Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Spectroscopic properties of transparent Y3Al5O12: Eu ceramics

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Yttrium aluminum garnet transparent ceramics with divalent or trivalent europium ion doping were prepared by vacuum sintering at 1780 °C. Refined XRD data confirmed the pure phase ceramic with little lattice expansion. The transmittance of the 1.1 mm thick blue color divalent europium doped sample was measured to be 61% at wavelength of 900 nm. The photoluminescence spectrum exhibited the typical broad emission related to divalent europium ions. Furthermore, the photoluminescence spectra of the samples with different europium doping concentration and different annealing temperature were compared.

© 2013 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

More and more inorganic transparent ceramics have been developed recently for scintillation applications such as radiation detection, medical imaging, and security inspection [15]. Among some primary characteristics such as density, light yield, decay time and radiation discrimination, decay time of the scintillator has always been considered an important parameter that needs to be minimized. In most circumstances where high count-rate is required, slow scintillation will cause light pulse pile-up and background build-up in the photomultiplier tube (PMT) signal, deteriorating the energy and spatial resolution of the camera [6]. However, scintillators with long decay times of a few milliseconds can now be used with new devices other than conventional PMT-based gamma cameras, such as electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices (EMCCDs) [6].

Transparent oxide ceramics doped with Ce3+ or Pr3+ exhibit fast scintillation decay and high light yield because of their dominating parity and spin allowed 5d-4f transition [79]. Similarly, Eu2+ doped non-oxide materials also show intense scintillation and acceptable decay time faster than 1 μs [10]. However, Eu3+ doped transparent oxide ceramics have been demonstrated to possess long decay time slightly above 1 ms due to the parity forbidden 4f-4f transitions [11], which may be applied with EMCCDs. Research reports about Eu2+ doped oxide materials, such as Y2O3, Lu2O3, Y3Al5O12 (YAG) [1214], are not common, mainly because Eu2+ easily becomes Eu3+ even for samples synthesized in a reducing atmosphere. Therefore, it is difficult to prepare high Eu2+ concentration or pure Eu2+ doped oxides, especially transparent ceramics, although some efforts have been presented by reduction of Eu3+ ions with aliovalent additives such as Zr4+ [14], or by the spark plasma sintering (SPS) technique [12].

In this work, Eu2+ doped YAG and Eu3+ doped YAG ceramics with high transmittance in the visible region were reported for the first time. These transparent ceramics were obtained from solid state reactive sintering with vacuum pressure as high as 10−7 torr. Vacuum sintered samples were annealed at different temperatures, and their photoluminescence spectra were studied to identify the characteristic peaks of Eu2+ and Eu3+ emissions. A YAG transparent ceramic codoped with Eu and Zr was also prepared and compared with other samples for photoluminescence.

2. Experimental

The starting material, Y2O3 powder with 99.99% purity, was purchased from Jiahua Advanced Materials Resources Co. Ltd.; the Al2O3 powder, with 99.99% purity, was ordered from Baikowski Malakoff Inc.; the Eu2O3 powder, also with 99.99% purity, along with Y2O3 stabilized ZrO2 nanopowder and tetraethyl orthosilicate (1 wt% used in the mixture) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The chemicals were mixed in a required ratio for ball milling, which was completed using ethanol as a solvent and alumina ball as a media, for 20 h. After drying and 800 °C calcination, the powder was sieved through a 200 mesh screen, and dry pressed into 20 mm diameter pellets, followed by a 200 MPa cold isostatic pressing. The green body was then sintered at 1780 °C in a graphite heating element vacuum furnace with a vacuum pressure of 10−7 torr during 12 h dwelling, while YAG phase was formed through a solid state reaction. The transparent samples after sintering were annealed with different temperature and summarized in Table 1

Tables Icon

Table 1. Conditions and major emission property of all the samples

X-ray diffraction (XRD) data of the ceramic samples were recorded using a Cu Kα radiation source with a Bruker D8 Phaser diffractometer. Absorption coefficients of the polished ceramic samples were measured in a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV-VIS-NIR spectrophotometer. The photoluminescence spectra were acquired at room temperature by a Jobin Yvon Flurolog-3 spectrofluorometer with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm for all samples.

3. Results and Discussion

YAG has a cubic crystal structure with a lattice constant of 12.000 Å [15]. The XRD patterns of the 1 mol% Eu: YAG, 6 mol% Eu: YAG, 1 mol% Eu, 1 mol% Zr: YAG and 1400 °C annealed 1 mol% Eu: YAG transparent ceramic samples in Fig. 1 showed that every peak from 15° to 140° 2θ could be indexed to the available standard YAG diffractions (JCPDS 88-2048, la-3d), with refined lattice parameters of 12.0053 Å, 12.01324 Å, 12.0098 Å and 12.0049 Å respectively. No second phases could be observed in the XRD patterns. In the YAG lattice, Y3+ (115.9 pm) is coordinated by 8 O2- ions in the form of a triangular dodecahedron, while Al3+ ions occupy two types of sites: one with coordination number (CN) 4 (53 pm), and another with CN 6 (67.5 pm). Given the ionic radii and CN of the doping ions and sintering aids, Eu2+ (139 pm, CN 8), Eu3+ (120.6 pm, CN 8), Zr4+ (98 pm, CN 8) and Si4+ would most likely substitute for the Y3+, Y3+, Y3+ and Al3+ sites, respectively. Therefore, it was reasonable that 6 mol% Eu: YAG sample presented the highest lattice constant with Zr, Eu co-doped sample being the smallest. However, it was not logical that the lattice constant of 1400 °C annealed sample (Eu3+, a = 12.0098) was higher than that of the as sintered sample (Eu2+, a = 12.0053) by only considering the Eu ion size. The plausible explanation was that after 12 h vacuum sintering, there were still some Si4+ ions in the YAG lattice that acted as negative effect as compared to Eu for lattice expansion. After 72 h annealing, with the decrease of Si4+ ion amount in the lattice, the lattice constant increased although Eu2+ turned into the smaller size Eu3+.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 XRD patterns of as sintered and annealed transparent YAG ceramics with different element and concentration doping.

Download Full Size | PDF

The incorporation of Eu2+ into the host lattice brought a proportional concentration of oxygen vacancies, which could capture electrons forming F+, F and even F-aggregate centers. As shown clearly in the absorption spectra in Fig. 2 , several strong, wide and bell-shaped bands lie in the ultraviolet (UV) and visible region of the spectrum for the as sintered 1 mol% Eu: YAG and 1 mol% Eu, 1 mol% Zr: YAG ceramic samples. These absorption peaks disappeared after annealing the samples at 1400 °C for 72 h and 1200 °C for 90 h in air. The absorption with wavelength smaller than 300 nm of the as sintered ceramics could be attributed to the 4f7 to 4f65d transition in Eu2+, which was much lower after annealing. It is difficult to identify the type and structural surrounding of the color centers with broad band peaks at 375 nm and 540 nm. Only a very weak color center emission band centered at 1325 nm could be observed, with the similar band shape to the two absorption bands where the excitation wavelength was chosen.. The photographs of the 1 mol% Eu: YAG ceramic (1.1 mm thick, 14 mm in diameter) and annealed 1 mol% Eu, 1 mol% Zr: YAG ceramic (0.8 mm thick, 14 mm in diameter) were presented in the inset of Fig. 2. The two ceramics were held around 2 cm above the printed paper, where the letters could be clearly seen through, although the as sintered ceramic was strongly colored. The transmittance of the 1.1 mm thick blue color sample was measured to be 61% at wavelength of 900 nm, while the recently reported transmittance value for 0.8 mm thick Eu2+ doped YAG ceramic was only 6% at the same wavelength [12].

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Absorption spectra of as sintered and annealed Eu: YAG and Eu, Zr: YAG transparent ceramics. The inset shows the photographs of as sintered 1 mol% Eu: YAG (a) and 1200°C annealed 1 mol% Eu, 1 mol% Zr:YAG (b) transparent ceramics around 0.8 mm thickness on top of printed paper.

Download Full Size | PDF

Photoluminescence spectra in Fig. 3 demonstrated the optical characteristics of Eu2+ ions in the as sintered ceramic samples. The emission ratio of Eu2+ to Eu3+ luminescence was much higher than the ratio in other reported Eu2+ doped YAG ceramics [1214]. The very broad emission band from wavelength lower than 420 nm to higher than 700 nm could be ascribed to 4f65d1 to 4f7 transitions of Eu2+ ions, while several sharp emission peaks around wavelength of 600 nm originated from the 5D0 to 7FJ (J = 0, 1, 2, 3) transitions of Eu3+ ions. It was revealed that the energy absorbed by Eu2+ could be transferred to Eu3+ ions resulting in the residual Eu3+ ion luminescence [16]. Furthermore, it was clear that higher doping concentration brought stronger luminescent intensity for the emission features of both Eu2+ and Eu3+ ions. However, Zr and Eu co-doped YAG showed lower emission intensity than that of Eu doped YAG sample. The O2- to Zr4+ charge transfer transition in the CN 8 dodecahedron unit only resulted in absorption around 180 nm, which could not be the reason for intensity decrease. Similarly, it was reported that the light yield slightly decreased after Zr codoping of Ce: YAP samples, and Ce-Zr pairing was proposed as the possible reason [17, 18].

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Photoluminescence spectra of vacuum as sintered YAG transparent ceramics with different element and concentration doping, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

As sintered 1 mol% Eu: YAG ceramic samples were annealed at different temperatures to study the photoluminescence properties. As presented in Fig. 4, the intensity of the broad emission decreased, while the intensity of the sharp Eu3+ emission increased, when the annealing temperature increased from 500 °C to 700 °C. This indicated that the defects accounting for whole emission weak intensity did not change while a small amount of Eu2+ had been transferred to Eu3+, and thus the oxidation of Eu2+ ions into Eu3+ ions was more energetically favorable. As annealing temperature increased to 900 °C, both Eu2+ emission and Eu3+ emission strongly increased with much higher Eu3+ emission ratio, meaning both defects and Eu2+ ion amount were decreasing.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Photoluminescence spectra of 1 mol% Eu doped YAG transparent ceramics annealed at different low temperatures, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

The ceramic sample annealed at much higher temperature exhibited spectra with only Eu3+ emission features as shown in Fig. 5.The emission intensity for these annealed samples increased dramatically as compared with the as sintered 6 mol% Eu: YAG transparent ceramic. There were no emission peaks related to Eu2+ emission observed in the photoluminescence spectra. With the successful fabrication of both Eu2+ and Eu3+ doped transparent YAG ceramics, further research will be focused on the defect structure and applications with PMT or CCD detectors.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Photoluminescence spectra of YAG transparent ceramics annealed at high temperature comparing with the spectrum of as sintered ceramic, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusion

Eu2+ or Eu3+ doped YAG transparent ceramics were fabricated by a reactive sintering method under high vacuum. Absorption coefficients of the as sintered ceramics exhibited strong and broad absorption peaks centered at 375 nm and 540 nm. Photoluminescence spectra of different temperature annealed and different doping concentration ceramics were compared, and Eu2+ or Eu3+ emission peaks and emission intensity ratio change were studied.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (contract FA9550-10-1-0067) for funding and supporting this research.

References and links

1. K. S. Shah, J. Glodo, M. Klugerman, W. Higgins, T. Gupta, P. Wong, W. W. Moses, S. E. Derenzo, M. J. Weber, and P. Dorenbos, “LuI3:Ce-a new scintillator for gamma ray spectroscopy,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 51(5), 2302–2305 (2004). [CrossRef]  

2. W. Drozdowski, P. Dorenbos, J. T. M. de Haas, R. Drozdowska, A. Owens, K. Kamada, K. Tsutsumi, Y. Usuki, T. Yanagida, and A. Yoshikawa, “Scintillation properties of praseodymium activated Lu3Al5O12 single crystals,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55(4), 2420–2424 (2008). [CrossRef]  

3. D. J. Singh, “Structure and optical properties of high light output halide scintillators,” Phys. Rev. B 82(15), 155145 (2010). [CrossRef]  

4. K. Biswas and M. Du, “Energy transport and scintillation of cerium-doped elpasolite Cs2LiYCl6: hybrid density functional calculations,” Phys. Rev. B 86(1), 014102 (2012). [CrossRef]  

5. S. Chen, L. Zhang, K. Kisslinger, and Y. Wu, “Transparent Y3Al5O12: Li, Ce ceramics for thermal neutron detection,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96(4), 1067–1069 (2013). [CrossRef]  

6. J. W. T. Heemskerk, R. Kreuger, M. C. Goorden, M. A. N. Korevaar, S. Salvador, Z. M. Seeley, N. J. Cherepy, E. van der Kolk, S. A. Payne, P. Dorenbos, and F. J. Beekman, “Experimental comparison of high-density scintillators for EMCCD-based gamma ray imaging,” Phys. Med. Biol. 57(14), 4545–4554 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. E. Mihóková, M. Nikl, J. A. Mares, A. Beitlerova, A. Vedda, K. Nejezchleb, K. Blazek, and C. D’Ambrosio, “Luminescence and scintillation properties of YAG: Ce single crystal and optical ceramics,” J. Lumin. 126(1), 77–80 (2007). [CrossRef]  

