JPEG Pleno holography: scope and technology validation procedures

Raees Kizhakkumkara Muhamad; Raees Kizhakkumkara Muhamad; Tobias Birnbaum; Tobias Birnbaum; Antonin Gilles; Saeed Mahmoudpour; Saeed Mahmoudpour; Kwan-Jung Oh; Manuela Pereira; Cristian Perra; Antonio Pinheiro; Peter Schelkens; Peter Schelkens

doi:10.1364/AO.404305

Applied Optics
Vol. 60,
Issue 3,
pp. 641-651
(2021)
•https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.404305

JPEG Pleno holography: scope and technology validation procedures

Raees Kizhakkumkara Muhamad, Tobias Birnbaum, Antonin Gilles, Saeed Mahmoudpour, Kwan-Jung Oh, Manuela Pereira, Cristian Perra, Antonio Pinheiro, and Peter Schelkens

Not Accessible

Your library or personal account may give you access

Get PDF
Email
Share
Get Citation
Copy Citation Text
Raees Kizhakkumkara Muhamad, Tobias Birnbaum, Antonin Gilles, Saeed Mahmoudpour, Kwan-Jung Oh, Manuela Pereira, Cristian Perra, Antonio Pinheiro, and Peter Schelkens, "JPEG Pleno holography: scope and technology validation procedures," Appl. Opt. 60, 641-651 (2021)

Export Citation
- BibTex
- Endnote (RIS)
- HTML
- Plain Text
Citation alert
Save article

Check for updates

Related Topics
Table of Contents Category
- Holography
Optics & Photonics Topics
?

The topics in this list come from the Optics and Photonics Topics applied to this article.

About this Article
History
- Original Manuscript: December 9, 2020
- Revised Manuscript: December 9, 2020
- Manuscript Accepted: December 15, 2020
- Published: January 18, 2021

Abstract

JPEG Pleno is a standardization framework addressing the compression and signaling of plenoptic modalities. While the standardization of solutions to handle light field content is currently reaching its final stage, the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) committee is now preparing for the standardization of solutions targeting point cloud and holographic modalities. This paper addresses the challenges related to the standardization of compression technologies for holographic content and associated test methodologies.

Full Article | PDF Article

More Like This

JPEG Pleno holography presents the numerical reconstruction software for holograms: an excursion in holographic views

Tobias Birnbaum, Raees K. Muhammad, Cristian Perra, Antonin Gilles, David Blinder, Tomasz Kozacki, and Peter Schelkens
Appl. Opt. 62(10) 2462-2469 (2023)

Deep compression network for enhancing numerical reconstruction quality of full-complex holograms

Juyeon Seo, Jaewoo Lee, Juhyun Lee, and Hyunsuk Ko
Opt. Express 31(15) 24573-24597 (2023)

End-to-end compression-aware computer-generated holography

Mi Zhou, Hao Zhang, Shuming Jiao, Praneeth Chakravarthula, and Zihan Geng
Opt. Express 31(26) 43908-43919 (2023)

Previous Article Next Article

Cited By

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Cited by links are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Figures (5)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Figure files are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Tables (3)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Article tables are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Equations (11)

You do not have subscription access to this journal. Equations are available to subscribers only. You may subscribe either as an Optica member, or as an authorized user of your institution.

Contact your librarian or system administrator
or
Login to access Optica Member Subscription

