Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Generation of five phase-locked harmonics by implementing a divide-by-three optical frequency divider

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We report the generation of five phase-locked harmonics, f1:2403nm, f2:1201nm, f3:801nm, f4:600nm, and f5:480nm with an exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3:4:5 by implementing a divide-by-three optical frequency divider in the high harmonic generation process. All five harmonics are generated coaxially with high phase coherence in time and space, which are applicable for various practical uses.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

Frequency division in the optical frequency region has been studied with the aim of coherently linking independent lasers [16] as part of a historical trend toward the establishment of an optical frequency standard [7,8]. Such lasers are attractive not only for establishing a frequency standard, but also as a coherent light source itself for various practical uses. Individually, they can be used as single frequency tunable lasers with highly precise frequencies in the frequency domain. As a whole, they can be an excellent candidate for ultrabroad bandwidth coherent light source which, in the time domain, can be synthesized into ultrashort pulses (<fs) with an ultrahigh repetition rate (>THz) [1,912]. Furthermore, if the absolute phases of such a coherent light source are controlled, we can also synthesize arbitrary optical waveforms (AOWs) [1,9,13].

In this Letter, we demonstrate the generation of five phase-locked harmonics with an exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3:4:5 by implementing a divide-by-three optical frequency divider [3,5] in the generation process. We show that the five generated harmonics have relative and absolute phase coherences in time and space that make them suitable for various practical applications, including AOW synthesis.

Before proceeding, we briefly review the recent progresses related to the broad phase-locked harmonics generation. Chiodo et al. demonstrated a phase locking of two independent lasers at 1544 (Er-doped fiber laser) and 1029 nm (Yb-doped fiber laser) by matching the third harmonic of the 1544 nm radiation with the second harmonic of the 1029 nm radiation, which resulted in the phase-locked multi-frequency radiations (2fc:1544nm, 3fc:1029nm, 4fc:772nm, and 6fc:515nm) [6]. Chan et al. demonstrated generation of an automatically phase-locked five harmonics in the nanosecond-pulsed Raman process and based on such harmonics; they also showed an amplitude–waveform synthesis in the nanosecond-pulsed regime [13].

We begin our discussion by presenting the concept behind our divide-by-three optical frequency divider, as shown in Fig. 1. First, we employ two laser sources as master and divider lasers whose oscillation frequencies are f3 and f2, respectively. We then produce the difference frequency radiation, f1=f3f2, in a difference frequency generation (DFG) process. Furthermore, the f1 radiation is doubled in a second harmonic generation (SHG) process to produce f2(=2f1) radiation. Then we detect the RF beat signal between the f2 and f2 radiations, where the oscillation frequencies of the two laser sources are adjusted in advance so that f2f2; that is, f223f3 is satisfied. Finally, we feed back the detected beat signal to the f2 divider, or f3 master-laser source, to control their oscillation frequencies so that they exactly satisfy f2=f2=23f3 When this locking is stabilized with a phase coherence between f2 and f2, the divide-by-three optical frequency division is completed. We thus obtain the three phase-locked harmonics, f1, f2, and f3, at the exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Concept of a divide-by-three optical frequency divider.

Download Full Size | PDF

Figure 2 shows the entire system for generating the phase-locked high harmonics, and the principal system elements are the divide-by-three optical frequency divider and the high harmonic generator. First, we perform divide-by-three optical frequency division to obtain three phase-locked harmonics, f1, f2 and f3. For this purpose, we employ external cavity diode lasers (ECDLs) oscillating at 801 and 1201 nm for the master (f3) and divider (f2) lasers, respectively. The typical output power of each ECDL is 10mW. The oscillation frequency of the master 801 nm ECDL is stabilized to a reference cavity (finesse: 2000) with the Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) method [14] and is followed by two tapered amplifiers (TA) that can increase the power to 1 W. We couple these 801 and 1201 nm radiations in space with a dichroic mirror and introduce them into a periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide, WG-PPLN1 (length: 48 mm, quasi-phase matching (QPM) pitch: 20.22 μm), to generate the difference frequency, f3f2=f1:2403nm. This DFG process, which also acts as an optical parametric amplifier (OPA), increases the power of 1201 nm radiation simultaneously. We then segregate a small amount of the 2403 and 1201 nm radiations from the main beam line and send them to the divide-by-three optical frequency divider subsystem. The main beam line is used to generate high harmonics through nonlinear optical mixing processes.

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. System layout for generating phase-locked high harmonics. ECDL, external cavity diode laser; TA, tapered amplifier; EOM, electro-optic modulator; LO, local oscillator; PS, phase shifter; SA, servo amplifier; PD, photo detector; WG-PPLN, periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide; AOM, acousto-optic modulator; DFG, difference frequency generation; SFG, sum frequency generation; SHG, second harmonic generation.

Download Full Size | PDF

At the divide-by-three optical frequency divider, we first separate the 2403 and 1201 nm radiations into an individual line. Then we give a frequency shift, 95MHz, to the 1201 nm radiation using an acoustic optical modulator (AOM). We then recombine the 2403 nm and the frequency-shifted 1201 nm radiations in space and introduce them into another periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide, WG-PPLN2 (length: 48 mm, QPM pitch: 31.3 μm), to generate the second harmonic of f1:2403nm radiation, i.e., f2 radiation. We then heterodyne the generated second harmonic, f2, and the frequency-shifted 1201 nm, f295MHz, radiations in a high-speed photo-diode and detect their RF beat signals, i.e., 95MHz+(f2f2). We further mix this RF beat signal with a 95 MHz RF standard using a phase detector and generate an error signal. The phase detector employed here has a broad response bandwidth of 200 MHz, which consists of an ultrafast dual comparator (Analog Device AD96687) and a phase and frequency discriminator (Analog Device AD9901). Finally, we feed back the obtained error signal to the current of the divider laser, the 1201 nm ECDL; one is through the current controller with a slow feedback of <100kHz, the other is to the ECDL directly with a fast feedback of <1.5MHz. In this way, we achieve divide-by-three optical frequency division, which results in the generation of three phase-locked harmonics, f1:2403nm, f2:1201nm, and f3:801nm at the exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3.

Based on these three phase-locked harmonics, we generate further high harmonics through nonlinear optical mixing processes to widen the whole harmonic bandwidth. To achieve this aim, we introduce the three phase-locked harmonics into two periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides, WG-PPLN3 (length: 34 mm, QPM pitch: 11.65 μm) and WG-PPLN4 (length: 23 mm, QPM pitch: 11.63 μm) sequentially to generate f4:600nm and f5:480nm harmonics by mixing f1:2403nm and f3:801nm radiations, and f2:1201nm and f3:801nm radiations, respectively, which can result in the generation of the five phase-locked harmonics with an exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3:4:5 as a whole. We note that all the harmonics are coupled coaxially from one waveguide to another by using parabolic mirrors (focal length: 15 mm, Ag coated) to avoid chromatic aberration. This coaxial layout of the entire system is practically significant in terms of application, since we can robustly maintain the phase-locked nature among all the harmonics against disturbances. We also note that all of the harmonics, f1f5, always maintain the same linear polarization, since we employ the QPM technology for the entire system, as shown here.

In the actual operation of the system, the output power of the master (f3:801nm) and divider (f2:1201nm) lasers were set at 10 and 12 mW, respectively. Then, the output power of the master laser was amplified to 1 W, approximately. At the WG-PPLN1 input, the coupling efficiency of 801 and 1201 nm radiations were 92% and 84%, respectively. The DFG conversion efficiency was found to be 421%·W1. As a result, at the exit of WG-PPLN1, we obtained output powers of 810, 80, and 39 mW for 801, 1201, and 2403 nm radiations, respectively. From these output powers, we segregated 2 mW of 1201 nm radiation and 20 mW of 2403 nm radiation for the phase locking. The remaining power was used for the main beam line for generating the phase-locked high harmonics.

First, we evaluated the phase-locking precision and stability of the optical frequency divider. The RF beat signal, f2f2, was monitored after the WG-PPLN2. Here, the SHG conversion efficiency in the WG-PPLN2 to produce f2 radiation was around 122%·W1, where the coupling efficiency of the 2403 nm radiation at the WG-PPLN2 input was 43%. Figure 3 shows the frequency spectrum of the beat signal without phase locking (gray) and with phase locking (black). As clearly seen here, when the locking loop was operated, a very sharp peak appeared at exactly 95 MHz (expected beat frequency value) with a locking bandwidth of 1.2 MHz. This bandwidth implies that 84% of the broad beat spectrum in the unlocked case was pulled into the carrier beat frequency at 95 MHz. Thus, the carrier beat frequency power became 25 dB greater than the residual noise sideband peaks. These results show that the divide-by-three optical frequency division, i.e., the locking of f1, f2, and f3 at the exact integer ratio of 1:2:3, was achieved.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. Frequency spectrum of the beat signal without phase locking (gray) and after phase locking (black).

