Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Taming the snake instabilities in a polariton superfluid

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

The dark solitons observed in a large variety of nonlinear media are unstable against the modulational (snake) instabilities and can break in vortex streets. This behavior has been investigated in nonlinear optical crystals and ultra-cold atomic gases. However, a deep characterization of this phenomenon is still missing. In a resonantly pumped two-dimensional polariton superfluid, we use an all-optical imprinting technique together with the bistability of the polariton system to create dark solitons in confined channels. Due to the snake instabilities, the solitons are unstable and break into arrays of vortex streets whose dynamical evolution is frozen by the pump-induced confining potential, allowing their direct observation in our system. A deep quantitative study shows that the vortex street period is proportional to the quantum fluid healing length, in agreement with the theoretical predictions. Finally, the full control achieved on the soliton patterns is exploited to give proof of principle of an efficient, ultra-fast, analog, all-optical maze solving machine in this photonic platform.

© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. INTRODUCTION

Dark solitons are fundamental localized excitations characterized by a density dip on a homogeneous background that preserve their shape along the propagation in a nonlinear medium because of the balance between the combined effects of diffraction and non-linearity [1]. They are intrinsically one-dimensional (1D) objects, becoming unstable to transverse modulations as soon as they are embedded in two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) environments. This behavior due to the so called “snake instabilities” [2] has been theoretically predicted and experimentally observed in optics with self-defocusing nonlinear media [35] and more recently in ultra-cold bosonic and fermionic gases [68]. In the latter system, the solitons were observed to break into sound excitations and vortex rings, which are 3D dynamically stable structures.

More generally, if not stabilized by a supersonic flow [9], snake instabilities induce the dark solitons decay in quantized vortex anti-vortex (VA) pairs, leading to the formation of quantum vortex streets, a quantum version of von Karman vortex streets. Interestingly, the creation of  VA pairs in a subsonic flow interacting with a defect has been reported in time-resolved pulsed experiments in atomic quantum fluids [10]. However, despite several efforts devoted to the study of this phenomenon, the quantitative study of the snake instability dynamics remains elusive so far in equilibrium quantum fluids.

Driven-dissipative quantum fluids, namely cavity exciton–polaritons [11] (polaritons), which are 2D photonic modes interacting via their excitonic parts, emerged in the last two decades as a very flexible photonic platform to study quantitatively topological excitations [1214]. In these systems, with a resonant excitation, quantized vortices and oblique dark solitons are generated when the flow interacts with a static defect [15,16]. However, in this case, the solitons are stable even at subsonic flows, due to the intrinsic dissipation of the system [17], and their breaking into vortex streets is not observed. In incoherently pumped polariton condensates, theoretical proposals were made to generate dark solitons [18,19]; however, the very fast relaxation of the solitonic structures is expected to hinder the observation of vortex street formation.

A scheme that emerged recently is based on resonant pumping and the use of the bistability loop of the non-linear polariton system [2022], where, for a given pumping intensity, the density can be either low or high. When high- and low-density regions are simultaneously present in the system, stationary phase defects of a new type can exist in low-density regions [2328], where the phase is not fixed by the resonant excitation, because most particles are not directly injected by the laser but diffuse from higher-density regions, which represent potential barriers with sharp interfaces.

In the resonant configuration, the sharpness of the interfaces is limited by the healing length $\xi$ of the quantum fluid and not by the thermal diffusion of the exciton reservoir, as is the case for non-resonant excitation. The control of the spatial distribution of the phase and intensity of the pump with spatial light modulators (SLM) allows us to realize various confining potentials, such as 1D channels, zero-dimensional (0D) traps [29], or circuits made by the combination of both.

In this work, we use an all-optical imprinting technique together with polariton bistability to create dark solitons confined inside 1D elongated channels. We observe the soliton snake instability leading to the formation of symmetric arrays of vortex streets, which are frozen by the pump-induced confining potential, allowing their direct observation and a quantitative study of the onset of the instabilities.

Moreover, by exploiting the full optical control and flexibility offered by our photonic platform, we demonstrate its applied potential by implementing an all-optical, programmable maze solving machine.

A maze of arbitrary shape is optically imprinted as a complex set of 1D channels with dead ends and only an entrance and an exit. We observe that in a certain range of parameters the vortex streets disappear from the dead ends and remain only along the path connecting the entrance and exit, then “solving” the maze within a picosecond timescale. This ultra-fast all-optical maze solving machine represents an important step for the large interdisciplinary field of analog graph solving algorithms [3036], opening a new field of applications for quantum fluids of light.

