Design of a hot mirror: contest results

Alfred Thelen

doi:10.1364/AO.35.004966

Applied Optics
Vol. 35,
Issue 25,
pp. 4966-4977
(1996)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.35.004966

Design of a hot mirror: contest results

Alfred Thelen

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Alfred Thelen, "Design of a hot mirror: contest results," Appl. Opt. 35, 4966-4977 (1996)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Abstract

Various designs for a hot mirror to improve the efficacy of tungsten lamps are described. These designs were solicited at the 1995 Topical Meeting on Optical Interference Coatings.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

Topical Meeting on Optical interference Coatings (OIC’2001): design contest results

Alfred Thelen, Markus Tilsch, Alexander V. Tikhonravov, Michael K. Trubetskov, and Ulf Brauneck
Appl. Opt. 41(16) 3022-3038 (2002)

Optical interference coating design contest 2016: a dispersive mirror and coating uniformity challenge

Jennifer D. T. Kruschwitz, Vladimir Pervak, Jason Keck, Ilya Bolshakov, Zachary Gerig, Fabien Lemarchand, Kageyuki Sato, William Southwell, Muneo Sugiura, Michael Trubetskov, and Wenjia Yuan
Appl. Opt. 56(4) C151-C162 (2017)

Optical Interference Coatings Design Contest 2013: angle-independent color mirror and shortwave infrared/midwave infrared dichroic beam splitter

Karen Hendrix, Jennifer D. T. Kruschwitz, and Jason Keck
Appl. Opt. 53(4) A360-A376 (2014)

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (7)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Designer	T _vis	A _vis	R _ir	D	Design Type	Layers	Physical Thickness
Tikhonravov (1)	97.33	2.46	97.25	7.07	Numerical	75	8204
Tikhonravov (2)	96.96	2.76	97.82	7.19	Numerical	84	9089
Southwell (1)	96.68	3.01	96.66	8.34	Numerical	76	8253
Noe	96.66	3.03	96.22	8.94	Numerical	80	7049
Southwell (2)	96.05	3.26	96.70	9.30	Numerical	86	8272
Lemarquis	96.07	3.31	96.57	9.63	Classical	91	11260
Perilloux	96.13	2.88	96.32	9.73	Classical	89	8611
Paul	96.56	2.95	95.94	9.82	Classical	92	8562
Anonymous	95.55	2.58	96.50	10.13	Classical	89	8678
Goldstein (1)	97.17	2.37	95.21	10.23	Classical	98	7485
Greiner	96.84	2.74	94.11	10.84	Numerical	79	6816
Bloom	95.01	3.83	96.34	11.06	Classical	94	9456
Carniglia	95.71	3.35	95.60	11.35	Classical	99	11834
Schallenberg	94.94	3.31	95.98	11.40	Classical	92	7931
Goldstein (2)	95.46	3.27	94.01	11.57	Numerical	52	8305
Emiliani	95.38	3.45	95.04	12.24	Classical	99	9702
Reinbolt	94.34	2.57	94.61	12.42	Classical	66	7817
Netterfield	97.14	2.36	91.52	12.95	Fourier	74	6232
Stolov	93.11	3.42	95.54	13.97	Classical	98	12262
Pencheva	92.28	3.89	95.13	15.10	Classical	96	12491
Mauer	91.59	3.02	93.76	16.21	Classical	72	9107

Designer	D	x _T	y _T	x _R	y _R
Southwell (2)	9.3	0.3336	0.3337	0.4326	0.403
Netterfield	12.95	0.3341	0.3345	0.3326	0.2442
Carniglia	11.35	0.3345	0.3345	0.3272	0.3121
Perilloux	9.73	0.3344	0.3346	0.3205	0.2914
Tikhonravov (1)	7.07	0.3345	0.3347	0.2163	0.1394
Greiner	10.84	0.3345	0.3347	0.2757	0.2275
Anonymous	10.13	0.3348	0.3345	0.3071	0.3169
Paul	9.82	0.3344	0.3349	0.3186	0.2051
Tikhonravov (2)	7.19	0.3346	0.3348	0.2441	0.1753
Noe	8.94	0.3347	0.3349	0.2715	0.2144
Southwell (1)	8.34	0.3347	0.335	0.2516	0.1786
Schallenberg	11.4	0.3346	0.3352	0.3206	0.2636
Goldstein (1)	10.23	0.3348	0.335	0.2121	0.171
Lemarquis	9.63	0.3351	0.3349	0.2378	0.2396
Pencheva	15.1	0.3323	0.3378	0.4032	0.2308
Emiliani	12.24	0.3348	0.3355	0.3021	0.2266
Bloom	11.06	0.3348	0.3357	0.3181	0.2414
Mauer	16.21	0.3345	0.3364	0.3293	0.2675
Stolov	13.97	0.3353	0.3358	0.3111	0.2934
Goldstein (2)	11.57	0.335	0.3363	0.2923	0.1738
Reinbolt	12.42	0.3345	0.3369	0.3257	0.2381

