Expand this Topic clickable element to expand a topic
Skip to content
Optica Publishing Group

Strong magneto-optical effects due to surface states in three-dimensional topological insulators

Open Access Open Access

Abstract

We show that a thin film of a three-dimensional topological insulator such as Bi2Se3 or Bi2Te3 can exhibit strong linear and nonlinear magneto-optical effects in a transverse magnetic field. In particular, one can achieve an almost complete circular polarization of an incident terahertz or mid-infrared radiation and an efficient four-wave mixing.

© 2015 Optical Society of America

1. Introduction

Three-dimensional topological insulators (TIs) such as Bi2Se3 or Bi2Te3 are ordinary gapped insulators in the bulk with gapless chiral Dirac fermion states on the surface that show a number of fascinating properties [14] and promise applications in electronic devices as well as terahertz and infrared optics [5]. The Fermi velocity for low-energy excitations near the Dirac point is close to that in graphene, which gives rise to similar matrix elements of the optical transitions between surface states. Unlike the Dirac fermions in monolayer graphene, surface states are not spin-degenerate. The spin direction is locked to the direction of momentum forming a chiral structure. Momentum scattering of carriers in surface states requires a spin flip and is suppressed due to the time-reversal symmetry. This leads to a long scattering time in high-quality samples without magnetic impurities, which enhances both linear and nonlinear optical response.

Applying a magnetic field breaks the time-reversal symmetry but the momentum scattering is still partially suppressed. Recent experiments in a strong transverse magnetic field have revealed the Landau levels of massless Dirac fermions states with energies En that scale as B|n| and demonstrated their longer decoherence time as compared to the Dirac fermion states in graphene [69]. This leads to sharper transition lines and stronger light-matter coupling, giving rise to strong magneto-optical effects such as a giant Kerr rotation θK 1 rad at THz wavelengths [10]. Furthermore, some of these materials have a relatively large bulk band gap (0.3 eV for Bi2Se3 and 0.2 eV for Bi2Te3 [24, 11]) and a tunable Fermi level which can be put within the bulk gap close to the Dirac point. Therefore, long-wavelength mid-infrared and THz radiation is not affected by interband absorption between the bulk states and can be selectively coupled to surface states. This opens up the possibility of observing the fascinating properties of these states by optical means. Some of the previous theoretical predictions include a quantized topological magnetoelectric effect when the time-reversal symmetry is broken by a weak perturbation, e.g. by the exchange coupling of surface state spins to a ferromagnetic film or the Zeeman term in an applied magnetic field. The magnetoelectric effect could be observed through measurements of Kerr and Faraday rotation for an incident electromagnetic wave [1214].

In this paper we concentrate on the polarization and nonlinear optical effects in TI films due to the orbital motion of massless Dirac electrons in the vicinity of inter-Landau-level resonances. We show that high-quality thin films can provide a nearly complete circular polarization of the incoming radiation and lead to strong four-wave mixing effects in the mid-infrared and THz range. Their thickness is constrained from below by electron tunneling which leads to the opening of a band gap. This means that the films can be as thin as several nanometers. In Section II we describe the electron states and linear optical properties of the surface states in Bi2Se3, both with and without magnetic field. We calculate the polarization coefficient for TI films showing the possibility of a near-complete circular polarization of an incoming radiation. In Section III we present the results on the four-wave mixing and stimulated Raman scattering of TI films.

2. Linear optical properties of the surface states

We start with the effective Hamiltonian for the topological insulator Bi2Se3 without a magnetic field. It has been considered a number of times; here we give a brief summary of the main results relevant for the optical properties. We will use the parameters from [3]. Following the approach in [15, 16], we use the hybridized states of Se and Bi orbitals {|p12+,,|p2z,,|p1z+,,|p2z,}. The Hamiltonian is given by