2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

Our sample is a planar $2\lambda$ GaAs high-finesse semiconductor microcavity made of 21 top and 24 bottom GaAs/AlAs Bragg mirror layer pairs, with one embedded ${{\rm In}_{0.04}}{\rm Ga_{0.96}}$ As quantum well (QW) at each of the three antinodes of the confined electromagnetic field [Fig. 1(a)]. QW excitons strongly couple to the first confined radiative mode of the microcavity to form polariton quasi-particles. Polaritons are massive (mass $m$) bosons with repulsive interactions (interaction constant $g$).

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Experimental setup. Panel (a) shows a cross-section sketch of the microcavity. Panel (b) is a sketch of the bistability loop obtained with a quasi-resonant excitation. Panel (c) gives, in detail, the shaping method to dig a rectangular vertical channel in the center of the driving field. In the scheme of the experimental setup, the red beam after the SLM corresponds to the laser intensity diffracted by the grating; the non-diffracted purple beam corresponds to the zero order of the grating, which is cut by a slit in the Fourier plane to obtain the intensity profile shown in the input plane of the cavity. The laser spot is flat and square due to the use of a top-hat lens. The real space detection arm gives access to the density and phase maps of the fluid, while the $k$-space one is for to the energy-momentum distribution of the fluid by using a spectrometer.

Download Full Size | PDF

The Rabi splitting and the polariton lifetime were measured to be, respectively, around $\hbar \Omega = 5.1\,\,{\rm meV}$ and ${\tau _{{\rm pol}}} = 15\;{\rm ps} $ in experiments conducted in an open-loop flow helium cryostat at a temperature of 5 K. The energy detuning between the photon and exciton modes can be tuned around 0 meV by changing the working point on the microcavity, due to the presence of a small wedge between the cavity mirrors.

A cw single mode Ti-sapphire laser injects photons at normal incidence with respect to the microcavity plane, so that the fluid has no imposed flow velocity in the transverse plane. It has a small positive energy above the resonant states of the lower polariton branch, typically blue-detuned by $\hbar \omega = 0.1\,\,{\rm meV}$. For homogeneous photonic systems with repulsive (defocusing) interactions, this type of pumping is associated with a hysteresis bistability cycle, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Starting from an empty system, the rise of the pumping intensity takes place with a weak absorption up to the turning point, where the system jumps on the higher bistability branch. The interaction energy between the created polaritons there is slightly larger than the laser detuning, which gives a good estimate of the height of the induced confining potential. It is then possible to reduce the pumping while staying on the upper branch with a large density of polaritons in the system.

The confinement potential is obtained by shaping the intensity of the driving field using a SLM. The latter displays a blazed diffraction grating, which deviates a part of the laser intensity in a given off-axis direction with respect to the main optical path. The diffraction efficiency depends on the contrast of the grating pattern. Thus, by locally changing the phase modulation of the grating, it is possible to “dig” shapes of low intensity together with phase jumps inside the profile of the laser beam. We call $P$ the pumping density in the high-density regions, where the system lies on the upper bistability branch, and $S$ the pumping density in the low-density regions, where the system lies on the lower bistability branch. The spot is previously flattened using a square top-hat diffractive optical lens to get a uniform intensity within the channel.

In the elongated channel case, the surrounding high-density walls are generated by the high phase-contrast regions of the grating, while the low-density channel comes from the low phase-contrast rectangular shape at the center of the SLM [Fig. 1(c)]. Then, by aligning the diffracted order on the optical axis and by cutting the non-diffracted zero order using a slit in the Fourier space, we obtain in the plane of the cavity of the desired channel geometry. This all-optical approach turns out to be very flexible for simultaneously designing in the fluid arbitrary confinement potentials and controlling the relative intensity and phase between the external and internal regions of these shapes.

A CCD camera collects the light transmitted by the cavity through the Bragg bottom mirror. The phase measurements are made by interfering with the emitted light with a reference beam extracted from the driving field before any modulation by the SLM.

