Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Broadband Cr3+-sensitized upconversion luminescence in La3Ga5GeO14: Cr3+,Yb3+,Er3+

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Broadband-light-sensitized upconversion (UC) photon management phenomenon in La3Ga5GeO14:Cr3+,Yb3+,Er3+ is reported, featuring the concentrated broadband noncoherent light excitable at room temperature. Energy transfer among Cr3+/Yb3+/Er3+ in the Stokes and UC luminescence processes reveals that Yb3+ as a “bridge” is requisite for Cr3+-sensitized UC luminescence of Er3+. Low Cr3+ contents are preferred for UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+, since it would be quenched by high Cr3+ contents. The designed UC emissions 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 of Er3+ at around 510 ~560 nm are proposed to through Energy transfer upconversion (ETU) mechanism based on the Cr3+-Yb3+ dimer model with superexchange interaction according to crystallographic data and the decay curves of Er3+ UC emission. This research may open up a new perspective to design novel photonic materials excitable by broadband noncoherent light for improving the photoresponse of solar cells.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Utilizing UC materials to convert the sub-bandgap photons to higher-energy photons, which could be absorbed by the single-junction solar cells, is an alternative to improve the conversion efficiency of solar cells [15]. Efficient photon upconversion phenomena were reported with singlet emission of organic molecules sensitized by organic chromophores with triplet-triplet annihilation in solutions, but suffered low efficiency in solid state for device application [6]. Lanthanide ions in solids are most common for photon UC management because of their long-lived intermediate energy level. However, the most significant problem of this kind of upconversion materials lies in the high pumping energy density and narrow excitation line of lanthanide ions [714]. Sensitizers, such as noble metals with plasmon coupling effects [1517] are used to enhance upconversion efficiency of lanthanide ions. Nevertheless, sensitizers with broadband absorption feature would benefit upconversion performance [6,10]. Furthermore, it is more practical for UC materials to be excitable by noncoherent sunlight. Most recently, It is reported [18] that dye molecules with broadband absorption characteristic could efficiently sensitize the UC luminescence of β-NaYF4:Er3+,Yb3+, which provides the upconverted emission from lanthanide ions under a broadband low power excitation [19]. Herein, to get high energy transfer efficiency, short distance and the matching of energy levels between sensitizer(dye molecules) and acceptor(Yb3+-Er3+) are required for resonant energy transfer pathway [19,20]. It is known that transition metal(TM) ions have the broadband absorption feature, which is commonly utilized to sensitize Stokes luminescence of lanthanide ions [21,22]. Analogously, they could also be used as a broadband sensitizer for UC luminescence [7,10], for instance, the Cr5+-Er3+ [23], V3+-Er3+ [24,25] and V3+-Pr3+ [26] systems. However, these systems show UC luminescence only at cryogenic temperature. It is scarce for TM-lanthanide ions codoped systems to show room-temperature UC luminescence since the nonradiative relaxation rate of TM ions is generally large [7,10,23,24,2729], resulting in depopulation of the intermediate energy level of TM ions involved in the UC process. Then it is preferable to design TM ion as sensitizer for the long-lived intermediate excited energy level of lanthanide ions in which the UC process occurs. In this way, TM ion broadband-sensitized UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+, which is considered as a high efficient UC luminescence system [30], may probably be obtained at room-temperature. Experience reveals that the material host with desired room-temperature UC luminescence should have proper sites for accommodating the TM ions and lanthanide ions, and the transition metal ions should not absorb the desired emission of lanthanide ions [10,28,29].

