004

Parameter	Description
P, P ₀	Optical power of the source and optical power transmitted to the tissue
ν	Optical frequency
E, E(t)	Electric field in complex notation and its real part, respectively
I, I _i	Irradiance and irradiance at the directional coupler input port i, respectively
G(ν)	Power spectral density of the source
G _i(ν)	Power spectral density at the coupler i input port
O	Reflectivity of the object under test
R	Total reflection due to fiber-end reflections
σ	Attenuation due to launching reference light into the second coupler
γ₁	Power cross-coupling efficiency for first coupler
γ(ν)	Power cross-coupling efficiency for the second coupler
α	Photodetector conversion factor of 〈EE*〉 into photocurrent
κ_B	Boltzmann constant
T	Temperature (K)
R _L	Load resistor of the balanced receiver
B	Electrical bandwidth of the balanced receiver including rectifier
e	Electron charge

Coupler	Cross-Coupling Function (wavelength λ, nm)
N1	γ(λ) = -2.378+ 0.00344λ
	Linear fit with r ² = 0.99405
N2	γ(λ) = 4.3- 0.0135λ+ 1.08× 10^-5 λ²
	Polynomial fit with r ² = 0.99556
B1	$γ (λ) = 0.354 + 0.062 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 775.7)}^{2}}{488.1}] + 0.146 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 827.4)}^{2}}{1579.6}]$
	Multipeak fit with χ² = 0.00002
B2	$γ (λ) = 0.21 + 0.15 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 773)}^{2}}{1352}] + 0.245 \times exp [- \frac{{(λ - 837)}^{2}}{4463}]$
	Multipeak fit with χ² = 0.00004

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (12)

Tables (2)

Equations (75)

Metrics

Login or Create Account