Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Energy transfer and thermal stability in Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped germanium-borate glasses for organic-resin-free UV LEDs

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

In this paper, novel Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped white-emitting germanium-borate glasses were successfully prepared by the melt-quenching method. Their luminescent properties were evaluated using the transmission spectra, photoluminescence excitation, and emission spectra (with a temperature range of 298-573 K), and lifetime decay curves. Due to the efficient energy transfer from Bi3+ to Eu3+, tunable emitting color between the bluish-green and the orange-red region has been obtained by varying the content of Eu3+ (0-7%). Interestingly, a perfect white-light emission with CIE coordinates (X = 0.356, Y = 0.325) is realized upon the excitation at 345 nm light in the Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped sample. More remarkably, the white-light emission glass maintains excellent color stability even at 423 K. Our results indicate that the Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped germanium-borate glasses may be used as a potential single-phased white light-emitting matrix material for the UV converted organic-resin-free WLEDs in the future.

© 2016 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Over the past two decades, there has been a growing focus on the research into phosphor-converted white-light emitting diodes (pc-WLEDs) owing to their economical and technological advantages with energy-efficient and environment-friendly characteristics [1–6]. High power pc-WLEDs fabricated by combining an ultraviolet (UV) LED chip with tri-color phosphors have particularly attracted more attention in recent years for the provision of high color quality, such as full gamut, higher color rendering index, lower color temperature, etc [7–9]. However, one of the major drawbacks for pc-WLEDs is the deterioration and yellowing of organic-resins used as encapsulating materials when the chip temperature of LED increases at higher driving current, which will lead to the luminous efficiency degradation, shift of chromaticity, and reduction of long-term reliability [6,10,11]. In addition, different luminescence responses of multiple phosphors packed in pc-WLEDs to thermal impact can also result in poor white light luminous brightness and color variation of the device [12–14].

Aiming to solve these problems, single-phase white light-emitting glasses are of great interest as an alternative strategy for WLEDs because of their excellent optical properties, better mechanical resistance, lower production cost and simpler package schemes. More importantly, the luminescent glasses show an organic-resin free assembly process and thus can effectively avoid aforementioned shortcomings [15,16]. Up to now, many studies regarding the white light luminescent glasses have been carried out by codoping multiple activators and managing the energy transfer between them, such as Ce3+/Eu3+ [17], Ce3+/Sm3+ [18], Ce3+/Tb3+/Mn2+ [15], Eu2+/Tb3+ [19], Eu2+/Dy3+ [20], Ag/Eu3+ [21], Cu/Eu3+ [16], and Cu/Sm3+ [22].

Trivalent bismuth (Bi3+), as one other kind of activator, has the outer 6s2 electronic configuration, enabling photoluminescence in different color region (from ultraviolet to blue, green, yellow and even red spectral range) which depends strongly on the type of host for Bi3+ doping [23,24]. These outstanding luminescent properties make Bi3+ not only a good candidate for spectra conversion but a fascinating class of sensitizers as well. Co-doping of Bi3+ with rare earth (RE) ions, such as Eu3+ and Sm3+, has been carried out extensively on phosphors as a means of acquiring white light emission via ET [14,25–27]. However, this strategy has rarely been utilized in glasses that could be efficiently excited by UV LED chips.

Herein, the glass-forming system GeO2-B2O3-Gd2O3-La2O3 was chosen as host due to the specific suitability for optically active Bi3+ species which generally occurs in germanates and (or) borates. Gd2O3 and La2O3 were introduced as modifiers to broaden the excitation wavelength of Bi3+ around 350-380 nm for matching well with the UV LED chips. Moreover, the high solubility for rare earth ions, such as terbium (Tb3+) has been reported in this glass system previously [28]. In the present study, Bi3+ emission centering at about 480 nm was observed under 345 nm light excitation. Because the lack of red emission in Bi3+ singly doped glass, a red emitter Eu3+ was intentionally introduced into this system for the white light tunable emission by controlling the energy transfer from Bi3+ to Eu3+. Different techniques including transmission spectra, photoluminescence excitation and emission spectra and lifetime decay curves have been utilized to investigate the luminescent properties of Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped germanium-borate glasses, and the energy transfer mechanism was thoroughly discussed. To understand the thermal quenching behavior of the optimized white light-emitting sample, temperature-dependent photoluminescence spectra in the range of 298-573 K was also performed.

2. Experimental

Glasses with nominal molar composition of 40GeO2-25B2O3-25Gd2O3-10La2O3 (Host) were prepared using a conventional melt-quenching technique. The doping species were 1 mol% Bi2O3 and x mol% Eu2O3 (where x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.5, labeled as GB1.0 and GBEx, respectively). Another sample doped with 0.3 mol% Eu2O3 alone (GE0.3) was also prepared for comparison. GeO2 (≥99.999%, Lincang Xinyuan Germanium Industrial Co., Ltd., China), H3BO3 (A.R. purity, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China), Gd2O3, La2O3 (99.99%, Shanghai Yuelong Nonferrous Metals Co., Ltd., China), Bi2O3 and Eu2O3 (99.99%) from Aladdin reagents were used as raw materials. Approximately 10 g batches of raw materials were fully mixed and melted in a covered corundum crucible at 1350 °C for 1h in air. The melt was poured onto a 300 °C preheated stainless-steel plate and pressed by another plate, and then annealed at 450 °C to release the inner stress. Finally, all the obtained glasses were sliced and polished with thickness of 2 mm for optical measurements.

The glass density was calculated according to the Archimedes principle, and distilled water was used as an immersion liquid. The refractive index of the glasses was measured directly by a Metricon Model 2010 prism coupler. Transmittance spectra were measured using a Hitachi U-3900 Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectrophotometer. Photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra were recorded on an Edinburgh FLS920 spectrofluorometer equipped with a continuous wave 450 W Xe lamp as excitation source. To study the thermal quenching properties of glasses, high-temperature PL spectra were measured between 298 and 573 K using a TAP-02 high-temperature heating instrument (Tian Jin Orient-KOJI instrument Co., Ltd.) connected to the FLS920 spectrofluorometer. A Hamamatsu R928 photomultiplier was used for signal detection. All PL results were corrected for the spectral response of the detection system. Luminescence decay lifetimes (ns) were determined by a Hamamatsu Quantaurus-Tau C11367 compact fluorescence lifetime spectrometer. Unless otherwise specified, all the measurements were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 UV-vis transmission spectra and optical band gap

Figure 1 displays the UV-vis transmission spectra of the Host, GB1.0, GBEx and GE0.3 samples in the spectral range of 300 to 800 nm. All samples are highly transparent (about 82%) and colorless. Two weak absorption peaks at 273 and 312 nm associated with the 8S7/26IJ and 8S7/26PJ characteristic transitions of Gd3+ ions [29], respectively, can be detected in the host glass (Host). Compared with the Host sample, the GB1.0 and GBEx samples show a noticeable red-shift in the glass absorption edge from 300 to 350 nm, which is generally from the characteristic absorption of Bi3+, corresponding to the 1S03P1 transition [30,31]. Meanwhile, two weak absorption peaks at 273 and 312 nm completely vanish. For all the Eu3+ doped samples (GE0.3 and GBEx), several characteristic absorption peaks located at 393, 464 and 529 nm are observed due to the 4f-4f electric transitions of Eu3+ ions from the ground state 7F0 to the excited states 5L6, 5D2 and 5D1, respectively [32], as labeled in Fig. 1. Notably, the intensity of all Eu3+-related absorption peaks increases gradually with the elevated Eu2O3 concentration.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 UV-vis transmission spectra of the Host, GB1.0, GBEx (x = 0.3, 1.0) and GE0.3 samples.

Download Full Size | PDF

Normally, the absorption edge is caused by the electronic transitions (as discussed above), which also reflects the optical band gap of glass. As developed by Tauc and Menth [33], the relationship between the absorption coefficient (α) and the optical band gap (Eg) can be expressed through the following equation:

αhv=B(hνEg)n
where B is a constant, hνrepresents the photon energy in eV, and n takes the values 1/2 and 2 corresponding to the direct and indirect transitions, respectively. For many amorphous materials, a reasonable fit of Eq. (1) with n = 2 is carried out. The absorption coefficient αcan be obtained from the transmittance T and thickness d of the glass (α=lgT/d). Thus, by plotting (αhv)1/2as a function of photon energy hν(Tauc’s plot), one can find the optical band gap (Eg). Finally, Eg are determined from the extrapolation of the linear region of (αhv)1/2=0 and the respective values are listed in Table 1. It is found that the values of Eg decrease from 4.15 to 3.35 eV with addition of Bi3+ and (or) Eu3+ into the glass. This result manifests the incorporations of Bi2O3 and (or) Eu2O3 may effectively open the glass network, which produces more nonbridging oxygens and thus leads to the decline of the band gap.

Tables Icon

Table 1. Density, refractive index, and indirect optical band gap of glasses samples.

In order to evaluate the physical properties, the density and refractive index of all glasses samples are investigated and presented in Table 1.

