## Abstract

In article I of this series, calculations and graphs of the depolarization ratio, $D(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )=1-<{S}_{22}>/<{S}_{11}>$, for light scattered from an ensemble of single-aerosolized *Bacillus* spores using the discrete dipole approximation (DDA) (sometimes also called the coupled dipole approximation) were presented. The $Sij$ in these papers denote the appropriate Mueller matrix elements. We compare graphs for different size parameters for both $D(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ and the ratio ${R}_{34}(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )=<{S}_{34}>/<{S}_{11}>$. The ratio ${R}_{34}(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ was shown previously to be sensitive to diameters of rod-shaped and spherical bacteria suspended in liquids. The present paper isolates the effect of length changes and shows that ${R}_{34}(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ is not very sensitive to these changes, but $D(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ is sensitive to length changes when the aspect ratio becomes small enough. In the present article, we extend our analysis to vegetative bacteria which, because of their high percentage of water, generally have a substantially lower index of refraction than spores. The parameters used for the calculations were chosen to simulate values previously measured for log-phase *Escherichia coli*. Each individual *E. coli* bacterium appears microscopically approximately like a right-circular cylinder, capped smoothly at each end by a hemisphere of the same diameter. With the present model we focus particular attention on determining the effect, if any, of length changes on the graphs of $D(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ and ${R}_{34}(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$. We study what happens to these two functions when the diameters of the bacteria remain constant and their basic shape remains that of a capped cylinder, but with total length changed by reducing the length of the cylindrical part of each cell. This approach also allows a test of the model, since the limiting case as the length of the cylindrical part approaches zero is exactly a sphere, which is known to give a value identically equal to zero for $D(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$ but not for ${R}_{34}(\mathrm{\Theta},\lambda )$.

© 2009 Optical Society of America

Full Article | PDF Article**Related Articles**

Philip J. Wyatt

Appl. Opt. **7**(10) 1879-1896 (1968)

Dan A. Cross and Paul Latimer

Appl. Opt. **11**(5) 1225-1228 (1972)

Michael Kotlarchyk, Sow-Hsin Chen, and Shoji Asano

Appl. Opt. **18**(14) 2470-2479 (1979)