Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Ultra-high Q lithium niobate microring monolithically fabricated by photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

As one of the element photonic structures, the state-of-the-art thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) microrings reach an intrinsic quality (Q) factor higher than 107. However, it is difficult to maintain such high-Q factors when monolithically integrated with bus waveguides. Here, a relatively narrow gap of an ultra-high Q monolithically integrated microring is achieved with 3.8 µm, and a high temperature annealing is carried out to improve the loaded (intrinsic) Q factor with 4.29 × 106 (4.04 × 107), leading to an ultra-low propagation loss of less than 1 dB/m, which is approximately 3 times better than the best values previously reported in ion-slicing TFLN platform.

© 2023 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement

1. Introduction

Thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) platform has shown great potentials for building of large-scale photonic integrated circuits (PICs) and is highly favored in fundamental research, because of the excellent properties of TFLN such as the broad transparency windows with high refractive index contrast between conventional cladding materials, high linear electro-optic coefficient and second-order nonlinear optical coefficient, acousto-optic effect, and piezo effect [117]. For lots of PICs applications, high performance, low power consumption, and scalable large-scale integration, are the core figures of merits, which are high sensitivity to the propagation loss of the devices. The propagation loss is mainly contributed from the surface roughness, coupling loss, and inner scattering loss of the devices [115]. To suppress the surface roughness, photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching has been used to etch the TFLN, leading to ultra-smooth sidewall [1618]. So far, ultra-high free-standing TFLN microdisk resonators and meter-scale length low-loss waveguides have been demonstrated on this novel platform [17,19], opening up the new possibilities of their applications ranging from low-threshold nonlinear optical processes, microlasers to high-speed optical information processing. However, due to the limited etch ratio between chromium hard mask and lithium niobate [1,16], photonic structures are often produced with low aspect ratio, making obstacle for monolithic microrings side-coupled with bus-waveguides. Whereas efforts have been made towards a monolithic integration scheme, that is, where a microring was over-coupled with the bus ridge-waveguide on the same chip, and the optical modes in the microring and the waveguide could be bridged with a slab lithium niobate layer to couple with each other [18]. Up to now, the narrowest coupling gap between microring and the bus-waveguide has been reduced to 4.8 µm with a slab layer with thickness of 500 nm and an etched depth of 200 nm. The over-coupled condition introduces high coupled loss and relatively low coupling efficiency of ∼10%, leading to a relatively low Q loaded factors of 3.2 × 105, which is much lower than the isolated counterpart. Moreover, the light confinement in the rib waveguide is weaker than the strip counterpart, which will make an obstruction to nonlinear optical applications and high-density integration.

Here, a monolithic microring side-coupled with rib waveguide was demonstrated on single TFLN chip with high loaded Q factor. The gap of the coupling region was bridged to 3.8 µm to obtain a higher coupling efficiency (37%) by optimizing the photo-lithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching (PLACE) process via reducing heat-affected zone during ablating the hard mask by femtosecond laser lithography [20]. To further improve the Q factors, high temperature annealing [2125] was adopted to restore the lattice damage caused by ion implantation during ion-slicing step, leading to an improvement in the loaded Q factors with 4 times. The highest loaded Q factors reach 4.29 × 106, which is of the same order of magnitude as those of the best microrings fabricated using inductively coupled plasma reactive ion etching (ICP-RIE) [2430]. And the intrinsic Q factor was determined as high as 4.04 × 107, corresponding to a propagation loss of 0.0091 dB cm−1, which is approximately 3 times lower than the best results reported on ion-slicing TFLN platform [1,24,25,29,31]. Our work will pave the way for the high-performance classical/quantum nonlinear light sources, optical information processing, and large-scale PICs with high scalability.

2. Fabrication methods

In our experiment, the monolithically integrated on-chip microring resonator side-coupled with a strip waveguide is fabricated on an undoped TFLN wafer, as shown in Fig. 1(a), which is composed of 700 nm-thick Z-cut TFLN, 2000 nm-thick silicon dioxide (SiO2) layer, and 500 µm-thick lithium niobate substrate.

 figure: Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Illustration of the fabrication flow of the monolithically integrated microring resonator. (a) Sandwiched structure configuration of an undoped 700 nm-thick Z-cut TFLN wafer. (b) The Cr film is coated on the surface of the undoped LN wafer. (c) Cr mask pattern is formed by femtosecond laser direct writing. (d) The exposed TFLN is etched by CMP for transferring the Cr mask pattern to the TFLN layer. (e) The Cr mask is removed by chemical wet etching. (f) The sample undergoes a secondary CMP and a high temperature annealing.

Download Full Size | PDF

The manufacturing process to fabricate the microring resonator comprises five major steps, as illustrated in Fig. 1(b)-(f). First, a 600 nm-thick chromium (Cr) film is coated on the surface of the thin-film lithium niobate on insulator (LNOI) by magnetron sputtering. Second, the Cr layer is ablated into the hard mask with pattern consisted with microrings side-coupled with strip waveguide by femtosecond laser direct writing [16,32]. In this process, the strip waveguide and the microring were designed with the same cross-section geometry, the curvature radius of the microring was set to be 200 µm with a top width of 1.98 µm, and the coupling gap between microring and strip waveguide was designed to be 3.8 µm. Here, a weak irradiation power of femtosecond laser of only 0.1 mW was adopted to ablate the Cr layer for reducing the heat-affected zone [20], which is just closed to the ablation threshold of Cr. The low-power ablation leads to a higher quality of Cr mask and higher ablation resolution, resulting in a higher etch ratio between Cr mask and TFLN. And the femtosecond laser was tuned to be circularly polarized to provide isotropic irradiation. Third, the fabricated structure undergoes chemo-mechanical polishing (CMP) to etch the exposed TFLN, leading to the pattern transferring from the Cr layer to TFLN. A narrowed coupled gap was obtained because of the higher etch ratio. Fourth, the sample is immerged in the Cr etching solution to remove the Cr mask. Finally, a secondary CMP and a high temperature annealing (450°C for 2 hours in air) are carried out to restore the lattice damage to guarantee a high Q factor of the microring resonator.

3. Characteristics of LN microrings side coupled with a ridge waveguide

The optical microscope image of the fabricated on-chip microring resonator is shown in Fig. 2(a). The zoom-in optical micrograph and the magnified scanning electron-microscope (SEM) image of the coupling region between the microring resonator and the strip waveguide are shown in Figs. 2(b) and 2(d), respectively, indicating the TFLN microring with a diameter of 400 µm and an ultra-smooth surface. The gap between the strip waveguide and the ring resonator was measured to be 3.8 µm on the top surface of the integrated photonic structure. The TFLN strip waveguide and the microring possess the same top width of 1.98 µm and the same bottom width of 6.22 µm. Because of the secondary CMP, the thickness of the microring integrated with the waveguide has been thinned to be 645.4 nm, and the wedge angle of the waveguide was measured to be 19ο, as illustrated in Fig. 2(c).

 figure: Fig. 2.

Fig. 2. (a) Optical microscope image of the fabricated microring resonator. (b) The close-up optical micrograph image of the fabricated microring resonator. (c) The scanning-electron-microscope image of the cross-section of the strip waveguide, showing a wedge angle of 19ο. (d) The magnified SEM image of the coupling region between the microring resonator and the straight waveguide.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Results and discussion

We characterized the Q factors of the modes of the fabricated integrated microring resonator before and after the annealing by sweeping the laser wavelength in 1550 nm wave band and measuring the transmission spectra. Lensed fibers were used to couple the light signal into and out of the strip waveguide by end-fire coupling. A C-band wavelength tunable narrow-linewidth laser diodes (model: TLB-6728, New Focus Inc.) was used as pump laser to measure the loaded Q factor. The power coupled into the microring resonator from the pump source needs to be as low as possible to avoid thermal and other nonlinear optical effects, which is ∼ 5 µW. The polarization state of the input light was tuned with an inline polarization controller. The output optical signal was coupled out of the microring resonator by the same strip waveguide and the other lensed fiber and sent into a photodetector (PD, model: 1611, New Focus Inc.). The transmission spectrum was real-time analyzed by an oscilloscope (model: Tektronix MDO3104). We can obtain sharp dips in the transmission spectrum when the laser wavelength was resonant with the cavity modes. And the Q factor of the microring resonator was determined by fitting the resonant dips with Lorentz function.

A typical fundamental mode at 1556.6 nm wavelength is plotted in Fig. 3(a) before annealing, which exhibits a Lorentz-shape curve. The coupling efficiency was measured to be 37%, which is closed to the theoretical simulated value of 30%. And it is higher than the results fabricated by PLACE technique [18]. And the loaded Q factor reached 1.02 × 106, which is resulted from the ultra-smooth sidewall of the photonic device. After annealing, the loaded Q factor QL up to (4.29 ± 0.20) ×106 was achieved, as shown in Fig. 3(b). It is more than 4 times higher than the result before annealing. And the coupling efficiency remains almost unchanged before and after annealing. Since the strip waveguide is partially connected with the microring, the waveguide is over-coupled with the microring. Therefore, the intrinsic Q factor Qi of the mode was calculated to be ${Q_i} = 2 \times {Q_L}/\sqrt {1 - T} = 4.04 \times {10^7}$, where T is the transmissivity of the mode which could be extracted from the transmission spectrum. This high intrinsic Q factor is closed to be the best results previously reported using PLACE technique [1,16,31]. To further improve the loaded Q factor, critical coupling condition should be satisfied, which can be achieved when the coupling gap is ∼2.5 µm.

 figure: Fig. 3.

Fig. 3. (a) Transmission spectra before annealing (black dots) and Lorentz fitting (red curve) revealing a loaded Q factor of 1.02 × 106 at the resonant wavelength of 1556.6 nm. (b) Transmission spectra after annealing (black dots) and Lorentz fitting (red curve) revealing a loaded Q factor of 4.29 × 106.

Download Full Size | PDF

Furthermore, we systemically measured the loaded Q factors of the same monolithic microring resonators before and after annealing for comparison, as shown in Table 1. The results show that the loaded Q factors are significantly improved with 4-5 times after the high temperature annealing. The underlying physics behind it is that the annealing can restore the lattice damage of the material which was induced by ion implantation when producing the TFLN [2125].

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the loaded Q factors of the microring resonators before and after annealing

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have demonstrated monolithically integrated microring with ultra-high Q factor on TFLN platform, which will open up new avenue for applications ranging from classical/quantum integrated light sources to coherent optical communications, metrology, and LiDAR application.

Funding

Engineering Research Center for Nanophotonics & Advanced Instrument, Ministry of Education, East China Normal University (2023nmc005); Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020249); Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (21DZ1101500, 23ZR1481800); Shanghai Municipal Youth Science and Technology Star Project (2019SHZDZX01); National Natural Science Foundation of China (11734009, 11874154, 11874375, 11933005, 12104159, 12134001, 12174113, 12192251, 62122079); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFA0705000, 2022YFA1404600).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jingzheng company for producing of the TFLN.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

References

1. J. Lin, F. Bo, Y. Cheng, and J. Xu, “Advances in on-chip photonic devices based on lithium niobate on insulator,” Photonics Res. 8(12), 1910–1936 (2020). [CrossRef]  

2. S. Ssaravi, T. Pertsch, and F. Setzpfandt, “Lithium Niobate on Insulator: An Emerging Platform for Integrated Quantum Photonics,” Adv. Opt. Mater. 9(22), 2100789 (2021). [CrossRef]  

3. A. Honardoost, K. Abdelsalam, and S. Fathpour, “Rejuvenating a Versatile Photonic Material: Thin-Film Lithium Niobate,” Laser Photonics Rev. 14(9), 2000088 (2020). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. C. Jia, L. Wang, and F. Chen, “Ion-cut lithium niobate on insulator technology: Recent advances and perspectives,” Appl. Phys. Rev. 8(1), 011307 (2021). [CrossRef]  

5. G. Y. Chen, N. X. Li, J. D. Ng, H. L. Lin, Y. Y. Zhou, Y. H. Fu, L. Y. T. Lee, Y. Yu, A. Q. Liu, and A. J. Danner, “Advances in lithium niobate photonics: development status and perspectives,” Adv. Photonics 4(3), 034003 (2022). [CrossRef]  

6. D. Zhu, L. B. Shao, M. J. Yu, R. Cheng, B. Desiatov, C. J. Xin, Y. W. Hu, J. Holzgrafe, S. Ghosh, A. Shams-Ansari, E. Puma, N. Sinclair, C. Reimer, M. Zhang, and M. Lončar, “Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate,” Adv. Opt. Photonics 13(2), 242–352 (2021). [CrossRef]  

