Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Investigation of photon emitters in Ce-implanted hexagonal boron nitride

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Color centers in hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) are presently attracting broad interest as a novel platform for nanoscale sensing and quantum information processing. Unfortunately, their atomic structures remain largely elusive and only a small percentage of the emitters studied thus far have the properties required to serve as optically addressable spin qubits. Here, we use confocal fluorescence microscopy at variable temperatures to study a new class of point defects produced via cerium ion implantation in thin hBN flakes. We find that, to a significant fraction, emitters show bright room-temperature emission, and good optical stability suggesting the formation of Ce-based point defects. Using density functional theory (DFT) we calculate the emission properties of candidate emitters, and single out the CeVB center—formed by an interlayer Ce atom adjacent to a boron vacancy—as one possible microscopic model. Our results suggest an intriguing route to defect engineering that simultaneously exploits the singular properties of rare-earth ions and the versatility of two-dimensional material hosts.

© 2021 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Solid-state quantum registers formed by interacting electron and nuclear spins amenable to high-fidelity state manipulation and readout provide a promising architecture for quantum technologies, including local information processing and storage, error correction, and long-distance state transmission via photon emission [1,2]. Pioneering work during the last decade has propelled color centers in diamond, silicon carbide, and other wide-bandgap semiconductors as reference platforms in the search for optimal chip-integrated solid-state quantum processors [35]. Adding to this list, recent effort has been devoted to the investigation of photon emitters in two-dimensional (2D) materials [6,7], where ever-improving ‘pick-and-place’ techniques promise opportunities for integration with electronic or photonic structures [810].

From among a growing set of options, hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) is attracting broad interest as the single wide-bandgap van der Waals host of color centers with narrow emission linewidths [11,12], high spectral-tunability [13,14], and strain activation [15]. Moreover, recent work showed the emission from some of these defects exhibits a magneto-optical response [16], ultimately exploited to demonstrate optically-detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) [17,18]. Unfortunately, it is yet unclear whether these intrinsic defects — whose exact physical nature is only now being uncovered [19] — can be more controllably engineered, and whether the strong hyperfine interactions with surrounding nuclei — all of which are spin-active — are compatible with efficient spin-qubit manipulation protocols.

Here we explore an alternative family of defects in hBN derived from low-energy implantation of rare earth ions. The latter are attractive in that their partly filled 4f electron orbitals are screened from the outside by outer-lying electrons, which makes their response less sensitive to the host crystal. Further, 4f electrons are often unpaired and hence exhibit magnetic moments that can be polarized and probed. For the present work, we focus on Ce, a rare-earth atom studied in other wide bandgap hosts down to the level of single emitters [20]. Cerium has already been incorporated into hBN as a way to modify the crystal electronic structure and photoluminescence (PL) properties [2124], although the doping concentrations (102-103 ppm) are greater than those explored herein (2–6 ppm).

We study Ce-implanted flakes of hBN on a SiO2 substrate featuring an array of 40-µm-deep pits. From white-light optical measurements [25,26], we determine the thickness to range from ∼50 to 100 nm, consistent with prior observations relying on the same dry-transfer protocols [2729]; Raman microscopy measurements indicate the crystal quality is high [3032] (see Supplemental Material, Section S1 for details). Room-temperature confocal microscopy reveals patchy areas of PL equally scattered across supported and suspended hBN regions (dashed white square in Fig. 1(a)), hence pointing to in-flake emitters minimally impacted by the substrate. Since flakes are virtually emitter-free prior to implantation, we conclude the observed color centers stem from Ce bombardment. This process, however, is likely to produce a broad class of defects hosting (or not) a Ce ion, a notion our experimental results seem to confirm.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Steady-state spectroscopy of Ce-implanted hBN flakes. (a) Confocal microscopy images of a Ce-implanted hBN flake under 460 nm laser excitation at room-temperature (left) and 5 K (right) revealing a high density of emitting sites across the flake. Emission stemming from a suspended region of the flake (dashed white square) indicates emitters are localized within hBN, not at the interface with the substrate. (b) Representative PL spectra collected from different sites throughout the hBN flake, revealing the simultaneous presence of Ce-derived defects (Type I) and intrinsic hBN defects (Type II). Noticeable spectral shifts are often observed for both types of defects. (c) Energy-level diagram for Ce3+. (d) Statistics of Type I and Type II spectra collected from isolated sites across multiple hBN flakes at room-temperature (upper panel) and 5 K (lower panel). Dashed lines are guides to the eye.

Download Full Size | PDF

Specifically, Fig. 1(b) shows the spectral PL response from representative sites across the flake, exhibiting either broad emission (Type I), or narrow fluorescence lines (Type II); ‘mixed’ spectra — where both types coexist — are also common. Further, Type I emitters are found to be remarkably photostable under continuous excitation, while Type II are found to blink persistently and ultimately bleach after prolonged laser exposure. While unambiguous assignment is difficult, we associate Type II spectra with intrinsic hBN color centers created during ion implantation, likely vacancy- or antisite-based complexes analogous to those obtained from electron irradiation and bombardment with other species, such as carbon or oxygen [19,33,34]. Type I spectra, on the other hand, are more intriguing as they seem to originate from a different class of color center we tentatively associate to Ce-based defects.

To interpret our observations, we begin with the Dieke-Carnall energy diagram of Ce3+, a characteristic charge state used here as an initial guide (Fig. 1(c)) [35]. With only one electron in its 4f orbital, the 2F ground state breaks into a manifold of seven Kramers doublets. Since the separation between them is relatively large, selective excitation from (to) the lowest energy doublet in the 4f (5d) set is possible with a laser tuned at (or near) 489 nm (blue arrow in Fig. 1(c)) [35]. Note that because 5 levels correspond to outer lying orbitals, excited state lifetimes in Ce3+ are expected to be short. Therefore, unlike heavier rare-earth ions — featuring low-photon-yield, intra-4f transitions — Ce3+ defects are expected to be bright.

Admittedly, however, the connection between Ce3+ ions and Type I emission is not immediate, as Type I spectra do not display a visible zero-phonon line (ZPL) near 489 nm, and their peak fluorescence wavelengths are heterogeneously distributed over a broad range. On the other hand, both observations are not unexpected as the Huang-Rhys factor of Ce3+ defects in common hosts is high (due to electronic-confinement mismatch following 4f↔5d atomic transitions) [20,35,36], whereas strain- and/or local-charge-induced spectral shifts (also affecting Type II emitters, Fig. 1(d)) are known to be large [13,34,37].

Despite the present limitations, valuable clues emerge from a more extensive optical characterization. Figure 2 zeroes in on a group of Type I sites, A through C, with nearly identical emission spectra and comparable excited state lifetimes. We monitor the fluorescence from one of these sites (A in Fig. 2(a)) as we vary the excitation wavelength using a tunable laser (Fig. 2(b)). Except for an overall scaling, we find the emission spectrum remains virtually unchanged, gradually fading as the excitation wavelength exceeds ∼ 490 nm. This response is consistent with that anticipated for a (hypothetical) Ce3+-based defect, as anti-Stokes-assisted photon absorption must decrease below the 4f $\leftrightarrow $ 5d transition energy [38]. Note that presumably identical sites (e.g., B, C in Fig. 2(a)), show different photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra (Fig. 2(c)), thus hinting at several subclasses of Type I emitters (the most likely scenario following an implantation process).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. Characterization of Type I defects. (a) (Main) Confocal image of a zoomed-in region from Fig. 1(a) under 485 nm pulsed-laser excitation. (Side Inserts) Fluorescence spectra and time decay for from three representative sites across the flake. Single-exponential fits reveal decay constants within 3–10 ns. (b) PLE spectra for all three sites in (a); dashed vertical line is the cutoff wavelength for PL collection. (c) PLE integrated intensity. Sites B and C follow a different trend, hinting at different classes of defects.

Download Full Size | PDF

Although these results suggest the ‘atom-like’ properties of Ce ions are somewhat preserved, the very notion of a Ce-based defect in hBN is a priori unclear, especially given the large atomic number mismatch between the implanted ions and the atoms of the crystal host. To gain some understanding, we resort to density-functional theory (DFT) in the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) including corrections for van der Waals interactions [3947]. Throughout our calculations, we use the projector augmented wave (PAW) method as implemented in the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package [48], with an orthorhombic supercell [49,50] of 6 layers, each containing 112 atoms (Supplemental Material, Section S.II.a).

Figure 3 summarizes the DFT results from one of the considered defects, where cerium associates with a boron vacancy in one of the adjacent atomic planes (Fig. 3(a)). In the following, we denote this system as CeVB instead of CeB due to the inter-layer position of the Ce atom. Unlike the case with a nitrogen vacancy, CeVN (Supplemental Material, Section S.II.b), we find reduced deformation of the atomic planes surrounding the defect. Calculation of the charge stability transition energies point to the positive, neutral, and negative charge states as the three most likely, with one or the other becoming dominant depending on the system’s Fermi energy (Fig. 3(b)). The latter can be modified locally via strain, which, in turn, can lead to pockets of fluorescent emitters heterogeneously distributed across the hBN flake; we suspect this mechanism underlies the formation of the bright spots seen in Figs. 1(a) and 2(a).

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Theoretical modelling of the CeVB defect center in hBN. (a) Atomic structure of the CeVB center (green, yellow, and gray spheres represent B, Ce and N atoms, respectively). (b) Charge stability for the +1, 0 and -1 charge states. (c-d) Ground state energy levels and density of states (DOS) for the 0 and -1 charge states, respectively. (e) Excited state energy levels and DOS for the neutral (0) charge state only. (f) The general 1D configurational-coordinate diagram, constructed from ground and excited state electronic calculations. (g) The corresponding emission spectrum as calculated from the effective parameters identified in (f). We calculate a negligible zero-phonon emission (vertical line at the origin) and a broad Stokes-shifted spectrum, in qualitative agreement with our observations. For the ZPL — set to 0 meV in the figure — we find a value of 2.50 eV.

Download Full Size | PDF

Inspection of the calculated density-of-states (DOS) plots in Fig. 3(c)-(e) reveals intra-bandgap levels deriving from the CeVB defect. The neutral charge state DOS (Fig. 4(c)) shows a single 4f state in the bandgap as the highest occupied orbital. Below the 4f state, other localized defect sates — corresponding to the boron vacancy — also fall inside the bandgap. Similarly, the negative charge state in Fig. 3(d) shows an occupation of a 4f state as well as an orbital with significant 5d character close to the conduction band. In addition, we find low hybridization of the ion’s 4f and 5d levels with localized defect states from the boron vacancy or bulk hBN, suggesting this system retains some of the key properties of the bare Ce3+ ion. We emphasize this feature cannot be generalized to all Ce-related defects as we find strong hybridization, e.g., when the Ce atom is forced to take an in-plane position (Supplementary Material, Section S.II.c).

We access excited state properties for this system by resorting to the self-consistent field (ΔSCF) approach (Fig. 3(f)). ΔSCF considers the energy difference between two separate energy calculations, one for the ground state and a second one, where we promote an electron from an occupied 4f state to a higher energy 5d-orbital. We follow the ab-initio methods outlined in [51] (Eqs. (2)–(11), which have been applied to NV centers in diamond and other atomic defects in hBN [5153]. These methods are based on a generating function and make use of the coupling between the ionically relaxed ground and excited state configurations, allowing to calculate optical properties (such as the Huang-Rhys factors). Figures 3(e)-(g) present the excited state properties for the defect structure in Fig. 3(a), obtained within this approach. We find a large configurational mismatch between the excited and ground state orbitals leading to a Huang-Rhys factor of 27 and a broad PL spectrum with vanishing ZPL (Fig. 3(g)), in qualitative agreement with the results summarized in Figs. 1 and 2. Note, however, that other potential Ce-vacancy complexes could show similarly broad features.

In summary, Ce implantation of hBN flakes produces a broad class of photon emitters, which we phenomenologically group in two classes featuring qualitatively different fluorescence spectra. One of these — exhibiting bright, stable Stokes-shifted emission over a broad band — generically reproduces Ce3+ emission previously seen in other material hosts, hence suggesting the presence of the ion. PLE data indicates that not all emitters in this class behave identically; in particular, we identify one sub-class whose response as a function of the illumination wavelength matches that expected for a Ce3+ ion. DFT calculations support the notion of stable Ce-based point defects in hBN. From among alternative options, the CeVB — comprising a Ce atom displaced from a vacant boron site towards an inter-layer position — features an intra-bandgap ground (excited) state with strong 4f (5d) character. Further, ΔSCF calculations allow us to derive a broad emission spectrum with vanishing ZPL, in qualitative agreement with our observations.

More generally, our results suggest an intriguing route to emitter engineering that benefits from the singular properties of 2D materials without necessarily relying on intrinsic point defects. Indeed, the atom-like properties of rare-earth ions prompts us to think in terms of an elemental toolkit containing nearly-ready-to-use spin qubits. The latter appears relevant to systems such as hBN, where all nuclear isotopes are spin active and intrinsic magneto-optically-active defects exhibit broad ODMR lines [17,18] (at odds with spin control protocols). It is still unclear, however, whether color centers stemming from rare-earth ion implantation exhibit valuable spin properties, a question that will require further investigation. On the other hand, the use of multi-layer membranes makes it possible to create surface-insensitive environments, while facilitating integration with structures for light extraction, strain engineering, or voltage control. Finally, extending this approach to 2D systems with heavier host atoms — such as transition metal dichalcogenides — could prove possible despite their lower bandgap, e.g., by resorting to rare-earth ions such as Er3+ with emission in the telecom band [54].

Funding

Crest Ideals (NSF-1547830); Research Corporation for Science Advancement (FRED); National Science Foundation (1547830, 1906096).

Acknowledgements

G.I.L.M. and N.V.P. acknowledge financial support from CREST IDEALS supported through grant NSF-1547830. V.M.M. and C.A.M. acknowledge support from the National Science Foundation through grant NSF-1906096. C.A.M. acknowledges support from Research Corporation through a FRED award. The Flatiron Institute is a division of the Simons Foundation.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Supplemental document

See Supplement 1 for supporting content.

References

1. P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, J. S. Hodges, and M. D. Lukin, “Coherence and control of quantum registers based on electronic spin in a nuclear spin bath,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(21), 210502 (2009). [CrossRef]  

2. D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, J. Wrachtrup, and B. B. Zhou, “Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins,” Nat. Photonics 12(9), 516–527 (2018). [CrossRef]  

3. L. Childress and R. Hanson, “Diamond NV centers for quantum computing and quantum networks,” MRS Bull. 38(2), 134–138 (2013). [CrossRef]  

4. A. Lohrmann, B. C. Johnson, J. C. McCallum, and S. Castelletto, “A review on single photon sources in silicon carbide,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80(3), 034502 (2017). [CrossRef]  

5. I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, “Solid-state single-photon emitters,” Nat. Photonics 10(10), 631–641 (2016). [CrossRef]  

6. S. Ren, Q. Tan, and J. Zhang, “Review on the quantum emitters in two-dimensional materials,” J. Semicond. 40(7), 071903 (2019). [CrossRef]  

7. M. Toth and I. Aharonovich, “Single photon sources in atomically thin materials,” Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 70(1), 123–142 (2019). [CrossRef]  

8. F. Peyskens, C. Chakraborty, M. Muneeb, D. Van Thourhout, and D. Englund, “Integration of single photon emitters in 2D layered materials with a silicon nitride photonic chip,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 4435 (2019). [CrossRef]  

9. A. W. Schell, H. Takashima, T. T. Tran, I. Aharonovich, and S. Takeuchi, “Coupling quantum emitters in 2D materials with tapered fibers,” ACS Photonics 4(4), 761–767 (2017). [CrossRef]  

10. N. V. Proscia, H. Jayakumar, X. Ge, G. Lopez-Morales, Z. Shotan, W. Zhou, C. A. Meriles, and V. M Menon, “Microcavity-coupled emitters in 2D hexagonal boron nitride,” Nanophot. 9(9), 2937–2944 (2020). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Koperski, K. Nogajewski, and M. Potemski, “Single photon emitters in boron nitride: More than a supplementary material,” Opt. Commun. 411, 158–165 (2018). [CrossRef]  

12. A. Sajid, M. J. Ford, and J. R Reimers, “Single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride: A review of progress,” Rep. Prog. Phys. (2019).

13. Z. Shotan, H. Jayakumar, C. R. Considine, M. Mackoit, H. Fedder, J. Wrachtrup, A. Alkauskas, M. W. Doherty, V. M. Menon, and C. A. Meriles, “Photoinduced modification of single-photon emitters in hexagonal boron nitride,” ACS Photonics 3(12), 2490–2496 (2016). [CrossRef]  

14. N. Nikolay, N. Mendelson, N. Sadzak, F. Böhm, T. T. Tran, B. Sontheimer, I. Aharonovich, and O. Benson, “Very large and reversible stark-shift tuning of single emitters in layered hexagonal boron nitride,” Phys. Rev. Applied 11(4), 041001 (2019). [CrossRef]  

15. N. V. Proscia, Z. Shotan, H. Jayakumar, P. Reddy, M. Dollar, A. Alkauskas, M. Doherty, C. A. Meriles, and V. M. Menon, “Near-deterministic activation of room-temperature quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride,” Optica 5(9), 1128 (2018). [CrossRef]  

16. A. L. Exarhos, D. A. Hopper, R. N. Patel, M. W. Doherty, and L. C. Bassett, “Magnetic-field-dependent quantum emission in hexagonal boron nitride at room temperature,” Nat. Commun. 10(1), 222 (2019). [CrossRef]  

17. N. Chejanovsky, A. Mukherjee, Y. Kim, A. Denisenko, A. Finkler, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, D. B. R. Dasari, J. H. Smet, and J. Wrachtrup, “Single spin resonance in a van der Waals embedded paramagnetic defect,” Nat. Mater. 20(8), 1079–1084 (2021). [CrossRef]  

18. A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlinskii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, “Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der Waals crystal at room temperature,” Nat. Mat. 19(5), 540–545 (2020). [CrossRef]  

19. N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, J. R. Reimers, T. S. Cheng, A. Gottscholl, H. Long, C. J. Mellor, A. Zettl, V. Dyakonov, P. H. Beton, S. V. Novikov, C. Jagadish, H. H. Tan, M. J. Ford, M. Toth, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, “Identifying carbon as the source of visible single-photon emission from hexagonal boron nitride,” Nat. Mater. 20(3), 321–328 (2021). [CrossRef]  

20. R. Kolesov, K. Xia, R. Reuter, M. Jamali, R. Stohr, T. Inal, P. Siyushev, and J. Wrachtrup, “Mapping spin coherence of a single rare-earth ion in a crystal onto a single photon polarization state,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111(12), 120502 (2013). [CrossRef]  

21. J. Wu, L. Yin, and L. Zhang, “Tuning the electronic structure, bandgap energy and photoluminescence properties of hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets via a controllable Ce3+ ions doping,” RSC Adv. 3(20), 7408 (2013). [CrossRef]  

22. J. Jung, Y. Baek, J. Lee, Y. Kim, S. Cho, and Y. Kim, “The structure and luminescence of boron nitride doped with Ce ions,” Appl. Phys. A 124(9), 628 (2018). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Y. Jung, J. Kim, Y. D. Kim, Y. Kim, H. Cha, J. Lee, C. S. Son, and D. Hwang, “Enhanced crystallinity and luminescence characteristics of hexagonal boron nitride doped with cerium ions according to tempering temperatures,” Materials 14(1), 193 (2021). [CrossRef]  

24. J. Jung, B. Song, and Y. Kim, “Tunable color emission of transparent boron nitride nanophosphors towards anti-counterfeiting application,” J. Alloys Compd. 791, 81–86 (2019). [CrossRef]  

25. D. Golla, K. Chattrakun, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. J. LeRoy, and A. Sandhu, “Optical thickness determination of hexagonal boron nitride flakes,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(16), 161906 (2013). [CrossRef]  

26. Y. Anzai, M. Yamamoto, S. Genchi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Ichikawa, Y. Fujiwara, and H. Tanaka, “Broad range thickness identification of hexagonal boron nitride by colors,” Appl. Phys. Express 12(5), 055007 (2019). [CrossRef]  

27. A. G. F. Garcia, M. Neumann, F. Amet, J. R. Williams, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, “Effective cleaning of hexagonal boron nitride for graphene devices,” Nano Lett. 12(9), 4449–4454 (2012). [CrossRef]  

28. J. Tan, Y. Wang, and Y. Guo, “Humidity effect on peeling of monolayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride,” Nanotechnology 32(2), 025302 (2021). [CrossRef]  

29. Z. Wang, Y. Zhu, D. Ji, Z. Li, and H. Yu, “Scalable exfoliation and high-efficiency separation membrane of boron nitride nanosheets,” ChemistrySelect 5(12), 3567–3573 (2020). [CrossRef]  

