Static phase change in a fiber optic coil hydrophone

V. S. Sudarshanam; K. Srinivasan

doi:10.1364/AO.29.000855

Static phase change in a fiber optic coil hydrophone

V. S. Sudarshanam and K. Srinivasan

Applied Optics
Vol. 29,
Issue 6,
pp. 855-863
(1990)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.29.000855

Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
V. S. Sudarshanam and K. Srinivasan, "Static phase change in a fiber optic coil hydrophone," Appl. Opt. 29, 855-863 (1990)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Get PDF (1009 KB)
Set citation alerts
Save article

Related Topics
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the OSA Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: May 3, 1989
- Published: February 20, 1990

Not Accessible

Your account may give you access

Abstract

For low acoustic frequencies, the acoustooptic interaction in a fiber optic interferometric coil hydrophone has been modeled on assumptions of hydrostatic and radial stress. However, an inherent ambiguity exists in the way by which the correct model has been chosen. It is established through unambiguous experimental determination of the sign of the induced static phase change that the hydrostatic model alone is valid. The method involves the use of a phase modulator constructed by bonding an optical fiber onto a piezoelectric PVF₂ film. Theoretical considerations which also favor the hydrostatic model are presented.

Full Article | PDF Article

OSA Recommended Articles

Static pressure sensitivity amplification in interferometric fiber-optic hydrophones

R. Hughes and J. Jarzynski
Appl. Opt. 19(1) 98-107 (1980)

Low cost, high performance white-light fiber-optic hydrophone system with a trackable working point

Jinyu Ma, Meirong Zhao, Xinjing Huang, Hyungdae Bae, Yongyao Chen, and Miao Yu
Opt. Express 24(17) 19008-19019 (2016)

Multimode fiber-optic hydrophone based on the photoelastic effect

W. B. Spillman and D. H. McMahon
Appl. Opt. 21(19) 3511-3514 (1982)

References

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Figures (10)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Tables (2)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Equations (19)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Hypothesis	Change in fiber length	Stress configuration	Strain matrix	Sensitivity ΔΦ/PL (rad/Pa m)	Sign of phase change
Axially constrained radial pressure	Zero	$\begin{array}{l} α_{x} = σ_{y} = - P \\ σ_{x} = ν (σ_{x} + σ_{y}) \end{array}$	$[\begin{matrix} - P (1 - ν - 2 ν^{2}) / E \\ - P (1 - ν - 2 ν^{2}) / E \\ 0 \end{matrix}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} (1 - ν - 2 v^{2}) (p_{11} + p_{12}) \\ = 6.74 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Positive
Axially unconstrained radial pressure (RPH)	Elongation	$\begin{array}{l} σ_{x} = σ_{y} = - P \\ σ_{x} = 0 \end{array}$	$[\begin{array}{l} - P (1 - ν) / E \\ - P (1 - ν) / E \\ + P (2 ν) / E \end{array}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{2 β ν}{E} + \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} [(1 - ν) (p_{11} + p_{12}) - 2 ν p_{12}] \\ = 13.92 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Positive
Hydrostatic pressure (HPH)	Contraction	$σ_{x} = σ_{y} = σ_{z} = - P$	$[\begin{matrix} - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \\ - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \\ - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \end{matrix}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{- β}{E} (1 - 2 ν) + \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} (1 - 2 ν) (2 p_{12} + p_{11}) \\ = - 4.06 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Negative

Element	Parameter	Value
FPF composite	(a) Phase shifting coefficient	1.77 rad/V_peak m
	(b) Fiber interaction length	1.04 m
Piezofilm	(a) Strain per unit applied voltage	0.82 × 10⁻⁶/V
	(b) Thickness	28 μm
	(c) Length	14 cm
Optical fiber	(a) Core radius	4 μm
	(b) Cladding radius	125 μm
	(c) Coating (Jacket) radius	230 μm
	(d) Longitudinal strain sensitivity	1.25 × 10⁷ rad/m (per unit strain)

Hypothesis	Change in fiber length	Stress configuration	Strain matrix	Sensitivity ΔΦ/PL (rad/Pa m)	Sign of phase change
Axially constrained radial pressure	Zero	$\begin{array}{l} α_{x} = σ_{y} = - P \\ σ_{x} = ν (σ_{x} + σ_{y}) \end{array}$	$[\begin{matrix} - P (1 - ν - 2 ν^{2}) / E \\ - P (1 - ν - 2 ν^{2}) / E \\ 0 \end{matrix}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} (1 - ν - 2 v^{2}) (p_{11} + p_{12}) \\ = 6.74 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Positive
Axially unconstrained radial pressure (RPH)	Elongation	$\begin{array}{l} σ_{x} = σ_{y} = - P \\ σ_{x} = 0 \end{array}$	$[\begin{array}{l} - P (1 - ν) / E \\ - P (1 - ν) / E \\ + P (2 ν) / E \end{array}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{2 β ν}{E} + \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} [(1 - ν) (p_{11} + p_{12}) - 2 ν p_{12}] \\ = 13.92 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Positive
Hydrostatic pressure (HPH)	Contraction	$σ_{x} = σ_{y} = σ_{z} = - P$	$[\begin{matrix} - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \\ - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \\ - P (1 - 2 ν) / E \end{matrix}]$	$\begin{array}{l} \frac{- β}{E} (1 - 2 ν) + \frac{β n^{2}}{2 E} (1 - 2 ν) (2 p_{12} + p_{11}) \\ = - 4.06 \times 10^{- 5} rad / Pa m \end{array}$	Negative

Element	Parameter	Value
FPF composite	(a) Phase shifting coefficient	1.77 rad/V_peak m
	(b) Fiber interaction length	1.04 m
Piezofilm	(a) Strain per unit applied voltage	0.82 × 10⁻⁶/V
	(b) Thickness	28 μm
	(c) Length	14 cm
Optical fiber	(a) Core radius	4 μm
	(b) Cladding radius	125 μm
	(c) Coating (Jacket) radius	230 μm
	(d) Longitudinal strain sensitivity	1.25 × 10⁷ rad/m (per unit strain)

Abstract

References

Cited By

Figures (10)

Tables (2)

Equations (19)

Metrics

Login or Create Account