Abstract

No abstract available.

Full Article  |  PDF Article

References

  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).
  2. M. R. B. Forshaw, Appl. Opt. 13, 2 (1974).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. J. M. Moran, I. P. Kaminow, Appl. Opt. 12, 1964 (1973).
    [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. M. R. B. Forshaw, Opt. Commun. 8, 201 (1973).
    [Crossref]
  5. V. V. Aristov, V. Sh. Shekhtman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 263 (1971).
    [Crossref]

1974 (1)

1973 (2)

1972 (1)

W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).

1971 (1)

V. V. Aristov, V. Sh. Shekhtman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 263 (1971).
[Crossref]

Amodei, J. J.

W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).

Aristov, V. V.

V. V. Aristov, V. Sh. Shekhtman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 263 (1971).
[Crossref]

Forshaw, M. R. B.

Kaminow, I. P.

Moran, J. M.

Phillips, W.

W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).

Shekhtman, V. Sh.

V. V. Aristov, V. Sh. Shekhtman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 263 (1971).
[Crossref]

Staebler, D. L.

W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).

Appl. Opt. (2)

Opt. Commun. (1)

M. R. B. Forshaw, Opt. Commun. 8, 201 (1973).
[Crossref]

RCA Rev. (1)

W. Phillips, J. J. Amodei, D. L. Staebler, RCA Rev. 33, 94 (1972).

Sov. Phys. Usp. (1)

V. V. Aristov, V. Sh. Shekhtman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 14, 263 (1971).
[Crossref]

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Typical observed diffraction rings from a lithium niobate crystal in which a plane holographic grating has been recorded. The original writing beams had a wavelength λw = 515 nm, and the subsequent probing beam for the above photographs was λr = 633 nm and had an angle of incidence in (a) of α = 0°, resulting in cone angles of Φ1 = 5.7° and Φ2 = −5.7°, and an angle of incidence in (b) of α = 4.5°, resulting in a cone angle Φ1 = 10.6°. Note in (b) the first order diffracted beam just to the left of the diffraction ring.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Ewald sphere construction used in deriving the relationship between the diffraction cone angles, Φ, and the angle of incidence, α.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for a LiNbO3 crystal originally exposed to two intersecting laser beams of λw = 515 nm having angles of incidence equal to +5° and −5° and subsequently probed with a single low power laser beam of λr = 488 nm, 515 nm, and 633 nm. The theoretical curves are the same as those in Fig. 4, the patterns having been displaced by Δα = ±5°.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for a LiNbO3 crystal originally exposed to a single laser beam of λw = 515 nm at normal incidence and subsequently probed with a laser beam of λr = 488 nm, 515 nm, and 633 nm.

Equations (4)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

ϕ 1 , ϕ 2 = 2 tan - 1 { [ sin ( α - θ 2 , θ 1 ) ] / [ cos ( α - θ 2 , θ 1 ) + λ w / λ r ] } ,
ϕ 3 , ϕ 4 = 2 tan - 1 { [ sin ( α - θ 2 , θ 1 ) ] / [ cos ( α - θ 2 , θ 1 ) - λ w / λ r ] } ,
ϕ 5 = ϕ 1 θ 2 = 0 = ϕ 2 θ 1 = 0 = 2 tan - 1 [ ( sin α ) / ( cos α + λ w / λ r ) ] ,
ϕ 6 = ϕ 3 θ 2 = 0 = ϕ 4 θ 1 = 0 = 2 tan - 1 [ ( sin α ) / ( cos α - λ w / λ r ) ] .

Metrics