H(k)=(CD1z2+D2k2)+(h(A1)A2kσxA2k+σxh(A1))
where
h(A1)=(M+B1z2B2k2)σziA1zσx,
k± = kx ± iky and k2=kx2+ky2. The parameters are [3]: M = 0.28 eV, A1 = 2.2 eV Å, A2 = 4.1 eV Å, B1 = 10 eV Å2, B2 = 56.6 eV Å2, C = 0.0068 eV, D1 = 1.3 eV Å2, D2 = 19.6 eV Å2. By expanding the Hamiltonian with the solutions of the surface states at the Γ point, the Hamiltonian can be expressed in a block-diagonal form
H(k)=(h+(k)00h(k));
with
h±(k)=E0Dk2+ħvF(σ×k)z±σz(Δ/2Bk2),
where E0 = (E+ + E)/2,∆ = E+ − E. Here E are the energies of surface states at the Dirac point. The explicit expressions for E0,D,∆ and– B are thickness-dependent and can be found in [15, 16]. When the film thickness is greater than about 6 quintuple layers (QLs), i.e. greater than 6 nm, the electron coupling between top and bottom surface states becomes weak and the above parameters become constant with E0 = 0.0337 eV, D = −12.25 eVÅ2, ħυF = 4.07 eV Å, and ∆ and B almost zero. As a result, the surface states becomes gapless in the vicinity of the Dirac point, and h+(k) = h(k). We then use only one block as the effective Hamiltonian
Heff(k)=E0Dk2+ħvF(kyσxkxσy),
and add a surface degeneracy factor of gs = 2 when calculating the optical response for the radiation interacting with both surfaces. The energy bands are shown in Fig. 1. It is clear that for low-energy excitations up to ∼ 100 meV the k2 term can be neglected.

 figure: Fig. 1

Fig. 1 (a) Energy bands of the surface states in Bi2Se3 near the Γ point at zero magnetic field (with quadratic correction shown by dashed line), and energies of Landau levels in a magnetic field of 10 T (horizontal lines). (b) Landau level energies as a function of the magnetic field for Bi2Se3, for transitions between states n = 1 and 2 (red bottom line), 0 and 1 (black middle line), and -1 and 2 (blue top line).

Download Full Size | PDF

The parameters from [3] are the fitting parameters in the effective Hamiltonian for low-energy excitations. They are based on ab initio calculations using experimental lattice constants and they are confirmed by ARPES experiments [4,17] which validates the effective two-component Hamiltonian that we use in this paper.

If a TI film is placed in a uniform perpendicular magnetic field, its effect on the orbital motion is included by the Peierls substitution π=k+eħcA. The new Hamiltonian is introduced using annihilation and creation operators a=lc2π and a=lc2π+. Here lc=ħceB is the magnetic length and π± = πx ± iπy.

Heff(π)=E02Dlc2(aa+12)+2ħvFlc(0iaia0).

The eigenfunctions and eigenvalues can be solved together with aψ|n|=|n|+1ψ|n|+1, aψ|n|=|n|ψ|n|1.

Ψn=CnLeikyy(sgn(n)·i|n|ψ|n|1,i|n|1ψ|n|)T,En=E02|n|Dlc2+sgn(n)2|n|(ħvFlc)2+(Dlc)2.

Here C0=1/2,Cn0=1, and ψ|n| is orthogonal Hermite polynomials. The magnetic field condenses the continuous k-dependent states into discrete surface Landau states, and brings a k-degeneracy of 12πlc2.

For low-energy excitations in the terahertz or long-wavelength mid-infrared region below 100 meV, it is safe to only keep linear terms in the Hamiltonian as the second-order correction is small; see Fig. 1(a). When the terms with D are neglected, the eigenenergies in Eq. (5) have the same universal behavior as in graphene. Therefore, in the following discussion we will use a simplified linear Hamiltonian

Heff(π)=E0ħvF(πxσyπyσx).

Note that the parameter υF has a value of about (5–6)×107 cm/s for Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3, as follows from ab initio simulations [3] and is confirmed by experiments [4, 9]. This value is close to the Fermi velocity in graphene, ~ 108 cm/s.

After finding energies and wave functions for the surface states of topological insulators in a strong magnetic field one can calculate the optical response. For a normally incident optical field, the interaction Hamiltonian describing the coupling between the surface Landau states and light is

Hint=vF(σ×Aopt)z(μ~×E(ω))zeiωt,
where μ˜ is defined as ievFωσ. The matrix element of the dipole moment corresponding to the optical transition between states n and m can be calculated as
μmn=em|r|n=ieħvfFEnEmm|σxy^σyx^|n.

It has the same magnitude and linear scaling with λ as the one in monolayer graphene. The selection rules are similar to that for graphene. Namely, ∆|n| = ±1, and êRH photons are absorbed when |nf| = |ni| − 1, while êLHS photons are absorbed when |nf| = |ni| + 1. The transition frequencies between LLs are in the mid/far-infrared region when the magnetic field strength is of the order of a few Tesla, as shown in Fig. 1(b).