The simulations of the polariton quantum fluid under resonant pumping are carried out using two coupled equations: the Schrodinger equation for the wave function of photons $\psi$ and the Gross–Pitaevskii equation for the wave function of excitons $\chi$. The low wave vector limit of this system of equations corresponds to the Lugiato–Lefever equation [37] that is well known in nonlinear optics. We neglect the polarization degree of freedom and any thermal effects. The equation reads

$$i\hbar \frac{{\partial \psi}}{{\partial t}} = \left[{- \frac{{{\hbar ^2}{\nabla ^2}}}{{2m}} - i{\Gamma _P}} \right]\psi + \hbar \Omega \chi + P{e^{- i{\omega _0}t}},$$
$$i\hbar \frac{{\partial \chi}}{{\partial t}} = \left[{- i{\Gamma _X} + g{{| \chi |}^2}} \right]\chi + \hbar \Omega \psi ,$$
where ${\Gamma _P} = \hbar /(2{\tau _P})$ is the photon decay rate (${\tau _P} = 7.5\;{\rm ps} $), ${\Gamma _X} = \hbar /(2{\tau _X})$ is the exciton decay rate (${\tau _X} = 150\;{\rm ps} $), $m = 4 \times {10^{- 5}}{m_0}$ is the photon mass (${m_0}$ is the free electron mass), and $g = 7\,\,\unicode{x00B5}{\rm eV}\,\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}^2$ is the exciton-exciton interaction constant.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We start with the study of different configurations of dark solitons in elongated 1D channels (Fig. 2). The phase patterns, processed by Fourier filtering and phase unwrapping, allow a clear observation of the characteristic $\pi$ phase jump of dark solitons. We first investigated the impact of the boundary conditions at the ends of the channel. In Fig. 2(a), the top end of the channel is open, being linked to the low-density region at the edge of the driving field. The bottom end is closed by a high-density horizontal wall. The breakdown of the translational symmetry due to the presence of the wall triggers the snake instability and leads to the formation of VA pairs. Figure 2(b) is a zoom on the intensity and phase defects existing near this edge, which clearly shows the $2\pi$ phase winding of quantum vortices, indicated by red and blue circles.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Density and phase of the polariton fluid for different channel geometries. Panel (a) shows a channel of length $l = {240}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ and width ${L} = {15}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ for a laser detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.2\;{\rm meV}$. A pair of dark solitons spreads along the channel, as confirmed by the two phase jumps of $\pi$. Its decay in VA pairs is observed in the bottom part of the channel, closed by a high-density wall. Panel (b) is a zoom of this region, where several windings of $2\pi$ on the phase map are visible. Panel (c) [panel (d)] shows three open-end channels surrounded by two in phase (out of phase) walls imprinted with different widths ${L} = {25}$, 40, 55 µm for a detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.05\;{\rm meV}$. The channel contains 2, 4, and 6 (1, 3, and 5) dark solitons.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 2(c), we study the case of channels with two open ends and show that by adjusting the width of the channel and the relative phase between the two channel walls one can precisely tune the number of solitons. Here, for a zero relative phase and for widths of 25 µm, 40 µm, and 55 µm, we observe two, four, and six dark solitons, respectively. For wide channels, as in the case of six solitons, the confinement induced by the walls is no longer sufficient to sustain stable solitons, and the modulational instability starts to develop.

The parity of the soliton number is imposed by the relative phase between the channel walls. Indeed, the dark solitons are characterized by a $\pi$ phase shift. In order to ensure the continuity of the quantum fluid wave function, they can appear only by pairs in a channel with zero relative phase between the two walls, which is equivalent to a multiple of $2\pi$. When the relative phase between the pumps is $\pi$, the soliton number is odd, as shown in Fig. 2(d). This type of observation was made previously [38] in a 1D system. In this case, the $x$ direction corresponded to the confinement direction, whereas the quasi-free $y$ direction is absent, which makes impossible the development of modulational instability.

We now consider a channel with both the ends closed by high-density walls (Fig. 3). The channel width is 23 µm, which for our set of parameters allows us to generate a single dark soliton pair, which evolves toward a stationary frozen vortex street due to the snake instability.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) Experimental fluid density and phase maps for a channel with length and width, respectively, $l = {150}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$, ${L} = {23}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$; the ratio S/P increases from left to right. (b) Corresponding numerical simulations. (c) Evolution of the number of VA pairs ${{N}_{{\rm top}}}$ in the channel for different values of $1/\xi$. The black dots are the experimental data. The red curve gives the simulations results under the same experimental conditions, whereas the blue curve shows the vortex density for an infinite channel. (See Visualization 1.)

