Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

High resolution integral holography using Fourier ptychographic approach

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

An innovative approach is proposed for calculating high resolution computer generated integral holograms by using the Fourier Ptychographic (FP) algorithm. The approach initializes a high resolution complex hologram with a random guess, and then stitches together low resolution multi-view images, synthesized from the elemental images captured by integral imaging (II), to recover the high resolution hologram through an iterative retrieval with FP constrains. This paper begins with an analysis of the principle of hologram synthesis from multi-projections, followed by an accurate determination of the constrains required in the Fourier ptychographic integral-holography (FPIH). Next, the procedure of the approach is described in detail. Finally, optical reconstructions are performed and the results are demonstrated. Theoretical analysis and experiments show that our proposed approach can reconstruct 3D scenes with high resolution.

© 2014 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Holography can reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) scenes, because the light wave distribution of a scene, both intensity and phase, was completely recorded in holograms. However, the traditional holographic recording process requires a coherent light illumination and should be operated in a darkroom. Therefore, obtaining holograms under incoherent light illumination is an urgent and practical desire. Among researches on this topic, a portable approach is synthesizing computer generated holograms (CGHs) from 2D multi-view projection images of a 3D object under white light illumination [13]. Depending on a micro-lens array (MLA) embedded in a imaging system, integral imaging (II) can acquire a set of elemental images (EIs) at a single-shot without mechanical scanning or camera matrix [46], which offers a convenient acquisition of multi-view images. In fact, the integral-holography (IH) [5] approach still presents some drawbacks, such as the small size of hologram and the low resolution of reconstructed image. Every angular viewpoint image yields one pixel in the hologram, consuming huge calculation time but throwing much redundant information. To obtain a big size hologram by utilizing a small number of multi-view images, some methods which are based on holographic stereogram technique are proposed [3, 4, 7]. Unfortunately, they have the inherent drawback of holographic stereogram that the reconstructed image is composed of patches of projections. To acquire a high resolution hologram, some researchers attempt to increase the sample density on the spatial and angular domain [8, 9]. Since artificially increasing density of sample by interpolation cannot break through the physical diffraction limitation of imaging system, nor bring more details, so the resolution enhancement of these methods is unsatisfactory.

Correspondently, a novel method termed as ptychography iterative engine (PIE) [10] was developed in microscopy in the past decade. PIE was originally employed in coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) to obtain a high measurement precision [11]. It seeks a complex solution that is consistent with intensity measurements under overlap illuminations by phase reversal iteration. PIE did have one uniquely and profoundly important advantage over all other phase-retrieval or imaging techniques: it is not subject to the limitations of the coherence envelope (the information limit) [10], thus remarkable fruitions were brought and published on Nature and Science [1215]. After replacing the illumination probe function by different angular plane waves and imposing object support constraints in Fourier domain, Guoan Zheng et al. developed a new method on Nature Photonics named as Fourier Ptychography (FP) [1621]. FP transforms a low-NA conventional optical microscope into a high-resolution wide-FOV microscope with a great throughput. This method begins with a random guess of the high resolution target image, and then considers the measured low resolution images to correspond to various low-pass filtered target images. The initial guess converges to a unique solution which is consistent with the measured images via an iterative approach. Based on this idea, FP stitches together a number of variably illuminated, low-resolution intensity images to recover an accurate high resolution measurement, and extends the resolution beyond the physical limitation of a microscope. Prior work on implementing FP in macroscopic imaging system was demonstrated in [22]. This approach can achieve a complex hologram of an object placed at the far field requiring no interfermetric measurements, but a mechanical scanning and a coherent light illumination are still needed.

FP and IH have same features: both remove the interfermetric measurements in capture stage; both capture intensity images rather than record phase information; both have huge quantity of redundant information in captured position-related images; both try to recover the phase distribution from the correlative intensity images. For the benefit of surpassing diffraction-limitation of FP and being inspired by these similarities, we expand the application of FP into IH, developing a new approach for CGH calculation which can generate big size holograms and produce 3D scenes with high resolution, termed as Fourier ptychographic integral holography (FPIH). In this method, orthographic images (OIs) are firstly generated from EIs captured by II system, and treated as multi-view projection images with low resolution taken from small apertures. Next, OIs fuses into a high resolution complex hologram by their spatial frequency spectrums being shifted and superposed partly. Simultaneously, the hologram is equivalent to the one taken from a big aperture and is iteratively solved through a phase retrieval procedure with FP constrains. Contrary to previous approaches of hologram acquisition and resolution improvement in IH, FP does not work in spatial domain, but synthesizes holograms and enhance resolution by spatial frequency spectrum fusion. FPIH has its unique advantage: it can reconstruct a scene accurately without a complicated algorithm to render the light field of the object or to resample it in spatial domain. To the best of the authors knowledge, it has never been reported that employing FP method in IH to enhance the resolution.