3.2 Photoluminescence of Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glasses

Excitation and emission spectra of the Host, GB1.0, GBE0.3 and GE0.3 samples are compared in Fig. 2. It can be clearly seen that the excitation spectra (λem = 480 nm) of the GB1.0 sample covers a broad UV excitation band from 250 to 400 nm with a maximum intensity at about 345 nm corresponding to the 1S03P1 transition of Bi3+, being consistent with the absorption band of Bi3+ in Fig. 1. The high excitation intensity at 320-380 nm suggests that Bi3+ doped germanium-borate glasses can be a good candidate for UV-pumping WLEDs. Upon excitation at 345 nm, this sample shows a broad intense bluish-green emitting band spanning the spectral range of 380 to 700 nm, originating from the 3P11S0 characteristic transition of Bi3+ (Fig. 2(a)). For the Eu3+ singly doped sample GE0.3, there are two sets of excitation signals observed in the excitation spectra shown in Fig. 2(b)em = 612 nm), namely, one broad band at around 290 nm and several sharp excitation peaks centered at 362, 378, 393, 413 and 464 nm. Obviously, the first one arises from the well-known Eu3+-O2- charge transfer (CT) band, and the other sharp peaks are assigned to the 4f-4f transitions of Eu3+ from 7F0 to 5D4, 5G4, 5L6, 5D3 and 5D2, respectively. The dominant excitation peak is located at 393 nm, being fully in agreement with the transmittance spectra (Fig. 1). Moreover, two sharp peaks at about 273 and 312 nm, originated from the Gd3+ 8S7/26IJ and 8S7/26PJ transitions, respectively, are also observed in the excitation spectra, which confirms the existence of the energy transfer (ET) from Gd3+ to Eu3+ in the present GE0.3 glass sample. When monitoring the 612 nm emission for the co-doped sample GBE0.3, both CT band and two sharp peaks from Gd3+ disappear in the excitation spectra. Oppositely, an extra broad excitation band centered at 345 nm ranging from 250 to 380 nm can be detected in addition to the aforementioned several characteristic sharp peaks related to 4f-4f transitions of Eu3+ ions. The shape and peak position of this broad band resemble those in the Bi3+ singly doped sample (Fig. 2(a)), implying an efficient occurrence of ET from Bi3+ to Eu3+ in the co-doped glass sample. This energy transfer could be attributed to a strong overlap between the emission of Bi3+ (Fig. 2(a)) and the excitation of Eu3+ (Fig. 2(b)) in the range of 380-480 nm. Accordingly, excited by a 345 nm light, the optimal excitation wavelength for Bi3+ but not for Eu3+, the emission spectra of GBE0.3 glass not only includes a bluish-green emitting broad band centered about 480 nm from Bi3+ but also contains five red characteristic emissions of Eu3+, peaking at 580, 591, 612, 652 and 702 nm, respectively. The latter can readily be assigned to the intrinsic 4f-4f transitions from the excited state 5D0 to the index states 7FJ (J = 0-4). It is notable that the Eu3+-related emissions become significantly enhanced for GBE0.3 compared with that of the GE0.3 sample, and almost no emission is detected in the host glass under the same excitation conditions. All of these results indicate that high light output of Eu3+ actually comes from the ET process from Bi3+ to Eu3+.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 Excitation and emission spectra of (a) GB1.0, (b) GE0.3 and GBE0.3 samples.

Download Full Size | PDF

In order to obtain a deeper insight into the ET process, photoluminescence and luminescence dynamics of the Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glasses with varying Eu2O3 doping concentrations were systemically investigated. Figure 3(a) shows the emission spectra (λex = 345 nm) of GB1.0 and GBEx (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5) samples. With increasing content of Eu3+, the emission intensity of Bi3+ decreases continuously, while that of Eu3+ increases rapidly. This observation directly verifies the presence of ET process from Bi3+ to Eu3+. In particular, within the doping concentration range (up to x = 3.5), no quenching of Eu3+ emission occurs, indicating that germanium-borate glass could be a suitable host for Eu3+ heavy doping.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Emission (λex = 345 nm), (b) Excitation (λem = 480 nm) spectra of the GB1.0 and GBEx (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5) samples. The inset of (b) shows the excitation spectra (λem = 612 nm). (c) Luminescence decay curves of GB1.0 and GBEx samples (λex = 345 nm, λem = 480 nm). (d) CIE chromaticity coordinates and luminescence photos corresponding to the emission of glass samples.

Download Full Size | PDF

Furthermore, it should be noted that a hole located at 464 nm, which just corresponds to the characteristic excitation (absorption) of Eu3+, is observed in the Bi3+ emission band for all co-doped samples, and this can be clearly seen from the enlarged spectra in the inset of Fig. 3(a)). Such result shows that a portion of the bluish-green emission from Bi3+ can also be re-absorbed by Eu3+ since there exists a large spectral overlaps between them. Clearly, the re-absorption at 464 nm becomes more efficient with the elevated content of Eu3+ ions.

Figure 3(b) depicts the excitation spectra of Bi3+ emission monitored at 480 nm (λem = 480 nm) for GB1.0 and GBEx (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5) samples. It is seen that the intensity of excitation band ranging from 250 to 400 nm also decreases all the way, which is similar with the observed luminescence behavior of Bi3+ in Fig. 3(a). However, both excitation signals from Bi3+ and Eu3+ are continuously enhanced when monitoring the strong emission peak of Eu3+ at 612 nm (λem = 612 nm), as shown in the inset of Fig. 3(b). All the above results definitively corroborate the proposed ET process, i.e., from Bi3+ to Eu3+.

