High-density magneto-optical recording systems require sensitive and robust focus position sensors that are immune to transient changes in the amplitude and the phase of the light diffracted from pregrooved media during the seek operation. The false focus-error signal produced by track crossing during seeking is termed feedthrough. Total immunity to feedthrough is never achieved, although some focus-error detection methods, notably the obscuration method, perform better in this regard. The astigmatic focus-error detection method is usually operated with a large astigmatic foci separation distance to facilitate detector alignment and to permit push–pull tracking, which increases pattern noise and contributes to its poor resistance to feedthrough. Pattern noise is caused by the projection of the intensity pattern at the exit pupil of the objective lens onto the detector plane, at which it produces false focus-error signals. The obscuration method, a diffraction-limited method of focus-error sensing, evens out this pattern noise and is therefore more resistant to feedthrough. We present numerical modeling results that compare the feedthrough performance of the astigmatic and the obscuration methods of focus-error detection.
© 1994 Optical Society of AmericaFull Article | PDF Article
OSA Recommended Articles
Bruce E. Bernacki, Keith Bates, M. Mansuripur, Delbert Hansen, and Daniel Cisneros
Appl. Opt. 32(29) 5789-5796 (1993)
James J. Zambuto, Ronald E. Gerber, J. Kevin Erwin, and M. Mansuripur
Appl. Opt. 33(34) 7987-7994 (1994)
Appl. Opt. 26(18) 3981-3986 (1987)