The principle of hologram synthesis and resolution improvement by multi-view image spectrum fusion is explained in Section 2. Constrains required in FPIH are determined accurately and the iterative process is described in detail in Section 3. The results of optical reconstructions from the CGHs synthesized by the proposed method are demonstrated in Section 4. Finally, discussion and conclusion are given in Section 5.

2. Principle of hologram synthesis from multi-projections

Firstly, we give a brief description of II model and note these optical devices and coordinates for later use. Figure 1(a) shows the scheme of an II system. A 3D scene (or an object) is considered as a gather of point sources with each position of (xo, yo, z) and is represented by O. Ns × Nt lenses, localized by discrete coordinates (s, t), compose a MLA. And Ns × Nt elemental images are captured on the image plane located at an approximate distance of f0 from the MIA, where f0 is the focal length of micro-lenses. Each EI has Nx × Ny pixels, so that EIs,t(x, y) expresses the intensity of a pixel located at (x, y) in the (s, t) th EI. Δp is the pixel pitch in an EI, and Δo is the sample interval on object plane. The magnification of II is defined as:

MII=f0z=ΔpΔo

As depicted in Fig. 1(b), we assume that there were a Fourier holographic 4f system, involving a Fourier lens with focal length of fh and a hologram plane located at the back focus of the Fourier lens, moreover, the hologram plane were at the front focus of a virtual low-NA lens array. All these planes and optical devices are parallel to each other and perpendicular to axial Z. The relationship of II system and IH system is built through a conversion of elemental image array (EIA) to orthographic image array (OIA), as shown in Fig. 1(c). It is the foundation of hologram synthesis and resolution enhancement and is expounded next.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Schemes of II model and multi-projection holography system. (a) The model of II, in which a 3D object parrot and its EIA are shown as well. (b) The multi-projection holography system, in which a high resolution hologram is composed of a set of low resolution regions which produce multi-view projections. (c) The conversion of EIA to OIA is of a link between II and multi-projection holography.

Download Full Size | PDF

In Fig. 1(b), the complex amplitude of a depth slice of the 3D object located at zo from the Fourier lens is O(xo, yo; zo). (u, v) are the continuous coordinates of the hologram plane and P is the light wave distribution on it, or the complex Fourier hologram. According to the phase modulation for light wave of lens and ignoring constants, P is proportional to the integral of Fourier transform of O(xo, yo; zo) along zo [23].

P(u,v)=exp[jπλfh(1z0fh)(u2+v2)]{O(xo,yo;zo)}dzo

Equation (2). means that P can be treated as the spatial frequency spectrum of the object. A complex value P(u, v) represents a plane wave component with spatial frequency of (ξu = u/(λfh), ξv = v/(λfh)) and modulus of |P(u, v)|. λ is the working wave length.

Defining P as a high resolution spatial frequency spectrum taken from a big aperture pupil, a part of P can be regarded as a low resolution spatial frequency spectrum taken from a small aperture. Let p is a rectangle region of P with center of (ux, uy) and size of a × b, and p is the output of applying a low-pass filter on P. The low-pass filter is confined within the small apertures and expressed in Fourier domain as rect(u/a)rect(v/b) * δ(uux, vvy), where the symbol * is a convolution operation. Because of digital filter theory, an inverse Fourier transform on p implies a spectrum shift of high frequency to low frequency, which results a multiplication of complex exponential signal on O(xo, yo; zo). As Eq. (3) describes:

1{p(uux,vvy)}=1{P(u,v)[rect(uv)rect(uv)*δ(uux,vvx)]}O(xo,yo,zo)exp[j2π(ξxx0+ξyyo)]*exp[jπλfh2fhzo(xo2+yo2)]*sinc(ax0λfh)sinc(by0λfh)dzo

It can be regarded as that the object O is illuminated by a plane wave exp[j2π(ξxxo + ξyyo)] with incidence angles of (θx, θy), and then modulated by a limited aperture imaging system, which is a transmission function denoted by a operator of L{}. The relationship between the spatial frequency and the incidence angles is denoted in Eq. (4).

