Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Arsenic selenide thin film degradation and its mitigation

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Thin films of arsenic triselenide (As2Se3) glass degrade significantly under ambient conditions in the presence of light. We investigate the mechanism of this degradation by maintaining thin film As2Se3 samples in a variety of environmental conditions for approximately one year and show that exposure to below-band gap light in the presence of oxygen and moisture lead to the formation of crystallites of arsenic oxide and selenium. Spectroscopic measurements, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and microscopy reveal that deposition of a thin (~10 nm) passivation layer together with preventing exposure to below-band gap light inhibits degradation. These results indicate that As2Se3 is a practical material for use in applications such as integrated optic waveguides or dielectric metasurfaces operating in wavelengths from the short-wave infrared through the long-wave infrared.

© 2018 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

The chalcogenide glasses – amorphous semiconductors that contain as a major constituent one or more of the “chalcogen” elements (sulfur, selenium and tellurium), covalently bonded to network formers, such as As, Ge, Sb, Ga, etc. – are of interest for a variety of applications. Their low phonon energy results in wide infrared transmission windows that, depending on composition, can include parts of the short-wave infrared (SWIR), mid-wave infrared (MWIR), and long-wave infrared (LWIR). They have thus been used for bulk optics, optical fiber, and planar photonics applications in these bands [1,2]. Their high optical nonlinearity, with values of n2 up to >1000 × greater than that of silica, make them useful for a variety of nonlinear applications [3].

Many compositions of chalcogenide glass are readily deposited via thermal evaporation. Furthermore, they often deposit congruently, meaning the composition of the deposited film matches that of the source material. For these reasons, thin films of chalcogenide glasses are of significant interest for integrated optic waveguides for both linear and nonlinear applications [2]. Recently, they have also been proposed for use in dielectric metasurface applications [4,5].

To date, arsenic trisulfide, As2S3, has been the most widely used and studied of the chalcogenide glasses for thin film applications. As2Se3, however, is of interest as an alternative for several reasons: 1) It has a high linear refractive index, n = 2.8, compared to that of As2S3 (n = 2.4), enabling more design flexibility for both waveguides and metasurface applications; 2) Its nonlinearity (n2>900 × that of silica) is significantly higher than that of As2S3 (n2>200 × that of silica); and 3) Its band gap of 1.8 eV [6] and wide transmission window, spanning from approximately 1.5-14 µm, make it useful for applications in the SWIR, MWIR, and into the LWIR. Passive integrated optic waveguides with As2Se3 used as the core material have been demonstrated [6–9]. Recently, As2Se3 films have been used for applications including supercontinuum generation [10–12] and high-Q MWIR resonators [13] and proposed for use in slow light generation [14].

Despite these promising characteristics some material challenges related to As2Se3 remain. When the authors fabricated initial samples and left them under ambient conditions, the films degraded rapidly. Photo-induced damage in As2Se3 has been observed previously in thin films under ambient conditions [15] and under laser irradiation [16]. It has also been observed that UV light leads to photo-induced damage in As2Se3 optical fiber [17], significantly reducing the mechanical strength of the fiber [18].

Berkes et al. proposed a mechanism for the photo-induced degradation [15], described by the reaction

As2Se3xAs+As2xSe3,
where 0 < x < 2. In their proposed mechanism, when a photon with an energy greater than the band gap is absorbed, it generates an electron-hole pair. In some fraction of photon absorption events, these charges will not recombine, resulting in broken bonds. Arsenic atoms that have been dissociated from the As2Se3 network as a result of these broken bonds may then cluster together. An oxide is subsequently formed by the reaction
4As+3O2H2OAs2O3
where the water acts as a catalyst.

This previous work assumes that this degradation process results in a Se-rich (in comparison to As2Se3) phase of arsenic selenide glass. Here, we report a series of experiments on As2Se3 thin films showing that exposure to oxygen and moisture together with below-band gap light do indeed cause defect formation but that these defects consist of both crystalline selenium and arsenic oxide. We investigated techniques to mitigate these effects and found that a passivation layer (e.g. as thin as 10 nm) of Al2O3 deposited via atomic layer deposition (ALD) combined with storing samples in the dark can almost completely prevent these degradation effects.