The luminescence decay curves of Bi3+ex = 345 nm, λem = 480 nm) for the GB1.0 and GBEx samples were measured to give a more convincing evidence of the ET. As shown in Fig. 3(c), all the decay curves fit well only into a double-exponential equation [25,34]:

I(t)=A1exp(t/τ1)+A2exp(t/τ2)
where I is the luminescence intensity at time t, parameters A1 and A2 are the fitting constants, and τ1 as well as τ2 are the short- and long-decay exponential components, respectively. The fitting results of theτ1, τ2 and correlation coefficient R2 are presented in Table 2. Using the above equation, the average lifetimes (τ) can be further evaluated by the following equation [25, 34]:
τ=(A1τ12+A2τ22)/(A1τ1+A2τ2)
consequently, the average lifetimes are determined to be about 460, 455, 438, 426, 398, 334, 314 and 270 ns for x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.5, respectively (Table 2). These values are similar to the lifetime of Bi3+ emission in crystal hosts. Obviously, increasing Eu3+ content leads to a faster decline in the lifetime of Bi3+ emission at 480 nm, indicating the ET from Bi3+ to the neighboring Eu3+. On this basis, the ET efficiency (ηT) from Bi3+ to Eu3+ is estimated using the following expression [35, 36]:
ηT=1τs/τs0
where τs0 and τsstands for the luminescence lifetime of sensitizer Bi3+ in the absence and the presence of the activator Eu3+, respectively. Using this Eq. (4), the obtained ηT values from Bi3+ to Eu3+ are 1.1, 4.8, 7.4, 13.5, 27.4, 31.7 and 41.3% for x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.5, respectively. This manifests that the ET from Bi3+ to Eu3+ becomes increasingly efficient with the increase of Eu3+ concentration.

Tables Icon

Table 2. Lifetimes (λex = 345 nm, λem = 480 nm), ET efficiencyηT, and CIE chromaticity coordinates of glasses samples.

The Dexter’s energy transfer theory was used to reveal the possible mechanism of the ET from Bi3+ to Eu3+. For a multipolar-multipolar interaction process, the equation can be expressed as [37]:

η0ηCn/3
whereη0 and η are the luminescence quantum efficiencies of Bi3+ in the absence and the presence of Eu3+, respectively, and C is the Eu3+ concentration. The n value depends on the type of interactions, specifically, n = 6, 8 and 10 for dipole-dipole (d-d), dipole-quadrupole (d-q) and quadrupole-quadrupole (q-q) interactions, respectively. Normally, the ratioη0/η can be estimated approximately by the related integrated emission intensity (I0/I) [38]. Based on this fact, the relationship of I0/I versus Cn/3 are plotted in Fig. 4, and best linear fitting was found (99.66%) only when n = 6. It implies, therefore, that the d-d interaction dominates the energy transfer from Bi3+ to Eu3+.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Dependence of (I0/I) values on (a) C6/3, (b) C8/3 and (c) C10/3 in GBEx (x = 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5) samples. Correlation efficiencies are 99.66, 97.70 and 94.60% for the fittings to Eq. (5), respectively.

Download Full Size | PDF

The energy level scheme of Bi3+ and Eu3+ ions with optical transitions as well as the possible ET process are schematically depicted in Fig. 5. When excited by the UV light (320-380 nm), electrons of Bi3+ are firstly excited from the 1S0 ground state to the 3P1 excited state, and then nonradiatively relax to the lowest vibration level of the 3P1 state, giving the typical bluish-green emission peaking at 480 nm when they radiatively relax down to the 1S0 ground state to. Because the 3P1 excited state of Bi3+ is energetically close to the 5L6 and 5D2 levels of Eu3+, a resonance nonradiative ET process can easily proceed. An excited Bi3+ relaxes from the excited state to the ground state nonradiatively and transfers the excitation energy to a neighboring Eu3+, promoting it from the 7F0 ground state to the 5L6 (393 nm) and (or) 5D2 (464 nm) level, respectively. Such ET process will lead to a decline in the lifetime of Bi3+ emission, as shown in Fig. 3(c). After that, the electrons populated in the 5L6 and (or) 5D2 levels of Eu3+ undergo multi-phonon relaxation to the emitting 5D0 level and then radiatively relax to the 7FJ level, showing enhanced red emissions of Eu3+. In addition, a part of the bluish-green emission from Bi3+ can also be re-absorbed by Eu3+ because of the spectral overlaps (see Figs. 2 and 3), which usually has no effect on the lifetime of Bi3+ emission.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Energy level scheme of Bi3+ and Eu3+ ions as well as the possible ET process