Cr3+-sensitized Stokes luminescence of lanthanide ions is extensively studied in d-f bimetallic complexes [21,31]. There is also several work about Cr3+-sensitized UC of lanthanide ions in d-f organometallic complexes, all of which were studied at cryogenic temperature [31]. It is reported that La3Ga5GeO14:Cr3+ exhibited excellent near infrared emission at around 980 nm with broadband absorption at 370~520 nm and 560~800 nm [32,33]. It can be deduced that Cr3+ could efficiently transfer its absorbed energy to Yb3+ in La3Ga5GeO14 through resonant energy transfer based on the matching of emission energy level of Cr3+ and absorption energy level of Yb3+ at around 980 nm, which are proved by many previous work [10,21,22,24]. The absence of absorption at 520~560 nm makes Cr3+ probable to sensitize Yb3+-Er3+ with room-temperature UC luminescence of Er3+ in this wavelength range, which is further convinced by the fact that La3+ site could accommodate Yb3+/Er3+ and Ga3+ site could accommodate Cr3+ with less distortion defects as emission killer. Fortunately, we observed the room-temperature broadband-noncoherent-light excitable UC luminescence in this system. This contribution will give an insight on the TM-sensitized room-temperature UC luminescence phenomenon and energy transfer mechanism involved.

2. Experimental

All samples were synthesized by high-temperature solid state reaction. Stoichiometric amounts of La2O3 (99.99%), Ga2O3 (analytical reagent, A.R.), GeO2 (99.99%), Cr2O3 (A.R.), Yb2O3 (99.99%), Er2O3 (99.99%) and NH4Cl (A.R., 10 wt%) were weighted and mixed thoroughly. NH4Cl was added as flux. The mixture was calcined at 1000 °C for 4 h and 1300 °C for another 4 h sequentially, with an intermediate grinding. Phase purity was checked by PANalytical X’ pert Pro X-ray diffractometer with Cu anode target (Kα1 = 1.54059 Å). XRD data for refinement was collected on a Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray diffractometer with Cu target and Ni filter. The step-scan mode was used with setup of 40 KV × 40 mA, step 0.01°, 0.2 s/step. Rietveld refinement was conducted by TOPAS-Academic program. Diffuse reflection spectra were carried out on a LAMBDA 950 UV–vis–NIR Spectrophotometer (PE) with BaSO4 powder as a reference. Photoluminescence excitation and near infrared emission spectra were measured on a FLS920 spectrometer (Edinburgh Instruments Ltd.) equipped with a continuous 450 W xenon lamp as an excitation source(detector Hamamatsu R5509-72). UC emission spectra were recorded on the Jobin-Yvon TRIAX320 spectrofluorimeter equipped with a R928 photomultiplier tube as the detector and a 976 nm laser diode (LD, Coherent Corp.) as monochromatic light source. Additionally, a solar-500 Xe lamp (500 W, Beijing NBeT Group Co. Ltd., China) was used as the broadband noncoherent light source for UC luminescence. Lens concentrator combined with a 590 nm Cut-off filter and a 380~800 nm bandpass filter were utilized in order to get sufficient focus power and the desired wavelengths of 590~800 nm. Broadband UC excitation spectra, UC emission spectra, UC decay curves and near infrared emission decay curves were measured with a customized UV to mid-infrared steady-state and phosphorescence lifetime spectrometer (FSP920-C, Edinburgh) equipped with a digital oscilloscope (TDS3052B, Tektronix) and a tunable mid-band OPO pulse laser as excitation source (410-2400 nm, 10Hz, pulse width≤5 ns, Vibrant 355II, OPOTEK). Excitation power was detected by a Coherent FieldMate laser power meter. All the measurements were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Diffuse reflection spectra and Stokes luminescence

For ease of reference and clarity, the abbreviation of LGG:CYE is used for La1-y-zGa5-xGeO14:xCr3+,yYb3+,zEr3+. To study the energy transfer mechanism among Cr3+, Yb3+ and Er3+, a series of samples with different contents of these ions were synthesized. XRD patterns reveal that all the samples are analogous with ICSD #20783 except some traced β-Ga2O3. It should be noted that the distance between La-Ga is much shorter than that of La-La according to the refinement results. Figure 1 shows the diffuse reflection spectra of LGG samples with different dopant ions. LGG:C has broad absorption bands in the range of 370~520 nm (4A24T1) and 560~800 nm(4A24T2). The LGG:YE sample shows some sharp absorption peaks, which are depicted as the intra-energy-level transitions of Yb3+/Er3+ in Fig. 1. It is worth noting that LGG:C has little absorption in the range of 520~560 nm while LGG:YE has some absorption peaks, implying that the 2H11/24I15/2 UC emission of Er3+ in LGG:CYE may be observed when excited by longer-wavelength light. Furthermore, the broadband absorption at 560~800 nm of LGG:C suggests the possibility of broadband excitation for the UC emission.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Diffuse reflection spectra of the samples.

Download Full Size | PDF

To investigate Cr3+-sensitized UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+, it is necessary to study the energy transfer mechanism among Cr3+, Yb3+ and Er3+. Figure 2 depicts the excitation and Stokes luminescence spectra of LGG:C, LGG:CE and LGG:CYE. The emission spectrum of LGG: C gives a broadband peak, which is ascribed to 4T24A2 transition of Cr3+ [32]. While that of LGG:CYE exhibits the characteristic 2F5/22F7/2 transition of Yb3+ at ~976 nm (even at low Yb3+ contents) and 4I13/24I15/2 transition of Er3+ at ~1540 nm when photostimulating Cr3+, which implies that energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+/ Er3+ takes place. Similar Er3+ emission spectrum of LGG:CE is observed at ~1540 nm, while the emission at ~985 nm is mostly the characteristic of 4I11/24I15/2 of Er3+. The excitation spectrum of LGG:CYE are composed of three bands at 550~770 nm and 375~520 nm, which are assigned to 4A24T2 and 4A24T1 transition of Cr3+, respectively. The analogous excitation spectra for LGG:C and LGG:CYE (only one is shown in Fig. 2) also convinces the occurrence of the energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+/Er3+. The variations of Stokes luminescence intensities and decay curves of LGG:CE and LGG:CYE samples on different Cr3+ contents and Yb3+ contents are illustrated in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, respectively. For LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+, both Yb3+ and Er3+ emission intensities go up firstly with x increases and then decline. Another point should be noted that Yb3+ emission intensity is much stronger than that of Er3+ emission. And for LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+, Er3+ emission intensities change little with x. Yb3+emission intensity continuously increases while that of Er3+ emission goes in the contrary way for LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+. These phenomena evidently suggest that energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+ is efficient and Cr3+ to Er3+ is inefficient. The decay curves of Yb3+ emission in Fig. 4(a) and Fig. 4(c) also prove that efficient energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+ exists in LGG:CYE. Figure 4(b) and Fig. 4(d) with decay curves of Er3+ emission suggests inefficient energy transfer from Cr3+ to Er3+ since they change little with Cr3+ contents and Yb3+ contents, which is consistent with Fig. 3. Another important conclusion can be made according to Fig. 3(a) and Fig. 4(a) that there is energy quench of Yb3+ emission with the increase of Cr3+ contents, which suggests less Cr3+ contents is required in the design of Cr3+-sensitized UC emission of Yb3+-Er3+. Furthermore, Yb3+ is essential for the Cr3+-sensitized UC emission of Er3+ since energy transfer from Cr3+ to Er3+ is inefficient.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Stokes luminescence and excitation spectra of LGG:C, LGG:CE and LGG:CYE(all the spectra are normalized).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Stokes luminescence intensity variations of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+, LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+(a) and LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+(b) on Cr contents x and Yb contents y.

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Stokes luminescence decay curves of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a, b) and LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+ (c, d)

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 UC luminescence pumped by a 976 nm laser diode

To better understand the process of Cr3+-sensitized UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+, UC process of Yb3+-Er3+ and Yb3+-Er3+-Cr3+ should be figured out since Yb3+ could be directly pumped by a 976 nm laser diode, which is demonstrated in Fig. 5.Intense UC emission 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 of Er3+ are observed for LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+, and two-photon UC process is proposed based on the slopes of Er3+ emission intensity on pump power are about 2 in Fig. 5(lower, inset). UC emission 4T24A2 of Cr3+ can be obtained for LGG: 0.10Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ except UC emission of Er3+, whereas, the slopes of the different emission peak intensities on pump power are obviously deviated from 2 (larger than 1), which may probably be ascribed to large depopulation rate of intermediate energy level in the UC process caused by forward and backward energy transfer among Yb3+, Er3+ and Cr3+ [29,34]. Figure 6(a) is the UC luminescence spectra of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+. It can be seen that the UC emission intensity of Er3+ declines dramatically and monotonically with Cr3+ content x increases, while that of Cr3+ varies little. For x = 0.30 in the inset of Fig. 6(a), UC emission of Er3+ is totally quenched and a single peak of Cr3+ is observed. Thus, it can be concluded that Cr3+ would quench the UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+, probably owing to the complex forward and backward energy transfer between Yb3+/Er3+ and nearest surrounded Cr3+. Since there is an absorption peak at around 976 nm for Er3+(see Fig. 1), UC luminescence spectra of LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+ are recorded in Fig. 6(b). It can be seen that UC emission intensity of Er3+ is much weaker without Yb3+, and UC process form Er3+ to Cr3+ is also inefficient. The same conclusion that Cr3+ would quench the UC luminescence of Er3+ can be made. Thus, the content of Cr3+ should be less in Cr3+-sensitized UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.10Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (upper) and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (lower) pumped by a 976 nm laser diode(~60 mW mm−2). Inset of each graph is the intensity dependence of different UC emission peak(integrated intensity) on pump power (in Log-Log plot).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 UC emission of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a) and LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+ (b) pumped by a 976 nm laser diode(~60 mW mm−2). Inset of graph(a) is the enlarge spectrum of sample with x = 0.30.

Download Full Size | PDF

3.2 Broadband sensitized UC luminescence and the related model

When pumped by 620 nm OPO tunable pulse laser, the emission spectrum of LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ sample evidently demonstrates the 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 emission of Er3+ while it almost shows little emission intensity at the same pump power for LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ sample in Fig. 7(a).The former is about 30 times stronger than the latter (integrated intensity) upon excitation of monochromic light of 620 nm. This phenomenon indicates the sensitization effect of Cr3+ for the UC luminescence of Yb3+-Er3+ in LGG:CYE, based on the fact that there is almost little absorption for Yb3+ and Er3+ at ~620 nm(see Fig. 1). The striking broad band (full width at half maximum is 33 nm) in Fig. 7(b) again convinces the 4A24T2 sensitization of Cr3+ for the 548 nm emission of Er3+, because it is evidentlydifferent from the absorption(excitation) peak of Er3+ at this wavelength range(the magenta line in Fig. 7(b)). It should be pointed out that it is scarce for UC luminescence of TM-lanthanide ions codoped systems at room temperature [7,10,28,29]. The UC luminescence decay curves of 4S3/24I15/2 emissions of Er3+ excited by 620 nm pulsed laser are shown in Fig. 8.As seen in Fig. 8(a), UC luminescence of Er3+ sensitized by Cr3+ directly is inefficient because almost no decay signal of Er3+ is observed for y = 0, which is in accord with the conclusion of Fig. 3. With Yb3+ contents y increase, the decay curves apparently prolong, which can be interpreted by the energy transfer from Cr3+ to Er3+ through Yb3+ as a “bridge” in the UC process. Another point should be noted that an obvious rise-up in the early stage of decay curves with the increase of y is observed, indicating that the UC mechanism is energy transfer upconversion(ETU) [10,27]. The decay curves decline with the raise of Cr3+ contents x in Fig. 8(b), suggesting large contents of Cr3+ hamper the energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+- Er3+, which also agree with the conclusion of Fig. 3, Fig. 4 and Fig. 6. The UC luminescence decay time of Er3+ in LGG: 0.10Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ is around 170 µs, which is larger than that of Stokes luminescence of Er3+ (75 µs). This may be caused by the much more complicated energy transfer process involved in the UC luminescence [35].

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 (a)UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ pumped by an OPO pulsed laser(620 nm) with the same power density (about 50 mW mm-2); (b) the monitored 548 nm UC emission intensity pumped by different wavelength(blue filled circle); for comparison, excitation peak at around 650 nm of LGG: 0.06Er3+ is also illustrated(magenta line).

Download Full Size | PDF

 figure: Fig. 8

Fig. 8 UC luminescence decay curves of LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a) and LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (b) pumped by an OPO pulsed laser (λex = 620 nm, λem = 548 nm).

Download Full Size | PDF

Strikingly, upon excitation of the concentrated noncoherent broadband 590~800 nm light of the solar simulator, the sample LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ exhibits apparent UC luminescence of Er3+ while LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ does not, as shown in Fig. 9(a). This phenomenon also convinces the broadband sensitization effect of Cr3+. It is essential to utilize broadband noncoherent solar light in the UC materials for solar cells application. This phosphor puts up the feasibility of broadband noncoherent photons UC management in TM-lanthanide ions codoped inorganic materials system.

 figure: Fig. 9

Fig. 9 (a)UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ upon excitation of concentrated broadband noncoherent 590 nm~800 nm light of solar simulator(~18 mW mm−2); (b)Sketch of UC model for LGG:CYE.

Download Full Size | PDF

The shortest distance of La-La is 4.259 Å, much longer than that of La-Ga(3.438 Å). Crystal structure shows that La3+(Yb3+) nearest surrounded cations are Ga3+(Cr3+) ions. According to the conclusions above that energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+ is efficient, Cr3+-Yb3+ dimer is proposed to play a role in the UC luminescence process based on that Yb3+(La3+)-Cr3+(Ga3+) is close enough to have superexchange interaction in accordance with the previous work [10,3639]. This could explain why the Stokes luminescence of Yb3+ and UC luminescence of Er3+ are easily quenched at high Cr3+ contents, at which there is more possibility for Cr3+ to show up around Yb3+ ion. An evident rise-up process in the early stage of decay curves in Fig. 8 suggests that the UC mechanism is ETU. Therefore, a simplified UC model is proposed in Fig. 9(b).︱2F7/2, 4A2>→︱2F7/2, 4T2> transition of Cr3+-Yb3+ dimer could absorb broadband light with some certain energy, then it relaxes to︱2F5/2, 4A2>, based on the fact that the relaxation rate is much larger than upconversion rate for︱2F7/2, 4T2> level [9,26]. Two︱2F5/2, 4A2>→︱2F7/2, 4A2> transition photons’ energy sequentially transfer to 4I11/2 and 4F7/2 levels of Er3+ through resonant energy transfer [10,20,27]. After relaxation from 4F7/2 level, green UC emission of 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 are obtained.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, Cr3+-sensitized room-temperature UC luminescence of Er3+ excited by concentrated broadband noncoherent light is demonstrated in LGG:CYE. Efficient energy transfer from Cr3+ to Yb3+ and inefficient energy transfer from Cr3+ to Er3+ make it requisite to utilize Yb3+ as “bridge” in the UC process. Low contents of Cr3+ would be preferred since large amounts of Cr3+ would hamper the UC luminescence of Er3+. UC luminescence corresponding to the transitions 2H11/24I15/2 and 4S3/24I15/2 of Er3+ at around 510 ~560 nm are through ETU mechanism based on Cr3+-Yb3+ dimer model with superexchange interaction. It may be helpful in designing new photonic materials for applications such as solar cells.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank Prof. Andries Meijerink for discussion and suggestion. Dr. K. N. Sharafudeen is also gratefully acknowledged for editing the manuscript. This work is financially joint supported by the NSFC (Grant Nos. 21101065, 11104266 and 51125005), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT, and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project.

