Abstract
In my previous Letter [Opt. Lett. 45, 4907 (2020) [CrossRef] ], oscillation wavelengths corresponding to ${\sigma _1}$-transition line, $ {}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{1}}) \to {}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({{1}}) $, and ${\sigma _2}$-transition line, ${}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{2}}) \to {}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({{2}})$ were described in inverse. Here, the corrected correspondence between transition lines and oscillation wavelengths is addressed. The correction has no influence on the conclusions of the original Letter.
© 2020 Optical Society of America
In the right column of the second page in [1], “${\sigma _1}$-transition line; ${}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{1}}) { \to } {}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({{1}})$” should read “${\sigma _2}$-transition line; ${}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{2}}) { \to }{}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({{2}})$” and vice versa. In short, the modal oscillation at $\lambda = {{1065.70}}\;{\rm{nm}}$ corresponds to the ${\sigma _2}$-transition line; ${}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{2}}) { \to} {}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({\rm{2}})$ and the modal oscillation at $\lambda = {\rm{1063.80}}\;{\rm{nm}}$ corresponds to the ${\sigma _1}$-transition line; ${}^4{{\rm{F}}_{3/2}}({{1}}) { \to }{}^4{{\rm{I}}_{11/2}}({{1}})$.
Reference
1. K. Otsuka, Opt. Lett. 45, 4907 (2020). [CrossRef]