High-frequency absorbance in a TI film in the absence of a magnetic field has a constant value π2·e2ħc [5], where we included a degeneracy factor of 2 stemming from two surfaces. In a quantizing magnetic field transitions between the Landau levels (LLs) give rise to multiple cyclotron resonances with peak absorbance values scaling as ωγ·e2ħc, where γ is a line broadening (half-width at half maximum). Its value depends strongly on the quality of the film and substrate. The only direct optical measurement of the line broadenings for the inter-LL transitions was reported in [7] for the topological insulator Bi0.91Sb0.09. It revealed narrow linewidths of 1–4 meV in a magnetic field of a few Tesla. Note that these are full widths at half maximum (FWHM), i.e. the value of gamma is two times smaller. For Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3 the only available measurements are scanning tunneling spectroscopy. The values of LL-related peaks in the tunneling conductance of Γ = 4 meV FWHM were quoted for Sb2Te3 [9], whereas [6] report the values of FWHM between 2 and 8 meV for Bi2Se3, with the largest peak widths at the Fermi level. These measurements were for the magnetic field of 4–11 T. Note that these peaks are determined by electron scattering rate which is typically higher than the dephasing rate of the optical polarization. Moreover, in [9] the peak width was likely dominated by electron scattering off the film terraces resulting from the sample growth. In the recent paper [17] the value of ωc/Γ = 0.05 was used in simulations to fit the STM data at 11 T. However, this value of Γ was determined by experimental resolution, meaning that the intrinsic linewidth was smaller. Overall, the available data indicate that it is becoming feasible to obtain samples with a high quality of the resonance ωc/γ ~ 100, and further progress in the growth technique will likely increase this number.

Next we use the density matrix formalism to calculate the linear susceptibility and magneto-optical effects due to the surface states in a TI film. The 2D optical polarization is defined as

P(r,t)=N·tr(ρ^·μ).
where N is the surface density of states per each surface LL. The density matrix elements ρnm are calculated from the master equation with phenomenological relaxation rates γnm:
ρ˙nm=iħ(εnεm)ρnmiħ[H^int(t),ρ^]nmγnm(ρnmρnm(eq)).

For a given incident field E(ω)=E(ω)eiωte^, using the 1st-order perturbation solution for a density matrix, the corresponding resonant part of the polarization per one surface layer of a TI is

P(1)(ω)=Nnmρmn(eq)ρnn(eq)ħ·(μ~nm×e^)zμmn(ωnmω)iγnm·E(ω)exp(iωt).

2.1. Polarization effects for a thin film

If the thickness of a TI film is much smaller than the wavelength of incidence and in the limit ωcγe2ħc1, one can directly apply standard formulas for a weak absorption and Faraday rotation of a linearly polarized light [18]. When ωcγe2ħc>1, a TI film becomes optically thick in the centers of the cyclotron lines. We should no longer use the standard formulas, but instead solve Maxwell’s equations together with an induced surface current j=iωχ˜ωE. Here E is the in-plane electric field and χ˜ω is the surface (2D) susceptibility tensor. Consider an incident field to be close to resonance with one particular transition between states n and m (ωωnm). Then the linear optical response is dominated by this particular transition:

χkj(1)(ω)=Nρmm(eq)ρnn(eq)2ħεzijμ˜nmiμmnkωnmωiγ,
where εijk is the Levi-Civita symbol and there is a summation with respect to index i′. In the geometry of Fig. 2(a) the resulting linear susceptibility tensor is in a gyrotropic form:
χ˜=(χxxχxyχyxχyy)=(χigigχ),

 figure: Fig. 2

Fig. 2 (a) An example of the experimental geometry: the incident field is linearly polarized with orientation angle π4. (b)The optical transition scheme for incident frequency ω ≈ ωc. Here Fermi level is placed between Landau levels -1 and 0. (c) Polarization coefficient K of the transmitted optical field, as a function of ξ=ωc4γe2ħc. The slab thickness is chosen as 0.01 λ in the plot.

Download Full Size | PDF

where χ and g can be calculated from Eq. (12) as

χ=Ωnm2ωnm2(ω+iγ)2;g=s·ω+iγωnmΩnm2ωnm2(ω+iγ)2,
with
Ωnm2=Cm2Cn2(ρmm(eq)ρnn(eq))Ne2vF2ħω,s={+1|n|=|m|11|m|=|n|1;Cn={1(n=0)12(n0).