Download Full Size | PDF

To evaluate the precision of this phase-locking condition, we measured the phase fluctuations of the beat signal by using the error signal that was proportional to the phase deviations of the beat signal from the RF frequency standard. Figure 4 shows the phase fluctuations which were measured over a time duration of 200 ms. The mean-square (MS) value of the phase fluctuations was estimated to be 0.096rad2 at this observation time of 200 ms, which are shown as a root-mean-square (RMS) value in Fig. 4. This MS value shows that the power concentration at the exact harmonic frequency was 91% [15]; this was also consistent to the observed beat-note spectrum of Fig. 3. This phase locking was maintained stably for at least 30 min.

 figure: Fig. 4.

Fig. 4. Phase fluctuations of the beat signal.

Download Full Size | PDF

Using these three phase-locked harmonics as a basis, we also generated their high-order harmonics, f4 (600 nm) and f5 (480 nm), by taking sum-frequencies such as f1+f3 and f2+f3 in the WG-PPLN3 and WG-PPLN4, respectively. At the WG-PPLN3 input, the coupling efficiencies of f1:2403nm and f3:801nm were 66% and 81%, respectively. The conversion efficiency was found to be 149%·W1 whereas, at the WG-PPLN4 input, the coupling efficiencies of f2:1201nm and f3:801nm were 54% and 57%, respectively, with the conversion efficiency of 235%·W1. Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show photographs of the five harmonics obtained in this way (except f1:2403nm), which were taken with a CCD camera (a) before and (b) after we dispersed the beam with a prism onto a white screen. As seen here, all five harmonics were generated coaxially with a Gaussian-like round beam profile. The respective output powers were 0.8, 33.5, 341.7, 5.5, and 29.5 mW for f1:2403, f2:1201, f3:801, f4:600, and f5:480nm at the exit of WG-PPLN4. We also measured the beam profiles for the generated high-order harmonic components. f4:600nm and f5:480nm harmonics exhibited a good beam quality, namely an M2-value of better than 1.2. The bandwidth of the phase-locked harmonics was expanded from 374.2 (f1f3: 2403801nm) to 623.7 THz (f1f5: 2403480nm).

 figure: Fig. 5.

Fig. 5. Photos of the five generated phase-locked harmonics (a) before and (b) after dispersal of the harmonic beam with a prism. The 2403 nm radiation is shown by a solid white circle.

Download Full Size | PDF

Finally, to determine the potential of the five produced harmonics for various practical applications, we performed an interference measurement; namely, we observed the interferences among the five harmonics via nonlinear optical processes. Figure 6 shows a typical result. The sum frequency component (named f7β) was generated in two ways in a thin BBO crystal (Type I phase matching, thickness: 10 μm), namely SFGs via f2+f5 and f3+f4; they were superimposed onto a photo detector (see the inset in Fig. 6). Furthermore, the spectral phases of these five harmonics were manipulated by inserting a pair of calcium fluoride plates (thickness: 5 mm) in the optical path after WG-PPLN4 and tilting them symmetrically with exactly the same angle of α (this phase manipulation is described in detail in [12,16]). The sinusoidal-like interference pattern was clearly observed and was well fitted with a theoretically predicted curve, which shows that the phase relationship among the high harmonics was well maintained in time and space, including its absolute phase. Furthermore, these harmonic frequencies were tunable by tuning the frequency of the 801 nm master laser. Even though the master laser frequency was tuned around 1 GHz, the phase-locked condition was maintained. The produced five phase-locked harmonics with an exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3:4:5 are applicable to AOW synthesis in the time domain and to single frequency tunable lasers in the frequency domain.

 figure: Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Interference signal aroused with two superimposed sum-frequency components, f2+f5 and f3+f4, as a function of the angle α of a glass plate pair inserted in the optical path.

Download Full Size | PDF

In summary, we have demonstrated the generation of five phase-locked harmonics, f1:2400nm, f2:1201nm, f3:801nm, f4:600nm, and f5:480nm with an exact frequency ratio of 1:2:3:4:5, by implementing a divide-by-three optical frequency divider in it. The output powers we finally obtained were f1:0.8, f2:33.5, f3:341.7, f4:5.5, and f5:29.5mW, respectively. All five phase-locked harmonics were generated coaxially and exhibited high phase coherence with each other in time and space, which was sufficient for them to be applicable to AOW synthesis in the time domain, including ultrashort pulse waveform (1.8 fs pulse duration [12,16]) and to ultrahigh-precision single-frequency tunable lasers in the frequency domain.

