Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. P. Chylek, J. D. Pendleton, R. G. Pinnick, “Internal and Near-Surface Scattered Field of a Spherical Particle at Resonant Conditions,” Appl. Opt. 24, 3940 (1985).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. See, for example, P. W. Dusel, M. Kerker, D. D. Cooke, “Distribution of Absorption Centers Within Irradiated Spheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 55 (1979); P. R. Conwell, P. W. Barber, C. K. Rushforth, “Resonant Spectra of Dielectric Spheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1, 62 (1984); J. R. Probert-Jones, “Resonance component of Backscattering by Large Dielectric Spheres,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1, 822 (1984); W. M. Greene, R. E. Spjut, E. Bar-Ziv, A. F. Sarofim, J. P. Longwell, “Photophoresis of Irradiated Spheres: Absorption Centers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B2, 998 (1985).
    [Crossref]
  3. R. Bhandari, “Specific Absorption of a Tiny Absorbing Particle Embedded Within a Nonabsorbing Particle,” submitted to Appl. Opt.25, (Month, 1986).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981).
  5. In fact, the minimum following the first large peak in Fig. 3 of Ref. 1 is significantly different from zero because of the insufficient smallness of the step size to reveal the local details.
  6. This is easily seen from the analytic expressions for the electric field intensity within the equatorial plane. The equatorial plane is the yz plane in our discussion.

1985 (1)

1979 (1)

Bhandari, R.

R. Bhandari, “Specific Absorption of a Tiny Absorbing Particle Embedded Within a Nonabsorbing Particle,” submitted to Appl. Opt.25, (Month, 1986).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

Chylek, P.

Cooke, D. D.

Dusel, P. W.

Kerker, M.

Pendleton, J. D.

Pinnick, R. G.

van de Hulst, H. C.

H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981).

Appl. Opt. (1)

J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1)

Other (4)

R. Bhandari, “Specific Absorption of a Tiny Absorbing Particle Embedded Within a Nonabsorbing Particle,” submitted to Appl. Opt.25, (Month, 1986).
[Crossref] [PubMed]

H. C. van de Hulst, Light Scattering by Small Particles (Dover, New York, 1981).

In fact, the minimum following the first large peak in Fig. 3 of Ref. 1 is significantly different from zero because of the insufficient smallness of the step size to reveal the local details.

This is easily seen from the analytic expressions for the electric field intensity within the equatorial plane. The equatorial plane is the yz plane in our discussion.

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (2)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Source functions S (= |E|2) averaged over angles for the TM53,1 resonance of Ref. 1. r is the radial distance, and a is the radius of the sphere. The amplitude of incident light is unity.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Source function S for the size parameter x = 40.7960 of Ref. 1, but for refractive index, m = 1.77. It is calculated for the z axis, the direction of propagation of incident light.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

E = exp ( i ω t ) 2 k r n = 1 ( i ) n ( 2 n + 1 ) [ d n ψ n ( m k r ) ± i c n ψ n ( m k r ) ] x ^
f M , 1 = r M , 1 / a = n ( n + 1 ) / ( m x ) ,
f M , j = r M , j / a = ψ n , j - 1 / ( m x ) ,             j = 2 , 3 , l ,
f E , j = r E , j / a = ψ n , j / ( m x ) ,             j = 1 , 2 , l ,

Metrics