For the radiation normally incident on a TI film or graphene on a substrate (see Fig. 2(a)), with an in-plane electric field given by E˜=(Ey,Ex)T, the transmitted field is:

(EyEx)=(1αχxxαχyxαχxy1αχxy)(1αχxx)2+(αχxy)2(EyEx),
where αi2πωc. If we define the in-plane polarization coefficient as K ≡ Ey/Ex, the corresponding polarization coefficient for the transmitted wave is
K=K(1αχxx)+αχyxKαχxy+(1αχyy).

The real and imaginary parts of K′ are shown in Fig. 3(c). As shown in the figure (see also Fig. 4(a)), in the limit ωcγe2ħc>1Ki, i.e. the field component with resonant polarization will be almost completely reflected and only the non-resonant circular polarization will go through, thus resulting in a nearly complete circular polarization of the transmitted radiation. Although Figs. 2(c) and 4(a) are plotted for the film thickness d = 0.01λ, the same result is obtained for smaller film thicknesses as long as d > 6 nm.

 figure: Fig. 3

Fig. 3 (a) Multiple reflections in the slab geometry. (b) The real and imaginary part of the polarization coefficient (K) of the transmitted optical field as a function of the slab thickness d. (c) Transmittance T as a function of slab thickness d (solid line). The dashed line is for a pure dielectric slab without surface layers of massless fermions. Here ξ = 4 in both plots.

Download Full Size | PDF

Although we considered only normal incidence, for a thin layer Eq. (16) remains valid for an obliquely incident light. In this case it describes the projection of the electric field vector on the plane of the layer. By varying the angle of incidence α one can change the eccentricity of the polarization ellipse. For example, if the transmitted polarization at normal incidence is a circle, the ratio of axes of an ellipse scales as a/b = cos α with increasing α.

2.2. Polarization effects in a slab geometry

A slab geometry with two 2D massless fermion layers on opposite surfaces emerges naturally for a thick TI film and can also be implemented by putting graphene layers or two thin TI films on two sides of a dielectric substrate; see Fig. 3(a). For a slab thickness d comparable to the wavelength one has to take into account multiple optical reflections between the two surface layers. For an optical field normally incident from z < 0 onto the slab, one can similarly derive the transmission matrices for the lower and upper surface:

T1=2(n+12αχ2αig2αign+12αχ)(n+12αχ)2(2αg)2
T2=2(n2+n2nαχ2nαig2nαign2+n2nαχ)(1+n2αχ)2(2αg)2
where n is a high-frequency refractive index of a bulk material between the surfaces. The transmitted in-plane electric field is
(EyEx)=einωLcT2(Ie2inωLcR2R2)1T1(EyEx)

As can be seen in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c), the standard Fabry-Perot transmission peaks at 2d/λ = N where N = 1,2,… correspond to the points of near-complete circular polarization when K → −i, similarly to the case of a thin film d << λ. In addition, surface layers give rise to extra peaks at 2d/λ ≈ 1/2,3/2,… where the transmitted field has a circular polarization with an opposite sense. Therefore, the same material can produce a beam circularly polarized in both directions by changing d or resonant wavelength λ. This is illustrated in Fig. 4(b).

 figure: Fig. 4

Fig. 4 Polarization ellipse of the transmitted field. First row: from left to right, ξ = 0.1,1,2,3,4; d is fixed at 0.01λ. Second row: from left to right, d = 0.01λ,0.2λ,0.29λ,0.4λ,0.5λ; ξ is fixed at 4. The sense of rotation in the polarization is indicated by arrows.

Download Full Size | PDF

3. Nonlinear optical properties

Although there are clear differences between 2D electron states in the topological insulators and in graphene that one can see e.g. in the chiral structure of the Hamiltonian (4) and its eigenenergies/eigenstates (5), they share the same ± |n|B sequence of the LLs and the same structure of the dipole matrix elements. This results in similar nonlinear optical properties. Here we consider just one example: a resonant four-wave mixing process based on resonant transitions between the LLs of surface states in Bi2Se3 (Fig. 5) which is similar to the one considered in [19] and shows similar nonlinear conversion efficiency. Another four-wave mixing process of an efficient two-photon parametric decay in a four-level scheme of LLs was considered in [20].

