Abstract
Visible, high-coherence optical sources are important to a wide range of applications spanning spectroscopy to precision timing. Integration of these sources on a semiconductor chip is a necessary step if the systems that use these devices are to be made compact, portable, and low power. Here, by self-injection-locking a 1560 nm distributed feedback semiconductor laser to a high-Q silicon-nitride resonator, a high-coherence 780 nm second-harmonic signal is generated via the photogalvanic-induced second-order nonlinearity. A record-low frequency noise floor of $4\;{{\rm Hz}^2}/{\rm Hz}$ is achieved for the 780 nm emission. The approach can potentially generate signals over a wide range of visible and near-visible bands, and thereby help transition many table-top systems into a fieldable form.
© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement
Highly coherent visible laser sources play a crucial role in the operation of optical atomic clocks [1], automotive LiDAR [2], and sensing systems [3]. However, existing bench-top visible lasers are both costly and bulky, limiting their use beyond laboratory environments including application in future navigation and sensing systems. To address this challenge, we generate visible light in a high-Q silicon nitride microcavity that is hybridly integrated to a semiconductor laser operating in the near-infrared band. The cavity both line narrows the laser through self-injection-locking (SIL) [4,5] and generates the high-coherence visible signal as a second-harmonic (SH) signal by way of the photogalvanic field-induced second-order nonlinearity [6] and the all-optical-poling effect [7–9] in ${{\rm Si}_3}{{\rm N}_4}$. Frequency noise is reduced by 100-fold compared with previous integrated visible lasers [10–13]. The approach can be readily tuned to any visible or near-visible band.
The resonator is fabricated using the ultra-low-loss silicon-nitride photonic platform [4,14] with a 100 nm thick silicon-nitride waveguide core and a 2.2 µm thick silica top cladding. The resonator has a 5 µm waveguide width and a 850 µm radius. The free-spectral range is 35.52 GHz at 1560 nm. Two pulley couplers are designed for coupling at both the near-infrared and visible bands. The near-infrared coupler has a 2.3 µm waveguide width with a 3.5 µm gap that is designed to prevent coupling to the visible mode. The visible coupler has a 1.6 µm waveguide width with a 0.3 µm gap that is designed to reduce coupling to the near-infrared mode.
The resonator is first characterized using the experimental setup shown in Fig. 1(a). A four-channel fiber array and a lensed fiber are used to couple to near-infrared and visible resonances simultaneously. To probe the resonances, the output of a near-infrared tunable laser is split with one output doubled in frequency using a periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) crystal. In this way, first- and SH probe waves are generated to characterize resonator spectra in these bands. Because the photogalvanic effect induces optical poling to thereby establish the quasi-phase-matching condition [9], a visible mode having twice the pumping frequency will achieve SH generation regardless of its propagation constant. To establish this condition, the ${{\rm Si}_3}{{\rm N}_4}$ chip is temperature controlled to tune the mode spectra. Tuning over no more than one free-spectral range is sufficient, and in the current setup, a chip temperature of ${45^ \circ}{\rm C}$ aligns the pump resonance at 1560.1 nm with a visible resonance at 780.05 nm. Photogalvanic-induced SH generation can be readily observed when scanning the pump laser across the near-infrared resonance, as shown in Fig. 1(b). Continuous-wave SH power measurements with the pump laser frequency fixed at the cavity resonance are shown in the inset of Fig. 1(b). The SH conversion efficiency is estimated to be $114 \pm 31\% {\rm W}$ (average over measured powers), and SH output power as high as 24 mW is measured (in the bus waveguide). The total Q factors (${Q_t}$) of the pump and SH modes are determined by transmission spectra measurements shown in Figs. 1(c) and 1(d).