We note that the frequency spacing of the produced harmonics exactly matches the vibrational Raman transition (v=10:125THz) in gaseous para-hydrogen. Therefore, they can be used to generate high-order stimulated Raman scattering [1719] which can extend the harmonics wavelength range to the extreme region (mid-infrared to vacuum ultraviolet). We also note that the technology studied here can be extended to a frequency comb of ultrashort pulses to efficiently expand the entire bandwidth of the frequency comb.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research A, 24244065).

Acknowledgment

The authors thank N. Watanabe and A. Suzuki for their support in setting up the system. The authors also acknowledge Y. Nishida for providing knowledge regarding the periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide.

REFERENCES

1. T. W. Hansch, Opt. Commun. 80, 71 (1990). [CrossRef]  

2. H. R. Telle, D. Meschede, and T. W. Hänsch, Opt. Lett. 15, 532 (1990). [CrossRef]  

3. D. Lee and N. C. Wong, Opt. Lett. 17, 13 (1992). [CrossRef]  

4. R. Wynands, T. Mukai, and T. W. Hansch, Opt. Lett. 17, 1749 (1992). [CrossRef]  

5. P. T. Nee and N. C. Wong, Opt. Lett. 23, 46 (1998). [CrossRef]  

6. N. Chiodo, F. Du-Burck, J. Hrabina, M. Lours, E. Chea, and O. Acef, Opt. Lett. 39, 2936 (2014). [CrossRef]  

7. H. Schnatz, B. Lipphardt, J. Helmcke, F. Riehle, and G. Zinner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 18 (1996). [CrossRef]  

8. J. E. Bernard, A. A. Madej, L. Marmet, B. G. Whitford, K. J. Siemsen, and S. Cundy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3228 (1999). [CrossRef]  

9. A. V. Sokolov, D. R. Walker, D. D. Yavuz, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 033402 (2001). [CrossRef]  

10. M. Y. Shverdin, D. R. Walker, D. D. Yavuz, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 033904 (2005). [CrossRef]  

11. M. Katsuragawa, K. Yokoyama, T. Onose, and K. Misawa, Opt. Express 13, 5628 (2005). [CrossRef]  

12. K. Yoshii, J. K. Anthony, and M. Katsuragawa, Light 2, e58 (2013). [CrossRef]  

13. H. S. Chan, Z. M. Hsieh, W. H. Liang, A. H. Kung, C. K. Lee, C. J. Lai, R. P. Pan, and L. H. Peng, Science 331, 1165 (2011). [CrossRef]  

14. R. W. P. Drever, J. L. Hall, F. V. Kowalski, J. Hhough, G. M. Ford, A. J. Munley, and H. Ward, Appl. Phys. B 31, 97 (1983). [CrossRef]  

15. M. Zhu and J. L. Hall, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 10, 802 (1993). [CrossRef]  

16. K. Yoshii, Y. Nakamura, K. Hagihara, and M. Katsuragawa, in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference, Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2014), paper FTh1D.5.

17. S. E. Harris and A. V. Sokolov, Phys Rev. A 55, R4019 (1997). [CrossRef]  

18. A. V. Sokolov, D. R. Walker, D. D. Yavuz, G. Y. Yin, and S. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 562 (2000). [CrossRef]  

19. J. Q. Liang, M. Katsuragawa, L. K. Fam, and K. Hakuta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2474 (2000). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Concept of a divide-by-three optical frequency divider.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. System layout for generating phase-locked high harmonics. ECDL, external cavity diode laser; TA, tapered amplifier; EOM, electro-optic modulator; LO, local oscillator; PS, phase shifter; SA, servo amplifier; PD, photo detector; WG-PPLN, periodically poled lithium niobate waveguide; AOM, acousto-optic modulator; DFG, difference frequency generation; SFG, sum frequency generation; SHG, second harmonic generation.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Frequency spectrum of the beat signal without phase locking (gray) and after phase locking (black).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4. Phase fluctuations of the beat signal.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5. Photos of the five generated phase-locked harmonics (a) before and (b) after dispersal of the harmonic beam with a prism. The 2403 nm radiation is shown by a solid white circle.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6. Interference signal aroused with two superimposed sum-frequency components, f 2 + f 5 and f 3 + f 4 , as a function of the angle α of a glass plate pair inserted in the optical path.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.