{ξx=ux/(λfh)=sinθx/λξy=uy/(λfh)=sinθy/λ

The right part of Eq. (3) equals to a light accumulation of the object in direction of angles (θx, θy). Since a projection image records the power of object light emitted at an angle, the following equation is deduced:

|1{p(uux,vvy)}||L{O(xo,yo,zo)exp[j2π(ξxxo+ξyyo)]}dzo|OI(θx,θy)
OI(θx, θy) represents the projection image at view angles of (θx, θy). Eq. (5) reveals that the subregions of spectrum correspond to multi-view projection images, which provide a foundation of hologram generation based on multi-view projections and constrains required in FP. To confirm the foundation, a numerical simulation is executed and shown in Fig. 2. Under the parameters of fh = 30cm and λ = 638nm, two point sources which are located at coordinates of (0, 0, 35cm) and (0, 0, 40cm) in Fourier holographic system, respectively, are calculated to generate a complex hologram with 768 × 768 pixels and 26μm pixel pitch by using Eq. (2). The intensity distribution of inverse Fourier transform of the hologram is illustrated in Fig. 2(a). Next, the hologram is cut into a 3 × 3 subregion array, so each subregion is equal to a low-pass-filtered spectrum. The intensity images of inverse Fourier transforms of subregions are still printed in array format in Fig. 2(b). In Fig. 2, due to the defocus aberrance, the big speckle represents the point source at zo = 40cm, while the small speckle represents the other one at zo = 35cm. According to the observation, each sub-image in Fig. 2b is same as a projection image at a view angle. Reversely deriving, hologram synthesis and resolution enhancement can be achieved via spatial frequency spectrum fusion.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 The principle of synthesizing high resolution holograms from low resolution multi-view images. (a) A numerical reconstruction of two point sources from a high resolution Fourier hologram (b) Reconstructions from the low-pass-filtered hologram array.

Download Full Size | PDF

In presented algorithms, OIs acquired from EIs can be treated as multi-view projections to calculate holograms. An OIA is synthesized from an EIA in following steps: the pixels are collected from each EI at the same local position, and then are arranged into an OI in the order of EI, which is expressed as OIx,y(s, t) = EIs,t(x, y). An OIA consisting of Nx × Ny OIs is generated, and each OI has Ns × Nt pixels. The details of projection images generation are provided in [6] and [24].

There is a fact should be noticed that: An EI captured by a real camera is always an inversion of a part of the object. In the case, the OIA formed from inversed EIs has a convex viewpoint distribution. After rotations of EIs by 180°, the OIA formed from un-inversed EIs has a concave viewpoint distribution. In FP microscopy, a specimen is transmitted by variable plane waves while the observe point is fixed. Therefore, the transmission images aligned as an array according the illumination angels are of concave viewpoint distribution. Since the OIA with concave viewpoint is a counterpart of the transmission image array, we can use this type of OIA to synthesize holograms. Additionally, addressing subregion in the target hologram is sequential access and straightforward.

3. Complex hologram generations by modified FP

The multi-view projection holography using FP algorithm is similar to the one using holographic stereogram technique: they both generate a hologram by sub-hologram tiling. But in holographic stereogram, each view image is first multiplied with a random phase mask, and then Fourier-transformed to be of a sub-hologram. These sub-holograms are tiled, neither with gap or overlap, into a big size hologram [3, 7]. There is no iteration in calculation. Since each sub-hologram produces a 2D perspective projection of a 3D scene, the reconstructed image from a stereographic hologram is composed of a set of patches and the depth perception is synthesized in human brain through stereo-vision. Whereas, FP algorithm makes good use of sufficient overlaps as a constraint to stitch together sub-holograms by iteration, creating a single hologram of a 3D scene. Because the unique wave field of an object is acquired, the reconstructed image from a FP hologram is a whole image distributed in 3D space. The reason for recovering a light wave field from correlative images was explained in [10], and the uniqueness of iterative solution of the retrieval was proved in [25]. In this section, we will deduce the constraints required in FPIH and describe the procedure of hologram generations using FP.

