Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Multi-functional angiographic OFDI using frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

Detection of blood flow inside the tissue sample can be achieved by measuring the local change of complex signal over time in angiographic optical coherence tomography (OCT). In conventional angiographic OCT, the transverse displacement of the imaging beam during the time interval between a pair of OCT signal measurements must be significantly reduced to minimize the noise due to the beam scanning-induced phase decorrelation at the expense of the imaging speed. Recent introduction of dual-beam scan method either using polarization encoding or two identical imaging systems in spectral-domain (SD) OCT scheme shows potential for high-sensitivity vasculature imaging without suffering from spurious phase noise caused by the beam scanning-induced spatial decorrelation. In this paper, we present multi-functional angiographic optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) using frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination. This frequency multiplexing scheme, utilizing unique features of OFDI, provides spatially separated dual imaging beams occupying distinct electrical frequency bands that can be demultiplexed in the frequency domain processing. We demonstrate the 3D multi-functional imaging of the normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber visualizing distinct layer structures from the intensity imaging, information about mechanical integrity from the polarization-sensitive imaging, and depth-resolved microvasculature from the angiographic imaging that are simultaneously acquired and automatically co-registered.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Micro-vascular morphology has been considered as one of the major indicators in medical and biological researches characterizing tissue viability and functionality [1]. Angiographic optical coherence tomography (OCT), based on phase-resolved Doppler difference or variance, speckle variance, intensity decorrelation, or complex differential variance has emerged as a promising technique that visualizes three-dimensional (3D) microvascular networks by detecting spatially localized motion within the sample, e.g., blood flow [2–14].

Angiographic OCT measures a change in phase, intensity, or complex OCT signal caused by motion of the light scatterers inside the tissue during the time interval τ, typically between successive A-lines, at the same spatial location. To ensure sufficient correlation between a pair of measurements for high-sensitivity angiographic OCT, the transverse displacement of the imaging beam during τ must be substantially small relative to the size of the imaging beam [15]. In conventional angiographic OCT systems, the transverse beam-scanning rate is intentionally reduced to minimize the decorrelation noise at the expense of the imaging speed.

Several approaches have been introduced to achieve high-speed and high-sensitivity angiographic OCT imaging [11,16–20]. Specially designed transverse sampling patterns were developed to achieve rapid beam scanning across large tissue volumes for angiographic OCT [11,16,17]. Scanning with stepwise or segmented sawtooth (or triangle) waveform along fast scan axis within each B-scan was utilized providing long enough time interval between a pair of OCT signal measurements while minimizing decorrelation noise. A pair of OCT signal measurements between consecutive B-scans was also suggested usually with high-speed OCT system. Recently dual-beam scanning schemes were demonstrated utilizing polarization encoding [18,19] or two identical OCT systems [20] in spectral-domain (SD) OCT systems to achieve high-sensitivity angiographic OCT imaging.

In this manuscript, we present multi-functional optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) performing angiographic and polarization-sensitive OCT imaging simultaneously. A frequency multiplexing scheme [21] enables the dual imaging beams that are encoded with distinct frequency shifts to perform high-speed and high-sensitivity angiographic OCT imaging. Since the frequency-multiplexed dual beam scheme operates independently from the polarization state of the imaging light, the simultaneous polarization-sensitive imaging was also achieved. We demonstrate the 3D multi-functional imaging of normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber. Distinct layer structures from the intensity imaging, information about mechanical integrity from the polarization-sensitive imaging, and depth-resolved microvasculature from angiographic imaging were simultaneously acquired and automatically co-registered.

2. Principle of frequency-multiplexed dual-beam angiographic OFDI

A schematic of the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination is described in Fig. 1(a). A free-space acousto-optic frequency shifter in the sample arm angularly separates the zeroth-order (frequency un-shifted) beam and the first-order-diffracted (frequency shifted) beam. An afocal telescope with a pair of lenses in an infinite-conjugate configuration converts the diverging angularly separated beams into the converging ones. The center of the galvanometric mirror scanner is located at the focal point of the second lens of the telescope. The orientation of the angular separation of the two imaging beams is aligned to match the beam scanning direction of the galvanometer so that the scanning path of the following beam exactly overlaps the trace of the preceding beam. By carefully adjusting the scanning speed of the galvanometer, the two spatially separated beams can illuminate the same location on the sample with a time interval corresponding to exact multiple of the A-line period, effectively removing noise associated with phase decorrelation resulting from the beam scanning. Each beam is encoded with a distinct frequency shift through the use of frequency shifters in both sample and reference arms. Since the two imaging beams occupy different electrical frequency bands as depicted in Fig. 1(b), the corresponding OFDI signals can be demultiplexed in frequency domain and processed to generate angiographic information of the sample, while additionally removing depth degeneracy [22].

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 Principles of frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination. (a) Schematic of the reference arm and the sample arm of the system. (b) Frequency bands occupied by dual-beam OFDI signals: f1=2fFS_ref and f2=2(fFS_ref+fFS_s).

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Imaging system configuration

Figure 2 depicts the configuration of the multi-functional angiographic OFDI system that was built based on the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination scheme. A short cavity length wavelength-swept laser (WSL) [23,24] was constructed using a tunable Fabry-Perot filter (Lambdaquest X1310), providing 123.2 kHz wavelength tuning over 106 nm centered at 1290 nm. The power of the light source was 62 mW at the laser output and 24 mW on the sample. A small portion of the laser output was tapped to generate a trigger signal for each A-line by using a fiber Bragg grating (FBG). A polarization modulator was included for polarization-sensitive imaging. Ninety percent of the laser output was coupled to the sample arm and the remaining ten percent was directed to the reference arm of the system interferometer by a 90/10 fiber directional coupler. In the reference arm, a 21.25 MHz fiber-pigtailed acousto-optic frequency shifter (Brimrose AMF-21.25-1300) was placed at the double pass section providing a frequency shift of 42.5 MHz. A 1% tap coupler directed the sample arm light to the calibration mirror (1% port) [10] and the sample to be imaged through the imaging optics (99% port). A free-space frequency shifter (Brimrose AMF-42.5-1300) in the path of the imaging beam (double pass section) was aligned to provide a diffraction efficiency of 50% so that the equal amount of imaging light was separated to both the zeroth-order beam (frequency un-shifted) and the first-order-diffracted beam. The shifting frequency of each acousto-optic frequency shifter was determined to ensure Nyquist sampling and minimum cross-talk between the two OFDI signals occupying two different electrical frequency bands. The beam diameter at the frequency shifter was selected to obtain sufficient optical bandwidth while reducing cross-talk between adjacent diffraction orders at the frequency shifter [21]. The orientation and the scanning speed of the fast axis of the two-dimensional galvanometer mirror (Cambridge Technology 6215H) were carefully aligned and adjusted so that the two spatially separated beams illuminate the same location on the sample with a time interval corresponding to an exact multiple of the A-line period. The interference signal between the reference and the sample arm lights was detected at a pair of balanced receivers (Femto HCA-S, 200 MHz) in the polarization diverse balanced detection arrangement. Each OFDI interference fringe corresponding to each of dual-beam illuminations was acquired over an 85 MHz frequency band centered at 42.5 MHz and 127.5 MHz, respectively, and digitized by a high-speed and high-resolution data acquisition board (Signatec PX14400, 400 MS/s max, 14 bits, 2 channels) at a sampling rate of 340 MHz. To minimize spurious phase noise, the digitizer, the frequency shifters, and the tunable Fabry-Perot filter were phase-locked to each other. A 340 MHz clock and a 10 MHz signal from a single master clock source (Novasource M2) were used as an external clock for data acquisition board and a frequency reference signal to phase-lock the frequency shifters and the tunable Fabry-Perot filter in the WSL. The axial resolution was 10.2 μm and the transverse resolution was 26.6 μm for both imaging beams in tissue. The sensitivity of the system was measured to be 97.3 dB at an A-line rate of 123.2 kHz.

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 System configuration. WSL, wavelength-swept laser; PM, polarization modulator; FBG, fiber Bragg grating; AFG, arbitrary function generator; Coll., collimator; BS, beam splitter; PBS, polarization beam splitter.

Download Full Size | PDF

4. Phase noise of the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system

To evaluate the sensitivity of the angiographic imaging in the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system, we performed a phase noise analysis. The sensitivity of the angiographic OCT measurement is fundamentally limited by the phase noise of the system, i.e., the noise in measurement of the phase difference between two time points. The phase noise of the conventional single-beam Doppler OCT system is determined by the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the phase decorrelation noise due to the dither of the closed-loop galvanometric mirror scanner [12,25]. In the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system, we have an additional decorrelation noise element resulting from the chromatic angular dispersion of the imaging beam diffracted by the frequency shifter as depicted in Fig. 3. Because each wavelength component of the first-order-diffracted imaging beam illuminates slightly different spot on the sample while the zeroth-order imaging beam is focused on a single spot regardless of its wavelength, it induces decorrealtion noise in angiographic OCT measurement between the two frequency-multiplexed imaging beams when the following beam reaches the spot where the preceding beam was. The overall phase noise of the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system is therefore estimated as a combination of these three phase noise elements as σΔϕ=σSNR2+σgalvo2+σFS2,, where σSNR=1/SNR [15], σgalvo is the phase noise due to the galvanometric dithering, and is the decorrelation noise arisen from the sample arm frequency shifter.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 Decorrelation between the dual imaging beams due to the chromatic angular dispersion of the first-order diffracted beam caused by the sample arm frequency shifter. FS, sample arm frequency shifter; 2D GM, 2D galvanometric mirror scanner.

Download Full Size | PDF

We first measured σgalvo by imaging a homogeneous scattering phantom with the conventional single-beam method at the exact same location without scanning the imaging beam but with the galvanometer servo driver turned on. From the measurement of 10,240 consecutive A-lines, phase noises with different time intervals were calculated. After subtracting the contribution of σSNR, the σgalvo was measured to be 0.12±0.011rad over time interval of 0.18.5ms. Assuming Gaussian beam envelope, the phase noise due to the imaging spot displacement between the two beams for phase difference measurement is given by σΔx=4π3[1exp(2(Δxd)2)] [15], where Δx is the spot displacement and d is the 1/e2 width of the imaging beam spot at the focus. The spot size of the imaging beam on the sample is given by d=4F1F3λcF2πω, where F1, F2 and F3 are the focal lengths of the lenses in the imaging optics, λc is the center wavelength of the WSL, and ω0 is the 1/e2 beam width at the fiber-optic collimator. The spot displacement for the wavelength component with λ=λc+Δλ due to the sample arm frequency shifter can be given by Δxλ=F1F3(λcλ)F2pcosβ0, where p is the pitch of the acoustic grating formed in the frequency shifter that can be calculated from the velocity and the frequency of the acoustic wave, and β0 is the beam incident angle to the frequency shifter. With the Gaussian spectral profile, the mean spot displacement can be given by |ΔxFS|=dλ|Δxλ|exp[α(λλc)2]dλexp[α(λλc)2], and the decorrelation noise caused by the sample arm frequency shifter is then given by σFS=4π3[1exp(2(|ΔxFS|d)2)]. In the system, we used optical components with the following parameters: F1=25mm, F2=100mm, F3=35mm, ω0=0.54mm, p=58.5μm, and β0=11mrad. The theoretically estimated overall phase noise and the standard deviation of the phase difference measured with a homogeneous scattering phantom as a function 3 dB optical bandwidth of the WSL are plotted in Fig. 4(a). The average SNR of the region of interest was 27.7 dB, which gives σSNR=0.041. The standard deviations of the phase difference measurement with different spectral widths were obtained by applying the Gaussian window with different width (different α) to the same fringe data. The theoretical estimation shows good agreement with the experimental data in the regime where the 3 dB bandwidth of the light source is broader than 30 nm. Figure 4(b) plots phase noise measured and calculated as a function of depth in the homogeneous phantom using a WSL with 3 dB bandwidth of 50 nm (106 nm before application of the Gaussian window). The theoretical curve that was obtained by using the average SNR value at each depth fits well with the experimentally measured phase noise. Experimentally acquired phase noise shown in Fig. 4 was measured from a B-scan (1,024 A-lines). The measurement was repeated over 10 frames and the mean ± standard deviation of the phase noise is presented.

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 (a) Phase noise as a function of 3 dB optical bandwidth of the WSL and (b) phase noise as a function of depth in the homogeneous scattering phantom.

Download Full Size | PDF

5. Imaging

We imaged the vascular network of normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber using the frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system. The dorsal skinfold chamber window model was prepared in normal skin of the BALB/c mouse. After anesthesia with zolazepam/tiletamine and xylazine, the dorsal skinfold chamber window was fixed to the custom-made stereotactic frame for imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) angiographic data set acquired from the system was processed by using the complex differential variance (CDV) algorithm [11,26]. Figure 5 shows en face vascular projections using color to encode depth (yellow (superficial) to red (deep)). Figure 5(a) shows the 3D vasculature over a volume of 6 mm (X: 1024 lines) x 6 mm (Y: 1024 lines) x 4 mm (Z: depth) acquired in 8.5 s. The time interval between the two measurements by the frequency-multiplexed imaging beams was 0.26 ms, which corresponds to the 32 A-line periods. As we increase time interval by reducing the fast-axis scanning speed, we were able to image smaller vessels in the dorsal skin of a mouse as shown in Figs. 5(b) and 5(c) with increased imaging time of 68 s and 272 s, respectively. The arterioles, venules, and capillary networks are visualized with depth-resolved color-coding.

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 3D vasculatures of normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber acquired with time interval of (a) 0.26 ms, (b) 2.08 ms, and (c) 8.32 ms between the two measurements by the frequency-multiplexed dual imaging beams. Depth is denoted by color: yellow (superficial) to red (deep). Scale bar, 500 μm.

Download Full Size | PDF

For multi-functional imaging that provides intensity, angiographic, and polarization-sensitive (PS) images, we performed the frequency-multiplexed dual beam imaging with the polarization modulator turned on (Fig. 2). Simultaneous acquisition of all three-types of data ensured absolute registration of these three image sets. Figure 6 shows the depth-projected vasculature in the dorsal skin fold of another mouse in the middle, and the cross-sectional intensity and local birefringence images at four different locations of the mouse skin on both sides of the angiographic image. While the angiographic projection visualizes the 3D microvascular networks, the intensity cross-sections show distinct layer structures of the mouse skin, such as muscle and dermis layers, and the corresponding local birefringence (local phase retardation) cross-sectional images show strong birefringence in the muscle layer and typical transversely varying birefringence in the dermis.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 3D multi-functional imaging. (a) Depth-projected vasculature in the dorsal skin fold of another mouse acquired with the time interval between the dual beams of 4.16 ms. (b)-(e) Cross-sectional intensity and local birefringence images at four different locations of the mouse skin on both sides of the angiographic image. Scale bar, 500 μm.

Download Full Size | PDF

6. Discussion

One of the shortcomings of our frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system is 6 dB sensitivity penalty caused by the frequency shifter at the sample arm. Since the light incident on the frequency shifter is split into two imaging beams and only 50% of the returning light from the sample is coupled back to the system through the frequency shifter, the system suffers sensitivity penalty of 6 dB compared with the conventional single-beam system.

Another limitation of the proposed system is relatively short time interval between the two frequency-multiplexed imaging beams. For visualization of small vessels and capillaries, long time interval of typically several milliseconds, which is at least several times longer than the interval that the current frequency-multiplexed dual beam provides, is necessary. To obtain long time, we need large separation between the two frequency-multiplexed imaging beams relative to the beam width on the sample. Increasing the beam separation on the sample by modifying the magnification of the sample arm imaging optics does not help to increase the time interval because it also increases the beam spot size. While the separation between the two beams is given by s=F1F3F2θ0, the size of the beam spot on the sample is given by d=4F1F3λcF2πω0. The beam separation relative to the spot size is, therefore, given by sd=πω0θ04λc, which we cannot change by modifying the magnification of the imaging optics. Reducing the spot size by increasing the beam diameter at the fiber-optic collimator in front of the frequency shifter can slightly increase the time interval, but the larger beam size limits the optical bandwidth at the frequency shifter.

Although the short time interval limits angiographic visualization of small vessels, it can be effectively utilized to quantitatively visualize the fast flows. Our frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system can easily provide short time interval of < 0.3 ms. Sub-millisecond time interval is necessary to selectively image the large vessels with fast flow, which cannot be achieved in the single-beam systems due to the limitation of the scan speed of the galvanometric mirror scanner [12]. Although the conventional method utilizing measurements between successive A-lines can provide very short time interval simply by slowly scanning the fast-axis galvanometric mirror allowing oversampling, it is usually too short even for most of the very fast blood flow (e.g. 0.01 ms with 100 kHz A-line rate). Smart combination of the intra-B-scan dual-beam and inter-B-scan single-beam schemes may provide quantitative angiographic imaging over wide range of flow speed by efficiently utilizing short time interval of the proposed dual-beam system.

7. Conclusion

We have demonstrated the multi-functional angiographic OFDI system using frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination. A frequency shifter in the sample arm provides two spatially separated imaging beams occupying distinct electrical frequency bands that can be demultiplexed in the frequency domain processing. Since the frequency-multiplexing scheme operates independently from the polarization state of the imaging light, we have achieved simultaneous polarization sensitive imaging in this system. The proposed multi-functional dual-beam OFDI system provides automatically co-registered three-dimensional intensity, polarization-sensitive, and angiographic images. The multi-functional imaging of the normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber visualized distinct layer structures in the intensity image, information about mechanical integrity in the polarization-sensitive image, and depth-resolved microvasculature in the angiographic image that are acquired simultaneously. Smart combination of the intra-B-scan dual-beam and inter-B-scan single-beam schemes may provide quantitative angiographic imaging over wide flow rate range by efficiently utilizing short time interval of the proposed frequency-multiplexed dual-beam system.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the NRF of Korea, grant 2010-0017465, by the MSIP of Korea, grant GFP/(CISS-2012M3A6A6054200) and grant NIPA-2013-H0401-13-1007, by the HRHR project of KAIST, and by the NIH, grant P41EB015903.

References and links

1. P. Carmeliet, “Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine,” Nature 438(7070), 932–936 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

2. Z. Chen, T. E. Milner, D. Dave, and J. S. Nelson, “Optical Doppler tomographic imaging of fluid flow velocity in highly scattering media,” Opt. Lett. 22(1), 64–66 (1997). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

3. J. A. Izatt, M. D. Kulkarni, S. Yazdanfar, J. K. Barton, and A. J. Welch, “In vivo bidirectional color Doppler flow imaging of picoliter blood volumes using optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 22(18), 1439–1441 (1997). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

4. Y. Zhao, Z. Chen, C. Saxer, S. Xiang, J. F. de Boer, and J. S. Nelson, “Phase-resolved optical coherence tomography and optical Doppler tomography for imaging blood flow in human skin with fast scanning speed and high velocity sensitivity,” Opt. Lett. 25(2), 114–116 (2000). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

5. M. C. Pierce, B. Hyle Park, B. Cense, and J. F. de Boer, “Simultaneous intensity, birefringence, and flow measurements with high-speed fiber-based optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 27(17), 1534–1536 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

6. M. Wojtkowski, R. Leitgeb, A. Kowalczyk, T. Bajraszewski, and A. F. Fercher, “In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography,” J. Biomed. Opt. 7(3), 457–463 (2002). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

7. R. A. Leitgeb, L. Schmetterer, C. K. Hitzenberger, A. F. Fercher, F. Berisha, M. Wojtkowski, and T. Bajraszewski, “Real-time measurement of in vitro flow by Fourier-domain color Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Lett. 29(2), 171–173 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

8. S. Makita, Y. Hong, M. Yamanari, T. Yatagai, and Y. Yasuno, “Optical coherence angiography,” Opt. Express 14(17), 7821–7840 (2006). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

9. R. K. Wang, S. L. Jacques, Z. Ma, S. Hurst, S. R. Hanson, and A. Gruber, “Three dimensional optical angiography,” Opt. Express 15(7), 4083–4097 (2007). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

10. B. Vakoc, S. Yun, J. de Boer, G. Tearney, and B. Bouma, “Phase-resolved optical frequency domain imaging,” Opt. Express 13(14), 5483–5493 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

11. B. J. Vakoc, R. M. Lanning, J. A. Tyrrell, T. P. Padera, L. A. Bartlett, T. Stylianopoulos, L. L. Munn, G. J. Tearney, D. Fukumura, R. K. Jain, and B. E. Bouma, “Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging,” Nat. Med. 15(10), 1219–1223 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

12. B. Braaf, K. A. Vermeer, K. V. Vienola, and J. F. de Boer, “Angiography of the retina and the choroid with phase-resolved OCT using interval-optimized backstitched B-scans,” Opt. Express 20(18), 20516–20534 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. W. Choi, B. Potsaid, V. Jayaraman, B. Baumann, I. Grulkowski, J. J. Liu, C. D. Lu, A. E. Cable, D. Huang, J. S. Duker, and J. G. Fujimoto, “Phase-sensitive swept-source optical coherence tomography imaging of the human retina with a vertical cavity surface-emitting laser light source,” Opt. Lett. 38(3), 338–340 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

14. V. J. Srinivasan and H. Radhakrishnan, “Total average blood flow and angiography in the rat retina,” J. Biomed. Opt. 18(7), 076025 (2013). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

15. B. Park, M. C. Pierce, B. Cense, S. H. Yun, M. Mujat, G. Tearney, B. Bouma, and J. de Boer, “Real-time fiber-based multi-functional spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 1.3 µm,” Opt. Express 13(11), 3931–3944 (2005). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

16. I. Grulkowski, I. Gorczynska, M. Szkulmowski, D. Szlag, A. Szkulmowska, R. A. Leitgeb, A. Kowalczyk, and M. Wojtkowski, “Scanning protocols dedicated to smart velocity ranging in Spectral OCT,” Opt. Express 17(26), 23736–23754 (2009). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

17. R. K. Wang, L. An, P. Francis, and D. J. Wilson, “Depth-resolved imaging of capillary networks in retina and choroid using ultrahigh sensitive optical microangiography,” Opt. Lett. 35(9), 1467–1469 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

18. S. Makita, F. Jaillon, M. Yamanari, M. Miura, and Y. Yasuno, “Comprehensive in vivo micro-vascular imaging of the human eye by dual-beam-scan Doppler optical coherence angiography,” Opt. Express 19(2), 1271–1283 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

19. S. Makita, F. Jaillon, M. Yamanari, and Y. Yasuno, “Dual-beam-scan Doppler optical coherence angiography for birefringence-artifact-free vasculature imaging,” Opt. Express 20(3), 2681–2692 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. S. Zotter, M. Pircher, T. Torzicky, M. Bonesi, E. Götzinger, R. A. Leitgeb, and C. K. Hitzenberger, “Visualization of microvasculature by dual-beam phase-resolved Doppler optical coherence tomography,” Opt. Express 19(2), 1217–1227 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

21. W. Y. Oh, S. H. Yun, B. J. Vakoc, M. Shishkov, A. E. Desjardins, B. H. Park, J. F. de Boer, G. J. Tearney, and B. E. Bouma, “High-speed polarization sensitive optical frequency domain imaging with frequency multiplexing,” Opt. Express 16(2), 1096–1103 (2008). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

22. S. Yun, G. Tearney, J. de Boer, and B. Bouma, “Removing the depth-degeneracy in optical frequency domain imaging with frequency shifting,” Opt. Express 12(20), 4822–4828 (2004). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

23. H. S. Cho, S. J. Jang, K. Kim, A. V. Dan-Chin-Yu, M. Shishkov, B. E. Bouma, and W. Y. Oh, “High frame-rate intravascular optical frequency-domain imaging in vivo,” Biomed. Opt. Express 5(1), 223–232 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

24. C. Jun, M. Villiger, W. Y. Oh, and B. E. Bouma, “All-fiber wavelength swept ring laser based on Fabry-Perot filter for optical frequency domain imaging,” Opt. Express 22(21), 25805–25814 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

25. V.-F. Duma, K. S. Lee, P. Meemon, and J. P. Rolland, “Experimental investigations of the scanning functions of galvanometer-based scanners with applications in OCT,” Appl. Opt. 50(29), 5735–5749 (2011). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

26. A. S. Nam, I. Chico-Calero, and B. J. Vakoc, “Complex differential variance algorithm for optical coherence tomography angiography,” Biomed. Opt. Express 5(11), 3822–3832 (2014). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 Principles of frequency-multiplexed dual-beam illumination. (a) Schematic of the reference arm and the sample arm of the system. (b) Frequency bands occupied by dual-beam OFDI signals: f1=2 f FS_ref and f2=2( f FS_ref + f FS_s ) .
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 System configuration. WSL, wavelength-swept laser; PM, polarization modulator; FBG, fiber Bragg grating; AFG, arbitrary function generator; Coll., collimator; BS, beam splitter; PBS, polarization beam splitter.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 Decorrelation between the dual imaging beams due to the chromatic angular dispersion of the first-order diffracted beam caused by the sample arm frequency shifter. FS, sample arm frequency shifter; 2D GM, 2D galvanometric mirror scanner.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 (a) Phase noise as a function of 3 dB optical bandwidth of the WSL and (b) phase noise as a function of depth in the homogeneous scattering phantom.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 3D vasculatures of normal mouse skin in the dorsal skin fold chamber acquired with time interval of (a) 0.26 ms, (b) 2.08 ms, and (c) 8.32 ms between the two measurements by the frequency-multiplexed dual imaging beams. Depth is denoted by color: yellow (superficial) to red (deep). Scale bar, 500 μm.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 3D multi-functional imaging. (a) Depth-projected vasculature in the dorsal skin fold of another mouse acquired with the time interval between the dual beams of 4.16 ms. (b)-(e) Cross-sectional intensity and local birefringence images at four different locations of the mouse skin on both sides of the angiographic image. Scale bar, 500 μm.
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.