Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. R. N. Hamm, R. A. MacRae, E. T. Arakawa, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 1460 (1965).
    [CrossRef]
  2. G. Rosenbaum, B. Feuerbacher, R. P. Godwin, M. Skibowski, Appl. Opt. 7, 1917 (1968).
    [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. V. G. Horton, E. T. Arakawa, R. N. Hamm, M. W. Williams, Appl. Opt. 8, 667 (1969).
    [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. W. H. Hancock, J. A. R. Samson, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 9, 211 (1976).
    [CrossRef]
  5. N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
    [CrossRef]
  6. For a beam with a large solid angle, the state of polarization cannot be represented by a simple scalar. Therefore the choice of definition will depend on the particular experiment.
  7. L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
    [CrossRef]
  8. B. J. Mulder, J. Phys. E: 8, 1046 (1975).
    [CrossRef]

1976 (1)

W. H. Hancock, J. A. R. Samson, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 9, 211 (1976).
[CrossRef]

1975 (1)

B. J. Mulder, J. Phys. E: 8, 1046 (1975).
[CrossRef]

1973 (1)

N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
[CrossRef]

1969 (1)

1968 (1)

1965 (1)

1964 (1)

L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
[CrossRef]

Arakawa, E. T.

Canfield, L. R.

L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
[CrossRef]

Dietz, E.

N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
[CrossRef]

Feuerbacher, B.

Gerhardt, U.

N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
[CrossRef]

Godwin, R. P.

Hamm, R. N.

Hancock, W. H.

W. H. Hancock, J. A. R. Samson, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 9, 211 (1976).
[CrossRef]

Hass, G.

L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
[CrossRef]

Horton, V. G.

Hunter, W. R.

L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
[CrossRef]

MacRae, R. A.

Mulder, B. J.

B. J. Mulder, J. Phys. E: 8, 1046 (1975).
[CrossRef]

Rehfeld, N.

N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
[CrossRef]

Rosenbaum, G.

Samson, J. A. R.

W. H. Hancock, J. A. R. Samson, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 9, 211 (1976).
[CrossRef]

Skibowski, M.

Williams, M. W.

Appl. Opt. (2)

Appl. Phys. (1)

N. Rehfeld, U. Gerhardt, E. Dietz, Appl. Phys. 1, 229 (1973).
[CrossRef]

J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. (1)

W. H. Hancock, J. A. R. Samson, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 9, 211 (1976).
[CrossRef]

J. Opt. Soc. Am. (1)

J. Phys. (1)

L. R. Canfield, G. Hass, W. R. Hunter, J. Phys. 25, 124 (1964).
[CrossRef]

J. Phys. E (1)

B. J. Mulder, J. Phys. E: 8, 1046 (1975).
[CrossRef]

Other (1)

For a beam with a large solid angle, the state of polarization cannot be represented by a simple scalar. Therefore the choice of definition will depend on the particular experiment.

Cited By

OSA participates in CrossRef's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (1)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Imaging polarizer. C1 and C2 are the centers of curvature of mirrors M1 and M2. Plane mirrors M3 and M4 can be added to improve polarization and to allow rotation of the polarizer around the beam axis.

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

1 s + 1 t = 2 R cos θ ,
1 s = 2 cos θ R .
s = R 2 cos θ             t = R 2 sin θ t g θ .
P i = I max - I min I max + I min ,
I max = I 0 - α / 2 + α / 2 cos 2 ϕ d ϕ = ½ I 0 ( α + sin α ) ,
I min = I 0 - α / 2 + α / 2 sin 2 ϕ d ϕ = ½ I 0 ( α - sin α ) ,
P i = sin a / α

Metrics