Abstract

Since the days of Senator William Proxmire's Golden Fleece awards, often given to laboratory projects he considered a waste of taxpayers' money, scientists and politicians have found themselves on opposite sides of a fundamental issue: how much control should government have over the research it pays for? The debate has become particularly bitter since last spring, when a Congressional committee investigating “scientific misconduct” enlisted Secret Service agents to examine the notebooks of Thereza Imanishi-Kari, a scientist who collaborated with David Baltimore, a Nobel laureate in medicine, on a paper describing immunology experiments at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In this essay, reprinted from The New York Times of 30 July 1989, Stephen Jay Gould, a Harvard geology professor, gives his view of the issue. © The New York Times Company.

© 1989 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription

Metrics

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription