Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Model for the polarization dependence of the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Polarization dependence of saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG was investigated. We theoretically proposed its general analytical formula expressed in terms of the intensity and the polarization angle of the pump beam. We also derive transmission formulas for specific incident surfaces of (100)-, (110)-, and (111)-planes. In order to prove our model, we examined the polarization dependence in the transmittance of (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG. With the consideration of pump depletion in Cr4+:YAG, we succeeded to explain the polarization dependence that is consistent with past spectroscopic parameters of Cr4+:YAG.

© 2017 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Since passively Q-switched microchip laser sources enables over the MW-class laser output [1], the concept of “laser ignition” has been considered realistic due to the possibility of the ubiquitous laser plug [2]. In reality, the driving of automobile that equipped the heat engine ignited by microchip laser plug was already demonstrated [3], and the output of high-power Q-switched microchip lasers reached sub-GW-level [4]. Without Cr4+-doped Y3Al5O12 (Cr4+:YAG) as an inorganic saturable absorber that can handle the high power photon energy, this success of passively Q-switched microchip laser would have never been realized. Although passive Q-switching was discovered over 50 years ago, the generation of giant-pulses by this method had been not practical due to poor durability of saturable absorbers. Thus, Cr4+:YAG has been interested and deeply evaluated.

As a result of plenty studies concentrated into the evaluation of Cr4+:YAG [5–8], the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG and its possibility for the saturable absorber became well-known. During the development of giant-pulsed microchip laser sources with Cr4+:YAG, the anisotropy of the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG with the isometric crystal structure has been pointed [8]. Although the mechanism about the appearance of anisotropy have been still unknown, it was found that this anisotropy can produce the modulation of the pulse duration [9] and single-polarized giant pulses without other polarization elements in the microchip laser cavity [10, 11]. Because the polarization control is quite useful for various applications such as the wavelength conversion including THz generation [12], it is necessary for the improvement of the extinction ratio of giant pulses from microchip lasers to explain of the polarization dependence in Cr4+:YAG.

In reality, currently we can never request the designed concentration of Cr4+-ion when we purchase a commercial Cr4+:YAG crystal. We can appoint only one specification of the thickness and the initial transmittance T0. Thus, it is not realistic to use the exact value of absorption cross sections. In addition, although we can order 2-didits for T0 of commercial Cr4+:YAG crystals only one digit is a significant figure. It means that the practical solution of the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG using minimum parameters based on physically appropriate approximations has been truly desired.

Before we consider the anisotropy of Cr4+:YAG, we define the cylindrical coordination (r, θ, z) that pump beam with the intensity of I propagate inside Cr4+:YAG along z-axis. Here the direction of the beam radius and the pump polarization angle can be directly described by use of coordinates r and of θ. The relation between the direction of the pump polarization and crystal axes of Cr4+:YAG crystal is defined by angles (Θ, Φ) as illustrated in Fig. 1.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Representation of the polarization by use of the polar coordinate with angles Θ and Φ.

Download Full Size | PDF

In this work, we investigated the polarization dependence of the transmittance in Cr4+:YAG, and found how to describe it by means of the polarization angles Θ and Φ. Especially also the formula with the polarization angle θ in several specific planes of (100), (110), and (111) are proposed. We also confirmed this model experimentally by use of CW pump sources.

2. Model for polarization dependence

It is found that the expression of the saturable absorption coefficient α(I, Θ, Φ) in Cr4+:YAG under the steady-state condition can be expressed by use of only three parameters of the initial (unsaturated) absorption coefficient α0, the parameter β, and the saturation intensity Is as (See Appendix 1)

α(I,Θ,Φ)=α0[1(1β)(Icos4Φsin4ΘIcos2Φsin2Θ+Is+Isin4Φsin4ΘIsin2Φsin2Θ+Is+Icos4ΘIcos2Θ+Is)].
β and Is are expressed by
β=σesaσabs,
Is=EPσabsτ,
where Ep, σabs, σesa, and τ are the photon energy, the absorption cross section of ground-state, the cross section of excited state absorption from the meta-stable level, and the radiative decay time of the meta-stable level, respectively.