Download Full Size | PDF

Through an efficient ET process from Bi3+ to Eu3+, the intensity ratio of Bi3+ bluish-green to Eu3+ red emission can be tuned by changing the Eu3+ concentration. Combining both of them, therefore, white light emission may be achieved. Figure 3(d) shows the luminescence colors of GB1.0 and GBEx (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5) samples characterized by the Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage (CIE) chromaticity diagram under 345 nm light excitation. The corresponding chromaticity coordinates are summarized in Table 2. Interestingly, the color gradually shifts from bluish-green to white and finally falls into a red region with the increasing Eu3+ content, as vividly shown in the luminescence photographs of the representative glass samples taken under 345 nm excitation in dark (Fig. 3(d)). A perfect white light emission is obtained in GBE0.3 and GBE0.5 samples with the CIE coordinates of (0.309,0.311) and (0.356,0.325), respectively, indicating that Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped germanium-borate glasses could be used as white-emitting phosphors for UV LED chips.

3.3 Thermal quenching properties of Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped white-emitting glass

The thermal quenching property is an important technological parameter for practical application in the solid-state lighting field because it has a considerable influence on the light output and color rendering index [39–41]. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the thermal quenching particularly at temperatures higher than room temperature. Figure 6(a) presents the emission spectra of the white light-emitting GBE0.5 sample measured at different temperatures upon 345 nm light excitation. Clearly, both the emission intensities for Bi3+ and Eu3+ part decrease with increasing temperature. By plotting the integrated intensity dependence of the Bi3+ and Eu3+ emissions on temperature in Fig. 6(b), it can be seen that the intensities at 423 K for Bi3+ and Eu3+ remain only 29.5% and 43.6% of the initial values at 298 K, respectively. This indicates the thermal quenching of Bi3+ is much serious than that of Eu3+. Generally, the thermal quenching of the emission intensity can be interpreted as the process in which, by active phonon-assistance, the luminescence center is thermally excited through the crossing point between the excited state and the ground state, and then returns to the ground state nonradiatively, thus resulting in a decline of the emission intensity. This nonradiative transition probability by thermal activation is strongly dependent on the energy barrier, that is, activation energy (Ea). The smaller activation energy is, the more severe thermal quenching is. According to the Arrhenius equation, the activation energy (Ea) of the luminescence center can be evaluated by [42, 43]:

IT=I01+cexp(EakT)
where I0 is the initial emission intensity (298 K), T is the temperature in Kelvin, IT is the integral emission intensity at different temperatures T, c is a constant, and k is the Boltzmann constant (8.629 × 10−5 eV·K−1). The relationship of ln(I0/IT −1) versus 1/kT is plotted in Fig. 6(c), from which the values of Ea for Bi3+ and Eu3+ are calculated to be about 0.17 eV and 0.21 eV, respectively, in the GBE0.5 glass sample, implying a more rapid degradation for the emission of Bi3+ in comparison with that of Eu3+.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 (a) Temperature-dependent emission spectra of the GBE0.5 sample (λex = 345 nm). (b) Relative integrated emission intensity versus temperature upon excitation at 345 nm. (c) Plot of ln(I0/IT −1) versus 1/kT and the linear fit of the data through Eq. (6).

Download Full Size | PDF

Moreover, the color stability can be quantifiably described by the chromaticity shift (ΔE) using the following equation [44]:

ΔE=(utu0)2+(vtv0)2+(wtw0)2
where u′ = 4x/(3−2x + 12y), v′ = 9y/(3−2x + 12y), and w′ = 1−u′−v′. u′ and v′ are the chromaticity coordinates in u′v′ uniform color space, x and y are the chromaticity coordinates in CIE 1931 color space, and 0 and t are the chromaticity shift at 298 K and a given temperature, respectively. As shown in Fig. 7, the GBE0.5 glass exhibits a relatively small chromaticity shift (0~3.45 × 10−2) when it works below 423 K. The CIE chromaticity coordinates upon 345 nm excitation at different temperatures are presented in the inset of Fig. 7. It can be clearly seen that the chromaticity coordinates of the GBE0.5 sample in the temperature range of 298-423 K are all located in warm white area. However, when the temperature further rises, the chromaticity shift becomes significantly increased, with the corresponding chromaticity coordinates moving to the red region. This is mainly due to the severe thermal quenching of the bluish-green emission from Bi3+, as shown in Fig. 6(a). The thermal stability of the Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glass can be further improved by optimizing the glass composition and Bi3+ doping content as well as by the annealing process.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Chromaticity shift of the GBE0.5 sample (λex = 345 nm) as a function of temperature from 298 to 573 K. The inset shows the CIE chromaticity coordinates at different temperatures.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Conclusions