References and links

1. W. Shockley and H. J. Queisser, “Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells,” J. Appl. Phys. 32(3), 510–519 (1961). [CrossRef]  

2. T. Trupke, M. A. Green, and P. Wurfel, “Improving solar cell efficiencies by up-conversion of sub-band-gap light,” J. Appl. Phys. 92(7), 4117–4122 (2002). [CrossRef]  

3. B. S. Richards, “Enhancing the performance of silicon solar cells via the application of passive luminescence conversion layers,” Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 90(15), 2329–2337 (2006). [CrossRef]  

4. J. de Wild, A. Meijerink, J. K. Rath, J. H. M. van Sark, and R. E. I. Schropp, “Upconverter solar cells: materials and applications,” Energy Environ. Sci. 4(12), 4835–4848 (2011). [CrossRef]  

5. R. Naccache, F. Vetrone, and J. A. Capobianco, “Lanthanide-Doped Upconverting Nanoparticles: Harvesting Light for Solar Cells,” ChemSusChem 6(8), 1308–1311 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. T. N. Singh-Rachford and F. N. Castellano, “Photon upconversion based on sensitized triplet–triplet annihilation,” Coord. Chem. Rev. 254(21-22), 2560–2573 (2010). [CrossRef]  

7. B. M. van der Ende, L. Aarts, and A. Meijerink, “Lanthanide ions as spectral converters for solar cells,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11(47), 11081–11095 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. X. F. Liang, X. Y. Huang, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Gd2(MoO4)3:Er3+ Nanophosphors for an Enhancement of Silicon Solar-Cell Near-Infrared Response,” J. Fluoresc. 19(2), 285–289 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. D. Q. Chen, L. Lei, A. P. Yang, Z. X. Wang, and Y. S. Wang, “Ultra-broadband near-infrared excitable upconversion core/shell nanocrystals,” Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 48(47), 5898–5900 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. J. F. Suyver, A. Aebischer, D. Biner, P. Gerner, J. Grimm, S. Heer, K. W. Krämer, C. Reinhard, and H. U. Güdel, “Novel materials doped with trivalent lanthanides and transition metal ions showing near-infrared to visible photon upconversion,” Opt. Mater. 27(6), 1111–1130 (2005). [CrossRef]  

11. A. X. Yin, Y. W. Zhang, L. D. Sun, and C. H. Yan, “Colloidal synthesis and blue based multicolor upconversion emissions of size and composition controlled monodisperse hexagonal NaYF4:Yb,Tm nanocrystals,” Nanoscale 2(6), 953–959 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. Z. Yin, Y. S. Zhu, W. Xu, J. Wang, S. Xu, B. Dong, L. Xu, S. Zhang, and H. W. Song, “Remarkable enhancement of upconversion fluorescence and confocal imaging of PMMA Opal/NaYF4:Yb3+, Tm3+/Er3+ nanocrystals,” Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 49(36), 3781–3783 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. I. Etchart, I. Hernández, A. Huignard, M. Bérard, W. P. Gillin, R. J. Curry, and A. K. Cheetham, “Efficient oxide phosphors for light upconversion: Yb3+ and Ho3+ co-doped Ln2BaZnO5,” J. Mater. Chem. 21, 1387–1394 (2011). [CrossRef]  

14. S. Ye, D. C. Yu, X. M. Wang, E. H. Song, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Anomalous upconversion emission of Eu3+-Yb3+-MoO6 in double perovskite induced by a laser,” J. Mater. Chem. C 1(8), 1588–1594 (2013). [CrossRef]  

15. E. Verhagen, L. Kuipers, and A. Polman, “Enhanced nonlinear optical effects with a tapered plasmonic waveguide,” Nano Lett. 7(2), 334–337 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. V. K. Rai, C. B. de Araújo, Y. Ledemi, B. Bureau, M. Poulain, X. H. Zhang, and Y. Messaddeq, “Frequency upconversion in a Pr3+ doped chalcogenide glass containing silver nanoparticles,” J. Appl. Phys. 103(10), 103526 (2008). [CrossRef]  

17. N. Liu, W. Qin, G. Qin, T. Jiang, and D. Zhao, “Highly plasmon-enhanced upconversion emissions from Au@β-NaYF4:Yb,Tm hybrid nanostructures,” Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 47(27), 7671–7673 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. W. Q. Zou, C. Visser, J. A. Maduro, M. S. Pshenichnikov, and J. C. Hummelen, “Broadband dye-sensitized upconversion of near-infrared light,” Nat. Photonics 6(8), 560–564 (2012). [CrossRef]  

19. X. J. Xie and X. G. Liu, “Photonics: Upconversion goes broadband,” Nat. Mater. 11(10), 842–843 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. Th. Förster, “Zwischenmolekulare Energiewanderung und Fluoreszenze,” Ann. Phys. 437(1-2), 55–75 (1948). [CrossRef]  

21. F. F. Chen, Z. Q. Chen, Z. Q. Bian, and C. H. Huang, “Sensitized luminescence from lanthanides in d–f bimetallic complexes,” Coord. Chem. Rev. 254(9-10), 991–1010 (2010). [CrossRef]  

22. L. Aboshyan-Sorgho, H. Nozary, A. Aebischer, J. C. Bünzli, P. Y. Morgantini, K. R. Kittilstved, A. Hauser, S. V. Eliseeva, S. Petoud, and C. Piguet, “Optimizing millisecond time scale near-infrared emission in polynuclear chrome(III)-lanthanide(III) complexes,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(30), 12675–12684 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. P. Gerner, K. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Broad-band Cr5+ sensitized Er3+ luminescence in YVO4,” J. Lumin. 102–103, 112–118 (2003). [CrossRef]  

24. L. Aboshyan-Sorgho, C. Besnard, P. Pattison, K. R. Kittilstved, A. Aebischer, J. C. Bünzli, A. Hauser, and C. Piguet, “Near-infrared→visible light upconversion in a molecular trinuclear d-f-d complex,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50(18), 4108–4112 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. C. Reinhard, K. Krämer, D. A. Biner, and H. U. Güdel, “Cooperative radiative and nonradiative effects in K2NaScF6 codoped with V3+ and Er3+.,” J. Chem. Phys. 120(7), 3374–3380 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. C. Reinhard and H. U. Güdel, “Cooperative processes in Pr3+ and V3+ codoped Cs2NaScCl6,” J. Lumin. 102–103, 373–379 (2003). [CrossRef]  

27. F. Auzel, “Upconversion and anti-stokes processes with f and d ions in solids,” Chem. Rev. 104(1), 139–174 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. R. Martín-Rodríguez, R. Valiente, and M. Bettinelli, “Room-temperature green upconversion luminescence in LaMgAl11O19:Mn2+, Yb3+ upon infrared excitation,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 95(9), 091913 (2009). [CrossRef]  

29. S. Ye, Y. J. Li, D. C. Yu, G. P. Dong, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Room-temperature upconverted white light from GdMgB5O10: Yb3+, Mn2+,” J. Mater. Chem. 21(11), 3735–3739 (2011). [CrossRef]  

30. C. Renero-Lecuna, R. Martín-Rodríguez, R. Valiente, J. González, F. Rodríguez, K. W. Krämer, and H. U. Güdel, “Origin of the High Upconversion Green Luminescence Efficiency in β-NaYF4: 2%Er3+,20%Yb3+,” Chem. Mater. 23(15), 3442–3448 (2011). [CrossRef]  

31. L. Aboshyan-Sorgho, M. Cantuel, S. Petoud, A. Hauser, and C. Piguet, “Optical sensitization and upconversion in discrete polynuclear chromium-lanthanide complexes,” Coord. Chem. Rev. 256(15-16), 1644–1663 (2012). [CrossRef]  

32. W. Z. Yan, F. Liu, Y. Y. Lu, X. J. Wang, M. Yin, and Z. W. Pan, “Near infrared long-persistent phosphorescence in La3Ga5GeO14:Cr3+ phosphor,” Opt. Express 18(19), 20215–20221 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

33. A. A. Kaminskii, A. P. Shkadarevich, B. V. Mill, V. G. Koptev, A. V. Butashin, and A. A. Demidovich, “Tunable stimulated-emission of Cr3+ ions and generation frequency self-multiplication effect in acentric crystals of Ca-gallogermante structure,” Inorg. Mater. 24, 579 (1988).