Here we consider the effective absorption coefficient for representative incident planes for Cr4+:YAG. In the case with (100)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals, θ should be the angle between the polarization direction and the [010]-axis as shown in Fig. 2. Under this definition, Θ equals to π/2θ and Φ equals to π/2. Thus, Eq. (1) brings the effective absorption coefficient α100(I, θ) for (100)-cut Cr:YAG crystals as

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Definition of θ for (100)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [100]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (100)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [1¯00], respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

α100(I,θ)=α01+IIs[1(1β)(cos4θ+sin4θ)]+βI2Is2sin2θcos2θ(1+IIscos2θ)(1+IIssin2θ).

Next, we consider the saturable absorption against (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. Figure 3 shows that θ should be the angle between the polarization direction and the [001]-axis, and Θ equals to θ and Φ equals to -π/4. Thus, Eq. (1) brings the effective absorption coefficient α110(I, θ) for (110)-cut Cr:YAG crystals as

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Definition of θ for (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [110]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (110)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [1¯1¯0], respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

α110(I,θ)=α01+IIs(βcos4θ+32cos2θsin2θ+β2sin4θ)+βI22Is2cos2θsin2θ(1+IIscos2θ)(1+I2Issin2θ).

We also show the notation for the saturable absorption against (111)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. Although relations between θ, Θ, and Φ are not so simple as previous 2-planes, Fig. 4 indicates that θ should be the angle between the polarization direction and the [112¯]axis. In this case, Θ and Φ are given by

Θ(θ)=cot1[sinΦ(θ)+cosΦ(θ)],
Φ(θ)=tan1(3tanθ)+π4.
Therefore, the effective absorption coefficient α111(I, θ) for (111)-cut Cr:YAG crystals is given by

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Definition of θ for (111)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [111]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (111)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [1¯1¯1¯], respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

α111(I,θ)=α01+12IIs(1+β)+136I2Is2[(1+8β)+(1β)cos6θ]+1108β(1+cos6θ)I3Is3(1+23IIscos2θ)[1+16IIs(1+2sin2θ+3sin2θ)][1+16IIs(1+2sin2θ3sin2θ)].

Figure 5 shows the calculated α100(I, θ), α110(I, θ), and α111(I, θ) for Cr4+:YAG with T0 of 75% and the thickness l of 1 mm. According to Lambert’s law, α0 is calculated to be 2.8 cm−1. In this calculation β and the ratio between I and Is are assumed to be 0.28 and 27.6, respectively. Since Is can be calculated to be 4.3 kW/cm2 by use of previously reported σabs and τ [13], this calculation relates to the condition where pump with the power of 1W is focused into the spot with radius of 25 μm. It was found that the saturation is caused not by the direction of wavevectors but by only the polarization of the pump source. In other words, anisotropy comes from the nonlinearity: when Cr4+ ions are affected by the allowed pump with the intensity I with the electric field E is parallel to the [100] axis, by use of the same pump Cr4+ ions affected by I/2 and I/3 under E parallel to [110] and E parallel to [111], respectively. The result of this calculation is consistent to the previously reported anisotropy [5, 10].

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Estimated polarized absorption coefficients of (100)-, (110)-, and (111)-cut Cr4+:YAG with α0 of 2.8 cm−1. β and the ratio between I and Is are assumed to be 0.28 and 27.6, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Experimental setup and result

We chose a (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG with the thickness l of 1.0 mm and T0 of 75% (Scientific Materials) for the experimental confirmation of the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG, because the (110)-plane in cubic system include all important represented vectors such as [100], [110], [111], [211], and so on. Figure 6 shows the experimental setup for the evaluation of the saturable absorption. The probe source was 1-W single-mode Nd:YAG laser with the wavelength of 1064 nm (Mephisto, Coherent), and its polarization was controlled by a λ/2-plate (WPH05M, Thorlabs). This probe beam was chopped to 25 Hz with the duration of 10 ms (25% duty cycle) in order to prevent the excess heating of the Cr4+:YAG crystal. The beam was focused onto the sample by use of an aspheric lens with focusing length of 50 cm, and the radius was evaluated by knife-edge method to be 18 μm on the sample surface, and the mean radius w inside Cr4+:YAG was 25 μm (with the minimum spot radius of 18 μm and the confocal length of 1.2 mm). The transmitted power through Cr4+:YAG was detected by the photo-energy sensor (PE25BF-C, Ophir).

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 The schematic diagram of experimental setup.