8. T. Yanagida, H. Takahashi, T. Ito, D. Kasama, T. Enoto, M. Sato, S. Hirakuri, M. Kokubun, K. Makishima, T. Yanagitani, H. Yagi, T. Shigeta, and T. Ito, “Evaluation of properties of YAG (Ce) ceramic scintillators,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 52(5), 1836–1841 (2005). [CrossRef]  

9. N. J. Cherepy, J. D. Kuntz, Z. M. Seeley, S. E. Fisher, O. B. Drury, B. W. Sturm, T. A. Hurst, R. D. Sanner, J. J. Roberts, and S. A. Payne, “Transparent ceramic scintillators for gamma spectroscopy and radiography,” Proc. SPIE 7805, 78050I, 78050I-5 (2010). [CrossRef]  

10. N. J. Cherepy, G. Hull, A. Drobshoff, S. A. Payne, E. van Loef, C. Wilson, K. Shah, U. N. Roy, A. Burger, L. A. Boatner, W.-S. Choong, and W. W. Moses, “Strontium and barium iodide high light yield scintillators,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92(8), 083508 (2008). [CrossRef]  

11. Q. Chen, Y. Shi, L. An, J. Chen, and J. Shi, “Fabrication and photoluminescence characteristics of Eu3+ doped Lu2O3 transparent ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89(6), 2038–2042 (2006). [CrossRef]  

12. M. Sugiyama, T. Yanagida, Y. Fujimoto, Y. Yokota, A. Ito, M. Nikl, T. Goto, and A. Yoshikawa, “Basic study of Eu2+-doped garnet ceramic scintillator produced by spark plasma sintering,” Opt. Mater. 35(2), 222–226 (2012). [CrossRef]  

13. S. R. Podowitz, R. Gaume, and R. S. Feigelson, “Effect of europium concentration on densification of transparent Eu:Y2O3 scintillator ceramics using hot pressing,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93(1), 82–88 (2010). [CrossRef]  

14. A. N. Trofimov, M. A. Petrova, and M. V. Zamoryanskaya, “Cathodoluminescence properties of yttrium aluminum garnet doped with Eu2+ and Eu3+ ions,” Semiconductors 41(5), 512–515 (2007). [CrossRef]  

15. A. J. Stevenson, X. Li, M. A. Martinez, J. M. Anderson, D. L. Suchy, E. R. Kupp, E. C. Dickey, K. T. Mueller, and G. L. Messing, “Effect of SiO2 on densification and microstructure development in Nd:YAG transparent ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94(5), 1380–1387 (2011). [CrossRef]  

16. M. Nogami, T. Yamazaki, and Y. Abe, “Fluorescence properties of Eu3+ and Eu2+ in Al2O3-SiO2 glass,” J. Lumin. 78(1), 63–68 (1998). [CrossRef]  

17. K. Blazek, A. Krasnikov, K. Nejezchleb, M. Nikl, T. Savikhina, and S. Zazubovich, “Luminescence and defects creation in Ce3+-doped YAlO3 and Lu0.3Y0.7AlO3 crystals,” Phys. Status Solidi 242(6), 1315–1323 (2005) (b). [CrossRef]  

18. A. G. Petrosyan, M. Derdzyan, K. Ovanesyan, P. Lecoq, E. Auffray, J. Trummer, M. Kronberger, C. Pedrini, C. Dujardin, and P. Anfre, “Properties of LuAP:Ce scintillator containing intentional impurities,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 571(1-2), 325–328 (2007). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (5)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 XRD patterns of as sintered and annealed transparent YAG ceramics with different element and concentration doping.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Absorption spectra of as sintered and annealed Eu: YAG and Eu, Zr: YAG transparent ceramics. The inset shows the photographs of as sintered 1 mol% Eu: YAG (a) and 1200°C annealed 1 mol% Eu, 1 mol% Zr:YAG (b) transparent ceramics around 0.8 mm thickness on top of printed paper.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Photoluminescence spectra of vacuum as sintered YAG transparent ceramics with different element and concentration doping, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Photoluminescence spectra of 1 mol% Eu doped YAG transparent ceramics annealed at different low temperatures, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Photoluminescence spectra of YAG transparent ceramics annealed at high temperature comparing with the spectrum of as sintered ceramic, with excitation at wavelength of 400 nm.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Conditions and major emission property of all the samples

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.