2. Experiment

Bulk As2Se3 samples were batched from purified precursors in an N2 purged glovebox. A melt was formed by heating the precursors in a sealed quartz ampoule at 750 °C for 10 hours in a rocking furnace. The glass melt was quenched in water and annealed. The glass boule was removed, and small pieces were used as deposition sources. 1.2 µm thick films of As2Se3 were deposited via thermal evaporation onto sapphire and BaF2 substrates. The resulting films were spatially uniform with low surface roughness (root mean squared roughness <10 Å) and with a composition similar to those of the deposition material. The samples on sapphire substrates were kept at a temperature of approximately 27 °C under six different sets of conditions for 344 days, with details shown in Table 1. Samples were kept under ambient conditions in both light and dark; coated with a thin Al2O3 passivation layer and kept in both light and dark; stored under N2 in the dark (no sample was stored under N2 in the light due to the challenge of establishing a properly calibrated light source into the glove box); and kept under vacuum in the dark as a control. The samples that were exposed to light were illuminated with a halogen bulb, and irradiance was measured with a calibrated optical power meter.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Names and storage conditions of As2Se3 film samples

Samples were removed periodically for characterization. Images were captured of the films’ surfaces using an optical microscope with a 20 × objective. XRD was performed using CuKα radiation from a sealed X-ray tube and a Rigaku SmartLab x-ray diffractometer in grazing incidence with a 2θ geometry with ϕ = 1°. The sample on a BaF2 substrate was kept under the same conditions as the Ambient/light sample in Table 1, and this sample was used for transmittance measurements in an Analect Diamond-20 FTIR spectrometer.

3. Results and discussion

We monitored the degradation of films stored under the conditions detailed in Table 1. Figure 1 shows microscope images of each film at different points in time. The Vacuum sample, which was not exposed to either light or atmosphere, showed no defects and remained pristine after 344 days. The Ambient/light sample showed the greatest degree of defect formation. By Day 133, significant dendrimer growth was evident, and by Day 344, the film was almost completely covered with crystallites. For the Ambient/dark, Al2O3 passivation/ambient/light, and N2/dark samples, defects are visible as early as Day 16, but the number of defects does not increase significantly during the observation period, and the growth of these defects is limited.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Optical microscope images of films at different times.

Download Full Size | PDF

These results indicate that exposure to atmosphere together with light result in the formation of defects. It is important to note that it is below-band gap light that is activating defect formation; while no filter was applied in this case, absorption of the As2Se3 is low above the optical band gap, and the photo-induced crystallization can be primarily attributed to the absorption of UV light [17]. The fact that the N2/dark sample shows defect formation indicates that even the small amount of moisture and O2 present in the glove box can aid in defect growth. The Al2O3 passivation/ambient/light sample does show some defect formation by the end of the experiment, possibly indicating that the surface was not perfectly passivated or that the passivation layer was damaged during handling. The Al2O3 passivation/ambient/dark sample shows no significant defect growth and appears to be pristine at the end of the observation period, indicating that As2Se3 film degradation is inhibited by eliminating exposure to moisture, O2, and light.

In order to understand the nature of the defects, XRD data were collected for the films. Figure 2(a) shows XRD results for films kept under each condition at the end of the experiment (after 344 days). Only the Ambient/light sample exhibits sufficient crystallite growth for diffraction peaks to be observed. The other samples all show broad amorphous peaks associated with the As2Se3 glass structure. Figure 2(b) shows results for the Ambient/light film as a function of time with diffraction peaks identified. An As2O3 peak emerges (2θ = 14°) after only 16 days; Se peaks are observable by 133 days; and strong As2O3 and Se peaks are evident after 344 days. Based on Scherrer analysis, both the As2O3 and Se crystallites are approximately 250 nm in size after 344 days. The XRD results indicate that the defects, shown for the Ambient/light sample in Fig. 1, consist of As2O3 and Se crystallites.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 XRD results for (a) films kept under each condition after 344 days (insets: photographs of the Vacuum sample and the Ambient/light sample after 344 days), and (b) the ambient/light film as a function of time with peaks indexed.

