Abstract

New direct measurement of high optical attenuation rates in polar bear hairs—2–8 dB/mm in the visible—and reanalysis of the data of Tributsch et al. [ Sol. Energy Mater. 21, 219 (1990)] seem to rule out the UV waveguiding proposed by Grojean et al. [ Appl. Opt. 19, 339 (1980)]. The case against fiber-optic polar bear hairs is summarized, and four conditions are given that any variation of the model of Grojean et al. would have to satisfy.

© 1998 Optical Society of America

Utilization of solar radiation by polar animals: an optical model for pelts

R. E. Grojean, J. A. Sousa, and M. C. Henry
Appl. Opt. 19(3) 339-346 (1980)

Investigation into the scattering of light by human hair

Helen K. Bustard and Robin W. Smith
Appl. Opt. 30(24) 3485-3491 (1991)

Digital and analog readout systems for fiber-optic strain sensors as applied to the monitoring of roller element bearing systems

Juan C. Juarez, Andrew P. Conkey, Robert X. Perez, and Henry F. Taylor
Appl. Opt. 42(31) 6276-6283 (2003)

Generation of a time-reversed replica of a nonuniformly polarized image-bearing optical beam

G. Martin, L. K. Lam, and R. W. Hellwarth
Opt. Lett. 5(5) 185-187 (1980)

Polarization-independent optical fiber modulator by use of polymer-dispersed liquid crystals

Kuniharu Takizawa, Kenichi Kodama, and Kiyoshi Kishi
Appl. Opt. 37(15) 3181-3189 (1998)