In Fig. 5 all transitions connected by arrows are allowed and the dipole moment matrix of the 4-level-system is given by

μ=elc2(0ix^y^01x^y^2+2ix^y^0ix^y^00ix^y^01x^y^221x^y^2+201x^y^220)

 figure: Fig. 5

Fig. 5 Landau levels near the Dirac point superimposed on the electron dispersion without the magnetic field E = ±υF|p|. (b): A scheme of the four-wave mixing process in the four-level system of Landau levels with energy quantum numbers n = 1,0,+1,+2 that are renamed to states 1 through 4 for convenience.

Download Full Size | PDF

Consider a strong bichromatic normally incident field E=E1exp(iω1t)+E2exp(iω2t)+c.c. with ω1 resonant with transition from n = 1 to n = 2 and ω2 resonant with transition between n = 0 and n = ±1, where E1 has left circular polarization and E2 has linear polarization. As a result, the field E2 is coupled to both transitions 0 → ±1. The partially degenerate 4-wave-mixing interaction generates a right-circularly polarized signal field E3 with frequency ω3 = ω1 2ω2. The signal frequency is in the THz range in a magnetic field of order 1 T. The third-order nonlinear susceptibility corresponding to this process can be calculated using the density matrix approach similarly to [19]:

χ(3)(ω3)=Nμ43μ˜41μ˜32*μ˜21*(iħ)3Γ43(ρ22ρ33Γ31*Γ32*+ρ22ρ11Γ31*Γ21*ρ11ρ44Γ42Γ41+ρ22ρ11Γ42Γ21*).

Here μ˜ is defined as ievFωm|σ|n, which coincides with dipole moment μ˜ at resonance; Γmn is the complex dephasing factor between surface LLs m and n [19]. At resonance, the dephasing factors become real numbers, and we further assume all the detuning rates are the same Γij ~ γ = 1012 s−1 in the plot below. When all fields are below saturation intensity and the Fermi level is between states 0 and -1, the equivalent 2D third order nonlinear susceptibility for the thin film is 10−5(1/B(T)) esu. When incident fields increase in intensity, the population differences on the transitions coupled by the pump fields decrease. As a result, the third order susceptibility drops after the 4 level system gets saturated and the signal intensity decays as well.

The electric field of the generated signal can be calculated by solving the density matrix equations together with Maxwell’s equations. Neglecting the depletion of the pump fields, the relation between the signal field and the nonlinear optical polarization is

Ez=i·2πωc·P.

The resulting signal field is then given by

E3=2πiω3cχ(3)E1(E2*)2.

The intensity of the nonlinear signal is plotted in Fig. 6(a) as a function of the pump intensity. The maximum signal is reached when the pump fields are of the order of their saturation values ~ 104 105 W/cm2 for the scattering rate ~ 1012 1013 s1. The maximum signal intensity decreases as 13 with increasing scattering rate. It increases roughly as B2 with the magnetic field, if we ignore the magnetic field dependence of the scattering rate.

 figure: Fig. 6

Fig. 6 Top panel: Intensity of the four wave mixing signal E3 as a function of the normalized intensity of the pump field E1, x = I1/Isat where the saturation intensity Isat ≈ 104 W/cm2 in the magnetic field of 1T and for a scattering rate γ = 1012 s1. The normalized intensity of the second pump field E2 is taken as 0.6x. Bottom panel: the Raman gain G for the field E3 under the same conditions and in the absence of the second field E2.

Download Full Size | PDF

Another way to generate a coherent THz signal within the level scheme of Fig. 5 is through stimulated Raman Stokes scattering of the pump field E1 into the field E3. In this case one does not need the second pump field E2 and the signal amplification develops exponentially, as E0 expG, where G is the gain per crossing of the TI film by a normally incident field, which has the form similar to that in graphene [21]:

G=2πω3Nμ43μ˜43ħcΓ43(n43|Ω41|2Γ31*Γ41*n41)×1/(1+|Ω41|2/(Γ43Γ31*)),
where Ω41=μ˜41E1/ħ is the Rabi frequency of the pump field. The gain dependence from the pump intensity is plotted in Fig. 6(b). Similarly to the four-wave mixing case, the gain reaches maximum when the pump field is of the order of the saturation value.