30. S. Reich, A. C. Ferrari, R. Arenal, A. Loiseau, I. Bello, and J. Robertson, “Resonant Raman scattering in cubic and hexagonal boron nitride,” Phys. Rev. B 71(20), 205201 (2005). [CrossRef]  

31. P. Kumbhakar, A. K. Kole, C. S. Tiwary, S. Biswas, S. Vinod, J. Taha-Tijerina, U. Chatterjee, and P. M. Ajayan, “Nonlinear optical properties and temperature-dependent UV–vis absorption and photoluminescence emission in 2D hexagonal boron nitride nanosheets,” Adv. Optical Mater. 3(6), 828–835 (2015). [CrossRef]  

32. E. Aradi, S. R. Naidoo, R. M. Erasmus, B. Julies, and T. E. Derry, “Investigations on the characterization of ion implanted hexagonal boron nitride,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 307, 214–217 (2013). [CrossRef]  

33. T. T. Tran, C. Elbadawi, D. Totonjian, C. J. Lobo, G. Grosso, H. Moon, D. R. Englund, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and M. Toth, “Robust multicolor single photon emission from point defects in hexagonal boron nitride,” ACS Nano 10(8), 7331–7338 (2016). [CrossRef]  

34. X. Li, G. D. Shepard, A. Cupo, N. Camporeale, K. Shayan, Y. Luo, V. Meunier, and S. Strauf, “Nonmagnetic quantum emitters in boron nitride with ultranarrow and sideband-free emission spectra,” ACS Nano 11(7), 6652–6660 (2017). [CrossRef]  

35. P. Siyushev, K. Xia, R. Reuter, M. Jamali, N. Zhao, N. Yang, C. Duan, N. Kukharchyk, A. D. Wieck, R. Kolesov, and J. Wrachtrup, “Coherent properties of single rare-earth spin qubits,” Nat. Commun. 5(1), 3895 (2014). [CrossRef]  

36. E. M. Shishonok, S. V. Leonchik, J. W. Steeds, and D. Wolverson, “Strong ultraviolet luminescence from cerium- and gadolinium-doped cubic boron nitride,” Diamond & Related Materials 16(8), 1602–1607 (2007). [CrossRef]  

37. G. Grosso, H. Moon, B. Lienhard, S. Ali, D. K. Efetov, M. M. Furchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M. J. Ford, I. Aharonovich, and D. Englund, “Tunable and high-purity room temperature single-photon emission from atomic defects in hexagonal boron nitride,” Nat. Commun. 8(1), 705 (2017). [CrossRef]  

38. X. He, X. Liu, R. Li, B. Yang, K. Yu, M. Zeng, and R. Yu, “Effects of local structure of Ce3+ ions on luminescent properties of Y3Al5O12:Ce nanoparticles,” Sci. Rep. 6(1), 22238 (2016). [CrossRef]  

39. J. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, “Generalized gradient approximation made simple,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(18), 3865–3868 (1996). [CrossRef]  

40. A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaane, “Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 52(8), R5467–R5470 (1995). [CrossRef]  

41. Y. Jia, A. Miglio, S. Poncé, X. Gonze, and M. Mikami, “First-principles study of Ce 3 + -doped lanthanum silicate nitride phosphors: Neutral excitation, Stokes shift, and luminescent center identification,” Phys. Rev. B 93(15), 155111 (2016). [CrossRef]  

42. M. Casadei, X. Ren, P. Rinke, A. Rubio, and M. Scheffler, “Density-functional theory for f-electron systems: The α − γ phase transition in cerium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(14), 146402 (2012). [CrossRef]  

43. D. Lu and P. Liu, “Rationalization of the Hubbard U parameter in CeOx from first principles: Unveiling the role of local structure in screening,” J. Chem. Phys. 140(8), 084101 (2014). [CrossRef]  

44. S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and S. Krieg, “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu,” J. Chem. Phys. 132(15), 154104 (2010). [CrossRef]  

45. S. Grimme, S. Ehrlich, and L. Goerig, “Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory,” J. Comput. Chem. 32(7), 1456–1465 (2011). [CrossRef]  

