Abstract

In this Letter, we report on the experimental investigation of three-dimensional (3D) optical trapping by a tightly focused circular Airy beam (CAB). We compare the trapping strength of the beam for 800 nm polystyrene particles, with two equivalent Gaussian beams of the same envelope (SEGB) and the same spot-size (SSGB). Through video microscopy, we found that SEGB is incapable of forming a 3D trap, and particles are pushed along the beam propagation direction, while SSGB and CAB could form stable 3D traps. Measurements of trap stiffness revealed that although both beams have similar lateral trap stiffnesses, interestingly CAB has a 6.6-fold stronger axial trap, owning to its autofocusing nature. Furthermore, we found that trap stiffness at various trapping depths is nearly constant for CAB, in contrast with the Gaussian beam, implying that CAB is robust against spherical aberration.

© 2022 Optica Publishing Group

Generation of optical 3D unpolarized lattices in a tightly focused random beam

Xiangyun Li, Xinlu Zhu, Lin Liu, Fei Wang, Yangjian Cai, and Yahong Chen
Opt. Lett. 48(14) 3829-3832 (2023)

3D micromanipulation at low numerical aperture with a single light beam: the focused-Bessel trap

Yareni A. Ayala, Alejandro V. Arzola, and Karen Volke-Sepúlveda
Opt. Lett. 41(3) 614-617 (2016)

Optical trapping with focused Airy beams

Zhu Zheng, Bai-Fu Zhang, Hao Chen, Jianping Ding, and Hui-Tian Wang
Appl. Opt. 50(1) 43-49 (2011)

Evolution and particle trapping dynamics of circular Pearcey-Airy Gaussian vortex beams in tightly focused systems

Shuaiyang Wei, Jialong Tu, Zhili Lu, Xinyue Wang, Zhenzhen Li, Guanghui Wang, and Dongmei Deng
Opt. Express 31(17) 27843-27857 (2023)

Circular Mathieu and Weber autofocusing beams

Yong Zhang, Zhenwu Mo, Danling Xu, Shangling He, Yiping Ding, Qiaobing Huang, Zhili Lu, and Dongmei Deng
Opt. Lett. 47(12) 3059-3062 (2022)