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 3, panel (a) shows the measured intensity and phase distributions in the channel for increasing ratios $S\!/\!P$. Figure 3(b) shows the corresponding numerical simulations obtained by solving the system of equations of Eq. (2). A symmetric array of VA pairs, similar to a von Karman vortex street, is visible for $S\!/\!P = 0.1$ and 0.4, respectively. The slight deviation with respect to the symmetric configuration in the experiment is most probably due to the presence of structural disorder in the microcavity. A soliton pair is indeed unstable in this regime [25] against modulational “snake” instability. The soliton pair therefore breaks into the observed VA chain. In free space, these chains would dynamically evolve [7] to eventually disappear. While we cannot resolve here the time evolution experimentally (a movie showing an example of this evolution in theory is shown in Visualization 1), remarkably the presence of the confining potential allows us to get access to the snake structure, frozen at a given stage of its evolution.

The particle density in the channel is associated with the healing length of the fluid $\xi = \hbar /\sqrt {gnm}$ ($n$ is the density), which sets the dark soliton width and the vortex core size.

It also naturally sets the spatial period at which the instability develops along the main channel axis [25] and therefore the number of VA pairs that appear in a channel of a finite length $L$. Panel (c) of Fig. 3 shows the number of pairs experimentally observed versus $1/\xi$, and, in red, the theoretical value obtained by numerically solving the system of equations of Eq. (2), which are in excellent agreement. They both show a step-like increase due to the quantization imposed by the finite channel length. The blue line shows the expected number of vortices per length $L$ in an infinite channel, which is proportional to ${\sim}1/\xi$.

In Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) ($S = 0.6\,\,P$), we observe that solitons are no longer visible in the channel. In this regime, the density inside the channel has increased, therefore the walls are no longer fixed: the channel closes, thereby causing the vanishing of the confinement potential and therefore of the soliton pair.

The critical support value ${{S}_c}$, at which the channel gets filled by a homogeneous polariton fluid, depends on its geometry. Indeed the transverse domain wall of closed channels is confined by the main walls. The particles belonging to the confined wall possess a larger kinetic energy than the one of an infinite wall, which modifies the pumping densities of the bistability cycle, reducing the critical support value at which the wall propagates. A closed channel typically shows a critical value ${{ S}_{{\rm cc}}} \lt {S_c}$ lower than that of the same open channel studied in detail in [25].

This difference can be exploited to solve an analog maze, built with an arrangement of several open and closed channels. First, the maze has an entry and an exit situated in the low-density regions and connected to each other by a channel. Second, it has a set of dead-end paths modeled by channels closed with a third wall. In this configuration, by judiciously adjusting the $S\!/\!P$ ratio and the width of the channels, it is possible to fill only the dead-end paths ($S \gt {S_{{\rm cc}}}$) in such a way that a pair of solitons only passes through the open path (because $S \lt {S_c}$) connecting the entry to the exit and therefore solving the maze.

Figures 4(a) and 4(b) illustrate, both experimentally and theoretically, the proof of principle of the maze resolution. We imprint in the fluid two orthogonal channels crossing each other at the center. The vertical channel is closed, while the horizontal one is open. They are both excited at the same intensity $S$, set at $0.3\;P$. This cross shape mimics a simple maze, in which one searches the path between the entry and the exit represented here by the two open ends of the horizontal channel.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. (a), (b) Experimental (left) and numerical (right) density maps of the imprinted cross; ${ S}\!/\!{ P} = {0.3}$, channel width ${ L} = {23}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$, laser detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.04\;{\rm meV}$. In Panel (a), the cavity plane is slightly out of focus: solitonic structures are present in both cross arms. In panel (b), the cavity plane is in focus, and the soliton pair is formed only in the horizontal arm, connecting the entrance with the exit, thus solving the maze. (c) Experimental (left) and numerical (right) density maps of the imprinted S-shaped channel; width $L = 23\,\,\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}$, laser detuning $\Delta E = 0.06\,\,{\rm meV}$. A dark soliton pair spreads along the whole channel, proving that complex shapes can be used to manipulate and guide the solitons.

Download Full Size | PDF

The excitation conditions between the two images are tuned by changing the position of the lens focusing the driving field on the sample. In Fig. 4(a), the positions of the input plane of the sample and the laser waist are slightly offset; in Fig. 4(b), they are coincident. In such a way, we tune the ${S_c}$ values of the open and closed channels while keeping a constant $S\!/\!P$ value.