These results show remarkably high values of the four wave mixing efficiency and Raman gain per monolayer of massless 2D fermions. The nonlinear signal could be enhanced even further by placing the TI film in a cavity which increases the effective interaction length of the fields with 2D layers. If the Raman gain is greater than the round-trip losses in a high-Q cavity, one could realize a Raman laser.

4. Conclusion

We have shown that high-quality thin films of topological insulators can be used as basic building blocks for the polarization optics. A nearly complete circular polarization of the incoming radiation can be achieved for a cyclotron resonance with a quality factor ω/γ ~ 100. The film thickness can be as small as several nm, and is bounded from below by electron tunneling between the two surfaces which opens the gap. The films also exhibit high third-order optical nonlinearity resulting in a strong four-wave mixing signal and stimulated Raman scattering in the mid/far-infrared range.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by NSF Grants OISE-0968405 and EEC-0540832, and by the AFOSR grant FA9550-14-1-0376. M. D. Tokman acknowledges support by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research Grants No. 13-02-00376 and No. 14-22-02034.

References and links

1. M.Z. Hasan and C.L. Kane, “Colloquium: Topological insulators”, Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010). [CrossRef]  

2. C.-X. Liu, X.-L. Qi, H. Zhang, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, “Model Hamiltonian for topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 045122 (2010). [CrossRef]  

3. H.J. Zhang, C.X. Liu, X.L. Qi, X. Dai, Z. Fang, and S.-C. Zhang, “Topological insulators in Bi2Se3, Bi2Te3, and Sb2Te3 with a single Dirac cone on the surface,” Nat. Phys. 5, 438–442 (2009). [CrossRef]  

4. Y. Xia, D. Qian, D. Hsieh, L. Wray, A. Pal, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Grauer, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, “Observation of a large-gap topological-insulator class with a single Dirac cone on the surface,” Nat. Phys. 5398–402 (2009). [CrossRef]  

5. X. Zhang, J. Wang, and S.-C. Zhang, “Topological insulators for high-performance terahertz to infrared applications,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 245107 (2010). [CrossRef]  

6. T. Hanaguri, K. Igarashi, M. Kawamura, H. Takagi, and T. Sasagawa, “Momentum-resolved Landau-level spectroscopy of Dirac surface state in Bi2Se3,” Phys. Rev. B 82, 081305 (2010). [CrossRef]  

7. A. A. Schafgans, K. W. Post, A. A. Taskin, Y. Ando, Xiao-Liang Qi, B. C. Chapler, and D. N. Basov, “Landau level spectroscopy of surface states in the topological insulator Bi0.91Sb0.09 via magneto-optics,” Phys. Rev. B 85, 195440 (2012). [CrossRef]  

8. P. Cheng, C. Song, T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Jin-Feng Jia, J. Wang, Y. Wang, B. F. Zhu, Xi Chen, X. Ma, Ke He, L. Wang, Xi Dai, Z. Fang, X. Xie, X. Qi, C. Liu, S.-C. Zhang, and Q.-K. Xue, “Landau quantization of topological surface states in Bi2Se3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 076801 (2010). [CrossRef]  

9. Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, M. Chen, Z. Li, C. Song, K. He, L. Wang, X. Chen, X. Ma, and Qi-Kun Xue, “Landau quantization and the thickness limit of topological insulator thin films of Sb2Te3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 016401 (2012). [CrossRef]  

10. R. V. Aguilar, A.V. Stier, W. Liu, L. S. Bilbro, D. K. George, N. Bansal, L. Wu, J. Cerne, A. G. Markelz, S. Oh, and N. P. Armitage, “Terahertz response and colossal Kerr rotation from the surface states of the topological insulator Bi2Se3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 087403 (2012). [CrossRef]  

11. D. Hsieh, Y. Xia, D. Qian, L. Wray, F. Meier, J. H. Dil, J. Osterwalder, L. Patthey, A. V. Fedorov, H. Lin, A. Bansil, D. Grauer, Y. S. Hor, R. J. Cava, and M. Z. Hasan, “Observation of time-reversal-protected single- Dirac-cone topological-insulator states in Bi2Te3 and Sb2Te3,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 146401 (2009). [CrossRef]  

12. W.-K. Tse and A. H. MacDonald, “Giant magneto-optical Kerr Effect and universal Faraday effect in thin-film topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 057401 (2010). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

13. J. Maciejko, X.-L. Qi, H. D. Drew, and S.-C. Zhang, “Topological quantization in units of the fine structure constant,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 166803 (2010). [CrossRef]  