46. C. Freysoldt, J. Neugebauer, and C. G. Van de Walle, “Fully ab initio finite-size corrections for charged-defect supercell calculations,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(1), 016402 (2009). [CrossRef]  

47. A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, “Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals,” J. Chem. Phys. 125(22), 224106 (2006). [CrossRef]  

48. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, “Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set,” Phys. Rev. B 54(16), 11169–11186 (1996). [CrossRef]  

49. L. Weston, D. Wickramaratne, M. Mackoit, A. Alkauskas, and C. G. Van de Walle, “Native point defects and impurities in hexagonal boron nitride,” Phys. Rev. B 97(21), 214104 (2018). [CrossRef]  

50. M. Mackoit-Sinkevičien, M. Maciaszek, C. G. Van de Walle, and A. Alkauskas, “Carbon dimer defect as a source of the 4.1 eV luminescence in hexagonal boron nitride,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 115(21), 212101 (2019). [CrossRef]  

51. A. Alkauskas, B. B. Buckley, D. D. Awschalom, and C. G. Van de Walle, “First-principles theory of the luminescence lineshape for the triplet transition in diamond NV centres,” New J. Phys. 16(7), 073026 (2014). [CrossRef]  

52. S. A. Tawfik, S. Ali, M. Fronzi, M. Kianinia, T. T. Tran, C. Stampfl, I. Aharonovich, M. Toth, and M. J. Ford, “First-principles investigation of quantum emission from hBN defects,” Nanoscale 9(36), 13575–13582 (2017). [CrossRef]  

53. G. Grosso, H. Moon, C. J. Ciccarino, J. Flick, N. Mendelson, L. Mennel, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, P. Narang, and D. R. Englund, “Low-temperature electron–phonon interaction of quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride,” ACS Photonics 7(6), 1410–1417 (2020). [CrossRef]  

54. Y. Sun, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, R. W. Equall, and R. L. Hutcheson, “Recent progressing developing new rare earth materials for hole burning and coherent transient applications,” J. Lumin. 98(1-4), 281–287 (2002). [CrossRef]  

Supplementary Material (1)

NameDescription
Supplement 1       Supporting information for: Investigation of photon emitters in Ce-implanted hexagonal boron nitride

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Steady-state spectroscopy of Ce-implanted hBN flakes. (a) Confocal microscopy images of a Ce-implanted hBN flake under 460 nm laser excitation at room-temperature (left) and 5 K (right) revealing a high density of emitting sites across the flake. Emission stemming from a suspended region of the flake (dashed white square) indicates emitters are localized within hBN, not at the interface with the substrate. (b) Representative PL spectra collected from different sites throughout the hBN flake, revealing the simultaneous presence of Ce-derived defects (Type I) and intrinsic hBN defects (Type II). Noticeable spectral shifts are often observed for both types of defects. (c) Energy-level diagram for Ce3+. (d) Statistics of Type I and Type II spectra collected from isolated sites across multiple hBN flakes at room-temperature (upper panel) and 5 K (lower panel). Dashed lines are guides to the eye.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Characterization of Type I defects. (a) (Main) Confocal image of a zoomed-in region from Fig. 1(a) under 485 nm pulsed-laser excitation. (Side Inserts) Fluorescence spectra and time decay for from three representative sites across the flake. Single-exponential fits reveal decay constants within 3–10 ns. (b) PLE spectra for all three sites in (a); dashed vertical line is the cutoff wavelength for PL collection. (c) PLE integrated intensity. Sites B and C follow a different trend, hinting at different classes of defects.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Theoretical modelling of the CeVB defect center in hBN. (a) Atomic structure of the CeVB center (green, yellow, and gray spheres represent B, Ce and N atoms, respectively). (b) Charge stability for the +1, 0 and -1 charge states. (c-d) Ground state energy levels and density of states (DOS) for the 0 and -1 charge states, respectively. (e) Excited state energy levels and DOS for the neutral (0) charge state only. (f) The general 1D configurational-coordinate diagram, constructed from ground and excited state electronic calculations. (g) The corresponding emission spectrum as calculated from the effective parameters identified in (f). We calculate a negligible zero-phonon emission (vertical line at the origin) and a broad Stokes-shifted spectrum, in qualitative agreement with our observations. For the ZPL — set to 0 meV in the figure — we find a value of 2.50 eV.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.