In the first case, the two channels are both filled with a soliton pair. Then, by bringing the sample closer to the position of the laser waist, which leads simultaneously to an increase of the intensity in the walls/cross regions and a decrease of the width of the channels, we reach an excitation regime without solitons in the closed channel. In the open channel, ${S_c}$ remains higher than $S$, while in the closed channel, ${S_{{\rm cc}}}$ is now lower than $S$. Consequently, the walls of the vertical (closed) channel are no longer fixed, and the confinement potential vanishes, causing the disappearance of the vertical solitons. In the end, only the open path—here the horizontal channel—contains a soliton pair: the maze is solved.

All-optical maze solving belongs to the interdisciplinary field of analog graph and maze solving algorithms [30,31,33,34,39]. The first scientific works on the mazes by Euler were the foundation of topology. Maze solving with robots started with the seminal work of Shannon [30] and has developed so much that now liquid metal droplets are solving mazes [36], paving the way towards future liquid metal robots. The algorithms used in robot maze solving implement the so-called potential method [40] (the destination is assigned a potential, and the choices are determined by its gradient). The same method is naturally used in biological maze solving [39,41], where the motion of biological organisms is controlled by gradients as well, although superior animals also use more advanced techniques, such as path integration [42]. In chemical methods, the velocity map of the reaction front allows us to find the shortest paths between any two points of a maze [31]. In microfluidics, maze solving uses the pressure gradient between the input and the output [43] or the voltage gradient in plasma [44]. In optics, escaping from the maze can be achieved via the diffusion of a quantum wavepacket [33] (here, the maze is not solved, the particle simply spreads over all sites, including the output site).

The maze solving occurring in the present work implements the dead-end filling algorithm and not the potential method discussed above. However, the filling of the dead ends is still based on the gradients, as discussed in [25]. The solving time is determined by the velocity $v$ of the transverse domain wall, arising from these gradients, and by the dead-end channel length, which is $NL$ in the worst case, where $N$ is the number of cells in the maze given by $N = {Z^2}/{L^2}$, with $Z$ the overall system size and $L$ the width of a channel. The solving time is therefore $t = NL/v$. The main advantage of this analog solver is the small value of the prefactor $L/v \sim 0.5\;{\rm ns} $: the high velocity $v$ reduces the solving time, allowing us to outperform a modern processor, which needs hundreds of clock ticks to check a single cell.

Of course, the cross shape we are presenting is a rudimentary architecture of a maze. However, we verified that it is also possible to guide solitons through more complex paths, as shown in Fig. 4(c). Here, we imprint in the fluid an S-shaped channel with two open ends, in which we observe a soliton pair and its decay into vortices, in excellent agreement with the numerical simulations. Thereby, we are not restricted to work with straight channels. These results prove that we have the basic elements for building more complex maze designs.

In this work, we were mainly limited by the presence of a large number of structural defects in the microcavity, which modify locally the potential felt by the polaritons, constraining the positions where we could create identical channels. Also, the lack of laser power necessary to work on a wider imprinting surface, while maintaining both a homogeneous intensity in the different channels and a large enough energy detuning, prevented the realization of larger mazes. Both of these parameters can be improved by using better quality samples, which are now available [45] and more powerful excitation lasers. After these technical limitations will be overcome, the high flexibility of the all-optical maze imprinting method could open the way to the implementation of a universal maze solving machine [25].

4. CONCLUSIONS

We have experimentally demonstrated that the modulational instabilities can be controlled and stabilized in a driven-dissipative polariton system allowing the on-demand formation of soliton pairs and vortex streets. This control allowed us to quantitatively measure the spatial period at which the instability develops versus the particle density. Non-stationary regimes can be used for fast analog maze solving.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (“Quantum Fluids of Light”, ANR-16-CE30-0021, “C-FLigHT”, 138678, “Investissements d’Avenir”, 16-IDEX-0001 (CAP 20-25), IDEX-ISITE); Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (820392, PhoQus); Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (0791-2020-0006).