7. Y. Cheng, Lithium Niobate Nanophotonics (Jenny Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.Singapore, 2021).

8. C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams-Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lončar, “Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages,” Nature 562(7725), 101–104 (2018). [CrossRef]  

9. Z. Lin, Y. Lin, H. Li, M. Xu, M. He, W. Ke, H. Tan, Y. Han, Z. Li, D. Wang, X. S. Yao, S. Fu, S. Yu, and X. Cai, “High-performance polarization management devices based on thin-film lithium niobate,” Light: Sci. Appl. 11(1), 93 (2022). [CrossRef]  

10. Y. Chen, “Photonic integration on rare earth ion-doped thin-film lithium niobate,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65(9), 294231 (2022). [CrossRef]  

11. J. Lin, S. Farajollahi, Z. Fang, N. Yao, R. Gao, J. Guan, L. Deng, T. Lu, M. Wang, H. Zhang, W. Fang, L. Qiao, and Y. Cheng, “Electro-optic tuning of a single-frequency ultranarrow linewidth microdisk laser,” Adv. Photonics 4(3), 036001 (2022). [CrossRef]  

12. G. T. Xue, Y. F. Niu, X. Liu, J. C. Duan, W. Chen, Y. Pan, K. Jia, X. Wang, H. Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, P. Xu, G. Zhao, X. Cai, Y. X. Gong, X. Hu, Z. Xie, and S. Zhu, “Ultrabright multiplexed energy-time-entangled photon generation from lithium niobate on insulator chip,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 15(6), 064059 (2021). [CrossRef]  

13. B.-Y. Xu, L.-K. Chen, J.-T. Lin, L.-T. Feng, R. Niu, Z.-Y. Zhou, R.-H. Gao, C.-H. Dong, G.-C. Guo, Q.-H. Gong, Y. Cheng, Y.-F. Xiao, and X.-F. Ren, “Spectrally multiplexed and bright entangled photon pairs in a lithium niobate microresonator,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65(9), 294262 (2022). [CrossRef]  

14. Y. Zheng, Y. Li, and X. Chen, “Lithium niobate on insulator for nonlinear and quantum applications,” in Advances in Nonlinear Photonics (Woodhead Publishing, 2023), pp. 467–488.

15. M. Wang, Z. Fang, J. Lin, R. Wu, J. Chen, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, L. Qiao, and Y. Cheng, “Integrated active lithium niobate photonic devices,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 62(SC), SC0801 (2023). [CrossRef]  

16. R. Wu, J. Zhang, N. Yao, W. Fang, L. Qiao, Z. Chai, J. Lin, and Y. Cheng, “Lithium niobate micro-disk resonators of quality factors above 107,” Opt. Lett. 43(17), 4116–4119 (2018). [CrossRef]  

17. R. Gao, N. Yao, J. Guan, L. Deng, J. Lin, M. Wang, L. Qiao, W. Fang, and Y. Cheng, “Lithium niobate microring with ultra-high Q factor above 108,” Chin. Opt. Lett. 20(1), 011902 (2022). [CrossRef]  

18. Y. Liang, J. Zhou, R. Wu, Z. Fang, Z. Liu, S. Yu, D. Yin, H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, J. Liu, Z. H. Wang, M. Wang, and Y. Cheng, “Monolithic single-frequency microring laser on an erbium-doped thin film lithium niobate fabricated by a photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching,” Opt. Continuum 1(5), 1193–1201 (2022). [CrossRef]  

19. J.-x. Zhou, R.-h. Gao, J. Lin, M. Wang, W. Chu, W.-b. Li, D.-f. Yin, L. Deng, Z.-w. Fang, J.-h. Zhang, R.-b. Wu, and Y. Cheng, “Electro-optically switchable optical true delay lines of meter-scale lengths fabricated on lithium niobate on insulator using photolithography assisted chemo-mechanical etching,” Chin. Phys. Lett. 37(8), 084201 (2020). [CrossRef]  

20. R. R. Gattass and E. Mazur, “Femtosecond laser micromachining in transparent materials,” Nat. Photonics 2(4), 219–225 (2008). [CrossRef]  

21. P. Rabiei and P. Gunter, “Optical and electro-optical properties of submicrometer lithium niobate slab waveguides prepared by crystal ion slicing and wafer bonding,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85(20), 4603–4605 (2004). [CrossRef]  

22. H. Hu, R. Ricken, and W. Sohler, “Lithium niobate photonic wires,” Opt. Express 17(26), 24261–24268 (2009). [CrossRef]  