Hologram	Type	Resolution	Pixel Pitch (µm)	Wavelength (nm)	Reconstruction Distance (mm)
CornellBox3 16 k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	2	633	250; (220; 228; 269; 286)
Ball	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	701; (751)
Chess	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	496.4; (648.6; 806.3)
DeepChess	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	396.4; (998.6; 1.6063)
Sphere	OGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532.8	960
Squirrel	OGH	$1792 \times 27904$	3.45	632	500; (465; 535)
Biplane16k w. BG	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	1	633; 532; 460	45.5; (37.4; 49.7)
Biplane16k wo. BG	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	1	633; 532; 460	45.5; (37.4; 49.7)
Dices16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	10; (6.58; 13.1)
SpecularCar16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	5; (4.4; 10)
Piano16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	10; (6.8; 12.5)
Ring16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	8; (6; 10)
Ballet8k4k (Frame 22)	CGH	$7680 \times 4320$	4.8	640; 532; 473	25; (5.84; 18.94; 51.87)
Breakdancers8k4k (Frame 22)	CGH	$7680 \times 4320$	4.8	640; 532; 473	25; (4.18; 8.69; 33.53)
Astronaut	OGH	$2588 \times 2588$	2.2	632.8	–172
Horse	OGH	$972 \times 972$	4.4	632.8	140
Lowiczanka Doll	OGH	$2016 \times 59394$	3.45	637; 532; 457	1060; (1030; 1075)
Warsaw Mermaid	OGH	$2010 \times 25730$	3.45	632.8	350; (340; 345; 355)
Bridge100K (Binary)	CGH	$100000 \times 100000$	0.5	660	17; 50
Dices200K (Binary)	CGH	$204800 \times 108000$	0.5	660; 532; 460	10; 32.8

Hologram	Type	Frames	Resolution	Pixel Pitch (µm)	Wavelength (nm)	Magnification	NA
PMMA spheres	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
USAF	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Single cell	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Cell culture	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Brain tissue	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Neuroblastoma cell	IP-OAH	121	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Keratinocyte cells	IP-OAH	138	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Nasal epithelium cells	IP-OAH	250	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7

Hologram Type	Higher Precision		Binary		Off-Axis DHM
Metric	Hologram Plane	Object Plane	Hologram Plane	Object Plane	–
SNR	Yes	–	Yes	–	Yes
PSNR	–	Yes	–	Yes	–
SSIM	Yes	Yes	–	Yes	–
VIFp	–	Yes	–	Yes	–
Hamming distance	–	–	Yes	–	–
SNR of first-order wavefield	–	–	–	–	Yes
RMSE of retrieved phase	–	–	–	–	Yes

Hologram	Type	Resolution	Pixel Pitch (µm)	Wavelength (nm)	Reconstruction Distance (mm)
CornellBox3 16 k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	2	633	250; (220; 228; 269; 286)
Ball	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	701; (751)
Chess	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	496.4; (648.6; 806.3)
DeepChess	CGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532	396.4; (998.6; 1.6063)
Sphere	OGH	$2048 \times 16384$	3.45	532.8	960
Squirrel	OGH	$1792 \times 27904$	3.45	632	500; (465; 535)
Biplane16k w. BG	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	1	633; 532; 460	45.5; (37.4; 49.7)
Biplane16k wo. BG	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	1	633; 532; 460	45.5; (37.4; 49.7)
Dices16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	10; (6.58; 13.1)
SpecularCar16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	5; (4.4; 10)
Piano16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	10; (6.8; 12.5)
Ring16k	CGH	$16384 \times 16384$	0.4	640; 532; 473	8; (6; 10)
Ballet8k4k (Frame 22)	CGH	$7680 \times 4320$	4.8	640; 532; 473	25; (5.84; 18.94; 51.87)
Breakdancers8k4k (Frame 22)	CGH	$7680 \times 4320$	4.8	640; 532; 473	25; (4.18; 8.69; 33.53)
Astronaut	OGH	$2588 \times 2588$	2.2	632.8	–172
Horse	OGH	$972 \times 972$	4.4	632.8	140
Lowiczanka Doll	OGH	$2016 \times 59394$	3.45	637; 532; 457	1060; (1030; 1075)
Warsaw Mermaid	OGH	$2010 \times 25730$	3.45	632.8	350; (340; 345; 355)
Bridge100K (Binary)	CGH	$100000 \times 100000$	0.5	660	17; 50
Dices200K (Binary)	CGH	$204800 \times 108000$	0.5	660; 532; 460	10; 32.8

Hologram	Type	Frames	Resolution	Pixel Pitch (µm)	Wavelength (nm)	Magnification	NA
PMMA spheres	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
USAF	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Single cell	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Cell culture	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Brain tissue	IP-OAH	1	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Neuroblastoma cell	IP-OAH	121	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Keratinocyte cells	IP-OAH	138	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7
Nasal epithelium cells	IP-OAH	250	$2456 \times 2058$	3.45	532	$50 \times$	0.7

Abstract

Cited By

Figures (5)

Tables (3)

Equations (11)

Applied Optics