Intrinsically, FP is a phase retrieval algorithm with some constraints [10]. The target spectrum which is searched for in FP must fulfill two support constraints: one is modulus constraint and the other is overlap constraint [26]. Modulus constraint is provided by Eq. (5). The overlap constraint is essential to ensure iterative convergence. In this paper, overlap constraint is determined by the projection angle. Each OIx,y can be regarded as a projection at the view angel of (tan−1(xΔp/f0), tan−1(yΔp/f0)) [6]. The projection angle is equivalent to the incidence angle of the oblique plane wave. Hence Eq. (4) is approximated to:

{ux=fhsinθxfhΔpx/f0ux=fhsinθyfhΔpy/f0

A discrete spectrum P is obtained by sampling (u, v) into digital coordinates (m, n) with step of Δh evenly. The constraints required in FPIH are listed as following:

  • Modulus constrain:
    |1{p(mmx,nny)}|=|1{px,y}|=OIx,y
  • Overlap constrain:
    {mx=(fhΔpx)/(f0Δh)ny=(fhΔpy)/(f0Δh),Ng=fhΔpf0Δh<min(Ns,Nt)
Ng is defined as the gap between centers of two adjacent subregions in unit of pixel, both in horizontal and vertical direction. Ng is smaller than the length of OI, allowing two adjacent subregions overlap. Subsequently, the size of hologram Nu × Nv is determined by the amount of OIs and the area of spectrum overlapping:
Nu×NvNx(NsNg)×Ny(NtNg)

Combining Eq. (1) and Eq. (8), the interval is expressed as another format:

Ng=fhΔhΔoz

The overlap region is depends on the distance and the sample interval of the object. According to sampling criterion, the sample interval of reconstructed image is determined by the highest spatial frequency contained in the hologram (For briefness, only horizontal direction is listed):

Δo=λfhΔhNu

Comparing Eq. (10) and Eq. (11), the ratio of original sample interval to reconstructed sample interval can be solved:

ΔoΔo=λfh2Δh2NuNgz

Obviously, contrary to conventional hologram, the transverse magnification of reconstructed image to original object depends not only on the parameters of hologram but also on the area of overlapping.

The procedure of recovering a complex hologram by FP from an OIA with concave viewpoint is demonstrated in Fig. 3 and explained as follows.

  • (1) The procedure begins by making an initial guess of broadband and high resolution spatial frequency spectrum of the object, or a guess of the target complex hologram. Create a complex matrix which is a random phase distribution as the initialization of the target hologram: P0(m, n) = exp((m, n)), φ(m, n) is a random phase function in the range of 0 – 2π.
  • (2) A small subregion px,y with the same pixel count as OIx,y is segmented in P0. The position of px,y in the spectrum is homologous to that of the OIx,y in OIA. In Fig. 3, the first selected subregion is and enclosed by a green rectangle, whose center is identical to that of the hologram and whose corresponding orthographic image is OI0,0 located at the center of OIA.
  • (3) A fast Fourier transform is applied on px,y with result of Ox,y, Ox,y = FFT{px,y}. Then replace the intensity of it with the square-root of OIx,y, namely
    Ox,y=OIx,yOx,y|Ox,y|
  • (4) An inverse fast Fourier transform of O′x,y is p′x,y = IFFT {O′x,y}. px,y is refreshed by the following criterion:
    px,y=ηpx,y+(1η)px,y
    Then the former px,y in P0 is set to the new value, updating P0 to P01. The parameter η is an empirical real number found giving a rapid convergence. η is also a blend proportion of two adjacent subregions. η can be calculated dynamically when a convergence optimization is applied in [26, 27].
  • (5) Select the next subregion px,y+1 from P01 (other neighborhoods work as well). The center of px,y+1 is at a gap of Ng to that of px,y+1, resulting an overlap between px,y and px,y+1, demonstrated by a blue rectangles superposed partly on the green one in Fig. 3. Then, repeat step 2 to 4.
  • (6) After all OIs having been accessed, the entire hologram is modified and generated as P0i, where i = Nx × Ny is the amount of OIs, at which point a single iteration is completed. Set P1=P0i as the new guess of target complex hologram and the input for the next iteration, and then repeat step2 to 6.
  • (7) The iterative cycle is continued until the predefined times of iterations or a error threshold was achieved. The final spectrum Pk is obtained where the index k is the iteration times.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Procedure of complex hologram calculation using FP. The numbers in figure represent the steps of FP. The orange arrow presents a Fourier transform operation while the black arrow presents an inverse one. Several OIs with concave viewpoint are laid out in array format. The red, green and blue rectangles individually enclose a subregion corresponding to an OI labeled by the same color arrow.

Download Full Size | PDF

The error between multi-view intensity images and the produced images of low-pass filtered spectrums in the k-th iteration is measured quantitatively by the following equation:

E(k)=1NxNyx,ys,t(|Ox,y|OIx,y)2s,tOIx,y
E represents the disparity between target wave field and imaged wave field. As it is narrowing, the target complex hologram is gradually convergent to the one which can propagate through a set of low-NA lenses and bring the given OIA.

In order to realize full-color holographic display, OIAs for three color channels should be generated separately. Each color channel OIA produces a hologram. And then in reconstruction, these holograms are illuminated by different color light to composite a color scene. In this paper, we calculate three color channel holograms but superpose them into one hologram and illuminate it by a single wave length laser.

4. Experimental results

We carry out some experiments to verify that a high resolution optical reconstruction can be achieved by the proposed method. To avoid the influence of a degraded EIA on reconstructions, we use computer generated EIAs of virtual 3D scenes to synthesize OIAs. The EIAs are computationally generated by the light ray sample approach [28], which simulates the II process accurately. Hence the imaging parameters can be controlled precisely and the light field of scenes can be captured by the computer generated EIA.

Three experiments are designed. The first experiment validates the capability of 3D holographic reconstruction by FPIH. The other two proves the resolution enhancement of FPIH. They share a common optical reconstruction setup but have individual CGH synthesized from different scenes. The sketch map of experimental setup is shown in Fig. 4, and the configurations of equipments are listed in Table 1.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Optical experimental setup.

Download Full Size | PDF

Tables Icon

Table 1. Configurations of equipments

A SLM is used to export holograms. As the SLM we used is of transmission amplitude modulated type, a complex hologram has to be encoded into an intensity picture by Burch coding:

H(m,n)=0.5{1+cos[φP(m,n)φ0]}
Where, φP(m, n) is the phase value of Pk(m, n), and an angular offset φ0 is introduced to produce an off-line hologram for departing the twin reconstructed images. The intensity hologram H is loaded into the SLM and illuminated by a beam of red light of wavelength 638nm, and then reconstructs a 3D image through the Fourier lens L1. A camera captures the image, or a screen receives it. For the convenience of observation and shielding conjugated image, reconstructed images are projected on a semi-transparent diffusing screen.

4.1. 3D scene reconstructions from FPIH

We firstly generate a depth extended object consisting two letters located at different distances in computer. Each letter is a gray 2D picture. Figure 5(a) illustrates the spatial arrangement of two letters with marked distances and dimensions. A total 32 × 32 EIs each with 64 × 64 pixels are computationally generated. Then, a complex Fourier hologram is calculated by FPIH algorithm with Ng of 24 pixels under η = 0.5 and 10 iterations, then encoded into an intensity CGH by Eq. (16). The intensity CGH is loaded into the SLM.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 3D scene reconstruction from FPIH. (a) Space alignment of letters in II system, (b) Reconstructed ‘A’ and ‘R’ letters at different distances ( Media 1 Media 2.

Download Full Size | PDF

In this experiment, which depth slice of the 3D scene is focused relies on where the screen is positioned. Figure 5(b) shows photographs of the image on the screen being at two axial positions. The reconstructed image of ‘A’ is in-focus at a position while ‘R’ is off-focus; the ‘R’ is in-focus on another position while ‘A’ is off-focus. Moving the screen axially, we will observe letters being in-focus or off-focus at different distances. This experiment validates that the FPIH indeed acquire the light wave distributions of 3D scenes and reconstruct 3D scenes in space. Note that the diffusing screen causes a degraded photograph.

4.2. Resolution improvement of FPIH

Firstly an EIA is generated through a 3D model of ‘parrot’ rendered in computer graphics (CG) software. The ‘parrot’ image which contains fine structure has appeared in Fig. 1. A virtual pinhole camera array which acts as a MLA faces the model and captures an EIA. The amount of pinhole cameras or EIs is 50 × 50, and each EI has pixels of 32 × 32. Several central OIs synthesized from the ‘parrot’ EIA have already been laid out in Fig. 3. Secondly, complex Fourier holograms are calculated by FP algorithm with Ng of 12 pixels under different iterative parameters, then encoded into intensity CGHs. These intensity CGHs are loaded into the SLM to reconstruct the ‘parrot’ images.

The experimental results are shown in Fig. 6, which validates that FPIH can improve resolution of reconstructed image remarkably. The curve in Fig. 6(a) denotes that as the iterative times increases, the target hologram which begins with a random phase guess is closer and closer to the spatial frequency spectrum of the object; the resolution of reconstructed image is improved. Figure 6(b) is the optical reconstruction under η = 0 and non-iteration. In this case, the proposed approach is equivalent to holographic stereogram method, presented in [3] and [7], just adding a part-superposition between adjacent sub-spectrums. The image is only an overall shape of ‘parrot’. Figure 6(c) shows the optical reconstruction result under η = 0.5 and iteration of 10. It is observed that the feathers on the head of the ‘parrot’ and its feet are too blurred to be recognized in Fig. 6(b), while they emerge clearly in Fig. 6(c). A comparison between Fig. 6(b) and Fig. 6(c) indicates that since the ‘parrot’ becomes clearer and sharper and presents more details, FP improves the image resolution. In Fig. 6(c), the camera captures images being of the zero, the first and the second diffraction orders respectively, at a single-shot. Because the view angles of the fixed camera to each image are different, one can observe stereo-phenomenon.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Reconstructions of a 3D object with fine structures from FPIH. (a) The variation curve of E with iteration times, (b) Reconstructed ‘parrot’ at the second diffraction order under η = 0 and non-iteration, (c) Reconstructed images at three diffraction orders under η = 0.5 and 10 iterations.

Download Full Size | PDF

Another experiment is performed to estimate the resolution improvement of FPIH quantitatively. A US Air force (USAF) resolution target picture, shown as Fig. 7(a), is computational calculated to an EIA. The resolution target has a size of 1750 × 1750 pixels, whose EIA contains 50 × 50 EIs each with 32 × 32 pixels. Figure 7(b) and Fig. 7(c) show the reconstructions from FPIH under different parameters, respectively. The ground noise of Fig. 7(c) is lower than that of Fig. 7(b) obviously. The number ”6” in Fig. 7(c) can be identified, whereas it is dim in Fig. 7(b). The intensity distributions crossing the 3rd, the 4th and the 5th line groups of Figs. 7(a)–7(c) (highlighted by a line on Fig. 7(a)) are plotted in Fig. 7(d). Some facts can be drawn from Fig. 7(d): The peak-valley distribution of the curve with triangle symbol is closer to that of the curve of USAF than that of the curve with circle symbol; At the region of the 5th line group, the curve with circle symbol is so oscillatory that one can not discriminate three major peaks, while the curve with triangle symbol still remains a three-peak-like shape; The resolution of reconstruction is indeed improved by FP algorithm.

 figure: Fig. 7

Fig. 7 Resolution enhancement of FPIH. (a) The USAF resolution target, (b) Reconstruction at the zero diffraction order under η = 0 and non-iteration, (c) Reconstruction at the zero diffraction order under η = 0.5 and 50 iterations.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Conclusion

In this paper, we propose and experimentally validate an innovative approach for obtaining a high resolution holographic reconstruction from II using FP algorithm. The hologram generated from OIs which are synthesized from EIs captured by II. The hologram begins with a random guess with high resolution, and converges to an accurate complex wave field by phase retrial iteration with FP constrains. The proposed approach enhances reconstruction resolution by expanding the spectrum in spatial frequency domain rather than increasing the sample intensity in spatial domain. As a future work, a real-existed scene should be captured by a light field camera or a MLA and be optically reconstructed in high resolution from a CGH synthesized by FPIH finally. FPIH is also promising in high resolution incoherent measurement.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61377007, 61301290).

