Hans Strasburger, Wolfgang Scheidler, and Ingo Rentschler, "Amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential," Appl. Opt. 27, 1069-1088 (1988)
The amplitude and phase characteristics of the steady-state visual evoked potential (VEP) and grating perception were studied for an unbiased group of fifteen healthy female subjects. The variability of VEP data, as obtained by using a digital sweep technique, was high between subjects but relatively low within them. Earlier claims that psychophysical detection thresholds can be predicted from VEP amplitude values were confirmed, whereas no correlation could be established between amplitude values and the perception of suprathreshold contrast. By using a principle of minimum phase difference the importance of VEP phase as an indicator of data reliability and of perceptual encoding processes could also be established.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
For transient stimulation the stimulus presentation time is given; for steady-state on/off stimulation the frequency in Hz is stated.
For checkerboard stimulation the corresponding fundamentals’s spatial frequency is given. When both adults and infants are examined, the ranges for adults are given.
Electrode positions:
1 cm above inion & ear
2 cm above inion & ear
3 cm above inion & ear
1 cm above inion & left mastoid
2.5 cm above inion & right mastoid
2 cm above inion & vertex
inion & 7 cm anterior
inion & 9 cm anterior
2 cm above inion & 2 cm lat. left
3.7 cm above inion & 3.7 cm lat. left
T6 & mid-frontal
“?” = not reported
No figure, shape of SFC mentioned in text only (p. 656).
Table II
Experimental Conditions for Reported Multimodal Amplitude/Spatial-Frequency Plots
For transient stimulation the stimulus presentation time is given.
For checkerboard stimulation the corresponding fundamental’s spatial frequency is given. When both adults and infants are examined the ranges for adults are given.
Electrode positions: Like in Table 1, plus
l) 3 cm above inion + 3 cm lateral right
m) 3 cm above inion + 3 cm further above
n) 1 cm above inion + 3 cm lateral right
o) 2 cm above inion + 2/3 inion/nasion
p) Cortex surface (!)
Table III
Phase vs Contrast
Sj
critical contrast f. phase
critical contrast f. ampl.
notch (cpd) from to
phase increase LC, LSF
phase increase LC, HSF
phase increase HC, LSF
phase increase HC, HSF
AS
5%
5–10%
3.2
+160° or −200°
+100° or −260°
−50°
−50°
BW
10%
5–10%
2.2
5.0
−50°
−200°
+50°
+50°
MB
15%
5–15%
1.5
2.2
−150°
−100°
+50°
+50°..−100°
RV
10–15%
10–15%
2.2
3.2
−150°..−250°
−125°..−225°
−125°
−25°..−125°
“critical contrast for phase”: contrast value where slope of phase changes
Table IV
Reaction Time and Temporal Phase
Reaction time: Author or Sj
Spat.freq. range (cpd)
RT increase (ms)
Breitmeyer (1975)
1 – 10
110
Lupp et al.(1976)
1 – 10
60
RV
1 – 10
65
BW
1 – 10
65
Phase:
Spat.freq. range (cpd)
Phase increase
Equivalent latency increase (msec)
Williamson et al. (1978)
1 – 10
-
50
Rentschler & Spin. (1984)
1 – 10
260°
45
Parker & Salzen (1982)
1 – 10
-
45
RV, extrapolated
1 – 10
186°
32
BW, extrapolated
1 – 10
200°
35
Tables (4)
Table I
Experimental Conditions for Reported Unimodal Amplitude/Spatial-Frequency Plots
For transient stimulation the stimulus presentation time is given; for steady-state on/off stimulation the frequency in Hz is stated.
For checkerboard stimulation the corresponding fundamentals’s spatial frequency is given. When both adults and infants are examined, the ranges for adults are given.
Electrode positions:
1 cm above inion & ear
2 cm above inion & ear
3 cm above inion & ear
1 cm above inion & left mastoid
2.5 cm above inion & right mastoid
2 cm above inion & vertex
inion & 7 cm anterior
inion & 9 cm anterior
2 cm above inion & 2 cm lat. left
3.7 cm above inion & 3.7 cm lat. left
T6 & mid-frontal
“?” = not reported
No figure, shape of SFC mentioned in text only (p. 656).
Table II
Experimental Conditions for Reported Multimodal Amplitude/Spatial-Frequency Plots
For transient stimulation the stimulus presentation time is given.
For checkerboard stimulation the corresponding fundamental’s spatial frequency is given. When both adults and infants are examined the ranges for adults are given.
Electrode positions: Like in Table 1, plus
l) 3 cm above inion + 3 cm lateral right
m) 3 cm above inion + 3 cm further above
n) 1 cm above inion + 3 cm lateral right
o) 2 cm above inion + 2/3 inion/nasion
p) Cortex surface (!)
Table III
Phase vs Contrast
Sj
critical contrast f. phase
critical contrast f. ampl.
notch (cpd) from to
phase increase LC, LSF
phase increase LC, HSF
phase increase HC, LSF
phase increase HC, HSF
AS
5%
5–10%
3.2
+160° or −200°
+100° or −260°
−50°
−50°
BW
10%
5–10%
2.2
5.0
−50°
−200°
+50°
+50°
MB
15%
5–15%
1.5
2.2
−150°
−100°
+50°
+50°..−100°
RV
10–15%
10–15%
2.2
3.2
−150°..−250°
−125°..−225°
−125°
−25°..−125°
“critical contrast for phase”: contrast value where slope of phase changes