Acknowledgment

Q. G., A. B., and D. S. thank the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF) for support. S. V. K. and D. D. S. acknowledge the support from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Y. S. Kivshar and B. Luther-Davies, “Dark optical solitons: physics and applications,” Phys. Rep. 298, 81–197 (1998). [CrossRef]  

2. Y. S. Kivshar and D. E. Pelinovsky, “Self-focusing and transverse instabilities of solitary waves,” Phys. Rep. 331, 117–195 (2000). [CrossRef]  

3. E. A. Kuznetsov and J. J. Rasmussen, “Instability of two-dimensional solitons and vortices in defocusing media,” Phys. Rev. E 51, 4479–4484 (1995). [CrossRef]  

4. V. Tikhonenko, J. Christou, B. Luther-Davies, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Observation of vortex solitons created by the instability of dark soliton stripes,” Opt. Lett. 21, 1129–1131 (1996). [CrossRef]  

5. A. V. Mamaev, M. Saffman, and A. A. Zozulya, “Propagation of dark stripe beams in nonlinear media: snake instability and creation of optical vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2262–2265 (1996). [CrossRef]  

6. B. P. Anderson, P. C. Haljan, C. A. Regal, D. L. Feder, L. A. Collins, C. W. Clark, and E. A. Cornell, “Watching dark solitons decay into vortex rings in a Bose–Einstein condensate,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2926–2929 (2001). [CrossRef]  

7. Z. Dutton, M. Budde, C. Slowe, and L. V. Hau, “Observation of quantum shock waves created with ultra-compressed slow light pulses in a Bose–Einstein condensate,” Science 293, 663–668 (2001). [CrossRef]  

8. A. Cetoli, J. Brand, R. G. Scott, F. Dalfovo, and L. P. Pitaevskii, “Snake instability of dark solitons in fermionic superfluids,” Phys. Rev. A 88, 043639 (2013). [CrossRef]  

9. A. Kamchatnov and L. Pitaevskii, “Stabilization of solitons generated by a supersonic flow of Bose–Einstein condensate past an obstacle,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160402 (2008). [CrossRef]  

10. W. J. Kwon, J. H. Kim, S. W. Seo, and Y. Shin, “Observation of von Kármán vortex street in an atomic superfluid gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 245301 (2016). [CrossRef]  

11. A. Kavokin, J. J. Baumberg, G. Malpuech, and F. P. Laussy, Microcavities (Oxford University, 2011).

12. K. Miyahara, M. Mukaida, and K. Hohkawa, “Abrikosov vortex memory,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 754–756 (1985). [CrossRef]  

13. H. Sigurdsson, O. Egorov, X. Ma, I. A. Shelykh, and T. C. H. Liew, “Information processing with topologically protected vortex memories in exciton-polariton condensates,” Phys. Rev. B 90, 014504 (2014). [CrossRef]  

14. X. Ma, B. Berger, M. Aßmann, R. Driben, T. Meier, C. Schneider, S. Höfling, and S. Schumacher, “Realization of all-optical vortex switching in exciton-polariton condensates,” Nat. Commun. 11, 897 (2020). [CrossRef]  

15. A. Amo, S. Pigeon, D. Sanvitto, V. Sala, R. Hivet, I. Carusotto, F. Pisanello, G. Leménager, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, C. Ciuti, and A. Bramati, “Polariton superfluids reveal quantum hydrodynamic solitons,” Science 332, 1167–1170 (2011). [CrossRef]  

16. R. Hivet, H. Flayac, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Tanese, T. Boulier, D. Andreoli, E. Giacobino, J. Bloch, A. Bramati, G. Malpuech, and A. Amo, “Half-solitons in a polariton quantum fluid behave like magnetic monopoles,” Nat. Phys. 8, 724–728 (2012). [CrossRef]  

17. A. Kamchatnov and S. Korneev, “Oblique solitons generated by the flow of a polariton condensate past an obstacle,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 115, 579–585 (2012). [CrossRef]  

18. L. A. Smirnov, D. A. Smirnova, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and Y. S. Kivshar, “Dynamics and stability of dark solitons in exciton-polariton condensates,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 235310 (2014). [CrossRef]  

19. T. C. H. Liew, O. A. Egorov, M. Matuszewski, O. Kyriienko, X. Ma, and E. A. Ostrovskaya, “Instability-induced formation and nonequilibrium dynamics of phase defects in polariton condensates,” Phys. Rev. B 91, 085413 (2015). [CrossRef]  

20. A. Baas, J. P. Karr, H. Eleuch, and E. Giacobino, “Optical bistability in semiconductor microcavities,” Phys. Rev. A 69, 023809 (2004). [CrossRef]  

21. A. V. Yulin, O. A. Egorov, F. Lederer, and D. V. Skryabin, “Dark polariton solitons in semiconductor microcavities,” Phys. Rev. A 78, 061801 (2008). [CrossRef]  

22. W. Zhang and Y. Rao, “Coupled polariton solitons in semiconductor microcavities with a double-well potential,” Chaos Solitons Fractals 45, 373–377 (2012). [CrossRef]  