References and links

1. Y. Sando, M. Itoh, and T. Yatagai, “Holographic three-dimensional display synthesized from three-dimensional Fourier spectra of real existing objects,” Opt. Lett. 28, 2518–2520 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. D. Abookasis and J. Rosen, “Three types of computer-generated hologram synthesized from multiple angular viewpoints of a three-dimensional scene,” Appl. Opt. 45, 6533–6538 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. Y. Ohsawa, K. Yamaguchi, T. Ichikawa, and Y. Sakamoto, “Computer-generated holograms using multiview images captured by a small number of sparsely arranged cameras,” Appl. Opt. 52, A167–A176 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. Y. Sando, M. Itoh, and T. Yatagai, “Holographic three-dimensional display synthesized from three-dimensional Fourier spectra of real existing objects,” Opt. Lett. 28, 2518–2520 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. N. T. Shaked, J. Rosen, and A. Stern, “Integral holography: white-light single-shot hologram acquisition,” Opt. Express 15, 5754–5760 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. J.-H. Park, M.-S. Kim, G. Baasantseren, and N. Kim, “Fresnel and Fourier hologram generation using orthographic projection images,” Opt. Express 17, 6320–6334 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. S.-K. Lee, S.-I. Hong, Y.-S. Kim, H.-G. Lim, N.-Y. Jo, and J.-H. Park, “Hologram synthesis of three-dimensional real objects using portable integral imaging camera,” Opt. Express 21, 23662–23670 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. K. Wakunami, M. Yamaguchi, and B. Javidi, “High-resolution three-dimensional holographic display using dense ray sampling from integral imaging,” Opt. Lett. 37, 5103–5105 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. C. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Xu, X. Wu, Y. Chen, and J. Zhang, “Analysis of information transfer property and aliasing and overlapping elimination methods in integral Fourier holography,” Appl. Opt. 52, 4728–4737 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. J. M. Rodenburg, “Ptychography and related diffractive imaging methods,” Advances in Imaging Electron Phys. 150, 87–184 (2008). [CrossRef]  

11. H. M. Faulkner and J. M. Rodenburg, “Movable aperture lensless transmission microscopy: a novel phase retrieval algorithm,” Phys Rev Lett. 93, 023903 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. B. Abbey, K. A. Nugent, G. J. Williams, J. N. Clark, A. G. Peele, M. A. Pfeifer, M. de Jonge, and I. McNulty, “Keyhole coherent diffractive imaging,” Nature Physics 4, 394–398 (2008). [CrossRef]  

13. P. Thibault, M. Dierolf, A. Menzel, O. Bunk, C. David, and F. Pfeiffer, “High-resolution scanning x-ray diffraction microscopy,” Science 321, 379–382 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. M. Dierolf, A. Menzel, P. Thibault, P. Schneider, C. M. Kewish, R. Wepf, O. Bunk, and F. Pfeiffer, “Ptychographic x-ray computed tomography at the nanoscale,” Nature 467, 436–439 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. M. Stockmar, P. Cloetens, I. Zanette, B. Enders, M. Dierolf, F. Pfeiffer, and P. Thibault, “Near-field ptychography: phase retrieval for inline holography using a structured illumination,” Scientific Reports 3, 1927 (2012).

16. G. Zheng, R. Horstmeyer, and C. Yang, “Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy,” Nature Photonics 7, 739–745 (2013). [CrossRef]  

17. X. Ou, R. Horstmeyer, C. Yang, and G. Zheng, “Quantitative phase imaging via Fourier ptychographic microscopy,” Opt. Lett. 38, 4845–4848 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. G. Zheng, “Breakthroughs in photonics 2013: Fourier ptychographic imaging,” Photonics Journal, IEEE 6, 1–7 (2014). [CrossRef]  

19. S. Dong, R. Shiradkar, P. Nanda, and G. Zheng, “Spectral multiplexing and coherent-state decomposition in Fourier ptychographic imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express 5, 1757–1767 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. R. Horstmeyer and C. Yang, “A phase space model of Fourier ptychographic microscopy,” Opt. Express 22, 338–358 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. G. Zheng, X. Ou, R. Horstmeyer, J. Chung, and C. Yang, “Fourier ptychographic microscopy: A gigapixel superscope for biomedicine,” Opt. Photon. News 25, 26–33 (2014). [CrossRef]  

22. S. Dong, R. Horstmeyer, R. Shiradkar, K. Guo, X. Ou, Z. Bian, H. Xin, and G. Zheng, “Aperture-scanning Fourier ptychography for 3D refocusing and super-resolution macroscopic imaging,” Opt. Express 22, 13586–13599 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics (Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood Village, Colorado, USA, 2004), 3rd ed.

