Abstract
This erratum corrects an error in Fig. 4 and its description in my published paper [Opt. Express 29, 37628 (2021) [CrossRef] ].
© 2021 Optica Publishing Group under the terms of the Optica Open Access Publishing Agreement
The error in the description of the design consideration for the OMNI-sine method is corrected [1]. The notation of the bin width of |tan θ| [pixels] corresponding to the sampling interval of each column in Fig. 4(a) (Fig. 1 in this erratum) is corrected to be |sin θ| [pixels]. The diagram and caption for Fig. 4 should be corrected as follows.
The corresponding description in the fifth and sixth sentences of the first paragraph of Section 4 is also corrected as follows:
The sampling interval of each column of the ROI, on the other hand, aligns with the bin array at intervals of |sin θ| pixels, where the bin array is simultaneously aligned with the projection paths of the pixels of each row and column for some critical angles.
I have confirmed that this error is isolated and no other problems exist with the proposed method and simulation results.
References
1. K. Masaoka, “Edge-based modulation transfer function measurement method using a variable oversampling ratio,” Opt. Express 29(23), 37628–37638 (2021). [CrossRef]