23. T. Aioi, T. Kadokura, and H. Saito, “Dissipative structures of quantized vortices in a coherently pumped polariton superfluid,” Phys. Rev. B 87, 205312 (2013). [CrossRef]  

24. S. Pigeon and A. Bramati, “Sustained propagation and control of topological excitations in polariton superfluid,” New J. Phys. 19, 095004 (2017). [CrossRef]  

25. S. V. Koniakhin, O. Bleu, D. D. Stupin, S. Pigeon, A. Maitre, F. Claude, G. Lerario, Q. Glorieux, A. Bramati, D. Solnyshkov, and G. Malpuech, “Stationary quantum vortex street in a driven-dissipative quantum fluid of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 215301 (2019). [CrossRef]  

26. G. Lerario, A. Maître, R. Boddeda, Q. Glorieux, E. Giacobino, S. Pigeon, and A. Bramati, “Vortex-stream generation and enhanced propagation in a polariton superfluid,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 023049 (2020). [CrossRef]  

27. G. Lerario, S. V. Koniakhin, A. Maître, D. Solnyshkov, A. Zilio, Q. Glorieux, G. Malpuech, E. Giacobino, S. Pigeon, and A. Bramati, “Parallel dark soliton pair in a bistable 2D exciton-polariton superfluid,” arXiv:2003.11408 (2020).

28. A. Maître, G. Lerario, A. Medeiros, F. Claude, Q. Glorieux, E. Giacobino, S. Pigeon, and A. Bramati, “Dark-soliton molecules in an exciton-polariton superfluid,” Phys. Rev. X 10, 041028 (2020). [CrossRef]  

29. R. Hivet, E. Cancellieri, T. Boulier, D. Ballarini, D. Sanvitto, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymanska, C. Ciuti, E. Giacobino, and A. Bramati, “Interaction-shaped vortex-antivortex lattices in polariton fluids,” Phys. Rev. B 89, 134501 (2014). [CrossRef]  

30. C. Shannon, “Presentation of a maze solving machine,” in Transactions of the Eighth Conference on Cybernetics (1951), p. 169.

31. O. Steinbock, A. Toth, and K. Showalter, “Navigating complex labyrinths: optimal paths from chemical waves,” Science 267, 868–871 (1995). [CrossRef]  

32. A. Nair, K. Raghunandan, V. Yaswant, S. S. Pillai, and S. Sambandan, “Maze solving automatons for self-healing of open interconnects: modular add-on for circuit boards,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 123103 (2015). [CrossRef]  

33. F. Caruso, A. Crespi, A. G. Ciriolo, F. Sciarrino, and R. Osellame, “Fast escape of a quantum walker from an integrated photonic maze,” Nat. Commun. 7, 11682 (2016). [CrossRef]  

34. N. G. Berloff, M. Silva, K. Kalinin, A. Askitopoulos, J. D. Topfer, P. Cilibrizzi, W. Langbein, and P. G. Lagoudakis, “Realizing the classical XY Hamiltonian in polariton simulators,” Nat. Mater. 16, 1120–1126 (2017). [CrossRef]  

35. J. Chao, J. Wang, F. Wang, X. Ouyang, E. Kopperger, H. Liu, Q. Li, J. Shi, L. Wang, J. Hu, L. Wang, W. Huang, F. C. Simmel, and C. Fan, “Solving mazes with single-molecule DNA navigators,” Nat. Mater. 18, 273–279 (2019). [CrossRef]  

36. A. Adamatzky, A. Chiolerio, and K. Szacilowski, “Liquid metal droplet solves maze,” Soft Matter 16, 1455–1462 (2020). [CrossRef]  

37. L. A. Lugiato and R. Lefever, “Spatial dissipative structures in passive optical systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 2209–2211 (1987). [CrossRef]  

38. V. Goblot, H. S. Nguyen, I. Carusotto, E. Galopin, A. Lematre, I. Sagnes, A. Amo, and J. Bloch, “Phase-controlled bistability of a dark soliton train in a polariton fluid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217401 (2016). [CrossRef]  

39. L. Tweedy, P. A. Thomason, P. I. Paschke, K. Martin, L. M. Machesky, M. Zagnoni, and R. H. Insall, “Seeing around corners: cells solve mazes and respond at a distance using attractant breakdown,” Science 369, eaay9792 (2020). [CrossRef]  