24. J.-H. Park, G. Baasantseren, N. Kim, G. Park, J.-M. Kang, and B. Lee, “View image generation in perspective and orthographic projection geometry based on integral imaging,” Opt. Express 16, 8800–8813 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. J. R. Fienup, “Reconstruction of a complex-valued object from the modulus of its Fourier transform using a support constraint,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 118–123 (1987). [CrossRef]  

26. F. Zhang, I. Peterson, J. Vila-Comamala, A. Diaz, F. Berenguer, R. Bean, B. Chen, A. Menzel, I. K. Robinson, and J. M. Rodenburg, “Translation position determination in ptychographic coherent diffraction imaging,” Opt. Express 21, 13592–13606 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

27. M. Guizar-Sicairos and J. R. Fienup, “Phase retrieval with transverse translation diversity: a nonlinearoptimization approach,” Opt. Express 16, 7264–7278 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

28. J.-S. Jang, F. Jin, and B. Javidi, “Three-dimensional integral imaging with large depth of focus by use of real and virtual image fields,” Opt. Lett. 28, 1421–1423 (2003). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Supplementary Material (1)

Media 1: MP4 (22842 KB)     

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (7)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Schemes of II model and multi-projection holography system. (a) The model of II, in which a 3D object parrot and its EIA are shown as well. (b) The multi-projection holography system, in which a high resolution hologram is composed of a set of low resolution regions which produce multi-view projections. (c) The conversion of EIA to OIA is of a link between II and multi-projection holography.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 The principle of synthesizing high resolution holograms from low resolution multi-view images. (a) A numerical reconstruction of two point sources from a high resolution Fourier hologram (b) Reconstructions from the low-pass-filtered hologram array.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Procedure of complex hologram calculation using FP. The numbers in figure represent the steps of FP. The orange arrow presents a Fourier transform operation while the black arrow presents an inverse one. Several OIs with concave viewpoint are laid out in array format. The red, green and blue rectangles individually enclose a subregion corresponding to an OI labeled by the same color arrow.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Optical experimental setup.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 3D scene reconstruction from FPIH. (a) Space alignment of letters in II system, (b) Reconstructed ‘A’ and ‘R’ letters at different distances ( Media 1 Media 2.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Reconstructions of a 3D object with fine structures from FPIH. (a) The variation curve of E with iteration times, (b) Reconstructed ‘parrot’ at the second diffraction order under η = 0 and non-iteration, (c) Reconstructed images at three diffraction orders under η = 0.5 and 10 iterations.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Resolution enhancement of FPIH. (a) The USAF resolution target, (b) Reconstruction at the zero diffraction order under η = 0 and non-iteration, (c) Reconstruction at the zero diffraction order under η = 0.5 and 50 iterations.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1 Configurations of equipments

Equations (16)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

M II = f 0 z = Δ p Δ o
P ( u , v ) = exp [ j π λ f h ( 1 z 0 f h ) ( u 2 + v 2 ) ] { O ( x o , y o ; z o ) } d z o
1 { p ( u u x , v v y ) } = 1 { P ( u , v ) [ rect ( u v ) rect ( u v ) * δ ( u u x , v v x ) ] } O ( x o , y o , z o ) exp [ j 2 π ( ξ x x 0 + ξ y y o ) ] * exp [ j π λ f h 2 f h z o ( x o 2 + y o 2 ) ] * sinc ( a x 0 λ f h ) sinc ( b y 0 λ f h ) d z o
{ ξ x = u x / ( λ f h ) = sin θ x / λ ξ y = u y / ( λ f h ) = sin θ y / λ
| 1 { p ( u u x , v v y ) } | | L { O ( x o , y o , z o ) exp [ j 2 π ( ξ x x o + ξ y y o ) ] } d z o | O I ( θ x , θ y )
{ u x = f h sin θ x f h Δ p x / f 0 u x = f h sin θ y f h Δ p y / f 0
| 1 { p ( m m x , n n y ) } | = | 1 { p x , y } | = OI x , y
{ m x = ( f h Δ p x ) / ( f 0 Δ h ) n y = ( f h Δ p y ) / ( f 0 Δ h ) , N g = f h Δ p f 0 Δ h < min ( N s , N t )
N u × N v N x ( N s N g ) × N y ( N t N g )
N g = f h Δ h Δ o z
Δ o = λ f h Δ h N u
Δ o Δ o = λ f h 2 Δ h 2 N u N g z
O x , y = OI x , y O x , y | O x , y |
p x , y = η p x , y + ( 1 η ) p x , y
E ( k ) = 1 N x N y x , y s , t ( | O x , y | OI x , y ) 2 s , t OI x , y
H ( m , n ) = 0.5 { 1 + cos [ φ P ( m , n ) φ 0 ] }
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.