To achieve a high-coherence visible light source in a compact foot print, we replace the bulk tunable laser with a distributed feedback (DFB) chip laser as shown in the experimental setup in Figs. 1(e) and 1(f). The DFB laser is endfire-coupled to the silicon-nitride chip and can deliver 20 mW pump power to the resonator waveguide (accounting for 6 dB facet coupling loss). Backscatter-induced feedback from the resonator to the laser provides SIL that dramatically reduces the laser frequency noise [4,5]. Upon current tuning the DFB laser frequency into the 1560.1 nm resonance, the optical poling process is initialized through the field-induced photogalvanic effect. This process is monitored by scanning the frequency of the DFB laser around the resonance by modulating the pump current with a function generator. The SH signal produced during forward and backward scanning is shown in the inset of Fig. 1(g) (blue region). The function generator is then turned off, and the DFB frequency self-injection-locks into the resonance. The resulting SH signal time evolution is shown over a short time interval in the inset of Fig. 1(g) (red region) and over several seconds in the main panel. The SH power build-up features a 0.6 s rise time and takes only a few seconds to reach steady state. In steady-state operation, the SH power at 780 nm reaches over 0.5 mW on-chip as monitored via a lensed fiber (12 dB coupling loss).
The SIL 1560 nm light and SH generated 780 nm light are then further analyzed to determine their frequency noise performance [Fig. 2(a)]. The SH signal is sent to a delayed self-homodyne detection setup with quadrature-point locking [15], and its measured frequency noise is shown as the red trace in Fig. 2(b). The peak at 18 kHz offset in the spectrum is due to the feedback loop response of a fiber stretcher used to maintain the quadrature point. At high offset frequencies, the photodetector (PD) white noise is suppressed using a cross-correlation technique [16,17], and the SH signal achieves $4\;{{\rm Hz}^2}/{\rm Hz}$ noise floor above 6 MHz offset frequency, corresponding to a record-low 25 Hz instantaneous linewidth for visible on-chip sources. The frequency noise of the self-injection locked pump laser is characterized with a self-heterodyne approach [17], and the result is shown as the blue curve in Fig. 2(b). Compared with the free-running DFB laser noise (gray trace), the SIL process suppresses the noise by 40 (32) dB at 100 kHz (1 MHz) offset frequency. The generated SH laser noise is four times higher than the SIL pump laser noise due to coherent photon conversion [12]. Specifically, the phase fluctuation of the pump field is doubled in the SH signal through the squaring of the pumping field. The corresponding SH spectral density function therefore experiences a factor of four increase (6 dB) relative to the pump. The difference in these spectra at high offset frequencies is due to pump laser spontaneous emission noise in the 1560 nm signal, and the measurement of this signal at the transmission port of the coupled resonator system.
High intra-cavity photon density and resonant backscattering make this system prone to Kerr frequency comb generation [4]. SIL comb formation is governed by feedback phase and frequency detuning [18,19], and these parameters also provide a way to favor single-mode lasing over comb generation. In the present device the laser-to-chip gap (feedback phase) and pump current (frequency detuning) provide useful controls. The latter is illustrated in Fig. 3(a) where the transmitted pumping power and the SH power are plotted versus DFB laser current scan. Distinct regimes where the single-frequency SIL state and the comb state appear are indicated. In the comb state, only the pump comb line can be frequency doubled due to the phase matching condition. The operation point used in the previous power and noise measurements is indicated. Typical SH spectra in the two regimes are shown in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c). Reduced SH power is apparent for the comb state since intracavity pump power is reduced by comb formation.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a record-low $4\;{{\rm Hz}^2}/{\rm Hz}$ frequency noise floor for a hybrid-integrated visible light source by SIL operation of a DFB laser with a high-Q ${{\rm Si}_3}{{\rm N}_4}$ resonator. The III-IV laser and the silicon-nitride resonator can be heterogeneously integrated using the integration technique described in Ref. [20]. The current resonator intrinsic Q factor is not optimal, and based on prior work could exceed 250M at 1560 nm [4]. This should further reduce frequency noise levels since the SIL noise reduction scales as ${Q^2}$ [21]. This scaling makes generation of highly coherent signals easier in the near-infrared where optical Q factors are overall much higher. The SH-SIL process therefore extends this advantage into the visible bands. Finally, the photogalvanic effect makes access to other wavelengths straightforward. Devices require only waveguide couplers designed for efficient visible and near-infrared operation.
During preparation of this paper, two other papers were reported: one on direct generation of high-coherence visible light [22] and one on SIL-SH using the photogalvanic effect [23].