Download Full Size | PDF

Given that these XRD results show evidence for crystalline Se as well as As2O3, it is clear that Eq. (1) does not provide a full accounting of the defect formation process. A more complete description is given by

As2Se3xAs+ySe+As2xSe3y.

It has been shown that a photo-induced crystallization process occurs for Se in which Se crystallites are induced to grow on amorphous films as a result of illumination [19]. The process is similar to that described above for As in which the absorption of photons produces electron-hole pairs, resulting in broken bonds and the potential for clustering. Because this process in known to occur for Se, the emergence of Se crystallites in the case of As2Se3 degradation is not entirely surprising. Unlike As2O3, the formation of selenium oxide appears to be less energetically favorable here, so the Se remains in crystalline form.

FTIR transmittance data were obtained in order to show the effects of defect formation on the films’ optical properties. The results are shown in Fig. 3, with only the Ambient/light sample showing a significant change during the observation period. Transmittance did not change significantly for the other samples and is thus not shown on the plot. For the Ambient/light sample, fringing is visible at shorter wavelengths due to thin film interference. For this sample, transmittance drops slightly through 31 days and then drops significantly by 344 days as the film becomes highly scattering. By 344 days, we observe absorption peaks at 9.6 µm and 12.5 µm associated with As-O.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 FTIR data for the Ambient/light sample as a function of time.

Download Full Size | PDF

Taken together, the microscopy, XRD, and spectroscopy results provide strong evidence that the formation of defects in As2Se3 films is due to photo-induced crystallization with the aid of moisture and oxygen, which produces As2O3 and Se crystallites. These crystallites increase in number and size to the point where they scatter a large fraction of incident light and have a major impact on the films’ optical properties.

4. Conclusions

Thin films of As2Se3 are promising for use in a variety of applications such as integrated optics or dielectric metasurfaces in the SWIR, MWIR, and LWIR. Degradation, caused by photo-induced crystallization in the presence of atmosphere was observed in thin film As2Se3 samples. We examined the mechanism of this degradation and found it to be due to the formation of As2O3 and Se crystallites. We describe a mechanism that accounts for the evolution of both species. These effects are minimized by passivating a film’s surface with a thin (~10 nm) Al2O3 layer and eliminating exposure to below-band gap light. In practice, a long pass filter can be used in order to block light below the band gap while transmitting light at the operation wavelength.

Funding

Office of Naval Research (ONR) (N0001418WX00344, N0001417WX00067, N0001413WX20527); U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) (N0001417WX00017).

Disclosures

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

References

1. X. H. Zhang, Y. Guimond, and Y. Bellec, “Production of complex chalcogenide glass optics by molding for thermal imaging,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 326–327, 519–523 (2003). [CrossRef]  

2. B. J. Eggleton, B. Luther-Davies, and K. Richardson, “Chalcogenide Photonics,” Nat. Photonics 5(3), 141–148 (2011). [CrossRef]  

3. J. M. Harbold, F. O. Ilday, F. W. Wise, and B. G. Aitken, “Highly nonlinear Ge-As-Se and Ge-As-S-Se glasses for all-optical switching,” IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 14(6), 822–824 (2002). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Xu, J. Sun, J. Frantz, M. I. Shalaev, Wiktor Walasik, A. Pandey, J. D. Myers, R. Y. Bekele, A. Tsukernik, J. S. Sanghera, and N. M. Litchinitser, “Reconfiguring structured light beams using nonlinear metasurfaces,” arXiv 1805.07327 (2018).

5. J. A. Frantz, J. D. Myers, R. Y. Bekele, Y. Xu, J. Sun, and M. Shalaev, “Chalcogenide Glass Films for Nonlinear Metasurface Applications,” Adv. Photonics Congr. 2 (2018).

6. N. Ponnampalam, R. Decorby, H. Nguyen, P. Dwivedi, C. Haugen, J. McMullin, and S. Kasap, “Small core rib waveguides with embedded gratings in As2Se3 glass,” Opt. Express 12(25), 6270–6277 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. N. Hô, M. C. Phillips, H. Qiao, P. J. Allen, K. Krishnaswami, B. J. Riley, T. L. Myers, and N. C. Anheier Jr., “Single-mode low-loss chalcogenide glass waveguides for the mid-infrared,” Opt. Lett. 31(12), 1860–1862 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. J. D. Myers, J. Frantz, C. Spillmann, R. Bekele, J. Kolacz, H. Gotjen, J. Naciri, B. Shaw, and J. Sanghera, “Refractive waveguide non-mechanical beam steering (NMBS) in the MWIR,” in Proc. of SPIE (2018), Vol. 10539, pp. 105390A–1–7.