23. J. Lin, Y. Xu, Z. Fang, M. Wang, J. Song, N. Wang, L. Qiao, W. Fang, and Y. Cheng, “Fabrication of high-Q lithium niobate microresonators using femtosecond laser micromaching,” Sci. Rep. 5(1), 8072 (2015). [CrossRef]  

24. A. Shams-Ansari, G. Huang, L. He, Z. Li, J. Holzgrafe, M. Jankowski, M. Churaev, P. Kharel, R. Cheng, D. Zhu, N. Sinclair, B. Desiatov, M. Zhang, T. J. Kippenberg, and M. Lončar, “Reduced material loss in thin-film lithium niobate waveguides,” APL Photonics 7(8), 081301 (2022). [CrossRef]  

25. K. Prabhakar and R. M. Reano, “Fabrication of low loss lithium niobate rib waveguides through photoresist reflow,” IEEE Photonics J. 14(6), 1–8 (2022). [CrossRef]  

26. J. Lu, M. Li, C.-L. Zou, A. A. Sayem, and H. X. Tang, “Toward 1% single-photon anharmonicity with periodically poled lithium niobate microring resonators,” Optica 7(12), 1654–1659 (2020). [CrossRef]  

27. Y. He, Q.-F. Yang, J. Ling, R. Luo, H. Liang, M. Li, B. Shen, H. Wang, K. Vahala, and Q. Lin, “Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO3 soliton microcomb,” Optica 6(9), 1138–1144 (2019). [CrossRef]  

28. Q. Luo, F. Bo, Y. Kong, G. Zhang, and J. Xu, “Advances in lithium niobate thin-film lasers and amplifiers: a review,” Adv. Photonics 5(3), 034002 (2023). [CrossRef]  

29. M. Zhang, C. Wang, R. Cheng, A. Shams-Ansari, and M. Lončar, “Monolithic ultra-high-Q lithium niobate microring resonator,” Optica 4(12), 1536–1537 (2017). [CrossRef]  

30. A. Pan, C. R. Hu, C. Zeng, and J. S. Xia, “Fundamental mode hubridization in a thin film lithium niobate ridge waveguide,” Opt. Express 27(24), 35659–35669 (2019). [CrossRef]  

31. R. Wu, M. Wang, J. Xu, J. Qi, W. Chu, Z. Fang, J. Zhang, J. Zhou, L. Qiao, Z. Chai, J. Lin, and Y. Cheng, “Long low-loss-litium niobate on insulator waveguides with sub-nanometer surface roughness,” Nanomaterials 8(11), 910 (2018). [CrossRef]  

32. J. Hou, J. Lin, J. Zhu, G. Zhao, Y. Chen, F. Zhang, Y. Zheng, X. Chen, Y. Cheng, L. Ge, and W. Wan, “Self-induced transparency in a perfectly absorbing chiral second-harmonic generator,” PhotoniX 3(1), 22 (2022). [CrossRef]  

Data availability

Data underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request.

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (3)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Illustration of the fabrication flow of the monolithically integrated microring resonator. (a) Sandwiched structure configuration of an undoped 700 nm-thick Z-cut TFLN wafer. (b) The Cr film is coated on the surface of the undoped LN wafer. (c) Cr mask pattern is formed by femtosecond laser direct writing. (d) The exposed TFLN is etched by CMP for transferring the Cr mask pattern to the TFLN layer. (e) The Cr mask is removed by chemical wet etching. (f) The sample undergoes a secondary CMP and a high temperature annealing.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (a) Optical microscope image of the fabricated microring resonator. (b) The close-up optical micrograph image of the fabricated microring resonator. (c) The scanning-electron-microscope image of the cross-section of the strip waveguide, showing a wedge angle of 19ο. (d) The magnified SEM image of the coupling region between the microring resonator and the straight waveguide.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. (a) Transmission spectra before annealing (black dots) and Lorentz fitting (red curve) revealing a loaded Q factor of 1.02 × 106 at the resonant wavelength of 1556.6 nm. (b) Transmission spectra after annealing (black dots) and Lorentz fitting (red curve) revealing a loaded Q factor of 4.29 × 106.

Tables (1)

Tables Icon

Table 1. Comparison of the loaded Q factors of the microring resonators before and after annealing

Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.