Download Full Size | PDF

Measured transmittance T and the calculations of T using Eq. (4) and Lambert’s law are shown in Fig. 7. Even though the evaluated dependence on the polarization angle was similar to calculations, the difference of the modulation depth in T was not negligible. Since the reliability of the beam radius evaluated by the knife-edge method is high, we have to conclude it was very difficult to fit the evaluated transmittance to Eq. (4) using Lambert’s law and the estimated Is from the previous report. In following section, we tried to explain this difference between Eq. (4) and the experimental result.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Transmittance of a (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG with T0 of 75% under 1-W pumping focused into the spot with the radius of 25 μm. Black marker is the experimental value, and red line, blue line, and green lines are the calculation by use of Eq. (4) with β of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Discussions

Influence of pump depletion

In order to describe the experimental transmittance by Eq. (4), we have to consider also the beam mode and the influence of pump depletion inside Cr4+:YAG, because performances categorized nonlinear phenomena severely depend on the intensity of probe sources. We can assume that power of pump beam along z-axis P(z) is the function of z, and it varies during the beam propagation according to (See Appendix 2):

dP(z)dz=P(z)01αj[2kP(z)πw2,θ]dk,
where j is a subscript that indicates the incident direction of pump beam. As shown in Fig. 8, we can simulate the experimental transmittance with β of 0.28 by use of Eqs. (4) and (7). According to the 1% of reproducible error in the measurement of transmittances, this evaluated β is consistent with 0.24 that was reported in previous reports [13]. The residual small difference between Eq. (4) and the experimental result in Fig. 8 is due to the accuracy of T of ± 0.2% in our experimental setup.

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 Transmittance of a (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystal with T0 of 75% unde 1-W pumping focused into the spot with the radius of 25 μm. Red marker is the experimental value, and blue line is the calculation by use of Eqs. (4) and (7) with β of 0.28.

Download Full Size | PDF

Saturable absorption by giant pulse

We have to consider also the transient saturation for pulsed optical sources. In recent high power microchip lasers that can generate giant pulses [1–4], the photon intensity inside the laser cavity is much larger than Is. This indicates that the rise time of these giant pulses is of the order of below 10 ps, because the ratio between this rise time and the radiative decay time of the meta-stable level in Cr4+:YAG τ is comparable to the ratio of Is and Ii. For example, the time constant of the absorption saturation in single crystalline Cr4+:YAG for E//[100] and E //[110] are three and two times faster than that for E //[111]. This difference in the time constant enables to control the polarization of the oscillation mode by means of [110]-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals for saturable absorbers. The rise time with the order of several 10ps is short enough compared to the pulse-duration. Thus, it should be possible to apply our model based on the continuous pumping to the lasing of the passive-Q switched lasers that can generate giant pulses. In future we will examine the anisotropy of Cr4+:YAG in passive-Q switched laser cavities as in Ref. [13].

5. Summary

The model of the polarization dependence in Cr4+:YAG was established, where the notation of the saturable absorption by numerical functions of the angle θ between representative axes of incident surfaces and the polarization of pump source well described with only three spectroscopic parameters of α0 (or T0), β, and Is. Our novel model for the anisotropy in saturable absorption should be useful to design the extinction ratio and the build-up time of the pulse generation in the passively Q-switched microchip lasers.

Appendix 1 Derivation of Eq.(1)

The site symmetry in crystals is well described in the authoritative tabulations [14]. Figure 9(a) shows the crystal structure of YAG crystal, where Cr4+-ions can be substituted Al3+-ions in YAG is located at 24d Wyckoff Position (WP) with site symmetry of the fourfold inversion (S4) [15]. WP 24d is surrounded by four O2--ions that form a tetrahedron. There are 24 S4-sites in the unit cell, and each of [100]-, [010]-, and [001]-axis is parallel to 8 S4-axes in these sites as shown in Fig. 9(b).

 figure: Fig. 9

Fig. 9 Unit cell in the crystal structure of YAG. (a) The position of all ions in unit cell, which contains 24 Y3+-ions with site symmetry of D2 (gray spheres), 16 Al3+-ions with site symmetry of S6 (spheres in hexahedrons), 24 Al3+-ions with the site symmetry of S4 (spheres in tetrahedrons), and 96 O2--ions with the site symmetry of C1 (red spheres). (b) The projection of 24 Al3+-ions with site symmetry of S4 from the [100]-direction.