9. J. A. Frantz, J. D. Myers, R. Y. Bekele, C. M. Spillmann, J. Naciri, J. Kolacz, H. G. Gotjen, V. Q. Nguyen, C. C. McClain, L. B. Shaw, and J. S. Sanghera, “A Chip-Based Non-Mechanical Beam Steerer in the Mid-Wave Infrared,” JOSA B Rev. (2018).

10. T. S. Saini, N. P. Trung Hoa, K. Nagasaka, X. Luo, T. H. Tuan, T. Suzuki, and Y. Ohishi, “Coherent midinfrared supercontinuum generation using a rib waveguide pumped with 200 fs laser pulses at 2.8 μm,” Appl. Opt. 57(7), 1689–1693 (2018). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. M. R. Karim, H. Ahmad, S. Ghosh, and B. M. A. Rahman, “Design of dispersion-engineered As 2 Se 3 channel waveguide for mid-infrared region supercontinuum generation,” J. Appl. Phys. 123(21), 213101 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. D. D. Hudson, S. Antipov, L. Li, I. Alamgir, M. El Amraoui, Y. Messaddeq, M. Rochette, S. Jackson, and A. Fuerbach, “Octave-spanning supercontinuum in the mid-IR with a 3 µm ultrafast fiber laser,” in Nonlinear Optics (OSA, 2017), p. NTu3A.3.

13. H. Lin, L. Li, Y. Zou, S. Danto, J. D. Musgraves, K. Richardson, S. Kozacik, M. Murakowski, D. Prather, P. T. Lin, V. Singh, A. Agarwal, L. C. Kimerling, and J. Hu, “Demonstration of high-Q mid-infrared chalcogenide glass-on-silicon resonators,” Opt. Lett. 38(9), 1470–1472 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. A. Tewari, A. Kumar, T. S. Saini, and R. K. Sinha, “Design of As2Se3 based chalcogenide ridge waveguide for generation of slow light,” Opt. - Int. J. Light Electron Opt. 127(24), 11816–11822 (2016). [CrossRef]  

15. J. S. Berkes, S. W. Ing Jr., and W. J. Hillegas, “Photodecomposition of Amorphous As 2Se3 and As2S3,” J. Appl. Phys. 42(12), 4908–4916 (1971). [CrossRef]  

16. K. Ogusu, Y. Hosokawa, S. Maeda, M. Minakata, and H. Li, “Photo-oxidation of As2Se3, Ag–As2Se3, and Cu–As2Se3 chalcogenide films,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351(37-39), 3132–3138 (2005). [CrossRef]  

17. J. S. Sanghera, J. D. Mackenzie, and F. Hulderman, “UV Radiation Damage of As2Se3 Glass Fibers,” Mater. Lett. 8(10), 409 (1989). [CrossRef]  

18. F. Hulderman, J. S. Sanghera, and J. D. Mackenzie, “The effect of UV radiation on the mechanical strength of As2Se3 glass fibers,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 127(3), 312–322 (1991). [CrossRef]  

19. J. Dresner and G. B. Stringfellow, “Electronic Processes in the Photo-Crystallization of Vitreous Selenium,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29(2), 303–311 (1968). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Optical microscope images of films at different times.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 XRD results for (a) films kept under each condition after 344 days (insets: photographs of the Vacuum sample and the Ambient/light sample after 344 days), and (b) the ambient/light film as a function of time with peaks indexed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 FTIR data for the Ambient/light sample as a function of time.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Names and storage conditions of As2Se3 film samples

Equations (3)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

As 2 Se 3 xAs+ As 2x Se 3 ,
4As+3 O 2 H 2 O As 2 O 3
As 2 Se 3 xAs+y Se+As 2x Se 3y .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.