Abstract
The use of tin oxide, condensed water vapor, and water drop electrodes on the oxide surface as well as corona charging of the surface are compared in their ability to repel minority carriers from recombination sites at the oxide–silicon interface without compromising the optical properties of the photodiode. Corona charging provides significant advantages compared with the other three approaches.
© 1982 Optical Society of America
Full Article |
PDF Article
More Like This
References
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Citation lists with outbound citation links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription
Cited By
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription
Tables (2)
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription
Metrics
You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article level metrics are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an OSA member, or as an authorized user of your institution.
Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access OSA Member Subscription