Download Full Size | PDF

If we set z-axis along the direction of one of S4–axis, electrons at WP 24d have the following wave-function ϕ with the symmetry of

ϕ(x,y,z)=ϕ(y,x,z)=ϕ(x,y,z)=ϕ(y,x,z).

As a result, the transition dipole moments along x- axis, y-axes, and z-axis become zero, zero, and non-zero, respectively. Thus we can treat transitions in Cr4+-ions with the polarization parallel to S4-axis is allowed, while transitions with the polarization perpendicular to S4-axis is forbidden. Authors’ group already observed this situation experimentally, where the cross section for allowed polarization is two orders of magnitude greater than forbidden polarization [13]. It means that optical pumping with the polarization parallel to [100]-axis can excite one third of Cr4+-ions doped into YAG crystals.

Here we describe the mechanism of anisotropy of the saturable absorption in Cr4+:YAG. Of course, the absorption cross section itself is a second-ordered tensor that can show no polarization dependence in the cubic crystalline system. On the contrary, the cascade process between the absorption and the excited state absorption include two second-ordered tensors and it can perform anisotropy even in cubic systems such as the garnet structure. According to the representative energy diagram in Cr4+:YAG [8] as shown in Fig. 10, we can set up the rate equation as following:

dn2idt=1τIiIsntot31τ(1+IiIs)n2i,
where Ii, ntot, and n2i are the pump intensity with the polarization parallel to i-axis of Cr4+:YAG, the number density of Cr4+-ions in Cr4+:YAG, and the population density of the Cr4+-ions in the meta-stable state with S4-axis parallel to i-axis, respectively. The suffix i indicates one of [100]-, [010]-, and [001]-axes.

 figure: Fig. 10

Fig. 10 Energy diagram of Cr4+:YAG, where A, B, and E are irreducible representations under S4 symmetry. Related transitions with cross sections (σabs, σesa), radiative the decay time (τ), and the population density (n) are also indicated.

Download Full Size | PDF

By use of angles (Θ, Φ), the pump intensity Ii can be expressed by

I[100]=Icos2Φsin2Θ,
I[010]=Isin2Φsin2Θ,
I[001]=Icos2Θ.

Under the assumption that there is an excited state absorption (ESA) from the meta-stable state with the cross section of σesa and the much faster decay of ESA upper level, the pump absorption in Cr4+:YAG with the initial transmittance T0 and the beam-path length l can be given by

dIidz=(ntot3n2i)σabsIin2iσesaIi=α0Ii[1(1β)3n2intot].
where the initial (unsaturated) absorption coefficient α0 and β are expressed by
Τ0=exp(α0l)=exp(ntot3σabsl),
β=σesaσabs.
We can obtain the expression of the saturable absorption coefficient α(n2i, Ii) from Eq. (11) as
α(n2i,Ii)=α0[1(1β)3ntotin2iIiI].
Especially under the steady-state condition, Eq. (9) gives the notation of n2i as
n2i=ntot3IiIi+Is.
From Eqs. (10), (13), and (14) the expression of the saturable absorption coefficient α(I, Θ, Φ) under the steady-state condition is found to be Eq. (1).

Appendix 2 Derivation of Eq.(7)

If the beam is a Gaussian beam with the radius of w, the pump intensity I can be expressed by

I(z,r)=2P(z)πw2exp(2r2w2).
We can describe the pump depletion inside Cr4+:YAG as a differential equation by
dP(z)dz=02πrαj(I,θ)I(z,r)dr,
where j is a subscript that indicates incident direction of pump beam. We can derive Eq. (7) applying the following substitution:
k=exp(2r2w2).
In addition, we can express the transmittance T as an explicit function of the pump input power Pin and θ of the pump polarization angle by use of the integral equation form from
0ldz=P(0)P(l)dPP01dkαj(2kPπw2,θ),
where z=0 at the beam incident surface and z=l at the beam transmitted surface of the sample. Finally we obtain

l=T(Pin,θ)PinPindPP01αj(2kPπw2,θ)dk.

Funding

This work is partially supported by Genesis Research Institute, Inc. and New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Prof. B. Boulanger for his comment. Authors also thank Dr. R. Bhandari for his check of the manuscript.