In summary, luminescent properties of novel Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glasses were systematically investigated. Excitation and emission spectra as well as decay lifetime data have demonstrated the efficient energy transfer from Bi3+ to Eu3+ ions in the Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glasses, and the energy transfer mechanism is confirmed due to a dipole-dipole interaction. By tuning the intensity ratio of Bi3+ bluish-green to Eu3+ red emission, a tunable white light is obtained under excitation at 345 nm light. Temperature-dependent CIE chromaticity coordinates show excellent color stability in working temperature below 423 K for the glass samples. These excellent characteristics enable the novel Bi3+/Eu3+ co-doped glasses to be a promising candidate for the application of WLEDs pumped by UV-LED chip.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 51125005, 51472088 and 11374269); Zhujiang Scholar Program of Department of Education of Guangdong Province.

References and links

1. E. F. Schubert and J. K. Kim, “Solid-State Light Sources Getting Smart,” Science 308(5726), 1274–1278 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. S. Pimputkar, J. S. Speck, S. P. DenBaars, and S. J. Nakamura, “Prospects for LED lighting,” Nat. Photonics 3(4), 180–182 (2009). [CrossRef]  

3. H. A. Höppe, “Recent developments in the field of inorganic phosphors,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 48(20), 3572–3582 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. S. Ye, F. Xiao, Y. X. Pan, Y. Y. Ma, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Phosphors in phosphor-converted white light-emitting diodes: Recent advances in materials, techniques and properties,” Mater. Sci. Eng. Rep. 71(1), 1–34 (2010). [CrossRef]  

5. H. Daicho, T. Iwasaki, K. Enomoto, Y. Sasaki, Y. Maeno, Y. Shinomiya, S. Aoyagi, E. Nishibori, M. Sakata, H. Sawa, S. Matsuishi, and H. Hosono, “A novel phosphor for glareless white light-emitting diodes,” Nat. Commun. 3(2138), 1132–1140 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. D. Q. Chen, W. D. Xiang, X. J. Liang, J. S. Zhong, H. Yu, M. Y. Ding, H. W. Lu, and Z. G. Ji, “Advances in transparent glass-ceramic phosphors for white light-emitting diodes–A review,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35(3), 859–869 (2015). [CrossRef]  

7. Z. Xia, Z. Xu, M. Chen, and Q. Liu, “Recent developments in the new inorganic solid-state LED phosphors,” Dalton Trans. 45(28), 11214–11232 (2016). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. W. B. Dai, S. Ye, E. L. Li, P. Z. Zhuo, and Q. Y. Zhang, “High quality LED lamps using color-tunable Ce3+-activated yellow-green oxyfluoride solid-solution and Eu3+-doped red borate phosphors,” J. Mater. Chem. C 3(31), 8132–8141 (2015). [CrossRef]  

9. B. Wang, H. Lin, F. Huang, J. Xu, H. Chen, Z. B. Lin, and Y. S. Wang, “Non-rare-earth BaMgAl10-2xO17: xMn4+,xMg2+: a narrow-band red phosphor for high-power warm W-LED,” Chem. Mater. 28(10), 3515–3524 (2016). [CrossRef]  

10. S. Fujita, S. Yoshihara, A. Sakamoto, S. Yamamoto, and S. Tanabe, “YAG glass-ceramic phosphor for white LED (I): background and development,” Proc. SPIE 5941, 186–192 (2005). [CrossRef]  

11. R. Zhang, H. Lin, Y. L. Yu, D. Q. Chen, J. Xu, and Y. S. Wang, “A new-generation color converter for high-power white LED: transparent Ce3+:YAG phosphor-in-glass,” Laser Photonics Rev. 8(1), 158–164 (2014). [CrossRef]  

12. M. Shang, C. Li, and J. Lin, “How to produce white light in a single-phase host?” Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(5), 1372–1386 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. Y. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Hao, X. Wang, and J. Zhang, “Tunable full-color-emitting Ca3Sc2Si3O12:Ce3+, Mn2+ phosphor via charge compensation and energy transfer,” Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 47(38), 10677–10679 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. F. Kang, Y. Zhang, and M. Peng, “Controlling the energy transfer via multi luminescent centers to achieve white light/tunable emissions in a single-phased X2-type Y2SiO5:Eu3+, Bi3+ phosphor for ultraviolet converted LEDs,” Inorg. Chem. 54(4), 1462–1473 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. X. Zhang, L. Huang, F. Pan, M. Wu, J. Wang, Y. Chen, and Q. Su, “Highly thermally stable single-component white-emitting silicate glass for organic-resin-free white-light-emitting diodes,” ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(4), 2709–2717 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. H. Guo, R. Wei, and X. Liu, “Tunable white luminescence and energy transfer in (Cu+)2, Eu3+ codoped sodium silicate glasses,” Opt. Lett. 37(10), 1670–1672 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. A. C. P. Rocha, L. H. C. Andrade, S. M. Lima, A. M. Farias, A. C. Bento, M. L. Baesso, Y. Guyot, and G. Boulon, “Tunable color temperature of Ce3+/Eu2+, 3+ co-doped low silica aluminosilicate glasses for white lighting,” Opt. Express 20(9), 10034–10041 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. P. Kaur, S. Kaur, G. P. Singh, and D. P. Singh, “Cerium and samarium codoped lithium aluminoborate glasses for white light emitting devices,” J. Alloys Compd. 588(181), 394–398 (2014). [CrossRef]  