APPENDIX A: COUPLER DESIGN PRINCIPLE
The 1560 nm pulley coupler waveguide width is chosen to achieve phase matching to the ring resonator fundamental eigenmode. The coupler occupies an effective arc length of about 0.1 radian of the resonator with a 3.5 µm minimum gap. This gap is too large to achieve significant interaction with the 780 nm eigenmode, thereby reducing parasitic coupling of the 780 nm mode to the 1560 nm coupler.
The 1.6 µm width of the 780 nm pulley coupler waveguide is approximately phase matched to the TE10 higher-order mode of the resonator. This substantially phase mismatches the coupler to the fundamental resonator eigenmode at 1560 nm, thereby suppressing parasitic coupling of the 1560 nm mode. The coupler gap is narrow (minimum 0.3 µm), and to further minimize perturbation to the 1560 nm mode, the gap is adiabatically reduced using the arc of an archimedian spiral. This, however, results in a coupler arc-length exceeding 1 radian, so that 780 nm optical power might undergo several coupling oscillations over the length of the coupler.
Some parasitic coupling of the 1560 nm light to the 780 nm coupler is expected. This parasitic loss channel contributes to the intrinsic Q factor of the resonator at 1560 nm, and spectral measurements of Q factors around 1560 nm reveal an oscillatory dependence (see Fig. 4) that is believed to result from this dependence.
Funding
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR001-20-2-0044).
Disclosures
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
1. A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 637 (2015). [CrossRef]
2. J. Hecht, Opt. Photonics News 29(1), 26 (2018). [CrossRef]
3. C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017). [CrossRef]
4. W. Jin, Q.-F. Yang, L. Chang, et al., Nat. Photonics 15, 346 (2021). [CrossRef]
5. B. Li, W. Jin, L. Wu, et al., Opt. Lett. 46, 5201 (2021). [CrossRef]
6. X. Lu, G. Moille, A. Rao, et al., Nat. Photonics 15, 131 (2021). [CrossRef]
7. A. Billat, D. Grassani, M. H. Pfeiffer, et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 1016 (2017). [CrossRef]
8. D. D. Hickstein, D. R. Carlson, H. Mundoor, et al., Nat. Photonics 13, 494 (2019). [CrossRef]
9. E. Nitiss, J. Hu, A. Stroganov, et al., Nat. Photonics 16, 134 (2022). [CrossRef]
10. A. Siddharth, T. Wunderer, G. Lihachev, et al., APL Photonics 7, 046108 (2022). [CrossRef]
11. M. Corato-Zanarella, A. Gil-Molina, X. Ji, et al., Nat. Photonics 17, 157 (2023). [CrossRef]
12. J. Ling, J. Staffa, H. Wang, et al., Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200663 (2023). [CrossRef]
13. C. A. Franken, A. van Rees, L. V. Winkler, et al., Opt. Lett. 46, 4904 (2021). [CrossRef]
14. M. Puckett, K. Liu, N. Chauhan, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 934 (2021). [CrossRef]
15. H. Lee, T. Chen, J. Li, et al., Nat. Photonics 6, 369 (2012). [CrossRef]
16. W. F. Walls, in Proceedings of the 1992 IEEE Frequency Control Symposium (IEEE, 1992), pp. 257–261.
17. Z. Yuan, H. Wang, P. Liu, et al., Opt. Express 30, 25147 (2022). [CrossRef]
18. B. Shen, L. Chang, J. Liu, et al., Nature 582, 365 (2020). [CrossRef]
19. G. Lihachev, W. Weng, J. Liu, et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 1771 (2022). [CrossRef]
20. C. Xiang, W. Jin, O. Terra, et al., Nature 620, 78 (2023). [CrossRef]
21. N. Kondratiev, V. Lobanov, A. Cherenkov, et al., Opt. Express 25, 28167 (2017). [CrossRef]
22. Z. Zhang, B. Shen, M. A. Tran, et al., Optica 10, 752 (2023). [CrossRef]
23. M. Clementi, E. Nitiss, E. Durán-Valdeiglesias, et al., in CLEO: Science and Innovations (Optical Society of America, 2023), paper STh4O-1.