40. V. Pavlov and A. Voronin, Sov. Autom. Control. 17, 45–51 (1984).

41. T. Nakagaki, H. Yamada, and Á. Tóth, “Maze-solving by an amoeboid organism,” Nature 407, 470 (2000). [CrossRef]  

42. B. Schatz, S. Chameron, G. Beugnon, and T. S. Collett, “The use of path integration to guide route learning in ants,” Nature 399, 769–772 (1999). [CrossRef]  

43. M. J. Fuerstman, P. Deschatelets, R. Kane, A. Schwartz, P. J. Kenis, J. M. Deutch, and G. M. Whitesides, “Solving mazes using microfluidic networks,” Langmuir 19, 4714–4722 (2003). [CrossRef]  

44. D. R. Reyes, M. M. Ghanem, G. M. Whitesides, and A. Manz, “Glow discharge in microfluidic chips for visible analog computing,” Lab Chip 2, 113–116 (2002). [CrossRef]  

45. D. Ballarini, D. Caputo, C. S. Muñoz, M. De Giorgi, L. Dominici, M. H. Szymańska, K. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, G. Gigli, F. P. Laussy, and D. Sanvitto, “Macroscopic two-dimensional polariton condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 215301 (2017). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Visualization 1       Simulation showing the temporal dynamics of dark solitons pairs confined in two crossed channels of low-density in a polariton superfluid. See full description via the link.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (4)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Experimental setup. Panel (a) shows a cross-section sketch of the microcavity. Panel (b) is a sketch of the bistability loop obtained with a quasi-resonant excitation. Panel (c) gives, in detail, the shaping method to dig a rectangular vertical channel in the center of the driving field. In the scheme of the experimental setup, the red beam after the SLM corresponds to the laser intensity diffracted by the grating; the non-diffracted purple beam corresponds to the zero order of the grating, which is cut by a slit in the Fourier plane to obtain the intensity profile shown in the input plane of the cavity. The laser spot is flat and square due to the use of a top-hat lens. The real space detection arm gives access to the density and phase maps of the fluid, while the $k$ -space one is for to the energy-momentum distribution of the fluid by using a spectrometer.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Density and phase of the polariton fluid for different channel geometries. Panel (a) shows a channel of length $l = {240}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ and width ${L} = {15}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ for a laser detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.2\;{\rm meV}$ . A pair of dark solitons spreads along the channel, as confirmed by the two phase jumps of $\pi$ . Its decay in VA pairs is observed in the bottom part of the channel, closed by a high-density wall. Panel (b) is a zoom of this region, where several windings of $2\pi$ on the phase map are visible. Panel (c) [panel (d)] shows three open-end channels surrounded by two in phase (out of phase) walls imprinted with different widths ${L} = {25}$ , 40, 55 µm for a detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.05\;{\rm meV}$ . The channel contains 2, 4, and 6 (1, 3, and 5) dark solitons.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Experimental fluid density and phase maps for a channel with length and width, respectively, $l = {150}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ , ${L} = {23}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ ; the ratio S/P increases from left to right. (b) Corresponding numerical simulations. (c) Evolution of the number of VA pairs ${{N}_{{\rm top}}}$ in the channel for different values of $1/\xi$ . The black dots are the experimental data. The red curve gives the simulations results under the same experimental conditions, whereas the blue curve shows the vortex density for an infinite channel. (See Visualization 1.)
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. (a), (b) Experimental (left) and numerical (right) density maps of the imprinted cross; ${ S}\!/\!{ P} = {0.3}$ , channel width ${ L} = {23}\;{\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}}$ , laser detuning $\Delta {E} = 0.04\;{\rm meV}$ . In Panel (a), the cavity plane is slightly out of focus: solitonic structures are present in both cross arms. In panel (b), the cavity plane is in focus, and the soliton pair is formed only in the horizontal arm, connecting the entrance with the exit, thus solving the maze. (c) Experimental (left) and numerical (right) density maps of the imprinted S-shaped channel; width $L = 23\,\,\unicode{x00B5}{\rm m}$ , laser detuning $\Delta E = 0.06\,\,{\rm meV}$ . A dark soliton pair spreads along the whole channel, proving that complex shapes can be used to manipulate and guide the solitons.

Equations (2)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

i ψ t = [ 2 2 2 m i Γ P ] ψ + Ω χ + P e i ω 0 t ,
i χ t = [ i Γ X + g | χ | 2 ] χ + Ω ψ ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.