14. F. Liu, J. Xu, and Y. Yang, “Polarization conversion of reflected electromagnetic wave from topological insulator,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41, 735–741 (2014). [CrossRef]  

15. W.-Y. Shan, H. Z. Lu, and S.-Q. Shen, “Effective continuous model for surface states and thin films of three-dimensional topological insulators,” New J. of Phys. 12, 043048 (2010). [CrossRef]  

16. H. Lu, W. Shan, W. Yao, Q. Niu, and S.-Q. Shen, “Massive Dirac fermions and spin physics in an ultrathin film of topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. B 81, 115407 (2010). [CrossRef]  

17. Y.-S. Fu, M. Kawamura, K. Igarashi, H. Takagi, T. Hanaguri, and T. Sasagawa, “Imaging the two-component nature of DiracLandau levels in the topological surface state of Bi2Se3,” Nature Phys. 10, 815–819 (2014). [CrossRef]  

18. L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevski, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2, 1979).

19. X. Yao and A. Belyanin, “Giant optical nonlinearity of graphene in a strong magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 255503 (2012). [CrossRef]   [PubMed]  

20. M. Tokman, X. Yao, and A. Belyanin, “Generation of entangled states in graphene in a strong magnetic field,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 0774904 (2013). [CrossRef]  

21. X. Yao and A. Belyanin, “Nonlinear optics of graphene in a strong magnetic field,” J. Phys. Cond. Matt. 25, 054203 (2013). [CrossRef]  

Cited By

Optica participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from Optica Publishing Group journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.


Figures (6)

Fig. 1
Fig. 1 (a) Energy bands of the surface states in Bi2Se3 near the Γ point at zero magnetic field (with quadratic correction shown by dashed line), and energies of Landau levels in a magnetic field of 10 T (horizontal lines). (b) Landau level energies as a function of the magnetic field for Bi2Se3, for transitions between states n = 1 and 2 (red bottom line), 0 and 1 (black middle line), and -1 and 2 (blue top line).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2 (a) An example of the experimental geometry: the incident field is linearly polarized with orientation angle π 4. (b)The optical transition scheme for incident frequency ω ≈ ωc. Here Fermi level is placed between Landau levels -1 and 0. (c) Polarization coefficient K of the transmitted optical field, as a function of ξ = ω c 4 γ e 2 ħ c. The slab thickness is chosen as 0.01 λ in the plot.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3 (a) Multiple reflections in the slab geometry. (b) The real and imaginary part of the polarization coefficient (K) of the transmitted optical field as a function of the slab thickness d. (c) Transmittance T as a function of slab thickness d (solid line). The dashed line is for a pure dielectric slab without surface layers of massless fermions. Here ξ = 4 in both plots.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4 Polarization ellipse of the transmitted field. First row: from left to right, ξ = 0.1,1,2,3,4; d is fixed at 0.01λ. Second row: from left to right, d = 0.01λ,0.2λ,0.29λ,0.4λ,0.5λ; ξ is fixed at 4. The sense of rotation in the polarization is indicated by arrows.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5 Landau levels near the Dirac point superimposed on the electron dispersion without the magnetic field E = ±υF|p|. (b): A scheme of the four-wave mixing process in the four-level system of Landau levels with energy quantum numbers n = 1,0,+1,+2 that are renamed to states 1 through 4 for convenience.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Top panel: Intensity of the four wave mixing signal E3 as a function of the normalized intensity of the pump field E1, x = I1/Isat where the saturation intensity Isat ≈ 104 W/cm2 in the magnetic field of 1T and for a scattering rate γ = 1012 s1. The normalized intensity of the second pump field E2 is taken as 0.6x. Bottom panel: the Raman gain G for the field E3 under the same conditions and in the absence of the second field E2.

Equations (27)

Equations on this page are rendered with MathJax. Learn more.

