Abstract
This erratum corrects Eq. (13a) in Appl. Opt. 55, 3104 (2016) [CrossRef] and shows its effect on the proposed dip estimate functions Eqs. (21a)–(21d2). The differences are small, maximal up to a few percent and well within the original error limits. A new figure shows how the variability of the terrestrial refraction of the dip—as estimated with the proposed estimate functions—decreases with increasing observer heights.
© 2018 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleMore Like This
Marcel E. Tschudin
Appl. Opt. 55(12) 3104-3115 (2016)
Congshan Wan, Thomas K. Gaylord, and Muhannad S. Bakir
Appl. Opt. 55(28) 7987-7987 (2016)
Anatoly M. Smolovich and Valery Chernov
Appl. Opt. 57(30) 8914-8914 (2018)