19. X. L. Liang, Z. Y. Lin, Y. X. Yang, Z. W. Xing, and G. Chen, “Luminescence Properties of Tb-Eu Co-Doped Aluminosilicate and Zinc Silicate Glasses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(1), 275–279 (2012). [CrossRef]  

20. R. G. Ye, Z. G. Cui, Y. J. Hua, D. G. Deng, S. L. Zhao, C. X. Li, and S. Q. Xu, “Eu2+/Dy3+ co-doped white light emission glass ceramics under UV light excitation,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357(11–13), 2282–2285 (2011). [CrossRef]  

21. J. J. Li, J. D. Chen, R. F. Wei, and H. Guo, “Combined White Luminescence from Eu3+, ML-Ag Particles and Ag+ in Ag/Eu3+ Co-Doped H3BO3-BaF2 Glasses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95(4), 1208–1211 (2012). [CrossRef]  

22. J. W. Yang, H. Guo, Y. L. Wei, H. M. Noh, and J. H. Jeong, “Luminescence and energy transfer process in Cu+,Sm3+ co-doped sodium silicate glasses,” Opt. Mater. Express 4(2), 315–320 (2014). [CrossRef]  

23. F. W. Kang, X. B. Yang, M. Y. Peng, L. Wondraczek, Z. J. Ma, Q. Y. Zhang, and J. R. Qiu, “Red Photoluminescence from Bi3+ and the Influence of the Oxygen-Vacancy Perturbation in ScVO4:A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study,” J. Phys. Chem. C 118(14), 7515–7522 (2014). [CrossRef]  

24. F. W. Kang, H. S. Zhang, L. Wondraczek, X. B. Yang, Y. Zhang, D. Y. Lei, and M. Y. Peng, “Band-Gap Modulation in Single Bi3+-Doped Yttrium-Scandium-Niobium Vanadates for Color Tuning over the Whole Visible Spectrum,” Chem. Mater. 28(8), 2692–2703 (2016). [CrossRef]  

25. K. Li, J. Fan, M. M. Shang, H. Z. Lian, and J. Lin, “Sr2Y8(SiO4)6O2:Bi3+/Eu3+: a single-component white-emitting phosphor via energy transfer for UV W-LEDs,” J. Mater. Chem. C 3(38), 9989–9998 (2015). [CrossRef]  

26. L. J. Wang, H. Guo, Y. L. Wei, H. M. Noh, and J. H. Jeong, “White luminescence and energy transfer process in Bi3+,Sm3+ co-doped Ca3Al2O6 phosphors,” Opt. Mater. 42, 233–236 (2015). [CrossRef]  

27. G. F. Ju, Y. H. Hu, L. Chen, X. J. Wang, Z. F. Mu, H. Y. Wu, and F. W. Kang, “White-Light Generation and Energy Transfer in Y2O3:Bi,Eu Phosphor for Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes,” J. Electrochem. Soc. 158(10), J294–J299 (2011). [CrossRef]  

28. X. Y. Sun, D. G. Jiang, S. W. Chen, G. T. Zheng, S. M. Huang, M. Gu, Z. J. Zhang, and J. T. Zhao, “Eu3+-Activated Borogermanate Scintillating Glass with a High Gd2O3 Content,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96(5), 1483–1489 (2013). [CrossRef]  

29. D. Q. Chen, Y. S. Wang, Y. L. Yu, and P. Huang, “Structure and Optical Spectroscopy of Eu-Doped Glass Ceramics Containing GdF3,” J. Phys. Chem. C 112(48), 18943–18947 (2008). [CrossRef]  

30. G. Boulon, B. Moine, J. C. Bourcet, R. Reisefeld, and Y. Kalisky, “Time resolved spectroscopy about 3P1 and 3P0 levels in Bi3+ doped germanate glasses,” J. Lumin. 18(1), 924–928 (1979). [CrossRef]  

31. G. Boulon, B. Moine, and J. C. Bourcet, “Spectroscopic properties of 3P1 and 3P0 excited states of Bi3+ ion in germanate glass,” Phys. Rev. B 22(3), 1163–1169 (1980). [CrossRef]  