References and links

1. H. Sakai, H. Kan, and T. Taira, “>1 MW peak power single-mode high-brightness passively Q-switched Nd 3+:YAG microchip laser,” Opt. Express 16(24), 19891–19899 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. N. Pavel, M. Tsunekane, and T. Taira, “Composite, all-ceramics, high-peak power Nd:YAG/Cr4+:YAG monolithic micro-laser with multiple-beam output for engine ignition,” Opt. Express 19(10), 9378–9384 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. T. Taira, S. Morishima, K. Kanehara, N. Taguchi, A. Sugiura, and M. Tsunekane, “World first laser ignited gasoline engine vehicle,” The 1st Laser Ignition Conference (LIC’13), OPIC’13, Yokohama, Japan, April 23–25, LIC3–1 (2013).

4. V. Yahia and T. Taira, “Development of a 0.3GW Microchip-seeded Amplifier,” The 4th. Laser Ignition Conference (LIC'16), OPIC'16, Yokohama, Japan, LIC3–3 (2016).

5. H. Eilers, K. R. Hoffman, W. M. Dennis, S. M. Jacobsen, and W. M. Yen, “Saturation of 1.064 μm absorption in Cr,Ca:Y3Al5O12 crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 61(25), 2958–2960 (1992). [CrossRef]  

6. Z. Burshtein, P. Blau, Y. Kalisky, Y. Shimony, and M. R. Kikta, “Excited-state absorption studies of Cr4+ ions in several garnets host materials,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 34(2), 292–299 (1998). [CrossRef]  

7. A. Sennaroglu, U. Demirbas, S. Ozharar, and F. Yaman, “Accurate determination of saturation parameters for Cr4+-doped solid-state saturasble absorbers,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 23(2), 241–249 (2006). [CrossRef]  

8. A. G. Okhrimchuk and A. V. Shestakov, “Absorption saturation mechanism for YAG:Cr4+ crystals,” Phys. Rev. B 61(2), 988–995 (2000). [CrossRef]  

9. N. N. Il’ichev, A. V. Kir’yanov, and P. P. Pashinin, “Model of passive Q switching taking account of the anisotropy of nonlinear absorption in a crystal switch with phototropic centres,” Quantum Electron. 28(2), 147–151 (1998). [CrossRef]  

10. H. Sakai, A. Sone, H. Kan, and T. Taira, “Polarization stabilizing for diode-pumped passively Q-switched Nd:YAG microchip lasers,” Advanced-Solid-State Photonics 2006, MD2, USA (2006).

11. H. Sakai, H. Kan, and T. Taira, “Passive Q switch laser device,” (2006), WO Patent App. PCT/JP2005/016,315.

12. S. Hayashi, K. Nawata, T. Taira, J. Shikata, K. Kawase, and H. Minamide, “Ultrabright continuously tunable terahertz-wave generation at room temperature,” Sci. Rep. 4, 5045 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. M. Tsunekane and T. Taira, “Direct Measurement of Temporal Transmission Distribution of a Saturable Absorber in a Passively Q-Switched Laser,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 52(5), 1–7 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. T. Hahn and A. Looijenga-Vos, “2.2 Contents and arrangement of the tables” in International Tables for Crystallography Brief Teaching Ed. Vol. A, T. Hahn ed. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002).

15. R. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures Ed. 2, Vol.3, (John Wiley & Sons, 1965) p.222.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (10)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Representation of the polarization by use of the polar coordinate with angles Θ and Φ.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Definition of θ for (100)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [100]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (100)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [ 1 ¯ 00 ], respectively.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Definition of θ for (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [110]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (110)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [ 1 ¯ 1 ¯ 0 ], respectively.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Definition of θ for (111)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystals. (a) The relation between θ and crystal axes described with the view direction of the [111]-axis. The square and tetrahedrons indicate the unit cell of YAG crystal and S4 site in the unit cell, respectively. (b) The relation between θ, Θ, and Φ. The gray surface indicates the (111)-plane. r- axis and z-axis are parallel to the direction of the polarization and the direction of [ 1 ¯ 1 ¯ 1 ¯ ], respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Estimated polarized absorption coefficients of (100)-, (110)-, and (111)-cut Cr4+:YAG with α0 of 2.8 cm−1. β and the ratio between I and Is are assumed to be 0.28 and 27.6, respectively.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 The schematic diagram of experimental setup.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Transmittance of a (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG with T0 of 75% under 1-W pumping focused into the spot with the radius of 25 μm. Black marker is the experimental value, and red line, blue line, and green lines are the calculation by use of Eq. (4) with β of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 Transmittance of a (110)-cut Cr4+:YAG crystal with T0 of 75% unde 1-W pumping focused into the spot with the radius of 25 μm. Red marker is the experimental value, and blue line is the calculation by use of Eqs. (4) and (7) with β of 0.28.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Unit cell in the crystal structure of YAG. (a) The position of all ions in unit cell, which contains 24 Y3+-ions with site symmetry of D2 (gray spheres), 16 Al3+-ions with site symmetry of S6 (spheres in hexahedrons), 24 Al3+-ions with the site symmetry of S4 (spheres in tetrahedrons), and 96 O2--ions with the site symmetry of C1 (red spheres). (b) The projection of 24 Al3+-ions with site symmetry of S4 from the [100]-direction.
Fig. 10
Fig. 10 Energy diagram of Cr4+:YAG, where A, B, and E are irreducible representations under S4 symmetry. Related transitions with cross sections (σabs, σesa), radiative the decay time (τ), and the population density (n) are also indicated.

Equations (24)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

α( I,Θ,Φ )= α 0 [ 1( 1β )( I cos 4 Φ sin 4 Θ I cos 2 Φ sin 2 Θ+ I s + I sin 4 Φ sin 4 Θ I sin 2 Φ sin 2 Θ+ I s + I cos 4 Θ I cos 2 Θ+ I s ) ].
β= σ esa σ abs ,
I s = E P σ abs τ ,
α 100 ( I,θ )= α 0 1+ I I s [ 1( 1β )( cos 4 θ+ sin 4 θ ) ]+β I 2 I s 2 sin 2 θ cos 2 θ ( 1+ I I s cos 2 θ )( 1+ I I s sin 2 θ ) .
α 110 ( I,θ )= α 0 1+ I I s ( β cos 4 θ+ 3 2 cos 2 θ sin 2 θ+ β 2 sin 4 θ )+ β I 2 2 I s 2 cos 2 θ sin 2 θ ( 1+ I I s cos 2 θ )( 1+ I 2 I s sin 2 θ ) .
Θ( θ )= cot 1 [ sinΦ( θ )+cosΦ( θ ) ],
Φ( θ )= tan 1 ( 3 tanθ )+ π 4 .
α 111 ( I,θ )= α 0 1+ 1 2 I I s ( 1+β )+ 1 36 I 2 I s 2 [ ( 1+8β )+( 1β )cos6θ ]+ 1 108 β( 1+cos6θ ) I 3 I s 3 ( 1+ 2 3 I I s cos 2 θ )[ 1+ 1 6 I I s ( 1+2 sin 2 θ+ 3 sin2θ ) ][ 1+ 1 6 I I s ( 1+2 sin 2 θ 3 sin2θ ) ] .
dP( z ) dz =P( z ) 0 1 α j [ 2kP( z ) π w 2 ,θ ]dk ,
ϕ( x,y,z )=ϕ( y,x,z )=ϕ( x,y,z )=ϕ( y,x,z ).
d n 2 i dt = 1 τ I i I s n tot 3 1 τ ( 1+ I i I s ) n 2 i ,
I [100] =I cos 2 Φ sin 2 Θ,
I [010] =I sin 2 Φ sin 2 Θ,
I [001] =I cos 2 Θ.
d I i dz =( n tot 3 n 2 i ) σ abs I i n 2 i σ esa I i = α 0 I i [ 1( 1β ) 3 n 2 i n tot ].
Τ 0 =exp( α 0 l )=exp( n tot 3 σ abs l ),
β= σ esa σ abs .
α( n 2 i , I i )= α 0 [ 1( 1β ) 3 n tot i n 2 i I i I ].
n 2 i = n tot 3 I i I i + I s .
I( z,r )= 2P( z ) π w 2 exp( 2 r 2 w 2 ).
dP( z ) dz = 0 2πr α j ( I,θ )I( z,r )dr ,
k=exp( 2 r 2 w 2 ).
0 l dz = P( 0 ) P( l ) dP P 0 1 dk α j ( 2kP π w 2 ,θ ) ,
l= T( P in ,θ ) P in P in dP P 0 1 α j ( 2kP π w 2 ,θ )dk .
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.