34. M. Pollnau, D. R. Gamelin, S. R. Lüthi, H. U. Güdel, and M. P. Hehlen, “Power dependence of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide and transition-metal-ion systems,” Phys. Rev. B 61(5), 3337–3346 (2000). [CrossRef]  

35. J. N. Shan, M. Uddi, N. Yao, and Y. G. Ju, “Anomalous Raman scattering of colloidal Yb3+, Er3+ codoped NaYF4 nanophosphors and dynamic probing of the upconversion luminescence,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 20(20), 3530–3537 (2010). [CrossRef]  

36. R. Martín-Rodríguez, R. Valiente, F. Rodríguez, F. Piccinelli, A. Speghini, and M. Bettinelli, “Temperature dependence and temporal dynamics of Mn2+ upconversion luminescence sensitized by Yb3+ in codoped LaMgAl11O19,” Phys. Rev. B 82(7), 075117 (2010). [CrossRef]  

37. P. Gerner, C. Reinhard, and H. U. Güdel, “Cooperative near-IR to visible photon upconversion in Yb3+-doped MnCl2 and MnBr2: Comparison with a series of Yb3+-Doped Mn2+ halides,” Chem. Eur. J. 10(19), 4735–4741 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

38. P. Gerner, O. S. Wenger, R. Valiente, and H. U. Güdel, “Green and red light emission by upconversion from the near-IR in Yb3+ doped CsMnBr3.,” Inorg. Chem. 40(18), 4534–4542 (2001). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

39. R. Valiente, O. Wenger, and H. U. Güdel, “New photon upconversion processes in Yb3+ doped CsMnCl3 and RbMnCl3,” Chem. Phys. Lett. 320(5-6), 639–644 (2000). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (9)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Diffuse reflection spectra of the samples.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Stokes luminescence and excitation spectra of LGG:C, LGG:CE and LGG:CYE(all the spectra are normalized).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Stokes luminescence intensity variations of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+, LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+(a) and LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+(b) on Cr contents x and Yb contents y.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Stokes luminescence decay curves of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a, b) and LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+ (c, d)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.10Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (upper) and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (lower) pumped by a 976 nm laser diode(~60 mW mm−2). Inset of each graph is the intensity dependence of different UC emission peak(integrated intensity) on pump power (in Log-Log plot).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 UC emission of LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a) and LGG: xCr3+, 0.06Er3+ (b) pumped by a 976 nm laser diode(~60 mW mm−2). Inset of graph(a) is the enlarge spectrum of sample with x = 0.30.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 (a)UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ pumped by an OPO pulsed laser(620 nm) with the same power density (about 50 mW mm-2); (b) the monitored 548 nm UC emission intensity pumped by different wavelength(blue filled circle); for comparison, excitation peak at around 650 nm of LGG: 0.06Er3+ is also illustrated(magenta line).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8 UC luminescence decay curves of LGG: 0.10Cr3+, yYb3+, 0.06Er3+ (a) and LGG: xCr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ (b) pumped by an OPO pulsed laser (λex = 620 nm, λem = 548 nm).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9 (a)UC luminescence spectra of LGG: 0.05Cr3+, 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ and LGG: 0.12Yb3+, 0.06Er3+ upon excitation of concentrated broadband noncoherent 590 nm~800 nm light of solar simulator(~18 mW mm−2); (b)Sketch of UC model for LGG:CYE.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.