32. G. J. Gao and L. Wondraczek, “Heavily Eu3+-doped boroaluminosilicate glasses for UV/blue-to-red photoconversion with high quantum yield,” J. Mater. Chem. C 2(4), 691–695 (2014). [CrossRef]  

33. J. Tauc and A. Menth, “States in the gap,” J. Non-Cryst. Solids 8(10), 569–585 (1972). [CrossRef]  

34. X. Y. Liu, H. Guo, Y. Liu, S. Ye, M. Y. Peng, and Q. Y. Zhang, “Thermal quenching and energy transfer in novel Bi3+/Mn2+co-doped white-emitting borosilicate glasses for UV LEDs,” J. Mater. Chem. C 4(13), 2506–2512 (2016). [CrossRef]  

35. P. I. Paulosea, G. Josea, V. Thomasa, N. V. Unnikrishnana, and M. K. R. Warrier, “Sensitized fluorescence of Ce3+/Mn2+ system in phosphate glass,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 64(5), 841–846 (2003). [CrossRef]  

36. M. Inokuti and F. Hirayama, “Influence of Energy Transfer by the Exchange Mechanism on Donor Luminescence,” J. Chem. Phys. 43(6), 1978–1989 (1965). [CrossRef]  

37. D. L. Dexter, “A Theory of Sensitized Luminescence in Solids,” J. Chem. Phys. 21(5), 836–850 (1953). [CrossRef]  

38. R. Reisfeld, “Excited states and energy transfer from donor cations to rare earths in the condensed phase,” Rare Earths (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991), pp. 65–97.

39. S. Shigeo and M. William, PhosphorHandbook (CRC Press, 1998).

40. C. R. Ronda, Luminescence: From Theory to Applications (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim , 2008) p. 46.

41. Y. Shi, G. Zhu, M. Mikami, Y. Shimomura, and Y. Wang, “A novel Ce3+ activated Lu3MgAl3SiO12 garnet phosphor for blue chip light-emitting diodes with excellent performance,” Dalton Trans. 44(4), 1775–1781 (2015). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

42. K. J. Laidler, “The Development of the Arrhenius Equation,” J. Chem. Educ. 61(6), 494–498 (1984). [CrossRef]  

43. S. Bhushan and M. V. Chukichev, “Temperature dependent studies of cathodoluminescence of green band of ZnO crystals,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 7(4), 319–321 (1988). [CrossRef]  

44. C. C. Tsai, W. C. Cheng, J. K. Chang, L. Y. Chen, J. H. Chen, Y. C. Hsu, and W. H. Cheng, “Ultra-High Thermal-Stable Glass Phosphor Layer for Phosphor-Converted White Light-Emitting Diodes,” J. Disp. Technol. 9(6), 427–432 (2013). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 UV-vis transmission spectra of the Host, GB1.0, GBEx (x = 0.3, 1.0) and GE0.3 samples.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 Excitation and emission spectra of (a) GB1.0, (b) GE0.3 and GBE0.3 samples.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Emission (λex = 345 nm), (b) Excitation (λem = 480 nm) spectra of the GB1.0 and GBEx (x = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5) samples. The inset of (b) shows the excitation spectra (λem = 612 nm). (c) Luminescence decay curves of GB1.0 and GBEx samples (λex = 345 nm, λem = 480 nm). (d) CIE chromaticity coordinates and luminescence photos corresponding to the emission of glass samples.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Dependence of ( I 0 /I ) values on (a) C6/3, (b) C8/3 and (c) C10/3 in GBEx (x = 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5) samples. Correlation efficiencies are 99.66, 97.70 and 94.60% for the fittings to Eq. (5), respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Energy level scheme of Bi3+ and Eu3+ ions as well as the possible ET process
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 (a) Temperature-dependent emission spectra of the GBE0.5 sample (λex = 345 nm). (b) Relative integrated emission intensity versus temperature upon excitation at 345 nm. (c) Plot of ln(I0/IT −1) versus 1/kT and the linear fit of the data through Eq. (6).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Chromaticity shift of the GBE0.5 sample (λex = 345 nm) as a function of temperature from 298 to 573 K. The inset shows the CIE chromaticity coordinates at different temperatures.

Tables (2)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Density, refractive index, and indirect optical band gap of glasses samples.

Tables Icon

Table 2 Lifetimes (λex = 345 nm, λem = 480 nm), ET efficiency η T , and CIE chromaticity coordinates of glasses samples.

Equations (7)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

αhv=B (hν E g ) n
I(t)= A 1 exp(t/ τ 1 )+ A 2 exp(t/ τ 2 )
τ=( A 1 τ 1 2 + A 2 τ 2 2 )/( A 1 τ 1 + A 2 τ 2 )
η T =1 τ s / τ s0
η 0 η C n/3
I T = I 0 1+cexp( E a kT )
ΔE= ( u t u 0 ) 2 + ( v t v 0 ) 2 + ( w t w 0 ) 2
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.