H ( k ) = ( C D 1 z 2 + D 2 k 2 ) + ( h ( A 1 ) A 2 k σ x A 2 k + σ x h ( A 1 ) )
h ( A 1 ) = ( M + B 1 z 2 B 2 k 2 ) σ z i A 1 z σ x ,
H ( k ) = ( h + ( k ) 0 0 h ( k ) ) ;
h ± ( k ) = E 0 D k 2 + ħ v F ( σ × k ) z ± σ z ( Δ / 2 B k 2 ) ,
H e f f ( k ) = E 0 D k 2 + ħ v F ( k y σ x k x σ y ) ,
H e f f ( π ) = E 0 2 D l c 2 ( a a + 1 2 ) + 2 ħ v F l c ( 0 i a i a 0 ) .
Ψ n = C n L e i k y y ( sgn ( n ) · i | n | ψ | n | 1 , i | n | 1 ψ | n | ) T , E n = E 0 2 | n | D l c 2 + sgn ( n ) 2 | n | ( ħ v F l c ) 2 + ( D l c ) 2 .
H e f f ( π ) = E 0 ħ v F ( π x σ y π y σ x ) .
H i n t = v F ( σ × A o p t ) z ( μ ~ × E ( ω ) ) z e i ω t ,
μ m n = e m | r | n = i e ħ v f F E n E m m | σ x y ^ σ y x ^ | n .
P ( r , t ) = N · tr ( ρ ^ · μ ) .
ρ ˙ n m = i ħ ( ε n ε m ) ρ n m i ħ [ H ^ i n t ( t ) , ρ ^ ] n m γ n m ( ρ n m ρ n m ( e q ) ) .
P ( 1 ) ( ω ) = N n m ρ m n ( e q ) ρ n n ( e q ) ħ · ( μ ~ n m × e ^ ) z μ m n ( ω n m ω ) i γ n m · E ( ω ) exp ( i ω t ) .
χ k j ( 1 ) ( ω ) = N ρ m m ( e q ) ρ n n ( e q ) 2 ħ ε z i j μ ˜ n m i μ m n k ω n m ω i γ ,
χ ˜ = ( χ x x χ x y χ y x χ y y ) = ( χ i g i g χ ) ,
χ = Ω n m 2 ω n m 2 ( ω + i γ ) 2 ; g = s · ω + i γ ω n m Ω n m 2 ω n m 2 ( ω + i γ ) 2 ,
Ω n m 2 = C m 2 C n 2 ( ρ m m ( e q ) ρ n n ( e q ) ) N e 2 v F 2 ħ ω , s = { + 1 | n | = | m | 1 1 | m | = | n | 1 ; C n = { 1 ( n = 0 ) 1 2 ( n 0 ) .
( E y E x ) = ( 1 α χ x x α χ y x α χ x y 1 α χ x y ) ( 1 α χ x x ) 2 + ( α χ x y ) 2 ( E y E x ) ,
K = K ( 1 α χ x x ) + α χ y x K α χ x y + ( 1 α χ y y ) .
T 1 = 2 ( n + 1 2 α χ 2 α i g 2 α i g n + 1 2 α χ ) ( n + 1 2 α χ ) 2 ( 2 α g ) 2
T 2 = 2 ( n 2 + n 2 n α χ 2 n α i g 2 n α i g n 2 + n 2 n α χ ) ( 1 + n 2 α χ ) 2 ( 2 α g ) 2
( E y E x ) = e i n ω L c T 2 ( I e 2 i n ω L c R 2 R 2 ) 1 T 1 ( E y E x )
μ = e l c 2 ( 0 i x ^ y ^ 0 1 x ^ y ^ 2 + 2 i x ^ y ^ 0 i x ^ y ^ 0 0 i x ^ y ^ 0 1 x ^ y ^ 2 2 1 x ^ y ^ 2 + 2 0 1 x ^ y ^ 2 2 0 )
χ ( 3 ) ( ω 3 ) = N μ 43 μ ˜ 41 μ ˜ 32 * μ ˜ 21 * ( i ħ ) 3 Γ 43 ( ρ 22 ρ 33 Γ 31 * Γ 32 * + ρ 22 ρ 11 Γ 31 * Γ 21 * ρ 11 ρ 44 Γ 42 Γ 41 + ρ 22 ρ 11 Γ 42 Γ 21 * ) .
E z = i · 2 π ω c · P .
E 3 = 2 π i ω 3 c χ ( 3 ) E 1 ( E 2 * ) 2 .
G = 2 π ω 3 N μ 43 μ ˜ 43 ħ c Γ 43 ( n 43 | Ω 41 | 2 Γ 31 * Γ 41 * n 41 ) × 1 / ( 1 + | Ω 41 | 2 / ( Γ 43 Γ 31 * ) ) ,
Select as filters


Select Topics Cancel
© Copyright 2024 | Optica Publishing Group. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies.