Comparison between intensity correlation and Fourier transform of the time interval probability techniques applied to laser Doppler velocimetry

Cases for Which the Comparison Between Experimental, Simulated and Theoretical Values of G_F(ν) was Made

Note: In this table Δ is the time the particle takes to cross the interference fringes, P is the period of the signal, and δ is its phase at the beginning of the fringes.

Cases for Which the Errors Involved in the Determination of ν₀ from Q_F(ν) or G⁽²⁾(τ) were Obtained, I₀ Being the Mean Intensity in a Period P

Values of the Systematic e_s and Statistics σ Errors in ν₀ when Obtained from G⁽²⁾(τ) or Q_F(ν)

Improvement Factors for the Errors in ν₀ When Q_F(ν) is Measured Instead of G⁽²⁾(τ)

Table I

Cases for Which the Comparison Between Experimental, Simulated and Theoretical Values of G_F(ν) was Made

Note: In this table Δ is the time the particle takes to cross the interference fringes, P is the period of the signal, and δ is its phase at the beginning of the fringes.

Table II

Cases for Which the Errors Involved in the Determination of ν₀ from Q_F(ν) or G⁽²⁾(τ) were Obtained, I₀ Being the Mean Intensity in a Period P

Table III

Values of the Systematic e_s and Statistics σ Errors in ν₀ when Obtained from G⁽²⁾(τ) or Q_F(ν)

Table IV

Improvement Factors for the Errors in ν₀ When Q_F(ν) is Measured Instead of G⁽²⁾(τ)