Abstract
Recently, the beam propagation method (BPM) has been significantly improved after finite-difference schemes replaced the FFT scheme. There are two kinds of commonly used finite-difference schemes. One is the Crank-Nicolson methodfl] in which a tridiagonal matrix has to be found followed by finding its inverse matrix for each propagation step. This scheme is stable and accurate. For a weakly guiding structure, a large step-size can be used with a reasonable accuracy. However, for a three dimensional problem, the matrix becomes complicated. It will not be easy to find the inverse matrix. The other is simply an explicit (centred forward-difference) method[2]. The method gives a very simple formulation for each propagation step, which is good for solving a three dimensional problem. However its stability problem is critical. In order to keep the scheme stable, the propagation step has to be less than a certain size which is usually very small, in some cases, too small to be applicable.
© 1994 Optical Society of America
PDF ArticleMore Like This
Youngchul Chung and Nadir Dagli
ITuI4 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1993
Youngchul Chung and Nadir Dagli
TuE12 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1990
D. Schulz, P.C. Lee, and E. Voges
ThF5 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1994