Design	D _theor	D _min	(D _min − D _theor)/D _theor (%)	D _max	D _max − D _min	(D _max − D _min)/D _theor (%)
Greiner	10.84	10.99	1.35	11.45	0.47	4.29
Goldstein (1)	10.23	10.34	1.05	10.87	0.53	5.17
Netterfield	12.95	13.05	0.75	13.90	0.86	6.61
Anonymous	10.13	10.28	1.49	11.00	0.72	7.13
Schallenberg	11.40	11.27	−1.18	12.28	1.02	8.91
Paul	9.82	9.96	1.42	10.88	0.92	9.34
Southwell (2)	9.30	9.37	0.74	10.24	0.87	9.36
Noe	8.94	9.20	2.99	10.08	0.88	9.83
Perrilloux	9.73	9.83	1.04	10.83	0.99	10.22
Tikhonravov (1)	7.07	7.32	3.51	8.07	0.76	10.69
Emiliani	12.24	12.16	−0.64	13.59	1.43	11.67
Tikhonravov (2)	7.19	7.50	4.25	8.35	0.85	11.85
Reinbolt	12.42	12.47	0.41	13.95	1.47	11.87
Pencheva	15.10	15.01	−0.59	16.86	1.85	12.24
Lemarquis	9.63	9.93	3.21	11.13	1.19	12.38
Bloom	11.06	11.40	3.07	12.80	1.40	12.61
Mauer	16.21	16.20	−0.04	18.49	2.28	14.08
Southwell (1)	8.34	8.55	2.50	9.82	1.27	15.21
Carniglia	11.35	11.48	1.07	13.31	1.83	16.14
Stolov	13.97	13.42	−3.89	15.84	2.41	17.27
Goldstein (2)	11.57	12.22	5.57	14.81	2.60	22.45

Designer	T _vis	A _vis	R _ir	D	Design Type	Layers	Physical Thickness
Tikhonravov (1)	97.33	2.46	97.25	7.07	Numerical	75	8204
Tikhonravov (2)	96.96	2.76	97.82	7.19	Numerical	84	9089
Southwell (1)	96.68	3.01	96.66	8.34	Numerical	76	8253
Noe	96.66	3.03	96.22	8.94	Numerical	80	7049
Southwell (2)	96.05	3.26	96.70	9.30	Numerical	86	8272
Lemarquis	96.07	3.31	96.57	9.63	Classical	91	11260
Perilloux	96.13	2.88	96.32	9.73	Classical	89	8611
Paul	96.56	2.95	95.94	9.82	Classical	92	8562
Anonymous	95.55	2.58	96.50	10.13	Classical	89	8678
Goldstein (1)	97.17	2.37	95.21	10.23	Classical	98	7485
Greiner	96.84	2.74	94.11	10.84	Numerical	79	6816
Bloom	95.01	3.83	96.34	11.06	Classical	94	9456
Carniglia	95.71	3.35	95.60	11.35	Classical	99	11834
Schallenberg	94.94	3.31	95.98	11.40	Classical	92	7931
Goldstein (2)	95.46	3.27	94.01	11.57	Numerical	52	8305
Emiliani	95.38	3.45	95.04	12.24	Classical	99	9702
Reinbolt	94.34	2.57	94.61	12.42	Classical	66	7817
Netterfield	97.14	2.36	91.52	12.95	Fourier	74	6232
Stolov	93.11	3.42	95.54	13.97	Classical	98	12262
Pencheva	92.28	3.89	95.13	15.10	Classical	96	12491
Mauer	91.59	3.02	93.76	16.21	Classical	72	9107

Designer	D	x _T	y _T	x _R	y _R
Southwell (2)	9.3	0.3336	0.3337	0.4326	0.403
Netterfield	12.95	0.3341	0.3345	0.3326	0.2442
Carniglia	11.35	0.3345	0.3345	0.3272	0.3121
Perilloux	9.73	0.3344	0.3346	0.3205	0.2914
Tikhonravov (1)	7.07	0.3345	0.3347	0.2163	0.1394
Greiner	10.84	0.3345	0.3347	0.2757	0.2275
Anonymous	10.13	0.3348	0.3345	0.3071	0.3169
Paul	9.82	0.3344	0.3349	0.3186	0.2051
Tikhonravov (2)	7.19	0.3346	0.3348	0.2441	0.1753
Noe	8.94	0.3347	0.3349	0.2715	0.2144
Southwell (1)	8.34	0.3347	0.335	0.2516	0.1786
Schallenberg	11.4	0.3346	0.3352	0.3206	0.2636
Goldstein (1)	10.23	0.3348	0.335	0.2121	0.171
Lemarquis	9.63	0.3351	0.3349	0.2378	0.2396
Pencheva	15.1	0.3323	0.3378	0.4032	0.2308
Emiliani	12.24	0.3348	0.3355	0.3021	0.2266
Bloom	11.06	0.3348	0.3357	0.3181	0.2414
Mauer	16.21	0.3345	0.3364	0.3293	0.2675
Stolov	13.97	0.3353	0.3358	0.3111	0.2934
Goldstein (2)	11.57	0.335	0.3363	0.2923	0.1738
Reinbolt	12.42	0.3345	0.3369	0.3257	0.2381

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (3)

Tables (3)

Equations (7)

Applied Optics