Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

An Explicit and Stable Finite Difference Beam Propagation Method

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Abstract

Recently, the beam propagation method (BPM) has been significantly improved after finite-difference schemes replaced the FFT scheme. There are two kinds of commonly used finite-difference schemes. One is the Crank-Nicolson methodfl] in which a tridiagonal matrix has to be found followed by finding its inverse matrix for each propagation step. This scheme is stable and accurate. For a weakly guiding structure, a large step-size can be used with a reasonable accuracy. However, for a three dimensional problem, the matrix becomes complicated. It will not be easy to find the inverse matrix. The other is simply an explicit (centred forward-difference) method[2]. The method gives a very simple formulation for each propagation step, which is good for solving a three dimensional problem. However its stability problem is critical. In order to keep the scheme stable, the propagation step has to be less than a certain size which is usually very small, in some cases, too small to be applicable.

© 1994 Optical Society of America

PDF Article
More Like This
An Explicit Finite Difference Wide Angle Beam Propagation Method

Youngchul Chung and Nadir Dagli
ITuI4 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1993

An Explicit Finite Difference Beam Propagation Method: Application to Semiconductor Rib Waveguide Analysis

Youngchul Chung and Nadir Dagli
TuE12 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1990

Finite Difference Beam Propagation Algorithms

D. Schulz, P.C. Lee, and E. Voges
ThF5 Integrated Photonics Research (IPR) 1994

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.